A suspect who has received the notice set forth in paragraph (3) of the preceding Article may orally request a hearing to a special inquiry officer within 3 days from the date of receiving the notice, if they have an objection to the findings set forth in the same paragraph.
If a request has been made for the hearing set forth in the preceding paragraph, an immigration inspector must submit the written evidence set forth in Article 45, paragraph (2) and other pertinent documents to a special inquiry officer.
If a request is made for the hearing set forth in paragraph (1), the special inquiry officer must notify the suspect of the time and place of the hearing and promptly conduct the hearing.
If the special inquiry officer conducts a hearing as set forth in the preceding paragraph, the officer must prepare a written evidence of the hearing.
The provisions of Article 10, paragraphs (3) through (6) apply mutatis mutandis to the hearing proceedings set forth in paragraph (3).
第十条第三項から第六項までの規定は、第三項の口頭審理の手続に準用する。
If a special inquiry officer determines that the findings set forth in paragraph (3) of the preceding Article are different from the facts (limited to cases in which the suspect does not fall under any of the items of Article 24) as a result of the hearing, they must immediately release the suspect, except where the suspect is a person under supervision measures.
If a special inquiry officer determines that the findings set forth in paragraph (3) of the preceding Article are different from the facts (limited to cases in which the suspect falls under the category of a foreign national subject to a departure order) as a result of the hearing, they must promptly notify a supervising immigration inspector to that effect. In this case, if the suspect has been given a departure order pursuant to the provisions of Article 55-85, paragraph (1), the special inquiry officer must immediately release the suspect, except where the suspect is a person under supervision measures.
If a special inquiry officer determines that there is no error in the findings set forth in paragraph (3) of the preceding Article as a result of the hearing, they must promptly notify the supervising immigration inspector and the suspect to that effect, and at the same time inform the suspect that they may file an objection pursuant to the provisions of the following Article and that they may file an application for the permission pursuant to the provisions of Article 50, paragraph (1).
If the suspect, upon receipt of the notice pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, has no objection to the findings set forth in the same paragraph, the supervising immigration inspector is to have the suspect sign a document containing a statement that they will not file an objection.
The provisions of the second sentence of paragraph (5) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to the issuance of a written deportation order to a suspect who has no objection to the determination set forth in paragraph (8). In this case, "the findings set forth in paragraph (3)" in paragraph (5), item (ii) of the same Article is deemed to be replaced with "the determination set forth in paragraph (8) of the following Article".
定義第二条第一項第十号・法令全体に適用
第六十一条の三に定める入国審査官
わかりやすく言うと
入国者収容所と地方出入国在留管理局に置かれる職員で、上陸や退去強制についての審査、収容令書や退去強制令書の発付、仮放免、出国命令などの事務を行う人のことです(第六十一条の三)。
略称規定第二十四条の三第一項
第二十四条第二号の四、第四号ロ又は第六号から第七号までのいずれかに該当する外国人で次の各号のいずれにも該当するもの(以下「出国命令対象者」という。)については、同条の規定にかかわらず…
わかりやすく言うと
在留期間を過ぎて残っているなどで退去強制の対象となる外国人のうち、自ら出頭するなどして速やかな出国の意思を示し、一定の罪で拘禁刑を受けておらず、過去に退去強制などで出国していないなどの条件をすべて満たす人です。退去強制でなく出国命令で出国します。
略称規定第二十七条第一項
入国警備官は、第二十四条各号の一に該当すると思料する外国人があるときは、当該外国人(以下「容疑者」という。)につき違反調査をすることができる。
わかりやすく言うと
退去強制の理由(第二十四条の各号)のどれかに当たると考えられる外国人で、入国警備官が違反調査をする対象となる人のことです。