In the cases set forth below, if the court finds that the existence of a company is unallowable for securing public interests, it may, in response to a petition by the Minister of Justice, shareholders, members, creditors or any other interested parties, order the dissolution of the company:
裁判所は、次に掲げる場合において、公益を確保するため会社の存立を許すことができないと認めるときは、法務大臣又は株主、社員、債権者その他の利害関係人の申立てにより、会社の解散を命ずることができる。
when the company fails to commence its business within one year from the day of its formation or suspends its business continuously for one year or more, without justifiable grounds; or
会社が正当な理由がないのにその成立の日から一年以内にその事業を開始せず、又は引き続き一年以上その事業を休止したとき。
if an executive director, an executive officer or a member who executes the business has committed an act that goes beyond or abuses the authority of the company prescribed by laws and regulations or the articles of incorporation or that violates criminal laws and regulations, if that person commits relevant act continuously or repeatedly despite receiving a written warning from the Minister of Justice.
When a shareholder, a member, a creditor or any other interested party files the petition set forth in the preceding paragraph, the court may, in response to a petition by the company, order the person who filed the petition set forth in that paragraph to provide reasonable security.
When a company intends to file the petition under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, it must make a prima facie showing that the petition set forth in paragraph (1) has been filed in bad faith.
The provisions of Article 75, paragraphs (5) and (7) and Articles 76 through 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Act No. 109 of 1996) apply mutatis mutandis to the security to be provided with respect to the petition set forth in paragraph (1) pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2).
民事訴訟法（平成八年法律第百九号）第七十五条第五項及び第七項並びに第七十六条から第八十条までの規定は、第二項の規定により第一項の申立てについて立てるべき担保について準用する。
(Order to Provide Security)
In the ruling stated in paragraph (1), the court must specify the amount of security and the time frame for providing security.
裁判所は、第一項の決定において、担保の額及び担保を立てるべき期間を定めなければならない。
Open this provision(Order to Provide Security)
An immediate appeal may be filed against a ruling on a petition under paragraph (1).
第一項の申立てについての決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
Open this provision(Manner of Providing Security)
In providing security, money or securities (including book-entry transfer bonds prescribed in Article 278, paragraph (1) of the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of Corporate Bonds and Shares (Act No. 75 of…
担保を立てるには、担保を立てるべきことを命じた裁判所の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所の管轄区域内の供託所に金銭又は裁判所が相当と認める有価証券（社債、株式等の振替に関する法律（平成十三年法律第七十五号）第二百七十八条第一項に規定する振替債を含む。次条において同じ。）を供託する方法その他最高裁判所規則で定める方法によらなけ…
Open this provision(Defendant's Right to Collateral)
A defendant has the right to receive payment for court costs, in preference to other creditors, from the money or securities deposited pursuant to the provisions of the preceding Article.
被告は、訴訟費用に関し、前条の規定により供託した金銭又は有価証券について、他の債権者に先立ち弁済を受ける権利を有する。
Open this provision(Result of Failure to Provide Security)
If a plaintiff fails to provide security within the time frame during which it is required to be provided, the court may enter a judgment denying the action, without hearing oral arguments; provided…
原告が担保を立てるべき期間内にこれを立てないときは、裁判所は、口頭弁論を経ないで、判決で、訴えを却下することができる。ただし、判決前に担保を立てたときは、この限りでない。
Open this provision(Release of Security)
If a person providing security proves that the grounds for providing security have ceased to exist, the court, upon petition, must rule to release that security.
担保を立てた者が担保の事由が消滅したことを証明したときは、裁判所は、申立てにより、担保の取消しの決定をしなければならない。
Open this provision(Substitution of Security)
At the petition of a person providing the security, the court may issue a ruling ordering the substitution of that security; provided, however, that this does not preclude other security from being…
裁判所は、担保を立てた者の申立てにより、決定で、その担保の変換を命ずることができる。ただし、その担保を契約によって他の担保に変換することを妨げない。
Open this provision(Dissolution Order for a Company)
In the cases set forth below, if the court finds that the existence of a company is unallowable for securing public interests, it may, in response to a petition by the Minister of Justice…
裁判所は、次に掲げる場合において、公益を確保するため会社の存立を許すことができないと認めるときは、法務大臣又は株主、社員、債権者その他の利害関係人の申立てにより、会社の解散を命ずることができる。
Open this provision(Dissolution Order for a Company)
When a shareholder, a member, a creditor or any other interested party files the petition set forth in the preceding paragraph, the court may, in response to a petition by the company…
株主、社員、債権者その他の利害関係人が前項の申立てをしたときは、裁判所は、会社の申立てにより、同項の申立てをした者に対し、相当の担保を立てるべきことを命ずることができる。
Open this provisioncompany
「会社」
Any of the four kinds of company this Act governs: a stock company (株式会社), a general partnership company (合名会社), a limited partnership company (合資会社) or a limited liability company (合同会社).
Defined inArticle 2, paragraph (1), item (i)· applies throughout the law
executive director
「業務執行取締役」
A director who runs a stock company's business: the representative director, any director chosen by the board to execute its business under Article 363, paragraph (1), and any other director who has in fact executed its business.
Defined inArticle 2, paragraph (1), item (xv), (a)
articles of incorporation
定款
A company's own basic rules, written by its founders when it is formed: at least its purpose, its trade name, where its head office is, the value of the property contributed at incorporation and who the founders are (Companies Act, Article 27). A stock company's must be certified by a notary before it takes effect (Article 30, paragraph (1)), and can later be changed by a resolution of the shareholders meeting (Article 466). Many rules in the Act apply "unless the articles of incorporation provide otherwise", so a company's articles decide a great deal of how the Act applies to it.
Written by AI using Companies Act, Arts. 26, 27, 30, 466, 575 as a reference.