The court (in the case of items (i) and (iv), including the presiding judge and the judges of the panel; in the case of items (ii) and (iii), including the judge under Article 66, paragraph (4), and the presiding judge and the judges of the panel; and in the case of item (v), meaning the judge) may, with regard to a case for which the extract of the charging sheet, etc. has been submitted pursuant to Article 271-2, paragraph (2), if it finds that, among the particulars identifying an individual stated in the charging sheet, those not stated in the extract of the charging sheet, etc. are those of a person set forth in paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii) of that Article, and finds it appropriate, take the following measures:
giving notice of the case charged under Article 61 by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual;
when issuing a subpoena or detention warrant, delivering at the same time, as the document to be shown to the defendant, an extract of the subpoena stating an outline of the facts of the charges by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual, or other substitute for the subpoena, or an extract of the detention warrant or other substitute for the detention warrant;
勾引状又は勾留状を発する場合において、これと同時に、被告人に示すものとして、当該個人特定事項を明らかにしない方法により公訴事実の要旨を記載した勾引状の抄本その他の勾引状に代わるもの又は勾留状の抄本その他の勾留状に代わるものを交付すること。
giving, or having given, notice of an outline of the charged facts under Article 76, paragraph (1) by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual;
giving, or having given, notice of an outline of the charged facts under Article 77, paragraph (3) by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual;
giving notice of the case charged under Article 280, paragraph (2) by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual.
With regard to the application of Article 73, paragraphs (1) and (3) where a substitute for the subpoena has been delivered pursuant to paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)), the phrase "said subpoena" in the first sentence of paragraph (1) of that Article, the phrase "the subpoena or detention warrant" in paragraph (3) of that Article, and the phrase "the warrant" in the proviso of that paragraph are deemed to be replaced with "the substitute for the subpoena prescribed in Article 271-8, paragraph (1), item (ii)", and the phrase "an outline of the facts of the charges to the defendant and" in that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "an outline of the facts of the charges to the defendant by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual stated in the subpoena that are not stated in the substitute for the subpoena prescribed in Article 271-8, paragraph (1), item (ii), and".
With regard to the application of Article 73, paragraphs (2) and (3) where a substitute for the detention warrant has been delivered pursuant to paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)), the phrase "said warrant" in paragraph (2) of that Article, the phrase "the subpoena or detention warrant" in paragraph (3) of that Article, and the phrase "the warrant" in the proviso of that paragraph are deemed to be replaced with "the substitute for the detention warrant prescribed in Article 271-8, paragraph (1), item (ii)", and the phrase "an outline of the facts of the charges to the defendant and" in that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "an outline of the facts of the charges to the defendant by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual stated in the detention warrant that are not stated in the substitute for the detention warrant prescribed in Article 271-8, paragraph (1), item (ii), and".
The presiding judge or a judge of the panel may, where a substitute for the detention warrant has been delivered pursuant to paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)) or where a substitute for the detention warrant has been delivered pursuant to Article 207-2, paragraph (2), if the presiding judge or that judge finds that, among the particulars identifying an individual stated in the detention warrant, those not stated in those substitutes for the detention warrant (excluding those that are to be notified by a ruling under Article 271-5, paragraph (1) or a judicial decision under Article 207-3, paragraph (1)) are those of a person set forth in Article 271-2, paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii), and, after hearing the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defense counsel, finds it appropriate, state the case charged, when disclosing the grounds for detention, by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual.
裁判長又は合議体の構成員は、第一項(第二号に係る部分に限る。)の規定による勾留状に代わるものの交付があつた場合又は第二百七条の二第二項の規定による勾留状に代わるものの交付があつた場合において、勾留状に記載された個人特定事項のうちこれらの勾留状に代わるものに記載がないもの(第二百七十一条の五第一項の決定又は第二百七条の三第一項の裁判により通知することとされたものを除く。)が第二百七十一条の二第一項第一号又は第二号に掲げる者のものに該当すると認める場合であつて、検察官及び弁護人の意見を聴き、相当と認めるときは、勾留の理由の開示をするに当たり、当該個人特定事項を明らかにしない方法により被告事件を告げることができる。
With regard to the application of Article 98 where a substitute for the detention warrant has been delivered pursuant to paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)) or where a substitute for the detention warrant has been delivered pursuant to Article 207-2, paragraph (2), the phrase "a transcript of the detention warrant" in Article 98, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "the substitute for the detention warrant prescribed in Article 271-8, paragraph (1), item (ii) or the substitute for the detention warrant prescribed in the main clause of Article 207-2, paragraph (2)".
第一項(第二号に係る部分に限る。)の規定による勾留状に代わるものの交付があつた場合又は第二百七条の二第二項の規定による勾留状に代わるものの交付があつた場合における第九十八条の規定の適用については、同条第一項中「勾留状の謄本」とあるのは、「第二百七十一条の八第一項第二号の勾留状に代わるもの又は第二百七条の二第二項本文の勾留状に代わるもの」とする。
The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to the application of the provisions of Article 98 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 167-2, paragraph (2), in the case prescribed in that paragraph, where a substitute for the detention warrant has been delivered pursuant to paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)) or where a substitute for the detention warrant has been delivered pursuant to Article 207-2, paragraph (2).
前項の規定は、第一項(第二号に係る部分に限る。)の規定による勾留状に代わるものの交付があつた場合又は第二百七条の二第二項の規定による勾留状に代わるものの交付があつた場合であつて、第百六十七条の二第二項に規定するときにおける同項において準用する第九十八条の規定の適用について準用する。
定義第二百一条の二第一項
氏名及び住所その他の個人を特定させることとなる事項
わかりやすく言うと
氏名や住所など、その人が誰かを特定できることになる事柄のことです。
略称規定第二百七十一条の二第二項
前項の規定による求めは、公訴の提起において、裁判所に対し、起訴状とともに、被告人に送達するものとして、当該求めに係る個人特定事項の記載がない起訴状の抄本その他の起訴状の謄本に代わるもの(以下「起訴状抄本等」という。)を提出して行わなければ…
わかりやすく言うと
検察官が起訴の際、起訴状と一緒に裁判所に出す、被害者などの個人特定事項を記載していない起訴状の抄本など、被告人に送達する起訴状の謄本の代わりとなるもののことです。
検察官
犯罪について、裁判所に訴えを起こす(公訴を行う)役目を負う者です(刑事訴訟法第二百四十七条)。犯人の性格、年齢や境遇、犯罪の重さや事情、犯罪の後の状況から、訴える必要がないと考えるときは、訴えを起こさないことができます(刑事訴訟法第二百四十八条)。刑事の事件では、裁判所に法を正しく当てはめるよう求め、裁判の執行を監督します。また、社会全体の利益を代表して、ほかの法令が検察官に任せた仕事も行い、それは刑事の事件に限りません(検察庁法第四条)。どのような犯罪についても捜査をすることができます(検察庁法第六条第一項)。検察官の仕事は検察庁がまとめており、検察庁には最高検察庁、高等検察庁、地方検察庁、区検察庁があります(検察庁法第一条)。
刑事訴訟法第247条・第248条、検察庁法第1条・第4条・第6条を参考にAIが作成。