第十一節 推定相続人の廃除に関する審判事件
Section 11 Adjudication Cases Regarding Disinheritance of Presumptive Heirs
第百八十八条（推定相続人の廃除の審判事件及び推定相続人の廃除の取消しの審判事件）
Article 188Adjudication Cases for Disinheritance of Presumptive Heirs and Adjudication Cases for the Revocation of Disinheritance of Presumptive Heirs
An adjudication case for the disinheritance of a presumptive heir and an adjudication case for the revocation of a ruling of the disinheritance of a presumptive heir are subject to the jurisdiction of the family court which has jurisdiction over the place of domicile of a decedent; provided, however, that if these cases are filed after the death of a decedent, they are subject to the jurisdiction of the family court which has jurisdiction over the place where the inheritance process has commenced.
推定相続人の廃除の審判事件及び推定相続人の廃除の審判の取消しの審判事件は、被相続人の住所地を管轄する家庭裁判所の管轄に属する。ただし、これらの審判事件が被相続人の死亡後に申し立てられた場合にあっては、相続が開始した地を管轄する家庭裁判所の管轄に属する。
The provisions of Article 118 apply mutatis mutandis to a decedent in the adjudication cases prescribed in the preceding paragraph.
In an adjudication case for the disinheritance of a presumptive heir, the family court must hear statements from the presumptive heir for whom disinheritance is sought, except when the petition is unlawful or the petition is clearly groundless. In this case, it must hear statements from the presumptive heir on a hearing date.
家庭裁判所は、推定相続人の廃除の審判事件においては、申立てが不適法であるとき又は申立てに理由がないことが明らかなときを除き、廃除を求められた推定相続人の陳述を聴かなければならない。この場合における陳述の聴取は、審問の期日においてしなければならない。
With regard to proceedings in an adjudication case for the disinheritance of a presumptive heir, the provisions of Articles 67 and 69 through 72 apply mutatis mutandis, while deeming the petitioner and the presumptive heir for whom disinheritance is sought to be the parties to the case.
推定相続人の廃除の審判事件における手続については、申立人及び廃除を求められた推定相続人を当事者とみなして、第六十七条及び第六十九条から第七十二条までの規定を準用する。
An immediate appeal may be filed against the rulings set forth in the following items by the persons specified respectively in these items:
次の各号に掲げる審判に対しては、当該各号に定める者は、即時抗告をすることができる。
a ruling of the disinheritance of a presumptive heir:the disinherited presumptive heir; and
推定相続人の廃除の審判 廃除された推定相続人
a ruling to dismiss a petition for a ruling of the disinheritance of a presumptive heir or a petition for the revocation of the ruling:the petitioner.
推定相続人の廃除又はその審判の取消しの申立てを却下する審判 申立人
Article 189Adjudication Cases for Dispositions Regarding the Administration of Estates
An adjudication case for a disposition regarding the administration of an estate for a period before a ruling of the disinheritance of a presumptive heir or a ruling to revoke the ruling becomes final and binding is subject to the jurisdiction of a family court before which the adjudication case for the disinheritance of a presumptive heir or the adjudication case for the revocation of a ruling of the disinheritance of a presumptive heir is pending (if neither adjudication case is pending before any court, the family court which has jurisdiction over the place where an inheritance process has commenced; if either adjudication case is pending before the court in charge of an appeal, the court).
推定相続人の廃除の審判又はその取消しの審判の確定前の遺産の管理に関する処分の審判事件は、推定相続人の廃除の審判事件又は推定相続人の廃除の審判の取消しの審判事件が係属している家庭裁判所（その審判事件が係属していない場合にあっては相続が開始した地を管轄する家庭裁判所、その審判事件が抗告裁判所に係属している場合にあってはその裁判所）の管轄に属する。
The provisions of Article 125, paragraphs (1) through (6) apply mutatis mutandis to an administrator appointed in an adjudication case for a disposition regarding the administration of an estate for a period before a ruling of the disinheritance of a presumptive heir or a ruling to revoke the ruling becomes final and binding. In this case, the term "family court" in paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of the Article is deemed to be replaced with "court that has ordered a disposition regarding the administration of an estate for a period before a ruling of the disinheritance of a presumptive heir or a ruling to revoke the ruling becomes final and binding", and the phrase "property of an adult under guardianship" in paragraph (3) of the Article is deemed to be replaced with "estate".
第百二十五条第一項から第六項までの規定は、推定相続人の廃除の審判又はその取消しの審判の確定前の遺産の管理に関する処分の審判事件において選任した管理人について準用する。この場合において、同条第一項、第二項及び第四項中「家庭裁判所」とあるのは「推定相続人の廃除の審判又はその取消しの審判の確定前の遺産の管理に関する処分を命じた裁判所」と、同条第三項中「成年被後見人の財産」とあるのは「遺産」と読み替えるものとする。
When a ruling of the disinheritance of a presumptive heir or a ruling to revoke the ruling becomes final and binding, the court that has ordered a disposition regarding the administration of an estate for a period before the ruling of the disinheritance of a presumptive heir or a ruling to revoke the ruling becomes final and binding must make a judicial decision to rescind the disposition, upon the petition of the presumptive heir for whom disinheritance is sought, the administrator set forth in the preceding paragraph or any interested party or by its own authority.
推定相続人の廃除の審判又はその取消しの審判の確定前の遺産の管理に関する処分を命じた裁判所は、推定相続人の廃除の審判又はその取消しの審判が確定したときは、廃除を求められた推定相続人、前項の管理人若しくは利害関係人の申立てにより又は職権で、その処分の取消しの裁判をしなければならない。