Supplementary Provisions, Article 9-3
第九条の三
If a beneficiary of an employees' old-age pension under the provisions of Article 8 of the Supplementary Provisions was not an insured at the time the person acquired that right and the person's insured period is 44 years or more (excluding the case where the provisions of paragraph (1) of the following Article apply), the amount of that employees' old-age pension is, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 43, paragraph (1), calculated following the example of the provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding Article.
The provisions of Article 44 and Article 44-2 as it was prior to the amendment by Article 1 of the 2013 Amendment Act, which remains in force pursuant to the provisions of Article 86, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the 2013 Amendment Act, apply mutatis mutandis to the case where the provisions of the preceding paragraph are applied to the amount of an employees' old-age pension under the provisions of Article 8 of the Supplementary Provisions. In this case, in Article 44, paragraph (1), the phrase "at the time that the beneficiary acquired the right to receive benefits (or at the time that the insured period had reached 240 months pursuant to the provisions of Article 43, paragraph (2) or (3), if the insured period constituting the basis for the calculation of the amount of the employees' old-age pension was less than 240 months at the time that the beneficiary acquired the right to receive those benefits; the same applies in paragraph (3))" is deemed to be replaced with "at the time that the beneficiary acquired the right to receive benefits", the phrase "Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 43" with "Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 9-2, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions, the example of which is followed pursuant to Article 9 and Article 9-3, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions", and the phrase "the amount provided for in that Article" with "the amount provided for in those provisions"; and in Article 44-2, paragraph (1) as it was prior to the amendment by Article 1 of the 2013 Amendment Act, which remains in force pursuant to the provisions of Article 86, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the 2013 Amendment Act, the phrase "the amount prescribed in Article 43, paragraph (1)" is deemed to be replaced with "the amount prescribed in Article 9-2, paragraph (2), item (ii) of the Supplementary Provisions", the phrase "from the amount provided for in that paragraph" with "from the amount provided for in that item (hereinafter in this Article referred to as the "amount of the remuneration-based portion")", the phrase "Article 132, paragraph (2)" with "Article 82, paragraph (1) or Article 83-2, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act Partially Amending the National Pension Act, etc. (Act No. 34 of 1985; hereinafter referred to as the "1985 Amendment Act"), Article 132, paragraph (2) as it was prior to the amendment by Article 3 of the 1985 Amendment Act, which remains in force pursuant to the provisions of Article 83, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the 1985 Amendment Act, Article 132, paragraph (2) as it was prior to the amendment by Article 4 of the Act Partially Amending the National Pension Act, etc. (Act No. 18 of 2000; hereinafter referred to as the "2000 Amendment Act"), which remains in force pursuant to the provisions of Article 9, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the 2000 Amendment Act, or Article 82, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the 1985 Amendment Act as it was prior to the amendment by Article 13 of the 2000 Amendment Act, Article 23, paragraph (1) or Article 24, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the 2000 Amendment Act, or Article 132, paragraph (2) as it was prior to the amendment by Article 1 of the Act Partially Amending the Employees' Pension Insurance Act, etc. for Ensuring the Soundness and Reliability of the Public Pension System (Act No. 63 of 2013), which remains in force pursuant to the provisions of Article 5, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of that Act", the phrase "the amount provided for in Article 43, paragraph (1)" with "the amount of the remuneration-based portion", and the phrase "the amount provided for in that paragraph)" with "the amount of the remuneration-based portion)".
第四十四条及び平成二十五年改正法附則第八十六条第一項の規定によりなおその効力を有するものとされた平成二十五年改正法第一条の規定による改正前の第四十四条の二の規定は、附則第八条の規定による老齢厚生年金の額について前項の規定を適用する場合に準用する。この場合において、第四十四条第一項中「当時（その権利を取得した当時、当該老齢厚生年金の額の計算の基礎となる被保険者期間の月数が二百四十未満であつたときは、第四十三条第二項又は第三項の規定により当該月数が二百四十以上となるに至つた当時。第三項において同じ。）」とあるのは「当時」と、「第四十三条の規定」とあるのは「附則第九条及び第九条の三第一項においてその例によるものとされた附則第九条の二第二項の規定」と、「同条」とあるのは「これらの規定」と、平成二十五年改正法附則第八十六条第一項の規定によりなおその効力を有するものとされた平成二十五年改正法第一条の規定による改正前の第四十四条の二第一項中「第四十三条第一項に規定する額」とあるのは「附則第九条の二第二項第二号に規定する額」と、「同項に定める額から」とあるのは「同号に定める額（以下この条において「報酬比例部分の額」という。）から」と、「第百三十二条第二項」とあるのは「国民年金法等の一部を改正する法律（昭和六十年法律第三十四号。以下「昭和六十年改正法」という。）附則第八十二条第一項若しくは第八十三条の二第一項、昭和六十年改正法附則第八十三条第一項の規定によりなおその効力を有するものとされた昭和六十年改正法第三条の規定による改正前の第百三十二条第二項、国民年金法等の一部を改正する法律（平成十二年法律第十八号。以下「平成十二年改正法」という。）附則第九条第一項の規定によりなおその効力を有するものとされた平成十二年改正法第四条の規定による改正前の第百三十二条第二項若しくは平成十二年改正法第十三条の規定による改正前の昭和六十年改正法附則第八十二条第一項、平成十二年改正法附則第二十三条第一項若しくは第二十四条第一項又は公的年金制度の健全性及び信頼性の確保のための厚生年金保険法等の一部を改正する法律（平成二十五年法律第六十三号）附則第五条第一項の規定によりなおその効力を有するものとされた同法第一条の規定による改正前の第百三十二条第二項」と、「第四十三条第一項に定める額」とあるのは「報酬比例部分の額」と、「同項に定める額）」とあるのは「報酬比例部分の額）」と読み替えるものとする。
In the case where a beneficiary of an employees' old-age pension under the provisions of Article 8 of the Supplementary Provisions who is an insured (limited to one the amount of which is calculated pursuant to the provisions of Article 43, paragraph (1) and Article 9 of the Supplementary Provisions) (limited to a person whose insured period is 44 years or more) loses status as an insured and the provisions of Article 43, paragraph (3) are applied (excluding the case where the provisions of paragraph (4) of the following Article apply), the amount of the employees' old-age pension is, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 43, paragraph (1), calculated following the example of the provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding Article, and the amount of the pension is revised.
The provisions of Article 44 and Article 44-2 as it was prior to the amendment by Article 1 of the 2013 Amendment Act, which remains in force pursuant to the provisions of Article 86, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the 2013 Amendment Act, apply mutatis mutandis to the case where the amount of the employees' old-age pension is revised pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph. In this case, in Article 44, paragraph (1), the phrase "at the time that the beneficiary acquired the right to receive benefits (or at the time that the insured period had reached 240 months pursuant to the provisions of Article 43, paragraph (2) or (3), if the insured period constituting the basis for the calculation of the amount of the employees' old-age pension was less than 240 months at the time that the beneficiary acquired the right to receive those benefits; the same applies in paragraph (3))" is deemed to be replaced with "at the time when one month has passed, counting from the day on which the beneficiary lost status as an insured pertaining to the revision of the amount of the employees' old-age pension under the provisions of Article 9-3, paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions (or, where the beneficiary came to fall under any of Article 14, items (ii) through (iv), counting from that day)", the phrase "Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 43" with "Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 9-2, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions, the example of which is followed pursuant to Article 9 and Article 9-3, paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions", and the phrase "the amount provided for in that Article" with "the amount provided for in those provisions"; in Article 44, paragraph (3), the phrase "at the time the beneficiary acquired the right to receive benefits" is deemed to be replaced with "at the time when one month has passed, counting from the day on which the beneficiary lost status as an insured pertaining to the revision of the amount of the employees' old-age pension under the provisions of Article 9-3, paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions (or, where the beneficiary came to fall under any of Article 14, items (ii) through (iv), counting from that day)"; and in Article 44-2, paragraph (1) as it was prior to the amendment by Article 1 of the 2013 Amendment Act, which remains in force pursuant to the provisions of Article 86, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the 2013 Amendment Act, the phrase "the amount prescribed in Article 43, paragraph (1)" is deemed to be replaced with "the amount prescribed in Article 9-2, paragraph (2), item (ii) of the Supplementary Provisions", the phrase "from the amount provided for in that paragraph" with "from the amount provided for in that item (hereinafter in this Article referred to as the "amount of the remuneration-based portion")", the phrase "Article 132, paragraph (2)" with "Article 82, paragraph (1) or Article 83-2, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act Partially Amending the National Pension Act, etc. (Act No. 34 of 1985; hereinafter referred to as the "1985 Amendment Act"), Article 132, paragraph (2) as it was prior to the amendment by Article 3 of the 1985 Amendment Act, which remains in force pursuant to the provisions of Article 83, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the 1985 Amendment Act, Article 132, paragraph (2) as it was prior to the amendment by Article 4 of the Act Partially Amending the National Pension Act, etc. (Act No. 18 of 2000; hereinafter referred to as the "2000 Amendment Act"), which remains in force pursuant to the provisions of Article 9, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the 2000 Amendment Act, or Article 82, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the 1985 Amendment Act as it was prior to the amendment by Article 13 of the 2000 Amendment Act, Article 23, paragraph (1) or Article 24, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the 2000 Amendment Act, or Article 132, paragraph (2) as it was prior to the amendment by Article 1 of the Act Partially Amending the Employees' Pension Insurance Act, etc. for Ensuring the Soundness and Reliability of the Public Pension System (Act No. 63 of 2013), which remains in force pursuant to the provisions of Article 5, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of that Act", the phrase "the amount provided for in Article 43, paragraph (1)" with "the amount of the remuneration-based portion", and the phrase "the amount provided for in that paragraph)" with "the amount of the remuneration-based portion)".
第四十四条及び平成二十五年改正法附則第八十六条第一項の規定によりなおその効力を有するものとされた平成二十五年改正法第一条の規定による改正前の第四十四条の二の規定は、前項の規定により老齢厚生年金の額を改定する場合に準用する。この場合において、第四十四条第一項中「その権利を取得した当時（その権利を取得した当時、当該老齢厚生年金の額の計算の基礎となる被保険者期間の月数が二百四十未満であつたときは、第四十三条第二項又は第三項の規定により当該月数が二百四十以上となるに至つた当時。第三項において同じ。）」とあるのは「附則第九条の三第三項の規定による老齢厚生年金の額の改定に係る被保険者の資格を喪失した日（第十四条第二号から第四号までのいずれかに該当するに至つた日にあつては、その日）から起算して一月を経過した当時」と、「第四十三条の規定」とあるのは「附則第九条及び第九条の三第三項においてその例によるものとされた附則第九条の二第二項の規定」と、「同条」とあるのは「これらの規定」と、同条第三項中「その権利を取得した当時」とあるのは「附則第九条の三第三項の規定による老齢厚生年金の額の改定に係る被保険者の資格を喪失した日（第十四条第二号から第四号までのいずれかに該当するに至つた日にあつては、その日）から起算して一月を経過した当時」と、平成二十五年改正法附則第八十六条第一項の規定によりなおその効力を有するものとされた平成二十五年改正法第一条の規定による改正前の第四十四条の二第一項中「第四十三条第一項に規定する額」とあるのは「附則第九条の二第二項第二号に規定する額」と、「同項に定める額から」とあるのは「同号に定める額（以下この条において「報酬比例部分の額」という。）から」と、「第百三十二条第二項」とあるのは「国民年金法等の一部を改正する法律（昭和六十年法律第三十四号。以下「昭和六十年改正法」という。）附則第八十二条第一項若しくは第八十三条の二第一項、昭和六十年改正法附則第八十三条第一項の規定によりなおその効力を有するものとされた昭和六十年改正法第三条の規定による改正前の第百三十二条第二項、国民年金法等の一部を改正する法律（平成十二年法律第十八号。以下「平成十二年改正法」という。）附則第九条第一項の規定によりなおその効力を有するものとされた平成十二年改正法第四条の規定による改正前の第百三十二条第二項若しくは平成十二年改正法第十三条の規定による改正前の昭和六十年改正法附則第八十二条第一項、平成十二年改正法附則第二十三条第一項若しくは第二十四条第一項又は公的年金制度の健全性及び信頼性の確保のための厚生年金保険法等の一部を改正する法律（平成二十五年法律第六十三号）附則第五条第一項の規定によりなおその効力を有するものとされた同法第一条の規定による改正前の第百三十二条第二項」と、「第四十三条第一項に定める額」とあるのは「報酬比例部分の額」と、「同項に定める額）」とあるのは「報酬比例部分の額）」と読み替えるものとする。
In the case prescribed in the main clause of paragraph (4) of the preceding Article, when, after the beneficiary in question (limited to a person whose insured period is 44 years or more and whose employees' old-age pension does not fall under any of the items of that paragraph) has ceased to be in a state of having a disability, the provisions of Article 43, paragraph (3) are applied due to loss of status as an insured on or before the month in which the beneficiary ceased to be in a state of having a disability (excluding the case where the provisions of paragraph (6) of the following Article apply), the amount of the pension is to be revised following the example of the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs.