審査請求人は、第九十三条第三項（答弁書の送付）の規定により送付された答弁書に記載された事項に対する反論を記載した書面（以下この条及び第九十七条の四第二項第一号ロ（審理手続の終結）において「反論書」という。）を提出することができる。この場合において、担当審判官が、反論書を提出すべき相当の期間を定めたときは、その期間内にこれを提出しなければならない。
The requester for review may submit a document stating a rebuttal to the matters stated in the written answer sent under Article 93, paragraph (3) (Sending of the Written Answer) (hereinafter referred to as a "written rebuttal" in this Article and Article 97-4, paragraph (2), item (i), (b) (Conclusion of Review Proceedings)). In this case, if the presiding tribunal judge has set a reasonable period within which the written rebuttal is to be submitted, it must be submitted within that period.
参加人は、審査請求に係る事件に関する意見を記載した書面（以下この条及び第九十七条の四第二項第一号ハにおいて「参加人意見書」という。）を提出することができる。この場合において、担当審判官が、参加人意見書を提出すべき相当の期間を定めたときは、その期間内にこれを提出しなければならない。
An intervenor may submit a document stating an opinion on the case concerning the request for review (hereinafter referred to as an "intervenor's written opinion" in this Article and Article 97-4, paragraph (2), item (i), (c)). In this case, if the presiding tribunal judge has set a reasonable period within which the intervenor's written opinion is to be submitted, it must be submitted within that period.
The presiding tribunal judge must send a written rebuttal submitted by the requester for review to the intervenors and the agency that made the original disposition, and an intervenor's written opinion submitted by an intervenor to the requester for review and the agency that made the original disposition, respectively.