Article 35Access to Parts of Case Records Concerning Examination of Facts
A person may file a request under Article 91, paragraph (1), (3) or (4) of the Code of Civil Procedure for inspection or copying, delivery of an authenticated copy, transcript or extract of it, or reproduction of it (referred to below as "inspection, etc." in this Article) with respect to a part of the case record that concerns an examination of the facts (referred to below as the "part of the record concerning an examination of the facts" in this Article) only if the court gives its permission pursuant to the provisions of the following paragraph or paragraph (3).
訴訟記録中事実の調査に係る部分(以下この条において「事実調査部分」という。)についての民事訴訟法第九十一条第一項、第三項又は第四項の規定による閲覧若しくは謄写、その正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又はその複製(以下この条において「閲覧等」という。)の請求は、裁判所が次項又は第三項の規定により許可したときに限り、することができる。
If a party files a petition for permission for inspection, etc. of the part of the record concerning an examination of the facts, the court must permit that inspection, etc. provided, however, that as it relates to a part of the record concerning an examination of the facts for which it is found that the following risks could arise from conducting the inspection, etc., the court may permit that inspection, etc. only if the court finds this to be appropriate:
a risk of harming the interests of a child the parties have who has not yet reached adulthood, if applicable;
当事者間に成年に達しない子がある場合におけるその子の利益を害するおそれ
a risk of disrupting the private life or business of a party or a third party; or
当事者又は第三者の私生活又は業務の平穏を害するおそれ
the risk that revealing a deep personal secret from the private life of a party or a third party could substantially interfere with their life in the community or cause substantial harm to their reputation.
当事者又は第三者の私生活についての重大な秘密が明らかにされることにより、その者が社会生活を営むのに著しい支障を生じ、又はその者の名誉を著しく害するおそれ
If a third party makes a prima facie showing of interest and files a petition for permission for inspection, etc. of the part of the record concerning an examination of the facts, the court may permit that inspection, etc. if it finds this to be appropriate.
An immediate appeal may be filed against a judicial decision denying the petition referred to in paragraph (2).
第二項の申立てを却下した裁判に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
If it is found that the immediate appeal under the provisions of the preceding paragraph has been filed for the purpose of unjustly delaying personal status litigation procedures, the court of first instance must dismiss it.
An immediate appeal may be filed against an order under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
前項の規定による決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
No appeal may be entered against a judicial decision to dismiss the petition referred to in paragraph (3).
第三項の申立てを却下した裁判に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。
The provisions of Article 133-2 and Article 133-3 of the Code of Civil Procedure do not apply to the part of the case record that concerns an examination of the facts.
事実調査部分については、民事訴訟法第百三十三条の二及び第百三十三条の三の規定は、適用しない。
第三十六条(判決によらない婚姻の終了の場合の附帯処分についての裁判)
Article 36Judicial Decisions on Ancillary Disposition in Cases of Termination of Marriage Other Than by Judgment
In litigation involving an action to rescind a marriage or an action for divorce, if the marriage that is the subject of that action has been terminated other than by a judgment, but a petition on an ancillary disposition has already been filed and any matter in question was not determined when the marriage was terminated, the court in charge of the case must conduct the trial and make a judicial decision on the ancillary disposition.
婚姻の取消し又は離婚の訴えに係る訴訟において判決によらないで当該訴えに係る婚姻が終了した場合において、既に附帯処分の申立てがされているときであって、その附帯処分に係る事項がその婚姻の終了に際し定められていないときは、受訴裁判所は、その附帯処分についての審理及び裁判をしなければならない。
第三節 和解並びに請求の放棄及び認諾
Section 3 Settlements; Waiver and Acknowledgement of Claims
Article 37
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 19, paragraph (2), the provisions of Article 266 of the Code of Civil Procedure (excluding the part related to the acknowledgement of a claim in paragraph (2)) and of Article 267, paragraph (1) and Article 267-2 of that Code apply to a settlement (limited to a settlement by which divorce is effected; the same applies in this Article below) and the waiver or acknowledgement of a claim in litigation connected with an action for divorce provided, however, that, with regard to the acknowledgement of claims, this is limited to cases in which it is not necessary to make a judicial decision on ancillary disposition, as referred to in Article 32, paragraph (1) or a judicial decision designating the person with parental authority, as referred to in paragraph (3) of that Article.
離婚の訴えに係る訴訟における和解(これにより離婚がされるものに限る。以下この条において同じ。)並びに請求の放棄及び認諾については、第十九条第二項の規定にかかわらず、民事訴訟法第二百六十六条(第二項中請求の認諾に関する部分を除く。)、第二百六十七条第一項及び第二百六十七条の二の規定を適用する。ただし、請求の認諾については、第三十二条第一項の附帯処分についての裁判又は同条第三項の親権者の指定についての裁判をすることを要しない場合に限る。
With regard to the application of Article 267, paragraph (1) and Article 267-2, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure in the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the phrase "creates an electronic record of a settlement or of the waiver or acknowledgment of a claim and records it in the court's computer files" in Article 267, paragraph (1) of that Code is deemed to be replaced with "enters a settlement or the waiver or acknowledgment of a claim in a record", the phrase "that entry" is deemed to be replaced with "that statement", and the phrase "an electronic record recorded in the court's computer files pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 267-2, paragraph (1) of that Code is deemed to be replaced with "a record referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article".
前項の場合における民事訴訟法第二百六十七条第一項及び第二百六十七条の二第一項の規定の適用については、同法第二百六十七条第一項中「について電子調書を作成し、これをファイルに記録した」とあるのは「を調書に記載した」と、「その記録」とあるのは「その記載」と、同法第二百六十七条の二第一項中「規定によりファイルに記録された電子調書」とあるのは「調書」とする。
A settlement under the provisions of Article 264 and Article 265 of the Code of Civil Procedure may not be effected in litigation connected with a divorce action.
離婚の訴えに係る訴訟においては、民事訴訟法第二百六十四条及び第二百六十五条の規定による和解をすることができない。
The parties referred to in Article 89, paragraph (3) and Article 170, paragraph (4) of the Code of Civil Procedure may not effect a settlement or acknowledge a claim on the date provided in Article 89, paragraph (2) and Article 170, paragraph (3) in litigation connected with an action for divorce provided, however, that this does not apply if the proceedings on that date are conducted by a method that allows both the court and each of the parties to communicate with one another through audio and visual transmissions while gaining an awareness of one another's situation.
離婚の訴えに係る訴訟における民事訴訟法第八十九条第二項及び第百七十条第三項の期日においては、同法第八十九条第三項及び第百七十条第四項の当事者は、和解及び請求の認諾をすることができない。ただし、当該期日における手続が裁判所及び当事者双方が映像と音声の送受信により相手の状態を相互に認識しながら通話をすることができる方法によって行われた場合には、この限りでない。
第四節 履行の確保
Section 4 Securing Performance
Article 38Issuing Recommendations to Perform
If requested by the obligee in connection with an obligation established through a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 32, paragraph (1) or (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of that Article; the same applies below), the family court that made that judicial decision (or the family court constituting the court of first instance, if it was an appellate court that made that decision) may investigate the status of performance of the obligation and issue the obligor a recommendation to perform under the obligation.
The family court referred to in the preceding paragraph may commission another family court to conduct the investigation or issue the recommendation under the provisions of that paragraph.
The family court referred to in paragraph (1) or the family court that has been commissioned as referred to in the preceding paragraph may have a family court investigator conduct the investigation or make the recommendation under the provisions of paragraph (1).
The provisions of the preceding three paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis to the performance of an obligation that may be established through a judicial decision under Article 32, paragraph (1) or (2) but that has been established through a settlement in litigation connected with an action to rescind a marriage or with an action for divorce.
Article 39Issuing Orders to Perform
At the request of the obligee, if a person has neglected to perform an obligation to pay money or provide any other economic benefit that has been established through a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 32, paragraph (2), the family court that made that decision (or the family court constituting the court of first instance, if it was an appellate court that made the decision) may issue an order to the obligor to perform under the obligation, specifying a reasonable period for performance. In that case, the court is to issue the order for all or part of the obligation that the obligor has neglected to perform by the time of the order.
第三十二条第二項の規定による裁判で定められた金銭の支払その他の財産上の給付を目的とする義務の履行を怠った者がある場合において、相当と認めるときは、当該裁判をした家庭裁判所(上訴裁判所が当該裁判をした場合にあっては、第一審裁判所である家庭裁判所)は、権利者の申立てにより、義務者に対し、相当の期限を定めてその義務の履行をすべきことを命ずることができる。この場合において、その命令は、その命令をする時までに義務者が履行を怠った義務の全部又は一部についてするものとする。
The family court referred to in the preceding paragraph must hear a statement from the obligor in order to issue an order to perform the obligation pursuant to the provisions of that paragraph.
The provisions of the preceding two paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis to an obligation to pay money or provide any other such economic benefit that may be established through a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 32, paragraph (2) but that has been established through a settlement in litigation connected with an action to rescind a marriage or with an action for divorce.
If a person ordered to perform an obligation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph) does not comply with the order and is without legitimate grounds for their non-compliance, the family court that ordered performance of the obligation issues a ruling imposing a civil fine of not more than 100,000 yen.
An immediate appeal may be filed against the ruling referred to in the preceding paragraph.
前項の決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
The provisions of Article 189 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the ruling referred to in paragraph (4).
民事訴訟法第百八十九条の規定は、第四項の決定について準用する。
Deleted
削除
定義第二条第一項・法令全体に適用
次に掲げる訴えその他の身分関係の形成又は存否の確認を目的とする訴え(以下「人事に関する訴え」という。)に係る訴訟
わかりやすく言うと
人事に関する訴えについての訴訟のことです。人事に関する訴えとは、離婚の訴え、認知の訴え、離縁の訴えなど、婚姻、親子、養子縁組などの身分関係を裁判で生じさせたり、変えたり、なくしたりすること、またはその有無を確認することを目的とする訴えをいいます。
略称規定第三十二条第一項
裁判所は、申立てにより、夫婦の一方が他の一方に対して提起した婚姻の取消し又は離婚の訴えに係る請求を認容する判決において、子の監護者の指定その他の子の監護に関する処分、財産の分与に関する処分…
わかりやすく言うと
婚姻の取消しや離婚の判決の中で、申立てにより裁判所があわせて裁判する処分のことです。子の監護に関する処分、財産の分与に関する処分、それに伴い親権を行う必要がある事項についての親権行使者の指定、厚生年金保険法による標準報酬の按分割合を定める処分をいいます(第三十二条第一項)。
略称規定第三十五条第一項・この条の中だけ
訴訟記録中事実の調査に係る部分(以下この条において「事実調査部分」という。)についての民事訴訟法第九十一条第一項、第三項又は第四項の規定による閲覧若しくは謄写、その正本…
わかりやすく言うと
訴訟記録のうち、事実の調査(離婚などの判決で附帯処分や親権者の指定について裁判をするために行う事実関係の調べ)に関わる部分のことです。その閲覧等の請求は、裁判所が許可したときに限りすることができます。
略称規定第三十五条第一項・この条の中だけ
訴訟記録中事実の調査に係る部分(以下この条において「事実調査部分」という。)についての民事訴訟法第九十一条第一項、第三項又は第四項の規定による閲覧若しくは謄写、その正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又はその複製(以下この条において「閲覧等」とい…
わかりやすく言うと
民事訴訟法第九十一条に基づく、電子化されていない訴訟記録の閲覧・謄写、正本・謄本・抄本の交付、録音テープやビデオテープなどの複製のことです。事実調査部分についてのその請求は、裁判所が許可したときに限りすることができます。