Chapter III Final Appeal
第三章 上告
第四百五条
A final appeal may be filed against a high court judgment of first or second instance on the grounds that:
高等裁判所がした第一審又は第二審の判決に対しては、左の事由があることを理由として上告の申立をすることができる。
There is a violation of the Constitution or an error in the interpretation of the Constitution;
A determination has been rendered that conflicts with a Supreme Court precedent; or
最高裁判所の判例と相反する判断をしたこと。
In the event that there is no Supreme Court precedent, a determination has been rendered that conflicts with a precedent of the former Supreme Court (daishin'in) or a high court that was the court of the final appellate instance, or that conflicts with a precedent of a high court that was the court of second instance at a time after the enforcement date of this Act.
最高裁判所の判例がない場合に、大審院若しくは上告裁判所たる高等裁判所の判例又はこの法律施行後の控訴裁判所たる高等裁判所の判例と相反する判断をしたこと。
第四百六条
The Supreme Court, as the final appellate instance, may accept a case that is deemed to involve important matters relating to the interpretation of laws and regulations pursuant to the Rules of Court, only before the judgment on the case has become final and binding, even if it is not a case in which a final appeal may be filed pursuant to the preceding Article.
最高裁判所は、前条の規定により上告をすることができる場合以外の場合であつても、法令の解釈に関する重要な事項を含むものと認められる事件については、その判決確定前に限り、裁判所の規則の定めるところにより、自ら上告審としてその事件を受理することができる。
第四百七条
The grounds for a final appeal shall be clarified in the written statement of the reasons for appeal, pursuant to the Rules of Court.
上告趣意書には、裁判所の規則の定めるところにより、上告の申立の理由を明示しなければならない。
第四百八条
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
The final appellate court may enter a judgment to dismiss the final appeal without hearing oral arguments when it is deemed to be clear that there are no grounds for a final appeal in the statement of the reasons for appeal or other documents.
上告裁判所は、上告趣意書その他の書類によつて、上告の申立の理由がないことが明らかであると認めるときは、弁論を経ないで、判決で上告を棄却することができる。
第四百九条
In the final appellate court, it is not necessary to summon the defendant to appear at the trial.
上告審においては、公判期日に被告人を召喚することを要しない。
第四百十条
The final appellate court shall, on a judgment, reverse the judgment of the court of first or second instance when there are grounds as prescribed in the items of Article 405; provided, however, that this shall not apply when it is clear that this would not affect the judgment.
上告裁判所は、第四百五条各号に規定する事由があるときは、判決で原判決を破棄しなければならない。但し、判決に影響を及ぼさないことが明らかな場合は、この限りでない。
The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall not apply when there are grounds as in item (ii) or item (iii) of Article 405 alone, and when the final appellate court deems it is appropriate to alter that precedent and to uphold the judgment of the court of first or second instance.
第四百十一条
Even in absence of grounds as prescribed in the items of Article 405, the final appellate court may render a judgment to reverse the judgment of the court of first or second instance, on any of the following grounds when it deems that not doing so would clearly be contrary to justice:
上告裁判所は、第四百五条各号に規定する事由がない場合であつても、左の事由があつて原判決を破棄しなければ著しく正義に反すると認めるときは、判決で原判決を破棄することができる。
There is a violation of laws and regulations which would have affected the judgment;
判決に影響を及ぼすべき法令の違反があること。
The degree of punishment is seriously unfair;
刑の量定が甚しく不当であること。
There is an erroneous finding of a material fact which would have affected the judgment;
判決に影響を及ぼすべき重大な事実の誤認があること。
There are grounds to request a retrial;
再審の請求をすることができる場合にあたる事由があること。
There was abolition or a change of punishment or a general pardon was granted after the judgment was rendered.
判決があつた後に刑の廃止若しくは変更又は大赦があつたこと。
第四百十二条
When the decision of the court of first or second instance is reversed on the grounds that jurisdiction was unlawfully found, a judgment shall be rendered to remit the case to the competent court of second or first instance.
不法に管轄を認めたことを理由として原判決を破棄するときは、判決で事件を管轄控訴裁判所又は管轄第一審裁判所に移送しなければならない。
第四百十三条
When the judgment of the court of first or second instance is reversed on grounds other than those prescribed in the preceding Article, a judgment shall be rendered to remit the case to the deciding court or the court of first instance or to transfer the case to another court of the same level; provided, however, that the final appellate court may immediately render a further judgment on the case when it deems that it is possible to do so based on the case records and the evidence examined in the deciding court and the court of first instance.
前条に規定する理由以外の理由によつて原判決を破棄するときは、判決で、事件を原裁判所若しくは第一審裁判所に差し戻し、又はこれらと同等の他の裁判所に移送しなければならない。但し、上告裁判所は、訴訟記録並びに原裁判所及び第一審裁判所において取り調べた証拠によつて、直ちに判決をすることができるものと認めるときは、被告事件について更に判決をすることができる。
第四百十三条の二
In a case in which the court of first instance has rendered a judgment in expedited trial proceedings, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 411, the final appellate court may not reverse the original judgment on the grounds that there are grounds prescribed in item (iii) of that Article with regard to the facts constituting the crime indicated in the rendered judgment.
第四百十四条
Except as otherwise provided in this Code, the provisions of the preceding Chapter shall apply mutatis mutandis to a trial in its final appeal.
前章の規定は、この法律に特別の定のある場合を除いては、上告の審判についてこれを準用する。
第四百十五条
When the final appellate court finds an error in the contents of its judgment, the court may render a judgment to amend such a judgment upon the request of the public prosecutor, the defendant, or his/her defense counsel.
上告裁判所は、その判決の内容に誤のあることを発見したときは、検察官、被告人又は弁護人の申立により、判決でこれを訂正することができる。
A request as prescribed in the preceding paragraph shall be made within ten days from the day of pronouncement of said judgment.
前項の申立は、判決の宣告があつた日から十日以内にこれをしなければならない。
The final appellate court may extend the period prescribed in the preceding paragraph upon the request of a person prescribed in paragraph (1), when it deems appropriate.
第四百十六条
Judgment for amendment may be rendered without hearing oral arguments.
訂正の判決は、弁論を経ないでもこれをすることができる。
第四百十七条
When not rendering a judgment for amendment, the final appellate court shall promptly dismiss the request on a ruling.
上告裁判所は、訂正の判決をしないときは、速やかに決定で申立を棄却しなければならない。
A request as prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 415 shall not be made against a judgment for amendment.
訂正の判決に対しては、第四百十五条第一項の申立をすることはできない。
第四百十八条
The judgment of the final appellate court shall become final and binding when the period prescribed in Article 415 has elapsed since the date said judgment was rendered or when a request as prescribed in paragraph (1) of the same Article has been made within that period and a judgment for amendment or a ruling for dismissal of the request has been pronounced.
public prosecutor
検察官
The official who brings a prosecution (公訴) for a crime before a court (Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 247), and who may decide not to prosecute where, in view of the offender's character, age and circumstances, the gravity and circumstances of the offence and what happened after it, prosecution is not needed (Article 248). In criminal cases a public prosecutor asks the court to apply the law correctly and oversees the carrying out of its judgments; and, as the representative of the public interest, a public prosecutor also does the work other laws and regulations assign to a public prosecutor, which is not limited to criminal cases (Public Prosecutors Office Act, Article 4). A public prosecutor may investigate any crime (Article 6, paragraph (1)). Public prosecutors work through the public prosecutors offices (検察庁): the Supreme, High, District and Local Public Prosecutors Offices (Article 1).
Written by AI using Code of Criminal Procedure, Arts. 247, 248 and Public Prosecutors Office Act, Arts. 1, 4, 6 as a reference.
Supreme Court
最高裁判所
The highest court, and the court of last resort on whether any law, order, regulation or official act conforms to the Constitution (Article 76, paragraph (1), and Article 81). That power is what makes the Constitution enforceable: there is no penalty attached to breaching it, and instead a conflicting rule is held to have no legal force (Article 98, paragraph (1)). Its judges are reviewed by the people at the first general election after appointment, and again after ten further years (Article 79, paragraph (2)).
Written by AI using Constitution, Arts. 76, 79, 81, 98 and Wikipedia: Supreme Court of Japan as a reference.