Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 52-8Plan for Departure

第五十二条の八(退去のための計画)

If any of the following items applies, the immigration control officer must, after ascertaining, by hearing the wishes of a person to whom a written deportation order has been issued or by other means, the circumstances that are the cause of being unable to immediately send the person outside Japan, establish a plan for departure:

入国警備官は、次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、退去強制令書の発付を受けた者の意向の聴取その他の方法により、その者を直ちに本邦外に送還することができない原因となつている事情を把握した上で、退去のための計画を定めなければならない。

the immigration control officer has detained a person to whom a written deportation order has been issued pursuant to the provisions of Article 52, paragraph (9);

退去強制令書の発付を受けた者を第五十二条第九項の規定により収容したとき。

beyond the case set forth in the preceding item, a decision on supervision measures has been made with regard to a person to whom a written deportation order has been issued.

前号に掲げる場合を除き、退去強制令書の発付を受けた者に対し監理措置決定がされたとき。

If the period during which a person subject to deportation who is the subject of the plan set forth in the preceding paragraph has been detained following the issuance of a written deportation order reaches 3 months continuously, the immigration control officer must promptly submit the plan to the supervising immigration inspector and report on its progress.

入国警備官は、前項の計画の対象である退去強制を受ける者が退去強制令書の発付を受けて収容されている期間が継続して三月に達したときは、速やかに、主任審査官に対し、当該計画を提出するとともに、その進捗状況を報告しなければならない。

The supervising immigration inspector who has received the submission and report under the provisions of the preceding paragraph must consider whether the decision set forth in Article 52-2, paragraph (5) is necessary, except when the inspector has not released the person subject to deportation because the deposit has not been paid despite having made the decision set forth in that paragraph. In this case, if the supervising immigration inspector does not make the decision set forth in that paragraph, the inspector must report that fact and the reasons therefor to the Commissioner of the Immigration Services Agency.

前項の規定による提出及び報告を受けた主任審査官は、第五十二条の二第五項の決定をしたにもかかわらず保証金が納付されていないため退去強制を受ける者を放免していないときを除き、同項の決定の要否を検討しなければならない。この場合において、主任審査官は、同項の決定をしないときは、その旨及び理由を出入国在留管理庁長官に報告しなければならない。

If the Commissioner of the Immigration Services Agency who has received the report set forth in the preceding paragraph finds it appropriate to release the person and place them under supervision measures, the Commissioner must order the supervising immigration inspector to make the decision set forth in Article 52-2, paragraph (5).

前項の報告を受けた出入国在留管理庁長官は、その者を放免して監理措置に付することが相当と認めるときは、第五十二条の二第五項の決定をすべきことを主任審査官に命じなければならない。

The supervising immigration inspector who has been ordered to make the decision set forth in Article 52-2, paragraph (5) pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph is to promptly make the decision set forth in that paragraph ex officio. In this case, the supervising immigration inspector may, pursuant to the provisions of the second sentence of that paragraph, have the person to be placed under supervision measures pay a deposit.

前項の規定により第五十二条の二第五項の決定をすべきことを命じられた主任審査官は、速やかに、職権で、同項の決定をするものとする。この場合において、主任審査官は、同項後段の規定により、監理措置に付される者に対し、保証金を納付させることができる。

If the period prescribed in paragraph (2) has continued beyond 3 months, the immigration control officer must promptly report the progress of the plan set forth in paragraph (1) to the supervising immigration inspector each time a further 3 months of that continuing period elapse. In this case, the provisions of the preceding three paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis.

入国警備官は、第二項に規定する期間が三月を超えて継続しているときは、当該超えて継続する期間が三月を経過するごとに、速やかに、第一項の計画の進捗状況を主任審査官に報告しなければならない。この場合においては、前三項の規定を準用する。

Read this in its chapter

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.SourcesTermsPrivacy