Article 432Application for Review Concerning the Price Registered in the Fixed Assets Tax Ledger
第四百三十二条（固定資産課税台帳に登録された価格に関する審査の申出）
A taxpayer of fixed assets tax who has an objection to the price registered in the fixed assets tax ledger for a fixed asset relating to the fixed assets tax for the relevant fiscal year that the taxpayer is to pay (excluding a price determined or revised by the prefectural governor or the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications under Article 389, paragraph (1), Article 417, paragraph (2) or Article 743, paragraph (1) or (2) and notified to the mayor of the municipality) may make an application for review to the fixed asset valuation review board in writing, during the period from the date of the public notice under Article 411, paragraph (2) until the date on which three months have elapsed after the date of receiving delivery of the tax notice, or during the period from the date of the public notice under Article 419, paragraph (3) until the date on which three months have elapsed after that date (for a person who has received delivery of a tax notice based on the reassessment under Article 420, the date on which three months have elapsed after the date of receiving delivery of that tax notice), or within three months from the date of receiving the notice under Article 417, paragraph (1); provided, however, that no application for review may be made regarding the price of land or a house, among those fixed assets, that is deemed under Article 411, paragraph (3) to have been registered in the land tax ledgers, etc. or the house tax ledger, etc., except where it is asserted that, because of the circumstances listed in Article 349, paragraph (2), item (i), the land or house should be subject to the proviso to the same paragraph, the proviso to paragraph (3) of that Article or the proviso to paragraph (5) of that Article.
固定資産税の納税者は、その納付すべき当該年度の固定資産税に係る固定資産について固定資産課税台帳に登録された価格（第三百八十九条第一項、第四百十七条第二項又は第七百四十三条第一項若しくは第二項の規定によつて道府県知事又は総務大臣が決定し、又は修正し市町村長に通知したものを除く。）について不服がある場合においては、第四百十一条第二項の規定による公示の日から納税通知書の交付を受けた日後三月を経過する日まで若しくは第四百十九条第三項の規定による公示の日から同日後三月を経過する日（第四百二十条の更正に基づく納税通知書の交付を受けた者にあつては、当該納税通知書の交付を受けた日後三月を経過する日）までの間において、又は第四百十七条第一項の通知を受けた日から三月以内に、文書をもつて、固定資産評価審査委員会に審査の申出をすることができる。ただし、当該固定資産のうち第四百十一条第三項の規定によつて土地課税台帳等又は家屋課税台帳等に登録されたものとみなされる土地又は家屋の価格については、当該土地又は家屋について第三百四十九条第二項第一号に掲げる事情があるため同条同項ただし書、第三項ただし書又は第五項ただし書の規定の適用を受けるべきものであることを申し立てる場合を除いては、審査の申出をすることができない。
The provisions of Article 10 through Article 12, Article 15, Article 18, paragraph (1) proviso and paragraph (3), Article 19, paragraph (2) (excluding items (iii) and (v)) and paragraph (4), and Article 23 of the Administrative Complaint Review Act apply mutatis mutandis to the procedures for an application for review under the preceding paragraph. In this case, the phrase "a person who has been nominated pursuant to the provisions of Article 9, paragraph (1) (referred to as "review officer" below)" in Article 11, paragraph (2) of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "the fixed asset valuation review board that has received an application for review under Article 432, paragraph (1) of the Local Tax Act (referred to as "reviewing agency" below)", and the phrase "the following matters" in Article 19, paragraph (2) of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "the following matters and other matters specified by Prefectural or Municipal Ordinance".
In a request for review concerning the assessment of fixed assets tax, an objection concerning matters for which an application for review may be made under paragraph (1) cannot be made a ground of objection to the assessment of that fixed assets tax.
固定資産税の賦課についての審査請求においては、第一項の規定により審査を申し出ることができる事項についての不服を当該固定資産税の賦課についての不服の理由とすることができない。
Read this with the articles around it
tax noticemachine translation
「納税通知書」
A document a local government draws up for local tax a taxpayer must pay, stating the Acts and the local government's ordinance (条例) provisions the tax is levied under, the taxpayer's address and name, the tax base, rate and amount, the payment periods and the amount due in each, where to pay, the steps that will be taken if the tax is not paid by the due date, and how to seek relief against the assessment.
Defined inArticle 1, paragraph (1), item (vi)· applies throughout the law
land tax ledgers, etc.machine translation
「土地課税台帳等」
The land tax ledger (土地課税台帳) or the supplementary land tax ledger (土地補充課税台帳), in which the value of land for fixed assets tax (固定資産税) is entered.
Short name set inArticle 349, paragraph (1)
house tax ledger, etc.machine translation
「家屋課税台帳等」
The house tax ledger (家屋課税台帳) or the supplementary house tax ledger (家屋補充課税台帳), in which houses and their values for fixed assets tax (固定資産税) are registered.
Short name set inArticle 349, paragraph (1)
pricemachine translation
「価格」
For land or a building (家屋), its price on the assessment date (賦課期日) of the base year (基準年度) registered in the land or building tax ledgers (土地課税台帳等, 家屋課税台帳等), or the price set by comparison with it under the provisos and paragraphs of Article 349 that Article 349-3, paragraph 9 lists; for depreciable assets (償却資産), its price on the assessment date registered in the depreciable assets tax ledger (償却資産課税台帳).
Defined inArticle 349-3, paragraph (9)
landmachine translation
「土地」
Rice paddies, upland fields, building land, salt fields, mineral spring sites (鉱泉地), ponds and marshes, forests, pastures, wilderness (原野) and any other land, for the special land holding tax (特別土地保有税).
Defined inArticle 585, paragraph (2)
Prefectural or Municipal Ordinance
条例
A rule a local government makes for itself: a prefecture (都道府県), a city, town or village (市町村), or one of Tokyo's special wards (特別区) (Local Autonomy Act, Articles 1-3, 281 and 283). Its assembly (議会), whose members the residents elect, passes it (Articles 89 and 96, paragraph (1), item (i)), and its head — the governor or the mayor (Article 139) — promulgates it, that is, makes it public so that it can take effect (Article 16). The Constitution lets local governments make them within the limits of Acts (Constitution, Article 94), and one may not go against the national laws and regulations (法令), such as Acts, Cabinet Orders (政令) and Ministerial Orders (省令) (Local Autonomy Act, Article 14, paragraph (1)). Unless national laws and regulations provide otherwise, a local government can impose a duty or restrict a right only by one of these (Article 14, paragraph (2)), and it may write into one penalties for breaking it, within limits the Local Autonomy Act sets (Article 14, paragraph (3)). It is made for that local government's own affairs (Article 2, paragraph (2) and Article 14, paragraph (1)), so the same matter can be handled differently from one place to the next. It is a local rule, not a national one: an "ordinance" in the name of a national rule, such as an Ordinance for Enforcement of an Act, is usually a Ministerial Order (省令) or another national instrument.
Written by AI using Constitution, Art. 94 and Local Autonomy Act, Arts. 1-3, 2, 14, 16, 89, 96, 139, 281, 283 as a reference.
request for review
審査請求
A request to an administrative agency (行政庁) to review a disposition (処分) the person objects to, or, where the person applied for a disposition under a law or regulation and a reasonable time has passed with none made, the agency's failure to act (不作為) (Administrative Complaint Review Act, Articles 2 and 3). Unless an Act, or for a disposition based on a local ordinance (条例) that ordinance, provides otherwise, it is made to the agency that made the disposition or failed to act where that agency has no superior agency or is itself the competent minister (主任の大臣) or the head of certain agencies; where such a minister or head is the agency above it, to that minister or head; and otherwise to its highest superior agency (Article 4). Another Act can set rules of its own for it, naming another body to make it to or another route (Article 1, paragraph (2); Article 4): the Employees' Pension Insurance Act, for instance, has a request about a disposition (処分) of the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare (厚生労働大臣) on a person's status as insured, standard remuneration or insurance benefits, other than a decision on a request to correct the pension insurance register, made to a social insurance examiner (社会保険審査官), and disapplies most of the Administrative Complaint Review Act's rules for it (Employees' Pension Insurance Act, Articles 90, paragraph (1), and 91-2). Under the Administrative Complaint Review Act, a request about a disposition must be made within three months of the day after the person learned of it — or one month after learning of the decision, where a request for re-investigation (再調査の請求) was made first — and within a year of the disposition or that decision, unless there is a justifiable reason (Administrative Complaint Review Act, Article 18, paragraphs (1) and (2)). Making one does not by itself stop the disposition taking effect or being carried out, or the proceedings going on (Article 25, paragraph (1)), but the agency reviewing it can suspend them in whole or in part on the application of the person who made the request — and, where it made the disposition or is the agency above the one that did, of its own motion — and, once the person who made the request has applied, must where that is urgently needed to avoid serious harm, unless that would seriously affect the public welfare or the request appears to have no grounds (Article 25, paragraphs (2) to (4)). The agency reviewing it (審査庁) decides it by a determination (裁決): it dismisses a request that is unlawful, for instance one made too late, rejects one that is groundless, and, where one is well founded, revokes the disposition in whole or in part or changes it — though never to the disadvantage of the person who made the request, and an agency that neither made the disposition nor is above the agency that did cannot change it (Articles 45, paragraphs (1) and (2), 46, paragraph (1), and 48). Where the request is about a de facto act (事実上の行為), the determination instead declares the act unlawful or unjust and orders it abolished in whole or in part or changed, or abolishes or changes it (Article 47). A well-founded request about a failure to act ends instead in a determination declaring the failure unlawful or unjust, and, where the agency finds a disposition should be made, an order to make it or the disposition itself (Article 49, paragraph (3)). Where revoking an unlawful or unjust disposition, or abolishing an unlawful or unjust de facto act, would seriously harm the public interest, the agency can reject the request while declaring in the determination that it is unlawful or unjust (Article 45, paragraph (3)). The determination takes effect when it is served on the person who made the request — or, where someone other than the disposition's addressee made it and the determination revokes or changes the disposition or deals with a de facto act, once it is served on the addressee too — and binds the agencies concerned (Articles 51, paragraph (1), and 52, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Administrative Complaint Review Act, Arts. 1 to 4, 18, 25, 45 to 49, 51, 52 and Employees' Pension Insurance Act, Arts. 90, 91-2 as a reference.