If a bond-issuing company, bond administrator, assistant bond administrator or bondholder submits a proposal with respect to any matter that is the purpose of a bondholders meeting (in the case of an assistant bond administrator, concerning the consent of the bondholders meeting provided in Article 711, paragraph (1) applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 714-7), if all persons who may vote with respect to the matter manifest their intention to agree to relevant proposal in writing or using an electronic or magnetic record, it is deemed that a resolution to approve relevant proposal has been passed at the bondholders meeting.
The bond-issuing company must keep the document or electronic or magnetic record referred to in the preceding paragraph at its head office for a period of ten years from the day when the resolution at the bondholders meeting is deemed to have been passed pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
The bond administrator, assistant bond administrator and bondholders may make the following requests at any time during the business hours of the bond-issuing company:
社債管理者、社債管理補助者及び社債権者は、社債発行会社の営業時間内は、いつでも、次に掲げる請求をすることができる。
a request to inspect a copy of the document of the preceding paragraph or to copy the document;
前項の書面の閲覧又は謄写の請求
a request to inspect or copy anything which displays matters recorded in electronic or magnetic records referred to in the preceding paragraph in accordance with methods prescribed by the applicable Order of the Ministry of Justice.
If a resolution at the bondholders meeting is deemed to have been approved pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), the provisions of Article 732 through the preceding Article (excluding Article 734, paragraph (2)) does not apply.
第一項の規定により社債権者集会の決議があったものとみなされる場合には、第七百三十二条から前条まで（第七百三十四条第二項を除く。）の規定は、適用しない。
Read this with the articles around it
electronic or magnetic record
「電磁的記録」
A record made in electronic, magnetic or any other form people cannot perceive directly, of a kind that Ministry of Justice Order (法務省令) specifies as used in computer processing.
Defined inArticle 26, paragraph (2)
bond-issuing company
「社債発行会社」
The company that issued the bonds in question.
Short name set inArticle 682, paragraph (1)· applies only in this part
voting rights holdermachine translation
「議決権者」
A bondholder who may vote at a bondholders meeting.
Defined inArticle 724, paragraph (1)· applies only in this chapter
manifestation of intention
意思表示
A person's expression of an intention to which the law gives a legal effect, such as an offer to conclude a contract, which shows its terms and forms the contract once the other party accepts it (Civil Code, Article 522, paragraph (1)), the acceptance itself (Article 527), or the notice to the other party by which a party rescinds (取消し) an act or cancels (解除) a contract (Articles 123 and 540, paragraph (1)). One made to another person takes effect when notice of it reaches that person, or when it would normally have reached them if they blocked it without good reason (Article 97, paragraphs (1) and (2)), and does not lose its effect because the person who made it dies, loses mental capacity (意思能力) or comes under legal limits on what they can do alone after sending the notice (Article 97, paragraph (3)); where the person making it cannot find out who the other party is or where they are, it can be made by public notice (Article 98, paragraph (1)). It is not void just because the person making it knew it was not their true intention, unless the other party knew or could have known that (Article 93, paragraph (1)); a false one made in collusion with the other party is void (Article 94, paragraph (1)); and neither voidness can be asserted against a third party who did not know of it (善意) (Articles 93, paragraph (2), and 94, paragraph (2)). One based on a mistake that is material in light of the purpose of the juridical act (法律行為) and accepted views in dealings may be rescinded — one based on a mistaken view of the circumstances behind the act only if it had been shown that the act was based on them, and as a rule not where the mistake came from the gross negligence of the person who made it (Article 95, paragraphs (1) to (3)) — and so may one made under fraud or duress, though one induced by a third party's fraud only if the other party knew of the fraud or could have known of it (Article 96, paragraphs (1) and (2)); a rescission for mistake or fraud cannot be relied on against a third party who did not know and was not careless in not knowing (Article 95, paragraph (4), and Article 96, paragraph (3)). One that an agent makes within the agent's authority, showing that it is made for the principal, takes effect directly for the principal (Article 99, paragraph (1)). The Consumer Contract Act lets a consumer rescind an offer or acceptance of a consumer contract made because the business, when soliciting it, told them something untrue about an important matter and they believed it, among other grounds (Consumer Contract Act, Article 4, paragraph (1), item (i)), and the Act on Specified Commercial Transactions does the same where, in a door-to-door sale, the seller or service provider told them something untrue about such matters as the goods or the price (Article 6, paragraph (1), and Article 9-3, paragraph (1), item (i)).
Written by AI using Civil Code, Arts. 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 123, 522, 527, 540, Consumer Contract Act, Art. 4 and Act on Specified Commercial Transactions, Arts. 6, 9-3 as a reference.