①When a public prosecutor finds it necessary to add or alter facts planned to be proven after the proceedings provided in Article 316-13 through the preceding Article (excluding Article 316-14, paragraph (5)) have been completed, the public prosecutor must promptly submit to the court and send to the defendant or the defense counsel a document describing the facts planned to be proven which are to be added or altered. In this case, the provisions of the second sentence of Article 316-13, paragraph (1) apply mutatis mutandis.

②When a public prosecutor finds it necessary to add a request for examination of evidence to be used to prove facts planned to be proven, the prosecutor must promptly make a request for examination of the evidence to be added. In this case, the provisions of Article 316-13, paragraph (3) apply mutatis mutandis.

③A court may, after hearing the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defendant or the defense counsel, set deadlines for submitting and sending the document under paragraph (1) and making the request under the preceding paragraph.

④The provisions of Article 316-14, paragraph (1), Article 316-15 and Article 316-16 apply mutatis mutandis to the evidence requested to be examined by a public prosecutor pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2).

①When the defendant or the defense counsel finds it necessary to add or modify allegations referred to in Article 316-17, paragraph (1) after the proceedings provided in Articles 316-13 through 316-20 (excluding Article 316-14, paragraph (5)) have been completed, that defendant or defense counsel must promptly reveal the allegations to be added or modified to the court and the public prosecutor. In this case, the provisions of the second sentence of Article 316-13, paragraph (1) apply mutatis mutandis.

②When the defendant or the defense counsel deems it necessary to add a request for examination of evidence which will be used to prove facts planned to be proven, said person must promptly request examination of the evidence to be added. In this case, the provisions of Article 316-13, paragraph (3) apply mutatis mutandis.

③The court may, upon hearing the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defendant or the defense counsel, set deadlines for clarification of the allegation prescribed in paragraph (1) and the request prescribed in the preceding paragraph.

④The provisions of Articles 316-18 and 316-19 apply mutatis mutandis to the evidence which is requested for examination by the defendant or the defense counsel pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2).

⑤The provisions of Article 316-20 apply mutatis mutandis to the evidence which is deemed to be connected to the allegation to which an addition or alteration should be made pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1).

①The provisions of Articles 299-2 and 299-3 apply mutatis mutandis when a public prosecutor or a defense counsel discloses evidence pursuant to the provisions of this Division.

②The provisions of Article 299-4 apply mutatis mutandis when a public prosecutor is to disclose evidence pursuant to the provisions of Article 316-14, paragraph (1) (including cases when these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 316-21, paragraph (4)).

③The provisions of Articles 299-5 through 299-7 apply mutatis mutandis when a public prosecutor has taken measures pursuant to the provisions of Article 299-4, paragraphs (1) through (10) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph.

In concluding the pretrial arrangement proceeding, the court must confirm the results of the arrangement of issues and evidence of the case with the public prosecutor and the defendant or the defense counsel.

①When a court finds it necessary taking into account the extent of the necessity of disclosure of evidence, the content and extent of the possible harmful effects of disclosure and other circumstances, the court may render a ruling to designate the time or means of or set a condition for the disclosure of the evidence to be disclosed pursuant to the provisions of Article 316-14, paragraph (1) (including cases when these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 316-21, paragraph (4)) upon request from a public prosecutor, or the evidence to be disclosed pursuant to the provisions of Article 316-18 (including cases when these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 316-22, paragraph (4)) upon request from the defendant or the defense counsel.

②If the court makes a ruling for the request prescribed in the preceding paragraph, it must hear the opinion of the opponent.

③An immediate appeal against the ruling prescribed in paragraph (1) may be filed.

①When a court finds that a public prosecutor has not disclosed the evidence to be disclosed pursuant to the provisions of Article 316-14, paragraph (1) or Article 316-15, paragraph (1) or (2) (including cases when these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 316-21, paragraph (4)) or Article 316-20, paragraph (1) (including cases when these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 316-22, paragraph (5)), or the defendant or the defense counsel has not disclosed the evidence to be disclosed pursuant to the provisions of Article 316-18 (including cases when these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 316-22, paragraph (4)), the court must, upon request from the opponent, render a ruling to order the disclosure of that evidence. In this case, the court may designate the time or means of or set a condition for the disclosure.

②If the court makes a ruling for the request prescribed in the preceding paragraph, it must hear the opinion of the opponent.

③An immediate appeal against the ruling prescribed in paragraph (1) may be filed.

①If the court deems it necessary in making a ruling for the request prescribed in Article 316-25, paragraph (1) or paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, it may order the public prosecutor, the defendant or the defense counsel to present the evidence which is requested. In this case, the court may not let anyone inspect or copy the evidence.

②If the court deems it necessary in making a ruling for the request made by the defendant or the defense counsel prescribed in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, it may order the public prosecutor to present a list of the evidence that said prosecutor holds which falls within the range specified by the court. In this case, the court may not let anyone inspect or copy the list.

③The provisions of paragraph (1) apply mutatis mutandis to the court where the immediate appeal prescribed in the provisions of Article 316-25, paragraph (3) or paragraph (3) of the preceding Article is pending and the provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to the court where the immediate appeal prescribed in the provisions of paragraph (3) of the same Article is pending.

①When a court finds it necessary during the course of the proceedings, the court may, upon request from a public prosecutor, the defendant or the defense counsel, or ex officio, render a ruling to order that the case be subject to an inter-trial arrangement proceeding as trial preparation for arrangement of the issues and evidence of the case after the first trial date.

②The provisions of the preceding Subsection (excluding the provisions of Article 316-2, paragraph (1) and Article 316-9, paragraph (3)) apply mutatis mutandis to the inter-trial arrangement proceeding. In this case, the evidence that the public prosecutor, the defendant or the defense counsel requested to be examined before the ruling prescribed in the preceding paragraph is deemed to be the evidence that was requested to be examined in the inter-trial arrangement proceeding and the words "the date of the pretrial arrangement proceeding" prescribed in Articles 316-6 to 316-10 and 316-12 are deemed to be "the date of the inter-trial arrangement proceeding" and the word "the records of the pretrial arrangement proceeding" prescribed in paragraph (2) of the same Article is deemed to be "the records of the inter-trial arrangement proceeding."

When a case has been placed into a pretrial arrangement proceeding or an inter-trial arrangement proceeding, the court may not be convened without the presence of the defense counsel even if it is not the case prescribed in Article 289, paragraph (1).

With regard to a case which has been placed in a pretrial arrangement proceeding, when the defendant or the defense counsel has facts which must be proved by evidence or any other factual or legal allegations, said person must clearly reveal them after the proceeding prescribed in Article 296. In this case, the provisions of the proviso of the same Article apply mutatis mutandis.

①With regard to a case which has been placed in a pretrial arrangement proceeding, the court must, pursuant to the Rules of Court, reveal the results of the proceeding on the trial date after the proceeding prescribed in the preceding Article.

②With regard to a case which has been placed in an inter-trial arrangement proceeding, the court must, pursuant to the Rules of Court, reveal the results of the proceeding on the trial date after the proceeding.

①With regard to a case which has been placed in a pretrial arrangement proceeding or an inter-trial arrangement proceeding, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 298, paragraph (1), the public prosecutor and the defendant or the defense counsel may not request examination of evidence after the end of the pretrial arrangement proceeding or the inter-trial arrangement proceeding, except evidence that was not able to be requested in the proceeding because of unavoidable reasons.

②The provisions of the preceding paragraph do not prevent the court from examining evidence ex officio when the court deems it to be necessary.