第七十二条の四十八の二(二以上の道府県において事務所又は事業所を設けて事業を行う法人の課税標準額の総額の更正、決定等)
Article 72-48-2Reassessment, Determination, etc. of the Total Tax Base Amount of a Corporation Conducting Business with Offices or Places of Business in Two or More Prefectures
The reassessment or determination to be made under Article 72-39, Article 72-41 or Article 72-41-2 with respect to the total tax base amount relating to the business conducted by a corporation set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is to be made by the prefectural governor of the prefecture where the principal office or place of business of that corporation is located.
前条第一項の法人の行う事業に係る課税標準額の総額について第七十二条の三十九、第七十二条の四十一又は第七十二条の四十一の二の規定によつてすべき更正又は決定は、当該法人の主たる事務所又は事業所所在地の道府県知事が行う。
The prefectural governor of a relevant prefecture may, where finding it necessary to make a reassessment or determination under Article 72-41 or Article 72-41-2 with respect to the total tax base amount relating to the business conducted by a corporation set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, request the prefectural governor of the prefecture where the principal office or place of business of that corporation is located, attaching documents stating the grounds for the reassessment or determination, to make the reassessment or determination. In this case, where the request for that reassessment or determination falls under any of the following items, the request for that reassessment or determination must be made within two months from the day set out in the relevant item.
関係道府県知事は、前条第一項の法人の行う事業に係る課税標準額の総額について第七十二条の四十一又は第七十二条の四十一の二の規定による更正又は決定をする必要があると認める場合においては、更正又は決定をすべき事由を記載した書類を添えて、当該法人の主たる事務所又は事業所所在地の道府県知事に対し、更正又は決定をすべき旨を請求することができる。この場合において、当該更正又は決定の請求が次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、当該更正又は決定の請求は、それぞれ当該各号に掲げる日から二月以内にしなければならない。
In the case of a request for reassessment to be made under Article 72-41, paragraph (1) or Article 72-41-2, paragraph (1): the day on which the return or amended return was filed;
第七十二条の四十一第一項又は第七十二条の四十一の二第一項の規定によつてすべき更正の請求にあつては、申告書又は修正申告書の提出があつた日
In the case of a request for determination to be made under Article 72-41, paragraph (2) or Article 72-41-2, paragraph (2): the deadline for filing the return;
第七十二条の四十一第二項又は第七十二条の四十一の二第二項の規定によつてすべき決定の請求にあつては、申告書の提出期限
In the case of a request for reassessment to be made under Article 72-41, paragraph (3) or Article 72-41-2, paragraph (3): the day on which the reassessment under Article 72-41, paragraph (1) or Article 72-41-2, paragraph (1), or the determination under Article 72-41, paragraph (2) or Article 72-41-2, paragraph (2), was made.
第七十二条の四十一第三項又は第七十二条の四十一の二第三項の規定によつてすべき更正の請求にあつては、第七十二条の四十一第一項若しくは第七十二条の四十一の二第一項の規定による更正又は第七十二条の四十一第二項若しくは第七十二条の四十一の二第二項の規定による決定があつた日
The prefectural governor of the prefecture where the principal office or place of business of the corporation set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is located is to, where finding an error in the apportionment basis for the apportioned tax base (meaning the tax base amount apportioned, or to be apportioned, for each relevant prefecture; the same applies hereinafter in this Article) relating to a return or amended return filed by the corporation set forth in that paragraph, or in an apportionment basis corrected or determined under this paragraph (including the case where the apportionment that should have been made of the total tax base amount was not made), correct it, and, where the corporation set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article did not file a return (excluding the case where a return is deemed to have been filed under Article 72-26, paragraph (5)), determine the apportionment basis.
Where a corporation set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article has filed a return or amended return with the prefectural governor of the prefecture where its principal office or place of business is located, or has been subject to a reassessment or determination under Article 72-39, Article 72-41 or Article 72-41-2, and, due to an error in the apportionment basis for the apportioned tax base relating to that filing of a return or amended return or to that reassessment or determination (including the case where the apportionment that should have been made of the total tax base amount was not made), there is a relevant prefecture for which the apportioned tax base or the amount of enterprise tax is excessive, that corporation may, as provided by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, request the prefectural governor of that relevant prefecture to make a reassessment under Article 72-39, Article 72-41 or Article 72-41-2 with respect to the apportioned tax base or amount of enterprise tax that has become excessive.
前条第一項の法人が主たる事務所又は事業所所在地の道府県知事に申告書若しくは修正申告書を提出した場合又は第七十二条の三十九、第七十二条の四十一若しくは第七十二条の四十一の二の規定による更正若しくは決定を受けた場合において、当該申告若しくは修正申告又は当該更正若しくは決定に係る分割課税標準額の分割基準に誤りがあつたこと(課税標準額の総額についてすべき分割をしなかつた場合を含む。)により、分割課税標準額又は事業税額が過大である関係道府県があるときは、当該法人は、総務省令の定めるところにより、当該関係道府県知事に対し、当該過大となつた分割課税標準額又は事業税額につき、第七十二条の三十九、第七十二条の四十一又は第七十二条の四十一の二の規定による更正をすべき旨を請求することができる。
A corporation intending to make a request for reassessment under the preceding paragraph must submit to the prefectural governor of the relevant prefecture a written request for reassessment stating the tax base, etc. or tax amount, etc. prescribed in Article 20-9-3, paragraph (6) after the reassessment relating to the request, the tax amount to be paid before the reassessment relating to the request, the tax amount equivalent to the amount of the refund under the provisions of this Act that is to be stated in the return or amended return, and other matters that should serve as reference.
前項の規定による更正の請求をしようとする法人は、その請求に係る更正後の第二十条の九の三第六項に規定する課税標準等又は税額等、当該請求に係る更正前の納付すべき税額及び申告書又は修正申告書に記載すべきこの法律の規定による還付金の額に相当する税額その他参考となるべき事項を記載した更正請求書を関係道府県知事に提出しなければならない。
The prefectural governor of a relevant prefecture may, where finding it necessary to make a correction or determination under the provisions of paragraph (3) with respect to the apportionment basis, request the prefectural governor of the prefecture where the principal office or place of business of that corporation is located, attaching documents stating the grounds therefor, to make a correction or determination of the apportionment basis.
Where the prefectural governor of the prefecture where the principal office or place of business of the corporation set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is located has received documents relating to a request for reassessment or determination under paragraph (2) with respect to the total tax base amount of that corporation, or documents relating to a request for correction or determination under the preceding paragraph with respect to the apportionment basis of that corporation, and finds it necessary, the governor must make a reassessment or determination of the total tax base amount of that corporation, or a correction or determination of the apportionment basis of that corporation; provided, however, that where the governor's opinion differs from that of the prefectural governor of the relevant prefecture, the governor must, within two months from the day on which the governor received those documents, send those documents to the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications with the governor's own opinion attached, and receive the Minister's instructions.
Where a request for instructions under the proviso to the preceding paragraph has been made, the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications must, when finding it necessary to make a reassessment or determination of the total tax base amount or a correction or determination of the apportionment basis, instruct the prefectural governor of the prefecture where the principal office or place of business of that corporation is located to make that reassessment or determination of the total tax base amount or that correction or determination of the apportionment basis. In this case, the prefectural governor of the prefecture where the principal office or place of business of that corporation is located must, based on those instructions, make a reassessment or determination of the total tax base amount of that corporation or a correction or determination of the apportionment basis, notify the prefectural governor of the relevant prefecture to that effect, and report to the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications.
Where a request for instructions under the proviso to paragraph (7) has been made, the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications must, when finding it unnecessary to make a reassessment or determination of the total tax base amount or a correction or determination of the apportionment basis, notify the prefectural governor of the prefecture where the principal office or place of business of that corporation is located and the prefectural governor of the relevant prefecture to that effect.
When the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications intends to give the instructions under the first sentence of paragraph (8) or the notification under the preceding paragraph, the Minister must hear the opinion of the Local Finance Council.
A reassessment or determination of the total tax base amount, or a correction or determination of the apportionment basis, made by the prefectural governor of the prefecture where the principal office or place of business of the relevant corporation is located pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) or (3) is deemed to be a reassessment or determination of the total tax base amount, or a correction or determination of the apportionment basis, respectively, made by the prefectural governor of the relevant prefecture.
The prefectural governor of the prefecture where the principal office or place of business of a corporation is located must, where the governor has made a reassessment or determination of the total tax base of that corporation, or a correction or determination of the apportionment basis, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) or (3), notify the prefectural governor of the relevant prefecture to that effect.
In the application of the provisions of the preceding paragraphs to a foreign corporation, the phrase "the prefectural governor of the prefecture where the principal office or place of business is located" in those provisions is deemed to be replaced with "the prefectural governor of the prefecture where the office or place of business at which the person responsible for managing the business conducted in the area where this Act is enforced mainly performs duties is located".
Article 72-49Offenses of False Requests for Reassessment
When a person has made false statements in the written request for reassessment prescribed in paragraph (5) of the preceding Article and submitted it to the prefectural governor of a relevant prefecture, the person who committed the violation is to be punished by imprisonment for not more than one year or a fine of not more than 500,000 yen.
前条第五項に規定する更正請求書に偽りの記載をして関係道府県知事に提出したときは、その違反行為をした者は、一年以下の拘禁刑又は五十万円以下の罰金に処する。
Where a representative of a corporation or an agent, employee or other worker has committed the violation referred to in the preceding paragraph in connection with the business or property of that corporation, in addition to punishing the offender, the fine prescribed in that paragraph is imposed on that corporation.
Where the provisions of the preceding paragraph apply to an association or foundation without juridical personality, in addition to the representative or administrator of the association or foundation without juridical personality representing it in its procedural acts, the provisions of laws and regulations concerning criminal proceedings in the case where a corporation is the defendant or suspect apply mutatis mutandis.
人格のない社団等について前項の規定の適用がある場合には、その代表者又は管理人がその訴訟行為につき当該人格のない社団等を代表するほか、法人を被告人又は被疑者とする場合の刑事訴訟に関する法律の規定を準用する。
Article 72-49-2Inspection of Documents Relating to Corporation Tax, Etc.
Where a prefectural governor, with regard to the assessment and collection of enterprise tax, has requested the Government to allow inspection or recording of a return or amended return submitted to the Government by a person liable for enterprise tax, or by a corporation that is liable for corporation tax and is found to have a full controlling interest prescribed in Article 2, item (xii)-7-6 of the Corporation Tax Act with a person liable for enterprise tax (excluding a full controlling interest held by that person liable for tax prescribed in that item), or of documents relating to a reassessment or determination made by the Government with respect to the tax base or tax amount of that corporation, the Government is to have the prefectural governor or an official designated by the prefectural governor inspect or record the relevant documents.
道府県知事が事業税の賦課徴収について、政府に対し、事業税の納税義務者又は事業税の納税義務者との間に法人税法第二条第十二号の七の六に規定する完全支配関係(当該納税義務者による同号に規定する完全支配関係を除く。)があると認められる者で法人税の納税義務がある法人が政府に提出した申告書若しくは修正申告書又は政府が当該法人の課税標準若しくは税額についてした更正若しくは決定に関する書類を閲覧し、又は記録することを請求した場合には、政府は、関係書類を道府県知事又はその指定する職員に閲覧させ、又は記録させるものとする。
Article 72-49-3Offenses Relating to Evasion of Corporate Enterprise Tax
Where all or part of the enterprise tax on the business conducted by a corporation has been evaded by deception or other wrongful acts, a representative of the corporation (including an individual who is a trustee of a trust subject to corporate taxation; the same applies in paragraph (3)), agent, employee or other worker who committed the violation is to be punished by imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine of not more than 10,000,000 yen, or both.
If the amount of tax evaded as referred to in the preceding paragraph exceeds 10,000,000 yen, the amount of the fine referred to in that paragraph may, in light of the circumstances, notwithstanding that paragraph, be an amount exceeding 10,000,000 yen and not exceeding the amount of the tax evaded.
In addition to what is provided for in paragraph (1), where all or part of the enterprise tax on the business conducted by a corporation has been evaded by failing to file, within the deadline for filing the return prescribed in the relevant paragraph, a return under Article 72-25, paragraph (1), Article 72-28, paragraph (1) or Article 72-29, paragraph (1), (3) or (5), a representative, agent, employee or other worker of the corporation who committed the violation is to be punished by imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine of not more than 5,000,000 yen, or both.
第一項に規定するもののほか、第七十二条の二十五第一項、第七十二条の二十八第一項又は第七十二条の二十九第一項、第三項若しくは第五項の規定による申告書を当該各項に規定する申告書の提出期限内に提出しないことにより、法人の行う事業に対する事業税の全部又は一部を免れた場合には、法人の代表者、代理人、使用人その他の従業者で、その違反行為をした者は、五年以下の拘禁刑若しくは五百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。
If the amount of tax evaded as referred to in the preceding paragraph exceeds 5,000,000 yen, the amount of the fine referred to in that paragraph may, in light of the circumstances, notwithstanding that paragraph, be an amount exceeding 5,000,000 yen and not exceeding the amount of the tax evaded.
Where a representative of a corporation, or an agent, employee or other worker has committed a violation set forth in paragraph (1) or (3) in connection with the business or property of that corporation, in addition to punishing the offender, the fine prescribed in the relevant paragraph is to be imposed on that corporation.
The period of prescription in the case where a fine is imposed on a corporation or person for a violation set forth in paragraph (1) or (3) pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph is governed by the period of prescription for the offenses under those paragraphs.
When paragraph (5) applies to an association or foundation without juridical personality, its representative or administrator represents that association or foundation without juridical personality in its procedural acts, and in addition, the provisions of laws and regulations on criminal proceedings in the case where a corporation is the defendant or suspect apply mutatis mutandis.
人格のない社団等について第五項の規定の適用がある場合には、その代表者又は管理人がその訴訟行為につき当該人格のない社団等を代表するほか、法人を被告人又は被疑者とする場合の刑事訴訟に関する法律の規定を準用する。
Article 72-49-4Reduction or Exemption of Corporate Enterprise Tax
A prefectural governor may reduce or exempt the enterprise tax on the business conducted by a corporation, in accordance with the Prefectural Ordinance of that prefecture, only for a corporation that the governor finds to need a reduction or exemption of the enterprise tax on the business it conducts due to a natural disaster or other special circumstances, or another corporation that has special circumstances.
道府県知事は、天災その他特別の事情がある場合において法人の行う事業に対する事業税の減免を必要とすると認める法人その他特別の事情がある法人に限り、当該道府県の条例の定めるところにより、法人の行う事業に対する事業税を減免することができる。
略称規定第二十条の九の三第二項・この規定以降に適用(第七十二条の四十八の二第五項及び第七十二条の五十第三項を除く)
…同項の規定にかかわらず、当該各号に掲げる期間において、その該当することを理由として同項の規定による更正の請求(第七十二条の四十八の二第五項及び第七十二条の五十第三項を除き、以下「更正の請求」という。)をすることができる。
わかりやすく言うと
申告書に書いた税額などの計算が法令に従っていなかったり誤っていたりして税額が多すぎるときなどに、地方団体の長に正しく直すよう求めることです(第二十条の九の三第一項)。第七十二条の四十八の二第五項と第七十二条の五十第三項の請求は含みません。
略称規定第七十二条第一項第五号・この節の中だけ
…当該条約の適用を受ける国内(この法律の施行地をいう。以下この号において同じ。)に本店若しくは主たる事務所若しくは事業所を有しない法人(以下この節において「外国法人」という。)又は国内に主たる事務所若しくは事業所を有しない個人については…
わかりやすく言うと
地方税法が施行されている地域(国内)に、本店も主たる事務所や事業所も持たない法人のことです。
定義第七十二条の二第四項・この節の中だけ
法人税法第二条第二十九号の二に規定する法人課税信託
わかりやすく言うと
法人税法第二条第二十九号の二に掲げる信託のことで、受益権を表す証券を発行する定めのある信託、受益者がいない信託、投資信託、特定目的信託などです。集団投資信託、退職年金等信託と公益信託等は除かれます。
略称規定第七十二条の三十一第二項・この節の中だけ
…当該申告書若しくは修正申告書に記載した、又は当該更正若しくは決定に係る付加価値額、資本金等の額、所得若しくは収入金額(以下この節において「課税標準額」と総称する。)又は事業税額について不足額がある場合(納付すべき事業税額がない旨の申告書…
わかりやすく言うと
法人の事業税で、申告書や修正申告書に記載した、または更正や決定を受けた付加価値額、資本金等の額、所得、収入金額をまとめて呼ぶ言葉です。
略称規定第七十二条の三十二第一項・この款の中だけ
…第七十二条の二十五、第七十二条の二十六、第七十二条の二十八若しくは第七十二条の二十九の規定による申告書(以下この款において「申告書」という。)又は前条第二項若しくは第三項の規定による修正申告書(以下この款において「修正申告書」という。)…
わかりやすく言うと
法人の事業税について、先の申告書や更正・決定の課税標準額や税額に不足があるとき、または法人税の課税標準について税務官署の更正・決定を受けたときに出す申告書のことです(第七十二条の三十一第二項・第三項)。
略称規定第七十二条の三十二第一項・この款の中だけ
…第七十二条の二十六、第七十二条の二十八、第七十二条の二十九又は前条第二項若しくは第三項の規定により、第七十二条の二十五、第七十二条の二十六、第七十二条の二十八若しくは第七十二条の二十九の規定による申告書(以下この款において「申告書」とい…
わかりやすく言うと
法人の事業税について、中間申告を要しない法人の申告(第七十二条の二十五)、中間申告(第七十二条の二十六)、中間申告を要する法人の確定申告(第七十二条の二十八)、清算中の法人の申告(第七十二条の二十九)で提出する申告書のことです。
略称規定第七十二条の四十八第四項・この款の中だけ
前項に規定する分割基準(以下この款において「分割基準」という。)の数値の算定については、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、当該各号に定めるところによる。
わかりやすく言うと
法人の事業税の課税標準額の総額を、関係する道府県ごとに分けるための基準です(第七十二条の四十八第三項)。事業の種類に応じて、従業者の数、事業所等の数、固定資産の価額、軌道の延長などで按分します。
罰金
金銭を国に納めさせる刑罰で、一万円以上です。減軽する場合は一万円未満に下げることができます(刑法第十五条)。拘禁刑より軽く、拘留や科料より重い刑です(同法第九条・第十条第一項)。完納できない人は、一日以上二年以下(罰金を併科した場合などは三年以下)の期間、労役場に留置され、その期間は刑の言渡しのときに定められます(同法第十八条第一項・第三項・第四項)。裁判が確定した後三十日以内は、本人の承諾がなければ留置の執行はできません(同条第五項)。刑の言渡しが確定した後、三年間執行を受けないと時効が完成し、執行の免除を得ます(同法第三十一条・第三十二条第五号)。ただし、法令により執行を猶予し又は停止した期間や、本人が国外にいる期間は時効が進行せず、執行行為をすると時効は中断します(同法第三十三条・第三十四条第二項)。
刑法第9条・第10条・第15条・第18条・第31条〜第34条を参考にAIが作成。
拘禁刑
刑事施設に拘置する刑です。無期と有期があり、有期は一月以上二十年以下です(刑法第十二条第一項・第二項)。刑を加重するときは三十年まで上げ、減軽するときは一月未満に下げることができます(同法第十四条第二項)。改善更生を図るため、必要な作業を行わせ、又は必要な指導を行うことができます(同法第十二条第三項)。主刑の中では死刑の次に重く、罰金より重い刑です(同法第九条・第十条第一項)。刑法等の一部を改正する法律(令和四年法律第六十七号)の施行により、懲役と禁錮に代わって設けられました(同法第二条)。懲役又は禁錮に処せられた人は、人の資格に関する法令の適用については、刑期を同じくする拘禁刑に処せられた人とみなされます(令和四年法律第六十八号第四百四十三条第一項)。
刑法第9条・第10条・第12条・第14条、令和4年法律第67号第2条、令和4年法律第68号第443条を参考にAIが作成。
条例
地方公共団体が自ら定めるきまりです。都道府県、市町村、東京都の特別区がそれぞれ定めます(地方自治法第一条の三・第二百八十一条・第二百八十三条)。住民が選挙した議員でつくる議会(同法第八十九条)の議決で制定され(同法第九十六条第一項第一号)、知事や市町村長などその団体の長(同法第百三十九条)が公布します(同法第十六条)。憲法は、地方公共団体が法律の範囲内で条例を制定できるとしており(日本国憲法第九十四条)、法律・政令・省令などの法令に違反することはできません(地方自治法第十四条第一項)。法令に特別の定めがある場合を除き、地方公共団体が人に義務を課したり権利を制限したりするには、条例によらなければなりません(同条第二項)。条例に違反した人に対する罰則も、同法が定める範囲で設けることができます(同条第三項)。条例はその地方公共団体の事務について定めるもの(同法第二条第二項・第十四条第一項)なので、同じ事柄でも地域によって扱いが違うことがあります。国の法令である省令(「施行規則」など)とは別のものです。
日本国憲法第94条、地方自治法第1条の3・第2条・第14条・第16条・第89条・第96条・第139条・第281条・第283条を参考にAIが作成。