Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 16-5Disposition of the Collateral and Enforcement of Guarantee

第十六条の五(担保の処分)

Where a person who has received a deferral of collection, ex officio suspension of realization or suspension of realization upon application does not pay or remit the local government levies subject to that deferral or suspension by the time limit of that deferral or suspension, or the head of a local government has revoked that deferral or suspension under Article 15-3, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis with replacement of terms under Article 15-5-3, paragraph (2) and Article 15-6-3, paragraph (2)), and the local government levies subject to that deferral or suspension are accordingly to be collected, if there is security taken in respect of those local government levies, the head of a local government is to dispose of the property provided as security in accordance with delinquent tax collection procedures and apply the proceeds to the local government levies to be collected and the expenses of disposing of the property provided as security, or have the guarantor pay or remit those local government levies.

徴収の猶予、職権による換価の猶予又は申請による換価の猶予を受けた者がその猶予に係る地方団体の徴収金をその猶予の期限までに納付若しくは納入をせず、又は地方団体の長が第十五条の三第一項(第十五条の五の三第二項及び第十五条の六の三第二項において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。)の規定によりその猶予を取り消したことによつて、その猶予に係る地方団体の徴収金を徴収する場合において、その地方団体の徴収金について徴した担保があるときは、地方団体の長は、滞納処分の例によりその担保財産を処分して、その徴収すべき地方団体の徴収金及び担保財産の処分費に充て、又は保証人にその地方団体の徴収金を納付し、若しくは納入させる。

In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, if the head of a local government finds that the proceeds of the disposition of the property provided as security, applied to the local government levies referred to in that paragraph and the expenses of disposing of the property provided as security, are still insufficient, the head is to carry out delinquent tax collection procedures against other property of the person delinquent in payment; and where the guarantor does not pay in full the amount to be paid or remitted, the head is to carry out delinquent tax collection procedures first against the person delinquent in payment, and, if there is still a shortfall or it is found that there will be a shortfall, against the guarantor.

前項の場合において、地方団体の長は、担保財産の処分の代金が同項の地方団体の徴収金及び担保財産の処分費に充ててなお不足があると認めるときは、滞納者の他の財産について滞納処分をし、また、保証人がその納付し、又は納入すべき金額を完納しないときは、まず滞納者に対して滞納処分をし、なお不足があるとき、又は不足があると認めるときは、保証人に対して滞納処分をする。

The preceding two paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis where, security having been provided under Article 16-3 or paragraph (3) or paragraph (4), item (i) of the preceding Article (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (12) of that Article), the local government levies relating to that security are to be collected. In this case, where the security is money, it is to be applied immediately to those local government levies.

前二項の規定は、第十六条の三又は前条第三項若しくは第四項第一号(同条第十二項において準用する場合を含む。)の担保の提供があつた場合において、その担保に係る地方団体の徴収金を徴収するときについて準用する。この場合において、その担保が金銭であるときは、直ちにその地方団体の徴収金に充てる。

The provisions of Article 11 apply mutatis mutandis where local government levies are collected from a guarantor under paragraph (1) or (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis in the preceding paragraph).

第十一条の規定は、第一項又は第二項(これらの規定を前項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により保証人から地方団体の徴収金を徴収する場合について準用する。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy