Article 78Revocation or Modification of Rulings
第七十八条(審判の取消し又は変更)
When a family court has made a ruling and subsequently finds the ruling to be unreasonable, it may revoke or modify the ruling by its own authority, except for the following rulings:
家庭裁判所は、審判をした後、その審判を不当と認めるときは、次に掲げる審判を除き、職権で、これを取り消し、又は変更することができる。
a ruling to dismiss a petition when a ruling should be made only when a petition is filed; and
申立てによってのみ審判をすべき場合において申立てを却下した審判
a ruling against which an immediate appeal may be filed.
即時抗告をすることができる審判
After five years have passed since the day on which a ruling became final and binding, the family court may not revoke or modify it as provided for in the provisions of the preceding paragraph; provided, however, that this does not apply when the family court finds the ruling to be unjust due to a change in circumstances.
審判が確定した日から五年を経過したときは、家庭裁判所は、前項の規定による取消し又は変更をすることができない。ただし、事情の変更によりその審判を不当と認めるに至ったときは、この限りでない。
When a family court revokes or modifies a ruling pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), it must hear statements from the party to the adjudication and any other person subject to adjudication.
家庭裁判所は、第一項の規定により審判の取消し又は変更をする場合には、その審判における当事者及びその他の審判を受ける者の陳述を聴かなければならない。
An immediate appeal may be filed against a ruling revoking or modifying the previous ruling under the provisions of paragraph (1) only by a person who may file an immediate appeal on the assumption that the ruling after the revocation or modification is the original ruling.
第一項の規定による取消し又は変更の審判に対しては、取消し後又は変更後の審判が原審判であるとした場合に即時抗告をすることができる者に限り、即時抗告をすることができる。
The provisions of Article 247, Article 256, paragraph (1), and Article 258 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (2) of the Article) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to a ruling. In this case, the phrase "after the rendition" in Article 256, paragraph (1) of the Code is deemed to be replaced with "from the day on which notice of the ruling is first given to the person who receives notice of the ruling".
民事訴訟法第二百四十七条、第二百五十六条第一項及び第二百五十八条(第二項後段を除く。)の規定は、審判について準用する。この場合において、同法第二百五十六条第一項中「言渡し後」とあるのは、「審判が告知を受ける者に最初に告知された日から」と読み替えるものとする。
第七十九条の二(外国裁判所の家事事件についての確定した裁判の効力)
The provisions of Article 118 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to a final and binding judicial decision rendered by a foreign court on a domestic relations case (including an equivalent determination made by a public authority), unless contrary to the nature thereof.
外国裁判所の家事事件についての確定した裁判(これに準ずる公的機関の判断を含む。)については、その性質に反しない限り、民事訴訟法第百十八条の規定を準用する。
第八十条(中間決定)
When a dispute on a legal relationship which will be the basis for an adjudication or any other interlocutory dispute is ready for making a judicial decision, the family court may make an interlocutory order.
家庭裁判所は、審判の前提となる法律関係の争いその他中間の争いについて、裁判をするのに熟したときは、中間決定をすることができる。
Changes by (Act No. 53 of 2023)
An interlocutory order must be made by preparing a written judgment.
中間決定は、裁判書を作成してしなければならない。
Article 81Judicial Decisions Other Than Rulings
第八十一条(審判以外の裁判)
In proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations, the family court makes a judicial decision by an order, except when making a ruling. In this case, the provisions of Articles 73 through 79 (excluding the proviso to Article 74, paragraph (2), Article 76, paragraph (1), and Article 78, paragraph (3)) apply mutatis mutandis.
家庭裁判所は、家事審判の手続においては、審判をする場合を除き、決定で裁判をする。この場合には、第七十三条から第七十九条まで(第七十四条第二項ただし書、第七十六条第一項及び第七十八条第三項を除く。)の規定を準用する。
A judicial decision concerning the control of proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations may be revoked at any time.
家事審判の手続の指揮に関する裁判は、いつでも取り消すことができる。
A judicial decision other than a ruling may be made by an assistant judge independently.
審判以外の裁判は、判事補が単独ですることができる。
Subsection 8 Closing of Cases by Withdrawal
第八款 取下げによる事件の終了
Article 82Withdrawal of Petitions for Adjudication of Domestic Relations
第八十二条(家事審判の申立ての取下げ)
Except as otherwise provided, a petition for adjudication of domestic relations may be withdrawn in whole or in part before a ruling is made.
家事審判の申立ては、特別の定めがある場合を除き、審判があるまで、その全部又は一部を取り下げることができる。
A petition for adjudication of domestic relations regarding any of the matters set forth in Appended Table 2 may be withdrawn in whole or in part before a ruling becomes final and binding; provided, however, that after a ruling is made, the withdrawal of a petition will not be effective without the consent of the respondent.
別表第二に掲げる事項についての家事審判の申立ては、審判が確定するまで、その全部又は一部を取り下げることができる。ただし、申立ての取下げは、審判がされた後にあっては、相手方の同意を得なければ、その効力を生じない。
When the consent of the respondent is required for the withdrawal of a petition pursuant to the provisions of the proviso to the preceding paragraph, Article 153 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 199, paragraph (1)) and Article 199, paragraph (2), the family court must give notice to the respondent of the fact that the petition is withdrawn; provided, however, that this does not apply when the petition is withdrawn orally on a date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations and the respondent attends the proceedings on that date.
If the respondent does not file an objection within two weeks from the day on which the respondent has received a notice given under the provisions of main clause of the preceding paragraph, the respondent is deemed to have consented to the withdrawal of the petition. The same applies to the case as provided for in the provisions of proviso to the paragraph when the respondent does not file an objection within two weeks from the day on which the petition has been withdrawn.
Changes by (Act No. 53 of 2023)
The provisions of Article 261, paragraphs (3) and (4) and Article 262, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the withdrawal of a petition for adjudication of domestic relations. In this case, in Article 261, paragraph (4) of the Code, the phrase "date for oral arguments, preparatory proceedings, or settlement (referred to below as a 'proceeding date' in this Chapter)" is deemed to be replaced with "date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations", the phrase "electronic record" is deemed to be replaced with "record", and the phrase "must record in" is deemed to be replaced with "must enter in".
民事訴訟法第二百六十一条第三項及び第四項並びに第二百六十二条第一項の規定は、家事審判の申立ての取下げについて準用する。この場合において、同法第二百六十一条第四項中「口頭弁論、弁論準備手続又は和解の期日(以下この章において「口頭弁論等の期日」という。)」とあるのは「家事審判の手続の期日」と、「電子調書」とあるのは「調書」と、「記録しなければ」とあるのは「記載しなければ」と読み替えるものとする。
Article 83Deemed Withdrawal of Petitions for Adjudication of Domestic Relations
第八十三条(家事審判の申立ての取下げの擬制)
When a petitioner for adjudication of domestic relations (if the consent of the respondent is required for the withdrawal of a petition under Article 153 (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the provisions of Article 199, paragraph (1)) and Article 199, paragraph (2), both parties), on two consecutive occasions, fails to appear on a date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations if the petitioner is summoned, or appears on a date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations if the petitioner is summoned and leaves their seat without making any statements, the family court may deem that the petition has been withdrawn.
Subsection 9 Proceedings Conducted by a High Court as Court of First Instance
第九款 高等裁判所が第一審として行う手続
第八十四条
Changes by (Act No. 53 of 2023)
For the purpose of the application of the provisions of this Section if a high court conducts proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations as the court of first instance: in the provisions of the Section (excluding the provisions of Article 58, Article 59, paragraphs (1) through (4), Article 61, paragraphs (1) and (2), and Article 65), the term "family court" is deemed to be replaced with "high court"; in Article 39, Article 47, paragraph (6), Article 49, paragraph (3), Article 56, paragraph (2), Article 65, Article 72, Article 73, Article 74, paragraphs (1) through (3) (excluding the proviso to paragraph (2)), Article 75, Article 77, paragraph (1), Article 78 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii), and paragraph (4)), Article 79, Article 80, paragraph (1), Article 81, paragraph (1), and Article 82, paragraphs (1) and (2), the term "ruling" is deemed to be replaced with "judicial decision in lieu of a ruling"; in Article 42, paragraph (2), the phrase "outcome of adjudication" is deemed to be replaced with "outcome of a judicial decision in lieu of a ruling"; in Article 58, paragraph (1), Article 59, paragraphs (1) through (4), Article 61, paragraph (1), and Article 65, the term "family court" is deemed to be replaced with "high court"; in Article 58, paragraph (3), the term "family court" is deemed to be replaced with "high court"; in Article 59, paragraph (3), the phrase "family court and" is deemed to be replaced with "high court and"; in Article 76, the term "written ruling" is deemed to be replaced with "written judgment"; in Article 76, paragraph (1), the term "ruling" is deemed to be replaced with "judicial decision in lieu of a ruling"; in the proviso to Article 76, paragraph (1), the phrase "ruling against which an immediate appeal may not be filed" is deemed to be replaced with "judicial decision in lieu of a ruling against which an immediate appeal may not be filed on the assumption that it is a ruling by a family court"; and in Article 78, paragraph (1), item (ii), the phrase "ruling against which an immediate appeal may be filed" is deemed to be replaced with "judicial decision in lieu of a ruling against which an immediate appeal may be filed on the assumption that it is a ruling by a family court".
高等裁判所が第一審として家事審判の手続を行う場合におけるこの節の規定の適用については、同節の規定(第五十八条、第五十九条第一項から第四項まで、第六十一条第一項及び第二項並びに第六十五条の規定を除く。)中「家庭裁判所」とあるのは「高等裁判所」と、第三十九条、第四十七条第六項、第四十九条第三項、第五十六条第二項、第六十五条、第七十二条、第七十三条、第七十四条第一項から第三項まで(第二項ただし書を除く。)、第七十五条、第七十七条第一項、第七十八条(第一項第二号及び第四項を除く。)、第七十九条、第八十条第一項、第八十一条第一項並びに第八十二条第一項及び第二項中「審判」とあるのは「審判に代わる裁判」と、第四十二条第二項中「審判の結果」とあるのは「審判に代わる裁判の結果」と、第五十八条第一項、第五十九条第一項から第四項まで、第六十一条第一項及び第六十五条中「家庭裁判所は」とあるのは「高等裁判所は」と、第五十八条第三項中「家庭裁判所に」とあるのは「高等裁判所に」と、第五十九条第三項中「家庭裁判所及び」とあるのは「高等裁判所及び」と、第七十六条中「審判書」とあるのは「裁判書」と、同条第一項中「審判は」とあるのは「審判に代わる裁判は」と、同項ただし書中「即時抗告をすることができない審判」とあるのは「家庭裁判所の審判であるとした場合に即時抗告をすることができない審判に代わる裁判」と、第七十八条第一項第二号中「即時抗告をすることができる審判」とあるのは「家庭裁判所の審判であるとした場合に即時抗告をすることができる審判に代わる裁判」とする。
The provisions of Articles 40 and 48 do not apply when a high court conducts proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations as the court of first instance.
Section 2 Appeals
第二節 不服申立て
Subsection 1 Appeals Against Rulings
第一款 審判に対する不服申立て
Division 1 Immediate Appeals
第一目 即時抗告
Article 85Rulings Against Which Immediate Appeals May Be Filed
第八十五条(即時抗告をすることができる審判)
An immediate appeal may be filed against a ruling only as specially provided.
審判に対しては、特別の定めがある場合に限り、即時抗告をすることができる。
An immediate appeal may not be filed independently against a judicial decision on the burden of procedural costs.
手続費用の負担の裁判に対しては、独立して即時抗告をすることができない。
Article 86Period for Filing Immediate Appeal
第八十六条(即時抗告期間)
Except as otherwise provided, an immediate appeal filed against a ruling must be filed within an unextendable period of two weeks; provided, however, that this does not preclude the effect of an immediate appeal filed prior to such period.
審判に対する即時抗告は、特別の定めがある場合を除き、二週間の不変期間内にしなければならない。ただし、その期間前に提起した即時抗告の効力を妨げない。
Except as otherwise provided, the period for filing an immediate appeal runs from the day on which a person who is to receive notice of a ruling received notice of a ruling if an immediate appeal is filed by the person, or from the day on which the petitioner received notice of a ruling if an immediate appeal is filed by a person other than a person who is to receive notice of a ruling (if there are two or more such days, the latest day), respectively.
即時抗告の期間は、特別の定めがある場合を除き、即時抗告をする者が、審判の告知を受ける者である場合にあってはその者が審判の告知を受けた日から、審判の告知を受ける者でない場合にあっては申立人が審判の告知を受けた日(二以上あるときは、当該日のうち最も遅い日)から、それぞれ進行する。
Article 87Method of Filing Immediate Appeals
第八十七条(即時抗告の提起の方式等)
An immediate appeal must be filed by submitting a petition for appeal with the court of prior instance.
即時抗告は、抗告状を原裁判所に提出してしなければならない。
A petition for appeal must state the following matters:
抗告状には、次に掲げる事項を記載しなければならない。
the party (parties) and the legal representative(s); and
当事者及び法定代理人
the indication of the ruling in prior instance, and a statement that an immediate appeal is filed against the ruling.
原審判の表示及びその審判に対して即時抗告をする旨
If an immediate appeal is unlawful and it is obvious that the deficiency cannot be corrected, the court of prior instance must dismiss the appeal.
即時抗告が不適法でその不備を補正することができないことが明らかであるときは、原裁判所は、これを却下しなければならない。
An immediate appeal may be filed against a ruling made under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
前項の規定による審判に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
The immediate appeal set forth in the preceding paragraph must be filed within an unextendable period of one week; provided, however, that this does not preclude the effect of an immediate appeal filed prior to the period.
前項の即時抗告は、一週間の不変期間内にしなければならない。ただし、その期間前に提起した即時抗告の効力を妨げない。
Changes by (Act No. 53 of 2023)
The provisions of Article 49, paragraphs (4) and (5) apply mutatis mutandis when a petition for appeal is in violation of paragraph (2) and when fees for filing an immediate appeal are not paid pursuant to the provisions of the Act on the Costs of Civil Proceedings.
Article 88Sending of Copy of Written Petition for Appeal
第八十八条(抗告状の写しの送付等)
When an immediate appeal is filed against a ruling, the court in charge of the appeal must send a copy of a petition for appeal to the party and interested party intervenor in the prior instance (excluding the appellant), except when the immediate appeal is unlawful or the immediate appeal is clearly groundless; provided, however, that if it is found that there is a risk of interfering with the smooth progress of proceedings in the instance of an appeal, the court in charge of the appeal may give notice to those parties of the fact that an immediate appeal is filed, in lieu of sending a copy of a petition for appeal.
審判に対する即時抗告があった場合には、抗告裁判所は、即時抗告が不適法であるとき又は即時抗告に理由がないことが明らかなときを除き、原審における当事者及び利害関係参加人(抗告人を除く。)に対し、抗告状の写しを送付しなければならない。ただし、抗告審における手続の円滑な進行を妨げるおそれがあると認められる場合には、即時抗告があったことを通知することをもって、抗告状の写しの送付に代えることができる。
When the presiding judge specifies a reasonable period and orders an appellant to prepay costs for sending a copy of a petition for appeal or giving notice in lieu of sending the copy under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, but the costs are not prepaid, the presiding judge must, by a direction, dismiss the petition for appeal.
裁判長は、前項の規定による抗告状の写しの送付又はこれに代わる通知の費用の予納を相当の期間を定めて抗告人に命じた場合において、その予納がないときは、命令で、抗告状を却下しなければならない。
Article 89Hearings of Statements
第八十九条(陳述の聴取)
The court in charge of an appeal may not revoke the ruling in prior instance unless it hears statements from a party in the prior instance and any other person subject to adjudication (excluding the appellant).
抗告裁判所は、原審における当事者及びその他の審判を受ける者(抗告人を除く。)の陳述を聴かなければ、原審判を取り消すことができない。
In adjudication cases regarding any of the matters set forth in Appended Table 2, the court in charge of an appeal must hear statements from a party in the prior instance (excluding the appellant), except when the immediate appeal is unlawful or the immediate appeal is clearly groundless.
別表第二に掲げる事項についての審判事件においては、抗告裁判所は、即時抗告が不適法であるとき又は即時抗告に理由がないことが明らかなときを除き、原審における当事者(抗告人を除く。)の陳述を聴かなければならない。
Article 90Correction by Courts of Prior Instance
第九十条(原裁判所による更正)
The court of prior instance must correct its ruling when it finds grounds for an immediate appeal filed against the ruling; provided, however, that a ruling regarding any of the matters set forth in Appended Table 2 may not be corrected.
原裁判所は、審判に対する即時抗告を理由があると認めるときは、その審判を更正しなければならない。ただし、別表第二に掲げる事項についての審判については、更正することができない。
Article 91Judicial Decisions by Courts in Charge of Appeals
第九十一条(抗告裁判所による裁判)
The court in charge of an appeal makes a judicial decision on an immediate appeal by an order.
抗告裁判所は、即時抗告について決定で裁判をする。
When the court in charge of an appeal finds grounds for an immediate appeal, it must by itself make a judicial decision in lieu of a ruling on the case for adjudication of domestic relations; provided, however, that this does not apply when it remands the case to the court of first instance pursuant to the provisions of Article 307 or Article 308, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 93, paragraph (3).
抗告裁判所は、即時抗告を理由があると認める場合には、家事審判事件について自ら審判に代わる裁判をしなければならない。ただし、第九十三条第三項において準用する民事訴訟法第三百七条又は第三百八条第一項の規定により事件を第一審裁判所に差し戻すときは、この限りでない。
domestic relations cases
「家事事件」
A case of adjudication of domestic relations (家事審判) or of mediation of domestic relations (家事調停): the family matters whose procedure this Act governs.
Short name set inArticle 1, paragraph (1)
procedural costsmachine translation
「手続費用」
The costs of proceedings: the costs of adjudication of domestic relations (審判費用) and the costs of mediation (調停費用), which as a rule each person bears for themselves.
Defined inArticle 28, paragraph (1)
interested party intervenor
「利害関係参加人」
A person who has joined proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations (家事審判) under Article 42, paragraphs (1) to (3) — as a person who is to be subject to the ruling, or, with the family court's permission or by its order, as a person directly affected by its outcome or qualified to be a party — and who may then perform most of the procedural acts a party can.
Short name set inArticle 42, paragraph (7)