第二百二十五条(任意後見監督人の解任の審判事件等を本案とする保全処分)
Article 225Provisional Orders Sought by Designating an Adjudication Case for the Dismissal of Supervisor of Voluntarily Appointed Guardians as a Case on the Merits
The provisions of Article 127, paragraphs (1) through (4) apply mutatis mutandis to a provisional order sought by designating an adjudication case for the dismissal of a supervisor of a voluntarily appointed guardian (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (117)) as a case on the merits.
第百二十七条第一項から第四項までの規定は、任意後見監督人の解任の審判事件(別表第一の百十七の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)を本案とする保全処分について準用する。
The provisions of Article 127, paragraphs (1) and (2) apply mutatis mutandis to a provisional order sought by designating an adjudication case for the dismissal of a voluntarily appointed guardian (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (120)) as a case on the merits. In this case, the phrase "suspend the performance of duties by the guardian of the adult or appoint a person acting as the representative thereof" in paragraph (1) of the Article is deemed to be replaced with "suspend the performance of duties by the guardian of the adult", and the phrase "a person acting as a representative appointed under the provisions of the paragraph" in paragraph (2) of the Article is deemed to be replaced with "supervisor of a voluntarily appointed guardian".
定義第百六条第一項
前条第一項の審判及び同条第二項の審判に代わる裁判
わかりやすく言うと
家事審判の手続(家事審判で扱う事柄について家事調停が申し立てられたときはその調停の手続)が進んでいる家庭裁判所が、仮差押え、仮処分、財産の管理者の選任などの必要な保全処分を命じる審判のことです。家事審判が高等裁判所で進んでいるときに、高等裁判所がこれに代えてする裁判も含みます。