A suspect who has received the notice set forth in paragraph (3) of the preceding Article may orally request a hearing to a special inquiry officer within 3 days from the date of receiving the notice, if they have an objection to the findings set forth in the same paragraph.
If a request has been made for the hearing set forth in the preceding paragraph, an immigration inspector must submit the written evidence set forth in Article 45, paragraph (2) and other pertinent documents to a special inquiry officer.
If a request is made for the hearing set forth in paragraph (1), the special inquiry officer must notify the suspect of the time and place of the hearing and promptly conduct the hearing.
If the special inquiry officer conducts a hearing as set forth in the preceding paragraph, the officer must prepare a written evidence of the hearing.
第十条第三項から第六項までの規定は、第三項の口頭審理の手続に準用する。
The provisions of Article 10, paragraphs (3) through (6) apply mutatis mutandis to the hearing proceedings set forth in paragraph (3).
特別審理官は、口頭審理の結果、前条第三項の認定が事実に相違すると判定したとき（容疑者が第二十四条各号のいずれにも該当しないことを理由とする場合に限る。）は、その者が被監理者であるときを除き、直ちにその者を放免しなければならない。
If a special inquiry officer determines that the findings set forth in paragraph (3) of the preceding Article are different from the facts (limited to cases in which the suspect does not fall under any of the items of Article 24) as a result of the hearing, they must immediately release the suspect, except where the suspect is a person under supervision measures.
特別審理官は、口頭審理の結果、前条第三項の認定が事実に相違すると判定したとき（容疑者が出国命令対象者に該当することを理由とする場合に限る。）は、速やかに主任審査官にその旨を知らせなければならない。この場合において、特別審理官は、当該容疑者が第五十五条の八十五第一項の規定により出国命令を受けたときは、その者が被監理者であるときを除き、直ちにその者を放免しなければならない。
If a special inquiry officer determines that the findings set forth in paragraph (3) of the preceding Article are different from the facts (limited to cases in which the suspect falls under the category of a foreign national subject to a departure order) as a result of the hearing, they must promptly notify a supervising immigration inspector to that effect. In this case, if the suspect has been given a departure order pursuant to the provisions of Article 55-85, paragraph (1), the special inquiry officer must immediately release the suspect, except where the suspect is a person under supervision measures.
特別審理官は、口頭審理の結果、前条第三項の認定が誤りがないと判定したときは、速やかに主任審査官及び当該容疑者にその旨を知らせるとともに、当該容疑者に対し、次条の規定により異議を申し出ることができる旨及び第五十条第一項の規定による許可の申請をすることができる旨を知らせなければならない。
If a special inquiry officer determines that there is no error in the findings set forth in paragraph (3) of the preceding Article as a result of the hearing, they must promptly notify the supervising immigration inspector and the suspect to that effect, and at the same time inform the suspect that they may file an objection pursuant to the provisions of the following Article and that they may file an application for the permission pursuant to the provisions of Article 50, paragraph (1).
If the suspect, upon receipt of the notice pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, has no objection to the findings set forth in the same paragraph, the supervising immigration inspector is to have the suspect sign a document containing a statement that they will not file an objection.
前条第五項後段の規定は、第八項の判定に服した容疑者に対する退去強制令書の発付について準用する。この場合において、同条第五項第二号中「第三項の認定」とあるのは、「次条第八項の判定」と読み替えるものとする。
The provisions of the second sentence of paragraph (5) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to the issuance of a written deportation order to a suspect who has no objection to the determination set forth in paragraph (8). In this case, "the findings set forth in paragraph (3)" in item (ii) of paragraph (5) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "the determination set forth in paragraph (8) of the following Article".