A financial instruments business operator, etc. that objects to the inaction of an association that does the registration work under Article 64-7, paragraph (1) or (2) in connection with an application for registration under Article 64, paragraph (3), that objects to such an association's refusal of a registration under Article 64-2, paragraph (1), or that objects to the Article 64-5, paragraph (1) disposition of an association that does the registration work under Article 64-7, paragraph (1), may file a request for review with the Prime Minister. In this case, with regard to the application of the provisions of Article 25, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 46, paragraphs (1) and (2), and Article 49, paragraph (3) of the Administrative Appeal Act (Act No. 68 of 2014), the Prime Minister is deemed to be the higher administrative agency of the association.
第六十四条の七第一項若しくは第二項の規定により登録事務を行う協会の第六十四条第三項の規定による登録の申請に係る不作為若しくは第六十四条の二第一項の規定による登録の拒否又は第六十四条の七第一項の規定により登録事務を行う協会の第六十四条の五第一項の規定による処分について不服がある金融商品取引業者等は、内閣総理大臣に対し、審査請求をすることができる。この場合において、内閣総理大臣は、行政不服審査法（平成二十六年法律第六十八号）第二十五条第二項及び第三項、第四十六条第一項及び第二項並びに第四十九条第三項の規定の適用については、協会の上級行政庁とみなす。
Read this with the articles around it
(Refusal of Registration)
If the sales representative to which an application for registration pertains falls under any of the following items, or if a written application for registration or an accompanying document includes…
内閣総理大臣は、登録の申請に係る外務員が次の各号のいずれかに該当するとき、又は登録申請書若しくはその添付書類のうちに虚偽の記載があり、若しくは重要な事実の記載が欠けているときは、その登録を拒否しなければならない。
Open this provision(Supervisory Dispositions for Sales Representatives)
If a registered sales representative falls under any of the following items, the Prime Minister may rescind the registration or order the sales representative to suspend their duties during a fixed…
内閣総理大臣は、登録を受けている外務員が次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合においては、その登録を取り消し、又は二年以内の期間を定めてその職務の停止を命ずることができる。
Open this provision(Delegation of Registration Work)
The Prime Minister may have an association (meaning an authorized financial instruments firms association or certified financial instruments business association prescribed in Article 78, paragraph…
内閣総理大臣は、内閣府令で定めるところにより、協会（認可金融商品取引業協会又は第七十八条第二項に規定する認定金融商品取引業協会をいう。以下この節において同じ。）に、第六十四条、第六十四条の二及び前三条に規定する登録に関する事務（以下この条（第六項各号を除く。）及び第六十四条の九において「登録事務」という。）であつて当…
Open this provision(Delegation of Registration Work)
The Prime Minister may designate one association and have it do the registration work (excluding the work to which Article 64-5 pertains) in connection with the sales representative of a financial…
内閣総理大臣は、内閣府令で定めるところにより、協会に所属しない金融商品取引業者等の外務員に係る登録事務（第六十四条の五に係るものを除く。）を一の協会を定めて行わせることができる。
Open this provision(Registration of Sales Representatives)
A financial instruments business operator, etc. seeking to have a registration made pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) must submit a written application for registration to the Prime…
第一項の規定により登録を受けようとする金融商品取引業者等は、次に掲げる事項を記載した登録申請書を内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。
Open this provision(Stay of Enforcement)
When finding it necessary, the higher administrative agency of the administrative agency reaching the disposition or the reviewing agency that is the administrative agency reaching the disposition…
処分庁の上級行政庁又は処分庁である審査庁は、必要があると認める場合には、審査請求人の申立てにより又は職権で、処分の効力、処分の執行又は手続の続行の全部又は一部の停止その他の措置（以下「執行停止」という。）をとることができる。
Open this provision(Stay of Enforcement)
When finding it necessary, the reviewing agency that is neither the higher administrative agency of the administrative agency reaching the disposition nor the administrative agency reaching the…
処分庁の上級行政庁又は処分庁のいずれでもない審査庁は、必要があると認める場合には、審査請求人の申立てにより、処分庁の意見を聴取した上、執行停止をすることができる。ただし、処分の効力、処分の執行又は手続の続行の全部又は一部の停止以外の措置をとることはできない。
Open this provision(Approval of Requests for Review of Dispositions)
When there are grounds for a request for review of a disposition (excluding de facto acts; the same applies below in this Article and Article 48)…
処分（事実上の行為を除く。以下この条及び第四十八条において同じ。）についての審査請求が理由がある場合（前条第三項の規定の適用がある場合を除く。）には、審査庁は、裁決で、当該処分の全部若しくは一部を取り消し、又はこれを変更する。
Open this provision(Approval of Requests for Review of Dispositions)
When revoking a disposition to dismiss or reject in full or in part an application based on laws and regulations pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph…
前項の規定により法令に基づく申請を却下し、又は棄却する処分の全部又は一部を取り消す場合において、次の各号に掲げる審査庁は、当該申請に対して一定の処分をすべきものと認めるときは、当該各号に定める措置をとる。
Open this provision(Administrative Determinations for Requests for Review Regarding Inaction)
When there are grounds for a request for review regarding inaction, the reviewing agency is to declare that the inaction is illegal or unjust by an administrative determination.
不作為についての審査請求が理由がある場合には、審査庁は、裁決で、当該不作為が違法又は不当である旨を宣言する。この場合において、次の各号に掲げる審査庁は、当該申請に対して一定の処分をすべきものと認めるときは、当該各号に定める措置をとる。
Open this provisionfinancial instruments business operator, etc.machine translation
「金融商品取引業者等」
A financial instruments business operator (金融商品取引業者) or a registered financial institution (登録金融機関).
Defined inArticle 34, paragraph (1)
associationmachine translation
「協会」
In Section 7 of Chapter 3, an authorized financial instruments firms association (認可金融商品取引業協会) or a certified financial instruments business association (認定金融商品取引業協会).
Defined inArticle 64-7, paragraph (1)· applies only in this section
Prime Minister
内閣総理大臣
The head of the Cabinet. Designated by the Diet from among its own members, and appointed by the Emperor on that designation (Articles 67 and 6). The Prime Minister appoints and may dismiss the other Ministers of State at will, and a majority of them must be members of the Diet (Article 68). No Minister of State can be subjected to legal action while in office without the Prime Minister's consent (Article 75).
Written by AI using Constitution, Arts. 6, 67, 68, 75 and Wikipedia: Prime Minister of Japan as a reference.
request for review
審査請求
A request to an administrative agency (行政庁) to review a disposition (処分) the person objects to, or, where the person applied for a disposition under a law or regulation and a reasonable time has passed with none made, the agency's failure to act (不作為) (Administrative Complaint Review Act, Articles 2 and 3). Unless an Act, or for a disposition based on a local ordinance (条例) that ordinance, provides otherwise, it is made to the agency that made the disposition or failed to act where that agency has no superior agency or is itself the competent minister (主任の大臣) or the head of certain agencies; where such a minister or head is the agency above it, to that minister or head; and otherwise to its highest superior agency (Article 4). Another Act can set rules of its own for it, naming another body to make it to or another route (Article 1, paragraph (2); Article 4): the Employees' Pension Insurance Act, for instance, has a request about a disposition (処分) of the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare (厚生労働大臣) on a person's status as insured, standard remuneration or insurance benefits, other than a decision on a request to correct the pension insurance register, made to a social insurance examiner (社会保険審査官), and disapplies most of the Administrative Complaint Review Act's rules for it (Employees' Pension Insurance Act, Articles 90, paragraph (1), and 91-2). Under the Administrative Complaint Review Act, a request about a disposition must be made within three months of the day after the person learned of it — or one month after learning of the decision, where a request for re-investigation (再調査の請求) was made first — and within a year of the disposition or that decision, unless there is a justifiable reason (Administrative Complaint Review Act, Article 18, paragraphs (1) and (2)). Making one does not by itself stop the disposition taking effect or being carried out, or the proceedings going on (Article 25, paragraph (1)), but the agency reviewing it can suspend them in whole or in part on the application of the person who made the request — and, where it made the disposition or is the agency above the one that did, of its own motion — and, once the person who made the request has applied, must where that is urgently needed to avoid serious harm, unless that would seriously affect the public welfare or the request appears to have no grounds (Article 25, paragraphs (2) to (4)). The agency reviewing it (審査庁) decides it by a determination (裁決): it dismisses a request that is unlawful, for instance one made too late, rejects one that is groundless, and, where one is well founded, revokes the disposition in whole or in part or changes it — though never to the disadvantage of the person who made the request, and an agency that neither made the disposition nor is above the agency that did cannot change it (Articles 45, paragraphs (1) and (2), 46, paragraph (1), and 48). Where the request is about a de facto act (事実上の行為), the determination instead declares the act unlawful or unjust and orders it abolished in whole or in part or changed, or abolishes or changes it (Article 47). A well-founded request about a failure to act ends instead in a determination declaring the failure unlawful or unjust, and, where the agency finds a disposition should be made, an order to make it or the disposition itself (Article 49, paragraph (3)). Where revoking an unlawful or unjust disposition, or abolishing an unlawful or unjust de facto act, would seriously harm the public interest, the agency can reject the request while declaring in the determination that it is unlawful or unjust (Article 45, paragraph (3)). The determination takes effect when it is served on the person who made the request — or, where someone other than the disposition's addressee made it and the determination revokes or changes the disposition or deals with a de facto act, once it is served on the addressee too — and binds the agencies concerned (Articles 51, paragraph (1), and 52, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Administrative Complaint Review Act, Arts. 1 to 4, 18, 25, 45 to 49, 51, 52 and Employees' Pension Insurance Act, Arts. 90, 91-2 as a reference.