Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act
Article 82, paragraph (5)
第八十二条第五項
Each amendment that changed this provision, and each that will, oldest first. Each is shown against the wording just before it; where an amendment gives the provision another number, it is followed under the new one. Read it as it stands today
In force today
The provisions of Article 261, paragraphs (3) and (4) and Article 262, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the withdrawal of a petition for adjudication of domestic relations. In this case, in Article 261, paragraph (4) of the Code, the phrase "date for oral arguments, preparatory proceedings, or settlement (referred to below as a 'proceeding date' in this Chapter)" is deemed to be replaced with "date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations", the phrase "electronic record" is deemed to be replaced with "record", and the phrase "must record in" is deemed to be replaced with "must enter in".
民事訴訟法第二百六十一条第三項及び第四項並びに第二百六十二条第一項の規定は、家事審判の申立ての取下げについて準用する。この場合において、同法第二百六十一条第四項中「口頭弁論、弁論準備手続又は和解の期日（以下この章において「口頭弁論等の期日」という。）」とあるのは「家事審判の手続の期日」と、「電子調書」とあるのは「調書」と、「記録しなければ」とあるのは「記載しなければ」と読み替えるものとする。
The provisions of Article 261, paragraphs (3) and (4) and Article 262, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the withdrawal of a petition for adjudication of domestic relations. In this case, in Article 261, paragraph (4) of the Code, the phrase "date for oral arguments, preparatory proceedings, or settlement (referred to below as a 'proceeding date' in this Chapter)" is deemed to be replaced with "date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations"
, the phrase "electronic record" is deemed to be replaced with "record", and the phrase "must record in" is deemed to be replaced with "must enter in".民事訴訟法第二百六十一条第三項及び第四項並びに第二百六十二条第一項の規定は、家事審判の申立ての取下げについて準用する。この場合において、同法第二百六十一条第四項中「口頭弁論、弁論準備手続又は和解の期日（以下この章において「口頭弁論等の期日」という。）」とあるのは、「家事審判の手続の期日
」と、「電子調書」とあるのは「調書」と、「記録しなければ」とあるのは「記載しなければ」と読み替えるものとする。