Article 417Determination or Revision, etc. of the Price, etc. on or after the Date of Public Notice That All Prices, etc. of Fixed Assets Have Been Registered
第四百十七条（固定資産の価格等の全てを登録した旨の公示の日以後における価格等の決定又は修正等）
Where the mayor of a municipality discovers, on or after the date of the public notice under Article 411, paragraph (2), that registration of the price, etc. of a fixed asset has not been made or that the registered price, etc. contains a material error, the mayor must immediately determine the price, etc., or revise the determined price, etc., so as not to be out of balance with the prices of similar fixed assets registered in the fixed assets tax ledger, and register it in the fixed assets tax ledger. In this case, the mayor must, without delay, notify the person liable for tax of the fixed assets tax imposed on that fixed asset to that effect.
Where the prefectural governor or the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications discovers, after giving the notice under Article 389, paragraph (1), that the determination of the price, etc. of a fixed asset has not been made or that the determined price, etc. contains a material error, the governor or the Minister must immediately determine the price, etc., or revise the determined price, etc., so as not to be out of balance with the prices of similar fixed assets, and in addition determine the municipality in which the fixed asset subject to that determination or revision is deemed to be located, distribute the price, etc. subject to that determination or revision to that municipality, and notify the mayor of that municipality of the fixed assets subject to the distribution and the price, etc. distributed. In this case, the governor or the Minister must, without delay, notify the owner of that fixed asset to that effect.
道府県知事又は総務大臣は、第三百八十九条第一項の規定による通知をした後において固定資産の価格等の決定がなされていないこと又は決定された価格等に重大な錯誤があることを発見した場合においては、直ちに、類似の固定資産の価格と均衡を失しないように価格等を決定し、又は決定された価格等を修正するとともに、当該決定又は修正に係る固定資産が所在するものとされる市町村を決定し、及び当該決定又は修正に係る価格等を当該市町村に配分し、その配分に係る固定資産及びその配分した価格等を当該市町村の長に通知しなければならない。この場合においては、道府県知事又は総務大臣は、遅滞なく、その旨を当該固定資産の所有者に通知しなければならない。
The provisions of Article 389, paragraphs (2) through (5), and paragraph (6) of that Article (excluding the part relating to item (i)) apply mutatis mutandis to the case referred to in the preceding paragraph.
第三百八十九条第二項から第五項まで及び同条第六項（第一号に係る部分を除く。）の規定は、前項の場合に準用する。
The provisions of Article 390 apply mutatis mutandis where the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications intends to make a ruling on a request for review concerning the determination or distribution of the price, etc. under paragraph (2), and the provisions of Article 399 apply mutatis mutandis where the prefectural governor or the Minister has made a ruling on a request for review concerning the determination or distribution of the price, etc. under that paragraph.
Read this with the articles around it
pricemachine translation
「価格」
For land or a building (家屋), its price on the assessment date (賦課期日) of the base year (基準年度) registered in the land or building tax ledgers (土地課税台帳等, 家屋課税台帳等), or the price set by comparison with it under the provisos and paragraphs of Article 349 that Article 349-3, paragraph 9 lists; for depreciable assets (償却資産), its price on the assessment date registered in the depreciable assets tax ledger (償却資産課税台帳).
Defined inArticle 349-3, paragraph (9)
ownermachine translation
「所有者」
In Article 702, paragraph 1 on city planning tax (都市計画税), the person who is treated as, or deemed to be, the owner of the land or house for fixed assets tax (固定資産税) under Article 343 (other than its paragraphs 3, 9 and 10).
Defined inArticle 702, paragraph (2)
request for review
審査請求
A request to an administrative agency (行政庁) to review a disposition (処分) the person objects to, or, where the person applied for a disposition under a law or regulation and a reasonable time has passed with none made, the agency's failure to act (不作為) (Administrative Complaint Review Act, Articles 2 and 3). Unless an Act, or for a disposition based on a local ordinance (条例) that ordinance, provides otherwise, it is made to the agency that made the disposition or failed to act where that agency has no superior agency or is itself the competent minister (主任の大臣) or the head of certain agencies; where such a minister or head is the agency above it, to that minister or head; and otherwise to its highest superior agency (Article 4). Another Act can set rules of its own for it, naming another body to make it to or another route (Article 1, paragraph (2); Article 4): the Employees' Pension Insurance Act, for instance, has a request about a disposition (処分) of the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare (厚生労働大臣) on a person's status as insured, standard remuneration or insurance benefits, other than a decision on a request to correct the pension insurance register, made to a social insurance examiner (社会保険審査官), and disapplies most of the Administrative Complaint Review Act's rules for it (Employees' Pension Insurance Act, Articles 90, paragraph (1), and 91-2). Under the Administrative Complaint Review Act, a request about a disposition must be made within three months of the day after the person learned of it — or one month after learning of the decision, where a request for re-investigation (再調査の請求) was made first — and within a year of the disposition or that decision, unless there is a justifiable reason (Administrative Complaint Review Act, Article 18, paragraphs (1) and (2)). Making one does not by itself stop the disposition taking effect or being carried out, or the proceedings going on (Article 25, paragraph (1)), but the agency reviewing it can suspend them in whole or in part on the application of the person who made the request — and, where it made the disposition or is the agency above the one that did, of its own motion — and, once the person who made the request has applied, must where that is urgently needed to avoid serious harm, unless that would seriously affect the public welfare or the request appears to have no grounds (Article 25, paragraphs (2) to (4)). The agency reviewing it (審査庁) decides it by a determination (裁決): it dismisses a request that is unlawful, for instance one made too late, rejects one that is groundless, and, where one is well founded, revokes the disposition in whole or in part or changes it — though never to the disadvantage of the person who made the request, and an agency that neither made the disposition nor is above the agency that did cannot change it (Articles 45, paragraphs (1) and (2), 46, paragraph (1), and 48). Where the request is about a de facto act (事実上の行為), the determination instead declares the act unlawful or unjust and orders it abolished in whole or in part or changed, or abolishes or changes it (Article 47). A well-founded request about a failure to act ends instead in a determination declaring the failure unlawful or unjust, and, where the agency finds a disposition should be made, an order to make it or the disposition itself (Article 49, paragraph (3)). Where revoking an unlawful or unjust disposition, or abolishing an unlawful or unjust de facto act, would seriously harm the public interest, the agency can reject the request while declaring in the determination that it is unlawful or unjust (Article 45, paragraph (3)). The determination takes effect when it is served on the person who made the request — or, where someone other than the disposition's addressee made it and the determination revokes or changes the disposition or deals with a de facto act, once it is served on the addressee too — and binds the agencies concerned (Articles 51, paragraph (1), and 52, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Administrative Complaint Review Act, Arts. 1 to 4, 18, 25, 45 to 49, 51, 52 and Employees' Pension Insurance Act, Arts. 90, 91-2 as a reference.