Article 31-2Notice to the Victim
Upon request from the victim, etc. of the case involving a juvenile as prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (1), item (i) or (ii), pursuant to the Rules of the Supreme Court, the family court is to give the following notice of matters to the person that filed the request if the court has given a ruling to close the case; provided, however, that this does not apply if the court finds the giving of that notice is likely to hinder sound development of the juvenile and is inappropriate:
name and residence of the juvenile and the statutory agent of the juvenile (if the statutory agent is a corporation, its name or trade name and the location of its main office or headquarters);
少年及びその法定代理人の氏名及び住居(法定代理人が法人である場合においては、その名称又は商号及び主たる事務所又は本店の所在地)
date of the ruling, the main text and summary of the reasons.
決定の年月日、主文及び理由の要旨
The request stated in the preceding paragraph may not be filed after three years have passed since the ruling prescribed in that paragraph has become final and binding.
The provisions of Article 5-2, paragraph (3) apply mutatis mutandis to the person who received the information pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1).
第四節 抗告
Section 4 Appeal
Article 32Appeal
The juvenile, legal representative, or attendant may file an appeal against a ruling imposing disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent within two weeks, only if the appeal is based on a violation of laws and regulations that affect the ruling, or if a serious inaccuracy of facts or a gross injustice in the disposition is found; provided, however, that the attendant may not file an appeal that is contrary to the intent clearly indicated by the parent or guardian who appointed the attendant.
Article 32-2Scope of Investigation by the Court in Charge of an Appeal
The court in charge of an appeal is to investigate only the matters included in the reasons for the appeal.
抗告裁判所は、抗告の趣意に含まれている事項に限り、調査をするものとする。
The court in charge of an appeal, by the court's own authority, may investigate any grounds for the appeal, even if the matters are not included in the reasons for the appeal.
抗告裁判所は、抗告の趣意に含まれていない事項であつても、抗告の理由となる事由に関しては、職権で調査をすることができる。
Article 32-3Examination of Facts by the Court in Charge of an Appeal
The court in charge of an appeal may examine the facts when it is necessary to give a ruling.
抗告裁判所は、決定をするについて必要があるときは、事実の取調べをすることができる。
The court in charge of an appeal may have a member of the panel of judges perform the examination prescribed in the preceding paragraph, or delegate it to a judge of a family court.
前項の取調べは、合議体の構成員にさせ、又は家庭裁判所の裁判官に嘱託することができる。
Article 32-4Request for Acceptance of an Appeal
If a ruling is made as prescribed in Article 22-2, paragraph (1), a public prosecutor may file a request for acceptance of an appeal which may be filed with the high court within two weeks regarding the ruling to impose or not to impose the disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent by the court of second instance, only if the appeal is based on a violation of laws and regulations that affect the ruling, or if a serious inaccuracy of facts is found concerning the fact finding on the delinquent act, for the case that the ruling prescribed in that paragraph is given.
検察官は、第二十二条の二第一項の決定がされた場合においては、保護処分に付さない決定又は保護処分の決定に対し、同項の決定があつた事件の非行事実の認定に関し、決定に影響を及ぼす法令の違反又は重大な事実の誤認があることを理由とするときに限り、高等裁判所に対し、二週間以内に、抗告審として事件を受理すべきことを申し立てることができる。
The request pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph (referred to as "request for acceptance of an appeal" below) must be filed by a written request to the court of prior instance. In this case, the court of prior instance must promptly transfer it to a high court.
前項の規定による申立て(以下「抗告受理の申立て」という。)は、申立書を原裁判所に差し出してしなければならない。この場合において、原裁判所は、速やかにこれを高等裁判所に送付しなければならない。
When a request for acceptance of an appeal is filed, the high court may accept it if it finds it appropriate to accept the case as the court of second instance. In this case, the high court must give a ruling to that effect.
高等裁判所は、抗告受理の申立てがされた場合において、抗告審として事件を受理するのを相当と認めるときは、これを受理することができる。この場合においては、その旨の決定をしなければならない。
When making the ruling prescribed in the preceding paragraph, the high court may eliminate any of the reasons from the reasons stated in the request for acceptance of an appeal, if the court finds it unimportant.
The high court must give the ruling prescribed in paragraph (3) within two weeks from the date on which the court received the written request prescribed in paragraph (2) from the court of prior instance.
When the ruling prescribed in paragraph (3) is made, it is deemed that an appeal has been filed. In this case, to apply the provisions of Article 32-2, the reasons for the request for acceptance of an appeal, excluding those eliminated pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4), are deemed as the reasons for the appeal.
Article 32-5Court-Appointed Attendants for Second Instance
When the ruling prescribed in paragraph (3) of the preceding Article is given, the court in charge of the appeal must appoint an attendant who is an attorney-at-law, if the juvenile does not have an attendant who is an attorney-at-law.
For the case prescribed in Article 22-3, paragraph (2) (limited to the case for which the family court conducted the measures prescribed in Article 17, paragraph (1), item (ii)), the court in charge of the appeal may appoint an attendant who is an attorney-at-law, if the juvenile does not have an attendant who is an attorney-at-law, and if the court finds that an attendant who is an attorney-at-law, needs to attend the proceedings of second instance, taking into consideration the nature of the case, presence or absence of the parent or guardian and other circumstances.
抗告裁判所は、第二十二条の三第二項に規定する事件(家庭裁判所において第十七条第一項第二号の措置がとられたものに限る。)について、少年に弁護士である付添人がなく、かつ、事案の内容、保護者の有無その他の事情を考慮し、抗告審の審理に弁護士である付添人が関与する必要があると認めるときは、弁護士である付添人を付することができる。
Article 32-6Mutatis Mutandis Application
Beyond what is provided for in Articles 32-2, 32-3 and the preceding Article, the rules of the family court concerning trial and decision apply mutatis mutandis to proceedings of second instance unless contrary to its nature.
Article 33Judicial Decision of Second Instance
If the procedure for an appeal violates the provisions, or if there are no grounds for an appeal, it must be dismissed by a ruling.
抗告の手続がその規定に違反したとき、又は抗告が理由のないときは、決定をもつて、抗告を棄却しなければならない。
If there are grounds for an appeal, the court must issue a ruling, revoke the ruling given in the prior instance, and remand the case to the court of prior instance, or transfer the case to another family court.
抗告が理由のあるときは、決定をもつて、原決定を取り消して、事件を原裁判所に差し戻し、又は他の家庭裁判所に移送しなければならない。
Article 34Suspension of Execution
No appeal is to have the effect of suspending execution; provided, however, that the court of prior or second instance may suspend the execution by a ruling.
抗告は、執行を停止する効力を有しない。但し、原裁判所又は抗告裁判所は、決定をもつて、執行を停止することができる。
Article 35Re-appeal From an Appeal From a Ruling
The juvenile, or the statutory agent or attendant of the juvenile, may particularly appeal against the ruling prescribed in Article 33 given by the court in charge of the appeal to the Supreme Court within two weeks, only on the grounds that the ruling violates the Constitution or the Constitution is misconstrued, or is contrary to the precedents of the Supreme Court or the high court as the court of second instance; provided, however, that the attendant may not file an appeal that goes against the explicit intentions of the parent or guardian who appointed the attendant.
The provisions of Article 32-2, Article 32-3, Article 32-5, paragraph (2) and Article 32-6 through to the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to the case prescribed in the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "revoke the ruling given in the prior instance, and remand the case to the court of prior instance, or transfer the case to another family court" in Article 33, paragraph (2) is deemed to be replaced with "revoke the ruling. In this case, the ruling given by the family court may be revoked, and remand the case to the family court, or transfer the case to another family court".
第三十二条の二、第三十二条の三、第三十二条の五第二項及び第三十二条の六から前条までの規定は、前項の場合に、これを準用する。この場合において、第三十三条第二項中「取り消して、事件を原裁判所に差し戻し、又は他の家庭裁判所に移送しなければならない」とあるのは、「取り消さなければならない。この場合には、家庭裁判所の決定を取り消して、事件を家庭裁判所に差し戻し、又は他の家庭裁判所に移送することができる」と読み替えるものとする。
Article 36Other Provisions
Beyond what is provided for in this Act, matters necessary for protection cases are prescribed by the Supreme Court.
この法律で定めるものの外、保護事件に関して必要な事項は、最高裁判所がこれを定める。
この部分の英訳はまだありません。
削除
定義第五条の二第一項
被害者又はその法定代理人若しくは被害者が死亡した場合若しくはその心身に重大な故障がある場合におけるその配偶者、直系の親族若しくは兄弟姉妹
略称規定第三十二条の四第二項
前項の規定による申立て(以下「抗告受理の申立て」という。)は、申立書を原裁判所に差し出してしなければならない。この場合において、原裁判所は、速やかにこれを高等裁判所に送付しなければならない。
わかりやすく言うと
検察官を審判に出席させる決定があった事件で、保護処分に付さない決定や保護処分の決定に対し、非行事実の認定に関する決定に影響する法令違反か重大な事実誤認を理由に、検察官が二週間以内に高等裁判所へ抗告審として事件を受理するよう求める申立てです(第三十二条の四)。
検察官
犯罪について、裁判所に訴えを起こす(公訴を行う)役目を負う者です(刑事訴訟法第二百四十七条)。犯人の性格、年齢や境遇、犯罪の重さや事情、犯罪の後の状況から、訴える必要がないと考えるときは、訴えを起こさないことができます(刑事訴訟法第二百四十八条)。刑事の事件では、裁判所に法を正しく当てはめるよう求め、裁判の執行を監督します。また、社会全体の利益を代表して、ほかの法令が検察官に任せた仕事も行い、それは刑事の事件に限りません(検察庁法第四条)。どのような犯罪についても捜査をすることができます(検察庁法第六条第一項)。検察官の仕事は検察庁がまとめており、検察庁には最高検察庁、高等検察庁、地方検察庁、区検察庁があります(検察庁法第一条)。
刑事訴訟法第247条・第248条、検察庁法第1条・第4条・第6条を参考にAIが作成。
最高裁判所
司法権の属する最高の裁判所で、一切の法律・命令・規則・処分が憲法に適合するかしないかを決定する終審裁判所です(第七十六条第一項・第八十一条)。憲法に違反する法令等は効力を有しないとされ(第九十八条第一項)、これを判断する権限が憲法を実効あらしめています。裁判官は任命後初の衆議院議員総選挙の際、その後十年を経過した後初めての総選挙の際に国民の審査に付されます(第七十九条第二項)。
日本国憲法第76条・第79条・第81条・第98条、Wikipedia「最高裁判所」を参考にAIが作成。