A request for review that concerns an order to submit reports or materials that the Commission issues pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of the preceding Article (including an order that the Director-General of a Local Finance Bureau or the Director-General of a Local Finance Branch Bureau issues pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (7) of that Article) may only be filed to the Commission.
Read this with the articles around it
(Delegation of Authority to the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency)
Among the authority delegated to the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the Commissioner is to delegate the following authority to…
金融庁長官は、前項の規定により委任された権限のうち、次に掲げるものを証券取引等監視委員会（以下この条及び次条において「委員会」という。）に委任する。ただし、報告又は資料の提出を命ずる権限は、金融庁長官が自ら行うことを妨げない。
Open this provision(Delegation of Authority to the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency)
The Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency may, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Order, delegate to the Commission, of the authority delegated pursuant to paragraph (1)…
金融庁長官は、政令で定めるところにより、第一項の規定により委任された権限（前項の規定により委員会に委任されたものを除く。）のうち、第二十六条（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十七条の二十二第一項（第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）…
Open this provision(Delegation of Authority to the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency)
The Commission may delegate a part of the authority delegated to it pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs (2) through (4) to the Director-General of a Local Finance Bureau or the Director-General…
委員会は、政令で定めるところにより、第二項から第四項までの規定により委任された権限の一部を財務局長又は財務支局長に委任することができる。
Open this provisionCommission
「委員会」
The Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (証券取引等監視委員会), to which the Commissioner of the Financial Services Agency (金融庁長官) delegates the powers listed in Article 194-7, paragraph (2).
Short name set inArticle 194-7, paragraph (2)· applies only in this article and in Article 195
request for review
審査請求
A request to an administrative agency (行政庁) to review a disposition (処分) the person objects to, or, where the person applied for a disposition under a law or regulation and a reasonable time has passed with none made, the agency's failure to act (不作為) (Administrative Complaint Review Act, Articles 2 and 3). Unless an Act, or for a disposition based on a local ordinance (条例) that ordinance, provides otherwise, it is made to the agency that made the disposition or failed to act where that agency has no superior agency or is itself the competent minister (主任の大臣) or the head of certain agencies; where such a minister or head is the agency above it, to that minister or head; and otherwise to its highest superior agency (Article 4). Another Act can set rules of its own for it, naming another body to make it to or another route (Article 1, paragraph (2); Article 4): the Employees' Pension Insurance Act, for instance, has a request about a disposition (処分) of the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare (厚生労働大臣) on a person's status as insured, standard remuneration or insurance benefits, other than a decision on a request to correct the pension insurance register, made to a social insurance examiner (社会保険審査官), and disapplies most of the Administrative Complaint Review Act's rules for it (Employees' Pension Insurance Act, Articles 90, paragraph (1), and 91-2). Under the Administrative Complaint Review Act, a request about a disposition must be made within three months of the day after the person learned of it — or one month after learning of the decision, where a request for re-investigation (再調査の請求) was made first — and within a year of the disposition or that decision, unless there is a justifiable reason (Administrative Complaint Review Act, Article 18, paragraphs (1) and (2)). Making one does not by itself stop the disposition taking effect or being carried out, or the proceedings going on (Article 25, paragraph (1)), but the agency reviewing it can suspend them in whole or in part on the application of the person who made the request — and, where it made the disposition or is the agency above the one that did, of its own motion — and, once the person who made the request has applied, must where that is urgently needed to avoid serious harm, unless that would seriously affect the public welfare or the request appears to have no grounds (Article 25, paragraphs (2) to (4)). The agency reviewing it (審査庁) decides it by a determination (裁決): it dismisses a request that is unlawful, for instance one made too late, rejects one that is groundless, and, where one is well founded, revokes the disposition in whole or in part or changes it — though never to the disadvantage of the person who made the request, and an agency that neither made the disposition nor is above the agency that did cannot change it (Articles 45, paragraphs (1) and (2), 46, paragraph (1), and 48). Where the request is about a de facto act (事実上の行為), the determination instead declares the act unlawful or unjust and orders it abolished in whole or in part or changed, or abolishes or changes it (Article 47). A well-founded request about a failure to act ends instead in a determination declaring the failure unlawful or unjust, and, where the agency finds a disposition should be made, an order to make it or the disposition itself (Article 49, paragraph (3)). Where revoking an unlawful or unjust disposition, or abolishing an unlawful or unjust de facto act, would seriously harm the public interest, the agency can reject the request while declaring in the determination that it is unlawful or unjust (Article 45, paragraph (3)). The determination takes effect when it is served on the person who made the request — or, where someone other than the disposition's addressee made it and the determination revokes or changes the disposition or deals with a de facto act, once it is served on the addressee too — and binds the agencies concerned (Articles 51, paragraph (1), and 52, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Administrative Complaint Review Act, Arts. 1 to 4, 18, 25, 45 to 49, 51, 52 and Employees' Pension Insurance Act, Arts. 90, 91-2 as a reference.