Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 156-51Postponement of Completion of Prescription

第百五十六条の五十一(時効の完成猶予)

If the dispute resolution mediators terminate dispute resolution procedures on the grounds that there is no prospect of reaching a settlement between the parties to a dispute related to financial instruments transaction services through dispute resolution procedures, and the party to the dispute related to financial instruments transaction services which filed the application for dispute resolution procedures files an action on a claim that was subject to the dispute resolution procedures within one month from the day on which that party receives notice of the termination, the action is deemed to have been filed at the time that the claim was filed in dispute resolution procedures in terms of the postponement of completion of prescription.

紛争解決手続によつては金融商品取引業等業務関連紛争の当事者間に和解が成立する見込みがないことを理由に紛争解決委員が当該紛争解決手続を終了した場合において、当該紛争解決手続の申立てをした当該金融商品取引業等業務関連紛争の当事者がその旨の通知を受けた日から一月以内に当該紛争解決手続の目的となつた請求について訴えを提起したときは、時効の完成猶予に関しては、当該紛争解決手続における請求の時に、訴えの提起があつたものとみなす。

The provisions of the preceding paragraph also apply if the discontinuation of dispute resolution services, etc. by a designated dispute resolution organization is authorized pursuant to Article 156-60, paragraph (1) or if the designation under Article 156-39, paragraph (1) is rescinded pursuant to Article 156-61, paragraph (1) and there is a dispute related to financial instruments transaction services for which dispute resolution procedures have been implemented as of the day of authorization or rescission, and the party to the dispute related to financial instruments transaction services which has filed the application for dispute resolution procedures files an action on a claim that was subject to those dispute resolution procedures within one month from the day on which the party receives the notice under Article 156-60, paragraph (3) or Article 156-61, paragraph (3), or within one month from the day on which the party comes to know of the authorization or rescission, whichever comes earlier.

指定紛争解決機関の紛争解決等業務の廃止が第百五十六条の六十第一項の規定により認可され、又は第百五十六条の三十九第一項の規定による指定が第百五十六条の六十一第一項の規定により取り消され、かつ、その認可又は取消しの日に紛争解決手続が実施されていた金融商品取引業等業務関連紛争がある場合において、当該紛争解決手続の申立てをした当該金融商品取引業等業務関連紛争の当事者が第百五十六条の六十第三項若しくは第百五十六条の六十一第三項の規定による通知を受けた日又は当該認可若しくは取消しを知つた日のいずれか早い日から一月以内に当該紛争解決手続の目的となつた請求について訴えを提起したときも、前項と同様とする。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy