Subsection 2 Petitions for Adjudication of Domestic Relations
第二款 家事審判の申立て
Article 49Method of Filing Petitions
第四十九条(申立ての方式等)
A petition for adjudication of domestic relations must be filed by submitting a written petition (hereinafter referred to as a "written petition for adjudication of domestic relations") to a family court.
家事審判の申立ては、申立書(以下「家事審判の申立書」という。)を家庭裁判所に提出してしなければならない。
A written petition for adjudication of domestic relations must state the following matters:
家事審判の申立書には、次に掲げる事項を記載しなければならない。
the party (parties) and the legal representative(s); and
当事者及び法定代理人
the object of and reasons for the petition.
申立ての趣旨及び理由
When a petitioner seeks a ruling on two or more matters, and if the proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations regarding these matters are of the same kind and these matters are based on the same factual and legal cause, the petitioner may seek the ruling by filing a single petition.
申立人は、二以上の事項について審判を求める場合において、これらの事項についての家事審判の手続が同種であり、これらの事項が同一の事実上及び法律上の原因に基づくときは、一の申立てにより求めることができる。
When a written petition for adjudication of domestic relations is in violation of the provisions of paragraph (2), the presiding judge must specify a reasonable period and order that the defect should be corrected within that period.
In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, if the petitioner fails to correct the defect, the presiding judge, by a direction, must dismiss the written petition for adjudication of domestic relations.
An immediate appeal may be filed against the direction set forth in the preceding paragraph.
前項の命令に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
The provisions of Article 137-2 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis when the petitioner does not pay fees for filing a petition for adjudication of domestic relations pursuant to the provisions of the Act on the Costs of Civil Proceedings (Act No. 40 of 1971).
民事訴訟法第百三十七条の二の規定は、申立人が民事訴訟費用等に関する法律(昭和四十六年法律第四十号)の規定に従い家事審判の申立ての手数料を納付しない場合について準用する。
Article 50Amendment to Petitions
第五十条(申立ての変更)
A petitioner may amend the object of or reasons for petition unless there is any change to the basis for the petition; provided, however, that this does not apply after proceedings have been concluded pursuant to the provisions of Article 71 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 188, paragraph (4)).
An amendment to the object of or reasons for a petition must be made in writing except when it is made on a date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations.
申立ての趣旨又は理由の変更は、家事審判の手続の期日においてする場合を除き、書面でしなければならない。
If an amendment to the object of or reasons for a petition is unlawful, the family court must make a judicial decision not to permit the amendment.
家庭裁判所は、申立ての趣旨又は理由の変更が不適法であるときは、その変更を許さない旨の裁判をしなければならない。
If an amendment to the object of or reasons for a petition would substantially delay proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations, the family court may make a judicial decision not to permit the amendment.
申立ての趣旨又は理由の変更により家事審判の手続が著しく遅滞することとなるときは、家庭裁判所は、その変更を許さない旨の裁判をすることができる。
Subsection 3 Date for Proceedings for Adjudication of Domestic Relations
第三款 家事審判の手続の期日
Article 51Summons to Person Concerned with Case
第五十一条(事件の関係人の呼出し)
A family court may summon a person concerned with a case on a date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations.
家庭裁判所は、家事審判の手続の期日に事件の関係人を呼び出すことができる。
A person concerned with a case who is summoned must appear on a date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations; provided, however, that the person may have a representative appear on the person's behalf if there are unavoidable circumstances.
呼出しを受けた事件の関係人は、家事審判の手続の期日に出頭しなければならない。ただし、やむを得ない事由があるときは、代理人を出頭させることができる。
If the person concerned with the case set forth in the preceding paragraph does not appear without justifiable grounds, the family court punishes the person by a non-criminal fine of up to 50,000 yen.
前項の事件の関係人が正当な理由なく出頭しないときは、家庭裁判所は、五万円以下の過料に処する。
Article 52Presiding Judge's Control of Proceedings
第五十二条(裁判長の手続指揮権)
On a date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations, the presiding judge controls the proceedings.
家事審判の手続の期日においては、裁判長が手続を指揮する。
The presiding judge may permit a person to speak or prohibit a person who does not comply with direction from speaking.
裁判長は、発言を許し、又はその命令に従わない者の発言を禁止することができる。
When a party makes an objection to a direction issued by the presiding judge with regard to the judge's control of proceedings on a date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations, the family court makes a judicial decision on such objection.
当事者が家事審判の手続の期日における裁判長の指揮に関する命令に対し異議を述べたときは、家庭裁判所は、その異議について裁判をする。
Article 53Proceedings by Authorized Judges
第五十三条(受命裁判官による手続)
A family court may have an authorized judge conduct proceedings on a date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations; provided, however, that with regard to the investigation of facts and examination of evidence, this is allowed only when an authorized judge may examine facts or examine evidence pursuant to the provisions of Article 61, paragraph (3) or the provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Sections 1 through 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 64, paragraph (1).
In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the authorized judge performs the duties of the family court and the presiding judge.
前項の場合においては、家庭裁判所及び裁判長の職務は、その裁判官が行う。
Article 54Proceedings through Communication by Audio Transmissions
第五十四条(音声の送受信による通話の方法による手続)
A family court may, when it finds it to be appropriate, after hearing the opinions of the parties, conduct proceedings on a date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations (excluding the examination of evidence) by means that enables the family court and both parties to communicate simultaneously with one another by audio transmissions, as provided for in the Rules of the Supreme Court.
家庭裁判所は、相当と認めるときは、当事者の意見を聴いて、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、家庭裁判所及び当事者双方が音声の送受信により同時に通話をすることができる方法によって、家事審判の手続の期日における手続(証拠調べを除く。)を行うことができる。
A party who has participated in the proceedings set forth in the preceding paragraph without appearing on a date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations is deemed to have appeared on that date.
家事審判の手続の期日に出頭しないで前項の手続に関与した者は、その期日に出頭したものとみなす。
Article 55Attendance of Interpreters and Other Measures
第五十五条(通訳人の立会い等その他の措置)
The provisions of Article 154 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the attendance of an interpreter, etc. on a date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations, and the provisions of Article 155 of the Code apply mutatis mutandis to the measures for a party, interested party intervenor, representative or assistant in court who is unable to make such statements as necessary to clarify the matters relating to proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations.
家事審判の手続の期日における通訳人の立会い等については民事訴訟法第百五十四条の規定を、家事審判事件の手続関係を明瞭にするために必要な陳述をすることができない当事者、利害関係参加人、代理人及び補佐人に対する措置については同法第百五十五条の規定を準用する。
Subsection 4 Investigation of Facts and Examination of Evidence
第四款 事実の調査及び証拠調べ
Article 56Investigation of Facts and Examination of Evidence
第五十六条(事実の調査及び証拠調べ等)
A family court must investigate facts by its own authority and must examine evidence as it finds necessary upon petition or by its own authority.
家庭裁判所は、職権で事実の調査をし、かつ、申立てにより又は職権で、必要と認める証拠調べをしなければならない。
A party is to cooperate in the investigation of facts and examination of evidence in order to achieve appropriate and swift proceedings and adjudication.
当事者は、適切かつ迅速な審理及び審判の実現のため、事実の調査及び証拠調べに協力するものとする。
第五十七条(疎明)
A prima facie showing must be made by materials that can be examined immediately.
疎明は、即時に取り調べることができる資料によってしなければならない。
Article 58Investigation of Facts by Family Court Investigating Officer
第五十八条(家庭裁判所調査官による事実の調査)
A family court may have a family court investigating officer examine facts.
家庭裁判所は、家庭裁判所調査官に事実の調査をさせることができる。
If there are pressing circumstances, the presiding judge may have a family court investigating officer examine facts.
急迫の事情があるときは、裁判長が、家庭裁判所調査官に事実の調査をさせることができる。
A family court investigating officer is to report the results of the examination of facts to the family court in writing or orally.
家庭裁判所調査官は、事実の調査の結果を書面又は口頭で家庭裁判所に報告するものとする。
A family court investigating officer may attach their own opinions to the report under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
家庭裁判所調査官は、前項の規定による報告に意見を付することができる。
Article 59Attendance of Family Court Investigating Officer on Dates for Proceedings
第五十九条(家庭裁判所調査官の期日への立会い等)
A family court may, when it finds it to be necessary, have a family court investigating officer attend on a date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations.
家庭裁判所は、必要があると認めるときは、家事審判の手続の期日に家庭裁判所調査官を立ち会わせることができる。
A family court may, when it finds it to be necessary, have the family court investigating officer, who attends on a date for proceedings pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, state their own opinion.
家庭裁判所は、必要があると認めるときは、前項の規定により立ち会わせた家庭裁判所調査官に意見を述べさせることができる。
A family court may, when it finds it to be appropriate, after hearing the opinions of the parties, on a date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations, by means that enables the family court and both parties to communicate simultaneously with the family court investigating officer by audio transmissions as provided for in the Rules of the Supreme Court, have the family court investigating officer attend the date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations and state the opinion referred to in the preceding paragraph on that date.
家庭裁判所は、相当と認めるときは、当事者の意見を聴いて、家事審判の手続の期日において、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、家庭裁判所及び当事者双方が家庭裁判所調査官との間で音声の送受信により同時に通話をすることができる方法によって、家庭裁判所調査官に家事審判の手続の期日に立ち会わせ、当該期日において前項の意見を述べさせることができる。
When a family court, in connection with the processing of a case for adjudication of domestic relations, finds it to be necessary in order to coordinate the family environment and other environments of a person concerned with the case, it may have a family court investigating officer communicate with a social welfare organization or take other measures.
家庭裁判所は、家事審判事件の処理に関し、事件の関係人の家庭環境その他の環境の調整を行うために必要があると認めるときは、家庭裁判所調査官に社会福祉機関との連絡その他の措置をとらせることができる。
If there are pressing circumstances, the presiding judge may have a family court investigating officer take the measures set forth in the preceding paragraph.
急迫の事情があるときは、裁判長が、前項の措置をとらせることができる。
Article 60Diagnosis by Technical Officials of Court
第六十条(裁判所技官による診断等)
A family court may, when it finds it to be necessary, have a technical official of the court, who is a physician, diagnose the physical and mental condition of a person concerned with a case.
家庭裁判所は、必要があると認めるときは、医師である裁判所技官に事件の関係人の心身の状況について診断をさせることができる。
Changes by (Act No. 53 of 2023)
The provisions of Article 58, paragraphs (2) through (4) apply mutatis mutandis to the diagnosis set forth in the preceding paragraph, and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (3) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to the attendance on a date for proceedings and statement of opinions by a technical official of the court.
第五十八条第二項から第四項までの規定は前項の診断について、前条第一項から第三項までの規定は裁判所技官の期日への立会い及び意見の陳述について準用する。
Article 61Commission of Investigation of Facts
第六十一条(事実の調査の嘱託等)
A family court may commission another family court or a summary court to investigate facts.
家庭裁判所は、他の家庭裁判所又は簡易裁判所に事実の調査を嘱託することができる。
When a commissioned judge who performs duties as commissioned under the provisions of the preceding paragraph finds it to be appropriate for another family court or a summary court to examine facts, the judge may further commission the other court to investigate facts.
前項の規定による嘱託により職務を行う受託裁判官は、他の家庭裁判所又は簡易裁判所において事実の調査をすることを相当と認めるときは、更に事実の調査の嘱託をすることができる。
A family court may, when it finds it to be appropriate, have an authorized judge investigate facts.
家庭裁判所は、相当と認めるときは、受命裁判官に事実の調査をさせることができる。
When a commissioned judge or authorized judge investigates facts pursuant to the provisions of the preceding three paragraphs, the respective judge performs the duties of the family court and the presiding judge.
前三項の規定により受託裁判官又は受命裁判官が事実の調査をする場合には、家庭裁判所及び裁判長の職務は、その裁判官が行う。
Article 62Commission of Examination
第六十二条(調査の嘱託等)
A family court may commission a government agency, public officer or any other entity as it finds appropriate to conduct the necessary examination, or may request a bank, a trust company or the employer of a person concerned or any other person to make the necessary report concerning the deposits, trust property, income, or other matters regarding a person concerned.
家庭裁判所は、必要な調査を官庁、公署その他適当と認める者に嘱託し、又は銀行、信託会社、関係人の使用者その他の者に対し関係人の預金、信託財産、収入その他の事項に関して必要な報告を求めることができる。
Article 63Notice of Investigation of Facts
第六十三条(事実の調査の通知)
When an investigation of facts is conducted and a family court finds that the results thereof could cause a material change to a party's engagement in conducting proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations, the family court must give notice to that effect to the party and an interested party intervenor.
家庭裁判所は、事実の調査をした場合において、その結果が当事者による家事審判の手続の追行に重要な変更を生じ得るものと認めるときは、これを当事者及び利害関係参加人に通知しなければならない。
interested party intervenor
「利害関係参加人」
A person who has joined proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations (家事審判) under Article 42, paragraphs (1) to (3) — as a person who is to be subject to the ruling, or, with the family court's permission or by its order, as a person directly affected by its outcome or qualified to be a party — and who may then perform most of the procedural acts a party can.
Short name set inArticle 42, paragraph (7)
written petition for adjudication of domestic relations
「家事審判の申立書」
The written petition a person must submit to the family court to ask it for an adjudication of domestic relations (家事審判).
Short name set inArticle 49, paragraph (1)
summary court
簡易裁判所
One of the four kinds of lower court (下級裁判所) beneath the Supreme Court, with the high courts (高等裁判所), the district courts (地方裁判所) and the family courts (家庭裁判所) (Courts Act, Article 1, and Article 2, paragraph (1)). A summary court has jurisdiction at first instance over civil claims whose value does not exceed 1.4 million yen, other than claims in administrative cases, and over criminal cases for offences punishable by no more than a fine or for which a fine is one of the penalties the law allows, among others (Article 33, paragraph (1)). A petition for court mediation goes, unless a special rule says otherwise, to the summary court for the place where the other party lives or has its business office or other office, or to a district court or summary court the parties agree on (Civil Mediation Act, Article 3, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Courts Act, Arts. 1, 2, 33 and Civil Mediation Act, Art. 3 as a reference.