Article 92Lack of Jurisdiction of Courts of Prior Instance
When the court in charge of an appeal finds that the whole or part of a case for adjudication of domestic relations (excluding adjudication cases regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 2) is not subject to the jurisdiction of the court of prior instance, it must revoke the ruling in prior instance; provided, however, that this does not apply if it finds that there are special circumstances where it is appropriate to maintain the ruling in prior instance in light of developments in the proceedings, the nature of the case, the reasons for an appeal and other matters.
抗告裁判所は、家事審判事件(別表第二に掲げる事項についての審判事件を除く。)の全部又は一部が原裁判所の管轄に属しないと認める場合には、原審判を取り消さなければならない。ただし、原審における審理の経過、事件の性質、抗告の理由等に照らして原審判を取り消さないことを相当とする特別の事情があると認めるときは、この限りでない。
When the court in charge of an appeal revokes the ruling in prior instance on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction over a case for adjudication of domestic relations, it must transfer the case to the family court which has jurisdiction over the case.
抗告裁判所は、家事審判事件が管轄違いであることを理由として原審判を取り消すときは、その事件を管轄権を有する家庭裁判所に移送しなければならない。
Article 93Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Proceedings for Adjudication of Domestic Relations and of the Code of Civil Procedure
Except as otherwise provided, with regard to an immediate appeal filed against a ruling and the proceedings in the instance of the appeal, the provisions of Subsections 1 through 8 of the preceding Section (excluding the provisions of Article 40, Article 41, paragraph (4), Article 42, paragraph (6), Article 43, paragraph (2), Article 44, paragraph (2), Article 47, paragraphs (8) through (10), Article 48, Article 49, paragraph (6), Article 66, Article 67, paragraph (4), the proviso to paragraph (2) and paragraphs (4) and (5) of Article 74, the proviso to Article 76, paragraph (1), Article 77, paragraphs (3) through (5), Article 78, paragraph (4), Article 81, paragraph (3), and Article 83), the provisions of Section 4 (excluding the provisions of Article 105, paragraph (2), Article 110, Article 111, and Article 113), and the provisions of the following Chapter (excluding the provisions concerning the jurisdiction of a family court and an immediate appeal) apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the phrase "a ruling against which an immediate appeal may be filed" in Article 78, paragraph (1), item (ii) is deemed to be replaced with "judicial decision in lieu of a ruling against which an immediate appeal may be filed on the assumption that it is a ruling by a family court".
審判に対する即時抗告及びその抗告審に関する手続については、特別の定めがある場合を除き、前節第一款から第八款までの規定(第四十条、第四十一条第四項、第四十二条第六項、第四十三条第二項、第四十四条第二項、第四十七条第八項から第十項まで、第四十八条、第四十九条第六項、第六十六条、第六十七条第四項、第七十四条第二項ただし書、第四項及び第五項、第七十六条第一項ただし書、第七十七条第三項から第五項まで、第七十八条第四項、第八十一条第三項並びに第八十三条の規定を除く。)、第四節の規定(第百五条第二項、第百十条、第百十一条及び第百十三条の規定を除く。)及び次章の規定(家庭裁判所の管轄及び即時抗告に関する規定を除く。)を準用する。この場合において、第七十八条第一項第二号中「即時抗告をすることができる審判」とあるのは、「家庭裁判所の審判であるとした場合に即時抗告をすることができる審判に代わる裁判」と読み替えるものとする。
When the court in charge of an appeal is not required to send a copy of a petition for appeal or give notice of the filing of an immediate appeal as provided in the provisions of Article 88, paragraph (1), it may dismiss an immediate appeal with or without prejudice on the merits, without taking the step of concluding proceedings under the provisions of Article 71 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph.
The provisions of Article 283, Article 284, Article 292, Article 298, paragraph (1), Article 299, paragraph (1), Article 302, Article 303, and Articles 305 through 308 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to an immediate appeal filed against a ruling and proceedings in the instance of the appeal. In this case, the phrase "Article 261, paragraphs (3) and (4), Article 262, paragraph (1) and Article 263" in Article 292, paragraph (2) of the Code is deemed to be replaced with "Article 82, paragraph (5) and Article 83 of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act", and the term "Article 189" in Article 303, paragraph (5) of the Code is deemed to be replaced with "Article 291 of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act".
民事訴訟法第二百八十三条、第二百八十四条、第二百九十二条、第二百九十八条第一項、第二百九十九条第一項、第三百二条、第三百三条及び第三百五条から第三百八条までの規定は、審判に対する即時抗告及びその抗告審に関する手続について準用する。この場合において、同法第二百九十二条第二項中「第二百六十一条第三項及び第四項、第二百六十二条第一項並びに第二百六十三条」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第八十二条第五項及び第八十三条」と、同法第三百三条第五項中「第百八十九条」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第二百九十一条」と読み替えるものとする。
第二目 特別抗告
Division 2 Special Appeals
Article 94Judicial Decisions Against Which Special Appeals May Be Filed
An appeal may specially be filed with the Supreme Court against a ruling of a family court against which no appeal is allowed to be made, and an order made by a high court on a case for adjudication of domestic relations, on the grounds that the respective judicial decision contains a misconstruction of the Constitution or any other violation of the Constitution.
家庭裁判所の審判で不服を申し立てることができないもの及び高等裁判所の家事審判事件についての決定に対しては、その裁判に憲法の解釈の誤りがあることその他憲法の違反があることを理由とするときに、最高裁判所に特に抗告をすることができる。
A court in charge of an appeal before which the appeal set forth in the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "special appeal") is pending conducts an examination only with regard to the reasons for a special appeal indicated in a petition for appeal or a statement of reasons for an appeal.
前項の抗告(以下「特別抗告」という。)が係属する抗告裁判所は、抗告状又は抗告理由書に記載された特別抗告の理由についてのみ調査をする。
Article 95Stay of Execution of Judicial Decisions in Prior Instance
A special appeal does not have the effect of a stay of execution; provided, however, that the court in charge of the appeal set forth in paragraph (2) of the preceding Article or the court of prior instance may, upon petition, order a stay of execution of the judicial decision in the prior instance or any other necessary measures while requiring or not requiring the provision of security, until a judicial decision on the special appeal is made.
When security is provided pursuant to the provisions of proviso to the preceding paragraph, if it is provided as a statutory deposit, the deposit must be made at the official depository located within the judicial district of the family court which has jurisdiction over the location of the court that has ordered the provision of security.
前項ただし書の規定により担保を立てる場合において、供託をするには、担保を立てるべきことを命じた裁判所の所在地を管轄する家庭裁判所の管轄区域内の供託所にしなければならない。
The provisions of Articles 76, 77, 79, and 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the security set forth in the preceding paragraph.
民事訴訟法第七十六条、第七十七条、第七十九条及び第八十条の規定は、前項の担保について準用する。
Article 96Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Immediate Appeal and of the Code of Civil Procedure
The provisions of Article 86, paragraph (2), Articles 87 through 89, Article 91, paragraph (1), and Article 93 apply mutatis mutandis to a special appeal and proceedings in the instance of the appeal. In this case, the phrase "and paragraph (5)" in Article 87, paragraph (6) is deemed to be replaced with "through paragraph (6)".
The provisions of Article 314, paragraph (2), Article 315, Article 316 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)), Article 321, paragraph (1), Article 322, the first sentence of paragraph (1), paragraph (2), the second sentence of paragraph (3), and paragraph (4) of Article 325, Article 326, and Article 336, paragraph (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to a special appeal and proceedings in the instance of the appeal. In this case: in Article 314, paragraph (2) of the Code, the phrase "Article 288 and Article 289, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding Article" is deemed to be replaced with "Article 87, paragraph (6) of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms and phrases pursuant to Article 96, paragraph (1) of the Act"; in Article 316, paragraph (2) of the Code, the phrase "may be filed against" is deemed to be replaced with "may be filed, within an unextendable period of one week, against"; in Article 322 of the Code, the phrase "the preceding two Articles" is deemed to be replaced with "the provisions of Article 94, paragraph (2) of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act, and Article 321, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 96, paragraph (2) of the Act"; in the first sentence of paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of Article 325 of the Code, the phrase "Article 312, paragraph (1) or (2)" is deemed to be replaced with "Article 94, paragraph (1) of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act"; in the second sentence of paragraph (3) of Article 325 of the Code, the phrase "In such a case" is deemed to be replaced with "When a court that has accepted a case remanded or transferred thereto makes a judicial decision"; and in paragraph (4) of Article 325 of the Code, the term "as referred to in the preceding paragraph" is deemed to be replaced with "at a court that has accepted a case remanded or transferred thereto".
民事訴訟法第三百十四条第二項、第三百十五条、第三百十六条(第一項第一号を除く。)、第三百二十一条第一項、第三百二十二条、第三百二十五条第一項前段、第二項、第三項後段及び第四項、第三百二十六条並びに第三百三十六条第二項の規定は、特別抗告及びその抗告審に関する手続について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百十四条第二項中「前条において準用する第二百八十八条及び第二百八十九条第二項」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第九十六条第一項において読み替えて準用する同法第八十七条第六項」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「対しては」とあるのは「対しては、一週間の不変期間内に」と、同法第三百二十二条中「前二条」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第九十四条第二項の規定及び同法第九十六条第二項において準用する第三百二十一条第一項」と、同法第三百二十五条第一項前段及び第二項中「第三百十二条第一項又は第二項」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第九十四条第一項」と、同条第三項後段中「この場合」とあるのは「差戻し又は移送を受けた裁判所が裁判をする場合」と、同条第四項中「前項」とあるのは「差戻し又は移送を受けた裁判所」と読み替えるものとする。
第三目 許可抗告
Division 3 Appeals with Permission
Article 97Judicial Decisions Against Which Appeals with Permission May Be Filed
An appeal may be specially filed with the Supreme Court against an order made by a high court on a case for adjudication of domestic relations (excluding an order on the petition set forth in the following paragraph), only if that high court permits it pursuant to the following paragraph, beyond the case under the provisions of Article 94, paragraph (1); provided, however, that this applies only when an immediate appeal may be filed against the order on the assumption that it is a ruling made by a family court.
When the order set forth in the preceding paragraph contains a determination that is inconsistent with precedents rendered by the Supreme Court (or precedents rendered by the former Supreme Court or those rendered by high courts as the final appellate court or the court in charge of an appeal filed against a ruling, if there are no precedents rendered by the Supreme Court) or when the order is found to involve other material matters concerning the construction of laws and regulations, the high court set forth in the paragraph must, upon petition, permit an appeal filed against the order.
The petition set forth in the preceding paragraph may not state the grounds prescribed in Article 94, paragraph (1) as reasons for appeal.
Where permission is granted under the provisions of paragraph (2), it is deemed that the appeal set forth in paragraph (1) (hereinafter referred to as an "appeal with permission" in this Article and paragraph (1) of the following Article) has been filed.
The court in charge of an appeal before which an appeal with permission is pending conducts an examination only with regard to the reasons for the appeal with permission indicated in a petition for permission under the provisions of paragraph (2) or a statement of reasons for a petition under the paragraph.
The court in charge of an appeal before which an appeal with permission is pending may quash the order in the prior instance if it contains a violation of laws or regulations that apparently affects a judicial decision.
許可抗告が係属する抗告裁判所は、裁判に影響を及ぼすことが明らかな法令の違反があるときは、原決定を破棄することができる。
Article 98Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Immediate Appeals and of the Code of Civil Procedure
The provisions of Article 86, paragraph (2), Article 87 (excluding paragraphs (4) and (5)), Article 88, Article 89, Article 91, paragraph (1), Article 93, and Article 95 apply mutatis mutandis to an appeal with permission and proceedings in the instance of such an appeal. In this case: the term "immediate appeal" in Article 86, paragraph (2), Article 87, paragraph (1), paragraph (2), item (ii), and paragraph (3), Article 88, paragraph (1), and Article 89, paragraph (2), the phrase "filing an immediate appeal" in Article 87, paragraph (6), and the term "special appeal" in the main clause of Article 95, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "petition set forth in Article 97, paragraph (2)"; the term "petition for appeal" in Article 87, paragraphs (1), (2), and (6), Article 88, and Article 93, paragraph (2) is deemed to be replaced with "petition for permission under the provisions of Article 97, paragraph (2)"; the term "immediate appeal" in Article 91, paragraph (1), the first sentence of paragraph (1), and paragraphs (2) and (3) of Article 93, and the term "special appeal" in the proviso to Article 95, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "appeal with permission".
第八十六条第二項、第八十七条(第四項及び第五項を除く。)、第八十八条、第八十九条、第九十一条第一項、第九十三条及び第九十五条の規定は、許可抗告及びその抗告審に関する手続について準用する。この場合において、第八十六条第二項、第八十七条第一項、第二項第二号及び第三項、第八十八条第一項並びに第八十九条第二項中「即時抗告」とあり、第八十七条第六項中「即時抗告の提起」とあり、並びに第九十五条第一項本文中「特別抗告」とあるのは「第九十七条第二項の申立て」と、第八十七条第一項、第二項及び第六項、第八十八条並びに第九十三条第二項中「抗告状」とあるのは「第九十七条第二項の規定による許可の申立書」と、第九十一条第一項並びに第九十三条第一項前段、第二項及び第三項中「即時抗告」とあり、並びに第九十五条第一項ただし書中「特別抗告」とあるのは「許可抗告」と読み替えるものとする。
The provisions of Article 315 and Article 336, paragraph (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the petition set forth in paragraph (2) of the preceding Article; the provisions of Article 318, paragraph (3) of the Code apply mutatis mutandis when permission is to be granted under the provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding Article; and the provisions of second sentence of Article 318, paragraph (4), Article 321, paragraph (1), Article 322, the first sentence of paragraph (1), paragraph (2), the second sentence of paragraph (3), and paragraph (4) of Article 325, and Article 326 of the Code apply mutatis mutandis when permission has been granted under the provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding Article. In this case, the term "Article 320" in the second sentence of Article 318, paragraph (4) of the Code is deemed to be replaced with "Article 97, paragraph (5) of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act"; the phrase "the preceding two Articles" in Article 322 of the Code is deemed to be replaced with "the provisions of Article 97, paragraph (5) of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act, and Article 321, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 98, paragraph (2) of the Act"; the phrase "Article 312, paragraph (1) or (2)" in the first sentence of paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of Article 325 of the Code is deemed to be replaced with "Article 97, paragraph (2) of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act"; the phrase "In such a case" in the second sentence of Article 325, paragraph (3) of the Code is deemed to be replaced with "If a court that has accepted a case remanded or transferred thereto makes a judicial decision"; and in paragraph (4) of Article 325 of the Code, the term "as referred to in the preceding paragraph" is deemed to be replaced with "at a court that has accepted a case remanded or transferred thereto".
民事訴訟法第三百十五条及び第三百三十六条第二項の規定は前条第二項の申立てについて、同法第三百十八条第三項の規定は前条第二項の規定による許可をする場合について、同法第三百十八条第四項後段、第三百二十一条第一項、第三百二十二条、第三百二十五条第一項前段、第二項、第三項後段及び第四項並びに第三百二十六条の規定は前条第二項の規定による許可があった場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百十八条第四項後段中「第三百二十条」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第九十七条第五項」と、同法第三百二十二条中「前二条」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第九十七条第五項の規定及び同法第九十八条第二項において準用する第三百二十一条第一項」と、同法第三百二十五条第一項前段及び第二項中「第三百十二条第一項又は第二項」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第九十七条第二項」と、同条第三項後段中「この場合」とあるのは「差戻し又は移送を受けた裁判所が裁判をする場合」と、同条第四項中「前項」とあるのは「差戻し又は移送を受けた裁判所」と読み替えるものとする。
第二款 審判以外の裁判に対する不服申立て
Subsection 2 Appeals Against Judicial Decisions Other Than Rulings
Article 99Subject of Appeals
An immediate appeal may be filed against a judicial decision other than a ruling only as specially provided.
審判以外の裁判に対しては、特別の定めがある場合に限り、即時抗告をすることができる。
Article 100Objection to Judicial Decisions Made by Authorized Judges or Commissioned Judges
A party who disagrees with a judicial decision made by an authorized judge or commissioned judge may file an objection with the court before which the case for adjudication of domestic relations is pending; provided, however, that this applies only when an immediate appeal may be filed against the judicial decision on the assumption that it is a judicial decision by a family court.
受命裁判官又は受託裁判官の裁判に対して不服がある当事者は、家事審判事件が係属している裁判所に異議の申立てをすることができる。ただし、その裁判が家庭裁判所の裁判であるとした場合に即時抗告をすることができるものであるときに限る。
An immediate appeal may be filed against a judicial decision on the objection set forth in the preceding paragraph.
前項の異議の申立てについての裁判に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
Article 101Period of Filing Immediate Appeals, etc.
An immediate appeal filed against a judicial decision other than a ruling must be filed within an unextendable period of one week; provided, however, that this does not preclude the effect of an immediate appeal filed prior to the period.
審判以外の裁判に対する即時抗告は、一週間の不変期間内にしなければならない。ただし、その期間前に提起した即時抗告の効力を妨げない。
Except as otherwise provided, the immediate appeal set forth in the preceding paragraph does not have the effect of a stay of execution; provided, however, that the court in charge of the appeal or the court of prior instance may, upon petition, order a stay of execution of the judicial decision in prior instance or any other necessary measures while requiring or not requiring the provision of security, until a judicial decision on the immediate appeal is made.
前項の即時抗告は、特別の定めがある場合を除き、執行停止の効力を有しない。ただし、抗告裁判所又は原裁判所は、申立てにより、担保を立てさせて、又は立てさせないで、即時抗告について裁判があるまで、原裁判の執行の停止その他必要な処分を命ずることができる。
The provisions of Article 95, paragraphs (2) and (3) apply mutatis mutandis to the security deposit and security if security is provided under the provisions of proviso to the preceding paragraph.
Article 102Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Appeals Against Rulings
The provisions of the preceding Subsection (excluding the provisions of Article 85, paragraph (1), Article 86, paragraph (1), and Articles 88 and 89 (including the cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 96, paragraph (1) and Article 98, paragraph (1))) apply mutatis mutandis to an appeal filed against a judicial decision other than a ruling, which is made by a court or judge or the presiding judge.
略称規定第九十四条第二項
前項の抗告(以下「特別抗告」という。)が係属する抗告裁判所は、抗告状又は抗告理由書に記載された特別抗告の理由についてのみ調査をする。
わかりやすく言うと
不服を申し立てることのできない家庭裁判所の審判や、家事審判事件についての高等裁判所の決定に対して、憲法の解釈の誤りその他の憲法違反があることを理由に、最高裁判所に特にする抗告のことです(第九十四条第一項)。
略称規定第九十七条第四項・この条及び第九十八条第一項の中だけ
第二項の規定による許可があった場合には、第一項の抗告(以下この条及び次条第一項において「許可抗告」という。)があったものとみなす。
わかりやすく言うと
高等裁判所が家事審判事件についてした決定に対し、その高等裁判所の許可を受けて最高裁判所にする抗告のことです。家庭裁判所の審判であれば即時抗告ができる決定に限られ、許可の申立てについての決定は対象外です。許可があると、抗告があったものとみなされます。
供託所
法令の定めにより供託する金銭や有価証券を保管する役所で、法務局、地方法務局、それらの支局、または法務大臣が指定するそれらの出張所がこれに当たります(供託法第一条)。事務は、法務局や地方法務局の長が供託官として指定した職員が取り扱います(供託法第一条の二)。宅地建物取引業法では、宅地建物取引業者は、営業保証金を主たる事務所の最寄りの供託所に供託しなければなりません(宅地建物取引業法第二十五条第一項)。業者と宅地建物取引業に関して取引をした人(ほかの業者を除きます)は、その取引で生じた債権について、この営業保証金から支払を受ける権利があります(宅地建物取引業法第二十七条第一項)。業者は、契約が成立するまでに、相手方にその供託所と所在地を説明しなければなりません。業者が宅地建物取引業保証協会の社員であるときは、協会の名称や所在地と、協会が供託した供託所とその所在地を説明します(宅地建物取引業法第三十五条の二)。
供託法第1条・第1条の2、宅地建物取引業法第25条・第27条・第35条の2・第64条の7を参考にAIが作成。
最高裁判所
司法権の属する最高の裁判所で、一切の法律・命令・規則・処分が憲法に適合するかしないかを決定する終審裁判所です(第七十六条第一項・第八十一条)。憲法に違反する法令等は効力を有しないとされ(第九十八条第一項)、これを判断する権限が憲法を実効あらしめています。裁判官は任命後初の衆議院議員総選挙の際、その後十年を経過した後初めての総選挙の際に国民の審査に付されます(第七十九条第二項)。
日本国憲法第76条・第79条・第81条・第98条、Wikipedia「最高裁判所」を参考にAIが作成。