Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 368Collection of Shortfall in Fixed Assets Tax and Delinquency Charges Due to Failure to Make an Application or Report

第三百六十八条(申請又は申告をしなかつたことによる固定資産税の不足税額及び延滞金の徴収)

If the mayor of the municipality discovers that there is a shortfall in the fixed assets tax amount for a person who is obliged to apply to a registry office for registration under the provisions of Article 36, Article 37, paragraph (1) or (2), Article 42, Article 47, paragraph (1), Article 51, paragraph (1) (excluding the part concerning a building for which there is a registration to the effect that it is a common element or a common element of a housing complex), (2) or (3), or Article 57 of the Real Property Registration Act, who is obliged to report to the mayor of the municipality or the prefectural governor under the provisions of Article 383 or Article 383 as applied mutatis mutandis in Article 745, paragraph (1), or who is obliged to report to the prefectural governor or the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications under the provisions of Article 394, on the basis that the price of the fixed asset (meaning, for land and houses, the base-year price or the price that is to be based on comparison with that price under the proviso to Article 349, paragraph (2), the proviso to Article 349, paragraph (3), Article 349, paragraph (4), the proviso to Article 349, paragraph (5) or Article 349, paragraph (6) (hereinafter collectively referred to as "comparison-based price"), and for depreciable assets, the price on the assessment date; the same applies hereinafter) was determined or corrected under Article 417 or Article 743, paragraph (2) because that person did not make the application or report that the person should have made, or made a false application or report, the mayor must immediately collect additionally the portion of the shortfall that relates to the payment periods up to the day on which the determination was made (hereinafter in this Article referred to as "shortfall"). However, if the total of the shortfall and the fixed assets tax amount already collected by the mayor of the municipality would exceed the fixed assets tax amount on the amount that the municipality should make the tax base of fixed assets tax under Article 349-4 or Article 349-5, the shortfall that the mayor is to collect additionally is limited to the difference between the fixed assets tax amount already collected and the fixed assets tax amount on the amount that the municipality should make the tax base of fixed assets tax under Article 349-5.

市町村長は、不動産登記法第三十六条、第三十七条第一項若しくは第二項、第四十二条、第四十七条第一項、第五十一条第一項(共用部分である旨の登記又は団地共用部分である旨の登記がある建物の場合に係る部分を除く。)、第二項若しくは第三項若しくは第五十七条の規定によつて登記所に登記の申請をする義務がある者、第三百八十三条若しくは第七百四十五条第一項において準用する第三百八十三条の規定によつて市町村長若しくは道府県知事に申告をする義務がある者又は第三百九十四条の規定によつて道府県知事若しくは総務大臣に申告をする義務がある者がそのすべき申請又は申告をしなかつたこと又は虚偽の申請又は申告をしたことにより第四百十七条又は第七百四十三条第二項の規定によつて当該固定資産の価格(土地及び家屋にあつては基準年度の価格又は第三百四十九条第二項ただし書、第三項ただし書、第四項、第五項ただし書若しくは第六項の規定により当該価格に比準するものとされる価格(以下「比準価格」と総称する。)を、償却資産にあつては賦課期日における価格をいう。以下同様とする。)を決定し、又は修正したことに基づいてその者に係る固定資産税額に不足税額があることを発見した場合においては、直ちにその不足税額のうちその決定があつた日までの納期に係る分(以下本条において「不足税額」という。)を追徴しなければならない。ただし、不足税額と既に市町村長が徴収した固定資産税額との合計額が第三百四十九条の四又は第三百四十九条の五の規定によつて当該市町村が固定資産税の課税標準とすべき金額に対する固定資産税額を超えることとなる場合においては、当該市町村長が追徴すべき不足税額は、既に徴収した固定資産税額と同条の規定によつて当該市町村が固定資産税の課税標準とすべき金額に対する固定資産税額との差額を限度としなければならない。

In the case of the preceding paragraph, a municipal tax collection official must collect the shortfall with an amount of delinquency charge added that is equivalent to the amount calculated by multiplying the amount obtained by dividing the shortfall by the number of payment periods up to the day on which the determination was made by the rate of 14.6 percent per annum (7.3 percent per annum for the period until the day on which payment is to be made under the tax notice for the shortfall, or the period until the day on which one month has elapsed from the day following that day), according to the number of days in the period from the day following the due date for payment under Article 362 (where there has been an extension of the due date for payment, the extended due date for payment; the same applies hereinafter for fixed assets tax) to the day of payment.

前項の場合においては、市町村の徴税吏員は、不足税額をその決定があつた日までの納期の数で除して得た額に、第三百六十二条の納期限(納期限の延長があつたときは、その延長された納期限とする。以下固定資産税について同様とする。)の翌日から納付の日までの期間の日数に応じ、年十四・六パーセント(当該不足税額に係る納税通知書において納付すべきこととされる日までの期間又はその日の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間については、年七・三パーセント)の割合を乗じて計算した金額に相当する延滞金額を加算して徴収しなければならない。

If the mayor of the municipality finds that there are unavoidable grounds for the taxpayer having been charged the shortfall additionally under paragraph (1), the mayor may reduce or exempt the amount of delinquency charge referred to in the preceding paragraph.

市町村長は、納税者が第一項の規定によつて不足税額を追徴されたことについてやむを得ない事由があると認める場合においては、前項の延滞金額を減免することができる。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy