If a financial instruments exchange falls under a case specified in any of the following items and the Prime Minister finds it to be necessary and appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors, the Prime Minister may issue a disposition provided for in each of those items:
内閣総理大臣は、金融商品取引所が次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合において、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当であると認めるときは、当該各号に定める処分をすることができる。
if it violates a law or regulation, a disposition by a government agency which is based on a law or regulation, a condition attached to the authorization referred to in the proviso to Article 87-2, paragraph (1) or in the proviso to Article 87-3, paragraph (1), or the articles of incorporation or any other rules; or, even though a member, etc. or an issuer of securities listed by a financial instruments exchange has violated a law or regulation, a disposition by a government agency which is based on a law or regulation, or the financial instruments exchange's articles of incorporation, operational rules, brokerage contract rules, or any other rules (hereinafter referred to as "laws and regulations, etc." in this item), or has engaged in an act that is contrary to the principle of good faith in transactions as specified in the articles of incorporation or any other rules, the financial instruments exchange fails to exercise the powers accorded it under this Act, an order based on this Act, or its articles of incorporation or any other rules, or to take any other necessary measures to cause the person to observe the laws and regulations, etc. or the principle of good faith in transactions:rescinding the license referred to in Article 80, paragraph (1), ordering the suspension of all or part of the business during a fixed period of no longer than one year, ordering a change in its business activities, issuing an order prohibiting performance of part of its business, ordering the dismissal of its officers, or ordering the financial instruments exchange to take the necessary measures specified in the articles of incorporation or any other rules;
法令、法令に基づく行政官庁の処分、第八十七条の二第一項ただし書若しくは第八十七条の三第一項ただし書の認可に付した条件若しくは定款その他の規則に違反したとき、又は会員等若しくは当該金融商品取引所に上場されている有価証券の発行者が法令、法令に基づく行政官庁の処分若しくは当該金融商品取引所の定款、業務規程、受託契約準則その他の規則（以下この号において「法令等」という。）に違反し、若しくは定款その他の規則に定める取引の信義則に背反する行為をしたにもかかわらず、これらの者に対し法令等若しくは当該取引の信義則を遵守させるために、この法律、この法律に基づく命令若しくは定款その他の規則により認められた権能を行使せずその他必要な措置をとることを怠つたとき 第八十条第一項の免許を取り消し、一年以内の期間を定めてその業務の全部若しくは一部の停止を命じ、その業務の変更若しくはその業務の一部の禁止を命じ、その役員の解任を命じ、又は定款その他の規則に定める必要な措置をとることを命ずること。
if the conduct of the financial instruments exchange, or the status of purchase and sales of securities or market derivatives transactions on a financial instruments exchange market operated by the financial instruments exchange, is found to be harmful to the public interest or to the protection of investors:ordering the suspension of all or a part of purchase and sales of securities or market derivatives transactions on the financial instruments exchange market during a fixed period of no longer than 10 days, or, subject to a cabinet decision, ordering the suspension of all or a part of its business during a fixed period of no longer than three months;
金融商品取引所の行為又はその開設する取引所金融商品市場における有価証券の売買若しくは市場デリバティブ取引の状況が公益又は投資者保護のため有害であると認めるとき 十日以内の期間を定めて取引所金融商品市場における有価証券の売買若しくは市場デリバティブ取引の全部若しくは一部の停止を命じ、又は閣議の決定を経て、三月以内の期間を定めてその業務の全部若しくは一部の停止を命ずること。
if the business it conducts after obtaining authorization pursuant to the proviso to Article 87-2, paragraph (1) is found likely to impair confidence in the public nature of the business of a financial instruments exchange or likely to impair the sound and appropriate operation in the business of operating, etc. a financial instruments market (meaning the operation of a financial instruments exchange market and business incidental thereto; the same applies in the following item), or the financial instruments exchange violates the conditions attached to the authorization referred to in the proviso to that paragraph:rescinding the authorization referred to in the proviso to that paragraph; or
if the act of its subsidiary company that has obtained the authorization pursuant to the proviso to Article 87-3, paragraph (1) is found likely to impair confidence in the public nature of the business of the financial instruments exchange or likely to impair the sound and appropriate operation in the financial instruments exchange's business of operating, etc. a financial instruments market, or the subsidiary company violates the conditions attached to the authorization referred to in the proviso to that paragraph:rescinding the authorization referred to in the proviso to that paragraph.
第八十七条の三第一項ただし書の規定により認可を受けて保有する子会社の行為が当該金融商品取引所の業務の公共性に対する信頼を損なうおそれ若しくは当該金融商品取引所の金融商品市場開設等業務の健全かつ適切な運営を損なうおそれがあると認めるとき、又は同項ただし書の認可に付した条件に違反したとき 同項ただし書の認可を取り消すこと。
Irrespective of the category of proceeding for hearing statements of opinion under Article 13, paragraph (1) of the Administrative Procedure Act, before seeking to order the suspension of all or part of the business, to order a change in the business, to issue an order prohibiting performance of part of the business, or to issue an order to take any necessary measures that are specified in the articles of incorporation or any other rules pursuant to item (i) of the preceding paragraph, the Prime Minister must conduct a hearing.
内閣総理大臣は、前項第一号の規定により業務の全部若しくは一部の停止、業務の変更若しくは業務の一部の禁止を命じ、又は定款その他の規則に定める必要な措置をとることを命じようとするときは、行政手続法第十三条第一項の規定による意見陳述のための手続の区分にかかわらず、聴聞を行わなければならない。
No request for review may be filed against a disposition under the provisions of paragraph (1), item (ii) of this Article.
第一項第二号の規定による処分については、審査請求をすることができない。
(Supervisory Dispositions for Financial Instruments Exchanges)
If a financial instruments exchange falls under a case specified in any of the following items and the Prime Minister finds it to be necessary and appropriate in the public interest or for the…
内閣総理大臣は、金融商品取引所が次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合において、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当であると認めるときは、当該各号に定める処分をすることができる。
Open this provision(Supervisory Dispositions for Financial Instruments Exchanges)
if it violates a law or regulation, a disposition by a government agency which is based on a law or regulation, a condition attached to the authorization referred to in the proviso to Article 87-2…
法令、法令に基づく行政官庁の処分、第八十七条の二第一項ただし書若しくは第八十七条の三第一項ただし書の認可に付した条件若しくは定款その他の規則に違反したとき、又は会員等若しくは当該金融商品取引所に上場されている有価証券の発行者が法令、法令に基づく行政官庁の処分若しくは当該金融商品取引所の定款、業務規程…
Open this provision(Supervisory Dispositions for Financial Instruments Exchanges)
if the conduct of the financial instruments exchange, or the status of purchase and sales of securities or market derivatives transactions on a financial instruments exchange market operated by the…
金融商品取引所の行為又はその開設する取引所金融商品市場における有価証券の売買若しくは市場デリバティブ取引の状況が公益又は投資者保護のため有害であると認めるとき 十日以内の期間を定めて取引所金融商品市場における有価証券の売買若しくは市場デリバティブ取引の全部若しくは一部の停止を命じ、又は閣議の決定を経て…
Open this provision(Supervisory Dispositions for Financial Instruments Exchanges)
if the act of its subsidiary company that has obtained the authorization pursuant to the proviso to Article 87-3, paragraph (1) is found likely to impair confidence in the public nature of the…
第八十七条の三第一項ただし書の規定により認可を受けて保有する子会社の行為が当該金融商品取引所の業務の公共性に対する信頼を損なうおそれ若しくは当該金融商品取引所の金融商品市場開設等業務の健全かつ適切な運営を損なうおそれがあると認めるとき、又は同項ただし書の認可に付した条件に違反したとき 同項ただし書の認可を取り消すこと。
Open this provision(Licensing)
With the exception of an authorized financial instruments firms Association, a person must not operate a financial instruments market unless it is licensed by the Prime Minister.
金融商品市場は、認可金融商品取引業協会を除き、内閣総理大臣の免許を受けた者でなければ、開設してはならない。
Open this provision(Scope of Business)
A financial instruments exchange may not engage in business other than the operation of financial instruments exchange markets and business incidental thereto; provided, however…
金融商品取引所は、取引所金融商品市場の開設及びこれに附帯する業務のほか、他の業務を行うことができない。ただし、内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の認可を受けた場合には、金融商品の取引（取引所金融商品市場における取引を除く。）の当事者を識別するための番号を指定する業務…
Open this provision(Scope of Subsidiary Companies)
A financial instruments exchange must not have a company other than one that operates a financial instruments exchange market or engages in business incidental to this as its subsidiary company…
金融商品取引所は、取引所金融商品市場の開設及びこれに附帯する業務を行う会社以外の会社を子会社としてはならない。ただし、内閣総理大臣の認可を受けた場合には、取引所金融商品市場の開設に関連する業務…
Open this provision(Procedures When Intending to Render Adverse Dispositions)
If an administrative agency intends to render adverse dispositions, as specified in this Chapter in accordance with the category referred to in the following items…
行政庁は、不利益処分をしようとする場合には、次の各号の区分に従い、この章の定めるところにより、当該不利益処分の名あて人となるべき者について、当該各号に定める意見陳述のための手続を執らなければならない。
Open this provisionsecurities
「有価証券」
Securities as this Act defines them: the instruments listed in Article 2, paragraph (1), among them national government and local government bonds, corporate bonds, share certificates and share option certificates, preferred equity investment certificates, beneficiary certificates of investment trusts and other trusts, investment securities, certain promissory notes, mortgage securities, option certificates and depositary receipts, foreign instruments of the same nature, and other instruments a Cabinet Order (政令) specifies.
Defined inArticle 2, paragraph (1)· applies throughout the law
issuer
「発行者」
A person who issues or intends to issue securities, or for securities a Cabinet Office Order (内閣府令) specifies, the person it specifies; for rights treated as securities under Article 2, paragraph (2), the person a Cabinet Office Order specifies for each kind of right is treated as issuing them, at the time it specifies.
Defined inArticle 2, paragraph (5)
financial instruments exchange
「金融商品取引所」
A membership corporation (金融商品会員制法人) or stock company (株式会社) licensed by the Prime Minister under Article 80, paragraph (1) to open a financial instruments market (金融商品市場).
Defined inArticle 2, paragraph (16)· applies throughout the law
financial instruments exchange market
「取引所金融商品市場」
A financial instruments market (金融商品市場) opened by a financial instruments exchange (金融商品取引所).
Defined inArticle 2, paragraph (17)· applies throughout the law
market derivatives transactions
「市場デリバティブ取引」
A transaction listed in Article 2, paragraph (21) — such as futures, index and option transactions on financial instruments or financial indicators — carried out on a financial instruments market under the standards and methods set by the person that operates that market.
Defined inArticle 2, paragraph (21)· applies throughout the law
officer
「役員」
A director, accounting advisor, company auditor or executive officer, or a person equivalent to one, in this Act other than Articles 163 to 167.
Defined inArticle 21, paragraph (1), item (i)· applies from here on, except in Articles 163 to 167
member, etc.
「会員等」
The members (会員) or trading participants (取引参加者) of a financial instruments exchange (金融商品取引所).
Short name set inArticle 81, paragraph (1), item (iii)
subsidiary company
「子会社」
A subsidiary company (子会社) as defined in Article 87-3, paragraph (3): a company in which a corporation holds a majority of the voting rights of all its shareholders, etc., including one in which the corporation and its subsidiary companies, or those subsidiary companies alone, hold such a majority.
Defined inArticle 102-23, paragraph (3)· applies only in this chapter
laws and regulations, etc.
「法令等」
In Article 152, paragraph (1), item (i), laws and regulations, dispositions of administrative agencies under them, and a financial instruments exchange's articles of incorporation, business rules (業務規程), brokerage contract rules (受託契約準則) and other rules.
Short name set inArticle 152, paragraph (1), item (i)· applies only in this item
business of operating, etc. a financial instruments marketmachine translation
「金融商品市場開設等業務」
In Article 152, paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv), operating a financial instruments exchange market (取引所金融商品市場) and the business incidental to it.
Defined inArticle 152, paragraph (1), item (iii)· applies only in this provision and in Article 152, paragraph (1), item (iv)
articles of incorporation
定款
A company's own basic rules, written by its founders when it is formed: at least its purpose, its trade name, where its head office is, the value of the property contributed at incorporation and who the founders are (Companies Act, Article 27). A stock company's must be certified by a notary before it takes effect (Article 30, paragraph (1)), and can later be changed by a resolution of the shareholders meeting (Article 466). Many rules in the Act apply "unless the articles of incorporation provide otherwise", so a company's articles decide a great deal of how the Act applies to it.
Written by AI using Companies Act, Arts. 26, 27, 30, 466, 575 as a reference.
Prime Minister
内閣総理大臣
The head of the Cabinet. Designated by the Diet from among its own members, and appointed by the Emperor on that designation (Articles 67 and 6). The Prime Minister appoints and may dismiss the other Ministers of State at will, and a majority of them must be members of the Diet (Article 68). No Minister of State can be subjected to legal action while in office without the Prime Minister's consent (Article 75).
Written by AI using Constitution, Arts. 6, 67, 68, 75 and Wikipedia: Prime Minister of Japan as a reference.
request for review
審査請求
A request to an administrative agency (行政庁) to review a disposition (処分) the person objects to, or, where the person applied for a disposition under a law or regulation and a reasonable time has passed with none made, the agency's failure to act (不作為) (Administrative Complaint Review Act, Articles 2 and 3). Unless an Act, or for a disposition based on a local ordinance (条例) that ordinance, provides otherwise, it is made to the agency that made the disposition or failed to act where that agency has no superior agency or is itself the competent minister (主任の大臣) or the head of certain agencies; where such a minister or head is the agency above it, to that minister or head; and otherwise to its highest superior agency (Article 4). Another Act can set rules of its own for it, naming another body to make it to or another route (Article 1, paragraph (2); Article 4): the Employees' Pension Insurance Act, for instance, has a request about a disposition (処分) of the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare (厚生労働大臣) on a person's status as insured, standard remuneration or insurance benefits, other than a decision on a request to correct the pension insurance register, made to a social insurance examiner (社会保険審査官), and disapplies most of the Administrative Complaint Review Act's rules for it (Employees' Pension Insurance Act, Articles 90, paragraph (1), and 91-2). Under the Administrative Complaint Review Act, a request about a disposition must be made within three months of the day after the person learned of it — or one month after learning of the decision, where a request for re-investigation (再調査の請求) was made first — and within a year of the disposition or that decision, unless there is a justifiable reason (Administrative Complaint Review Act, Article 18, paragraphs (1) and (2)). Making one does not by itself stop the disposition taking effect or being carried out, or the proceedings going on (Article 25, paragraph (1)), but the agency reviewing it can suspend them in whole or in part on the application of the person who made the request — and, where it made the disposition or is the agency above the one that did, of its own motion — and, once the person who made the request has applied, must where that is urgently needed to avoid serious harm, unless that would seriously affect the public welfare or the request appears to have no grounds (Article 25, paragraphs (2) to (4)). The agency reviewing it (審査庁) decides it by a determination (裁決): it dismisses a request that is unlawful, for instance one made too late, rejects one that is groundless, and, where one is well founded, revokes the disposition in whole or in part or changes it — though never to the disadvantage of the person who made the request, and an agency that neither made the disposition nor is above the agency that did cannot change it (Articles 45, paragraphs (1) and (2), 46, paragraph (1), and 48). Where the request is about a de facto act (事実上の行為), the determination instead declares the act unlawful or unjust and orders it abolished in whole or in part or changed, or abolishes or changes it (Article 47). A well-founded request about a failure to act ends instead in a determination declaring the failure unlawful or unjust, and, where the agency finds a disposition should be made, an order to make it or the disposition itself (Article 49, paragraph (3)). Where revoking an unlawful or unjust disposition, or abolishing an unlawful or unjust de facto act, would seriously harm the public interest, the agency can reject the request while declaring in the determination that it is unlawful or unjust (Article 45, paragraph (3)). The determination takes effect when it is served on the person who made the request — or, where someone other than the disposition's addressee made it and the determination revokes or changes the disposition or deals with a de facto act, once it is served on the addressee too — and binds the agencies concerned (Articles 51, paragraph (1), and 52, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Administrative Complaint Review Act, Arts. 1 to 4, 18, 25, 45 to 49, 51, 52 and Employees' Pension Insurance Act, Arts. 90, 91-2 as a reference.