Subsection 1 Pretrial Arrangement Proceedings
第一款 公判前整理手続
Division 1 General Rules
第一目 通則
第三百十六条の二
When a court deems it necessary to conduct productive proceedings of a trial consecutively, systematically and speedily, the court may, upon request from a public prosecutor, the defendant or the defense counsel or ex officio, render a ruling to order that the case be subject to a pretrial arrangement proceeding as trial preparation for arrangement of the issues and evidence of the case prior to the first trial date.
裁判所は、充実した公判の審理を継続的、計画的かつ迅速に行うため必要があると認めるときは、検察官、被告人若しくは弁護人の請求により又は職権で、第一回公判期日前に、決定で、事件の争点及び証拠を整理するための公判準備として、事件を公判前整理手続に付することができる。
When a court renders a ruling under the preceding paragraph or a ruling to dismiss the request under the same paragraph, the court must hear the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defendant or the defense counsel in advance pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of Court.
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
A pretrial arrangement proceeding shall be conducted by having the persons concerned in the case appear and make a statement, or having them submit documents, pursuant to the provisions of this Subsection.
公判前整理手続は、この款に定めるところにより、訴訟関係人を出頭させて陳述させ、又は訴訟関係人に書面を提出させる方法により、行うものとする。
第三百十六条の三
The court must endeavor to ensure sufficient preparation in the pretrial arrangement proceeding and, insofar as possible, have speedy conclusion of the proceeding in order to conduct productive proceedings of the trial consecutively, systematically and speedily.
裁判所は、充実した公判の審理を継続的、計画的かつ迅速に行うことができるよう、公判前整理手続において、十分な準備が行われるようにするとともに、できる限り早期にこれを終結させるように努めなければならない。
In order to have productive proceedings which are conducted consecutively, systematically and speedily, the persons concerned in the case must, in a pretrial arrangement proceeding, cooperate with one another and also must cooperate with the court willingly in the conduct of the proceeding.
訴訟関係人は、充実した公判の審理を継続的、計画的かつ迅速に行うことができるよう、公判前整理手続において、相互に協力するとともに、その実施に関し、裁判所に進んで協力しなければならない。
第三百十六条の四
A pretrial arrangement proceeding may not be conducted when there is no defense counsel for the defendant.
公判前整理手続においては、被告人に弁護人がなければその手続を行うことができない。
If there is no defense counsel for the defendant in a pretrial arrangement proceeding, the presiding judge must appoint defense counsel ex officio.
公判前整理手続において被告人に弁護人がないときは、裁判長は、職権で弁護人を付さなければならない。
第三百十六条の五
In a pretrial arrangement proceeding, the following actions may be taken:
公判前整理手続においては、次に掲げる事項を行うことができる。
clarification of the counts or applicable penal statutes;
訴因又は罰条を明確にさせること。
permission for addition, withdrawal or alteration of the counts or applicable penal statutes;
訴因又は罰条の追加、撤回又は変更を許すこと。
making a ruling on a request under Article 271-5, paragraph (1) or (2) (including the case where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 312-2, paragraph (4));
第二百七十一条の五第一項又は第二項(これらの規定を第三百十二条の二第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の請求について決定をすること。
arrangement of the issues of the case by having the allegation, which is planned to be given on the trial date, disclosed;
公判期日においてすることを予定している主張を明らかにさせて事件の争点を整理すること。
having a request for examination of evidence made;
証拠調べの請求をさせること。
disclosure of the facts to be proved, the particulars to be examined and other particulars relating to the evidence requested pursuant to the provisions of the preceding item;
前号の請求に係る証拠について、その立証趣旨、尋問事項等を明らかにさせること。
confirmation of the opinion concerning the request for examination of evidence (including whether or not to give the consent prescribed in Article 326 for the documentary evidence);
証拠調べの請求に関する意見(証拠書類について第三百二十六条の同意をするかどうかの意見を含む。)を確かめること。
rendering of a ruling to examine the evidence or dismiss the request for examination of evidence;
証拠調べをする決定又は証拠調べの請求を却下する決定をすること。
decision on the order and method of examining the evidence for which a ruling for examination has been made;
証拠調べをする決定をした証拠について、その取調べの順序及び方法を定めること。
rendering of a ruling on the filing of an objection against the examination of evidence;
証拠調べに関する異議の申立てに対して決定をすること。
rendering of a ruling on the disclosure of evidence pursuant to the provisions of division 3;
第三目の定めるところにより証拠開示に関する裁定をすること。
rendering of a ruling on a request to participate in the proceedings of the case pursuant to the provisions of Article 316-33, paragraph (1), or a ruling to revoke such ruling;
第三百十六条の三十三第一項の規定による被告事件の手続への参加の申出に対する決定又は当該決定を取り消す決定をすること。
setting or changing of the trial dates and a decision on other necessary particulars for the proceedings of the trial.
公判期日を定め、又は変更することその他公判手続の進行上必要な事項を定めること。
第三百十六条の六
The presiding judge must set the date of the pretrial arrangement proceeding when said judge is to have persons concerned in the case appear.
裁判長は、訴訟関係人を出頭させて公判前整理手続をするときは、公判前整理手続期日を定めなければならない。
The date of the pretrial arrangement proceeding must be notified to the public prosecutor, the defendant and the defense counsel.
公判前整理手続期日は、これを検察官、被告人及び弁護人に通知しなければならない。
The presiding judge may change the date of the pretrial arrangement proceeding upon the request of the public prosecutor, the defendant or the defense counsel or ex officio. In this case, the presiding judge must hear the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defendant or the defense counsel in advance pursuant to the Rules of Court.
裁判長は、検察官、被告人若しくは弁護人の請求により又は職権で、公判前整理手続期日を変更することができる。この場合においては、裁判所の規則の定めるところにより、あらかじめ、検察官及び被告人又は弁護人の意見を聴かなければならない。
第三百十六条の七
When the public prosecutor or the defense counsel does not appear on the date of the pretrial arrangement proceeding, the proceedings on that date may not be conducted.
公判前整理手続期日に検察官又は弁護人が出頭しないときは、その期日の手続を行うことができない。
第三百十六条の八
When the defense counsel does not appear on the date of the pretrial arrangement proceeding or when said defense counsel leaves the proceeding, the presiding judge must appoint defense counsel ex officio.
弁護人が公判前整理手続期日に出頭しないとき、又は在席しなくなつたときは、裁判長は、職権で弁護人を付さなければならない。
When there is a risk that the defense counsel will not appear on the date of the pretrial arrangement proceeding, the court may appoint defense counsel ex officio.
弁護人が公判前整理手続期日に出頭しないおそれがあるときは、裁判所は、職権で弁護人を付することができる。
第三百十六条の九
The defendant may appear on the date of the pretrial arrangement proceeding.
被告人は、公判前整理手続期日に出頭することができる。
When the court deems it to be necessary, it may ask the defendant to appear on the date of the pretrial arrangement proceeding.
裁判所は、必要と認めるときは、被告人に対し、公判前整理手続期日に出頭することを求めることができる。
When the defendant is to appear at the pretrial arrangement proceeding, the presiding judge must, on the first date that the defendant is to appear, begin by giving notification to the defendant that said person may remain silent at all times or may refuse to answer particular questions.
裁判長は、被告人を出頭させて公判前整理手続をする場合には、被告人が出頭する最初の公判前整理手続期日において、まず、被告人に対し、終始沈黙し、又は個々の質問に対し陳述を拒むことができる旨を告知しなければならない。
第三百十六条の十
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
When the court deems it necessary to confirm the intention of the defendant for a statement given by the defense counsel or a document to be submitted by the defense counsel, the court may, on the date of the pretrial arrangement proceeding, ask the defendant questions and have the defense counsel submit a document which is signed jointly by the defendant.
裁判所は、弁護人の陳述又は弁護人が提出する書面について被告人の意思を確かめる必要があると認めるときは、公判前整理手続期日において被告人に対し質問を発し、及び弁護人に対し被告人と連署した書面の提出を求めることができる。
第三百十六条の十一
The court may (excluding the rulings under Article 316-5, items (ii), (iii), (viii), and (x) through (xii)) order a member of a panel to put the case into a pretrial arrangement proceeding. In this case, the authorized judge has the same authority as the court or the presiding judge.
裁判所は、合議体の構成員に命じ、公判前整理手続(第三百十六条の五第二号、第三号、第八号及び第十号から第十二号までの決定を除く。)をさせることができる。この場合において、受命裁判官は、裁判所又は裁判長と同一の権限を有する。
第三百十六条の十二
A court clerk must attend on the date of the pretrial arrangement proceeding.
公判前整理手続期日には、裁判所書記官を立ち会わせなければならない。
The court proceedings on the dates of the pretrial arrangement proceeding must be recorded in the records of the pretrial arrangement proceeding pursuant to the Rules of Court.
公判前整理手続期日における手続については、裁判所の規則の定めるところにより、公判前整理手続調書を作成しなければならない。
Division 2 Arrangement of Issues and Evidence
第二目 争点及び証拠の整理
第三百十六条の十三
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
When a case is put into a pretrial arrangement proceeding, the public prosecutor must submit documents in which facts planned to be proven are described ("facts planned to be proven" means the facts which are planned to be proven by evidence on the trial date; the same applies hereinafter) to the court and must also send them to the defendant or the defense counsel. In this case, the public prosecutor may not describe in the documents any item from which prejudice or a preconception of the case is likely to arise based on materials which are not qualified for evidence or which are not intended to be requested for examination in court.
検察官は、事件が公判前整理手続に付されたときは、その証明予定事実(公判期日において証拠により証明しようとする事実をいう。以下同じ。)を記載した書面を、裁判所に提出し、及び被告人又は弁護人に送付しなければならない。この場合においては、当該書面には、証拠とすることができず、又は証拠としてその取調べを請求する意思のない資料に基づいて、裁判所に事件について偏見又は予断を生じさせるおそれのある事項を記載することができない。
Changes and moves to paragraph (3) by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
The public prosecutor must request the examination of evidence which is to be used to prove facts planned to be proven prescribed in the preceding paragraph.
Moves to paragraph (4) by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
Article 299, paragraph (1) does not apply to the request for the examination of evidence prescribed in the preceding paragraph.
前項の規定により証拠の取調べを請求するについては、第二百九十九条第一項の規定は適用しない。
Changes and moves to paragraph (5) by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
The court is to, upon hearing the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defendant or the defense counsel, set a deadline for the submission and delivery of the documents prescribed in paragraph (1) and the request prescribed in paragraph (2).
第三百十六条の十四
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
A public prosecutor must promptly disclose the evidence the prosecutor has requested to examine pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding Article (hereinafter referred to as "evidence for examination requested by the public prosecutor") to the defendant or the defense counsel by the means provided in the following items according to each category set forth in each item:
検察官は、前条第二項の規定により取調べを請求した証拠(以下「検察官請求証拠」という。)については、速やかに、被告人又は弁護人に対し、次の各号に掲げる証拠の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める方法による開示をしなければならない。
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
in the case of documentary evidence or an article of evidence, an opportunity is given to inspect (for the defense counsel, to inspect and copy) the documentary evidence or article of evidence; or
証拠書類又は証拠物 当該証拠書類又は証拠物を閲覧する機会(弁護人に対しては、閲覧し、かつ、謄写する機会)を与えること。
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
in the case of a witness, an expert witness, an interpreter or a translator, an opportunity is given to learn of the person's name and address and to inspect (for the defense counsel, to inspect and copy) those of the person's recorded statement documents that reveal the content of what the person is considered to state on the trial date (when there are no recorded statement documents, or those documents are found inappropriate to be inspected, documents that include an outline of the content of what the person is considered to state on the trial date).
証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人 その氏名及び住居を知る機会を与え、かつ、その者の供述録取書等のうち、その者が公判期日において供述すると思料する内容が明らかになるもの(当該供述録取書等が存在しないとき、又はこれを閲覧させることが相当でないと認めるときにあつては、その者が公判期日において供述すると思料する内容の要旨を記載した書面)を閲覧する機会(弁護人に対しては、閲覧し、かつ、謄写する機会)を与えること。
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
Upon request from the defendant or the defense counsel after the disclosure of evidence pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a public prosecutor must promptly deliver to the defendant or the defense counsel a list of the evidence held by the public prosecutor.
検察官は、前項の規定による証拠の開示をした後、被告人又は弁護人から請求があつたときは、速やかに、被告人又は弁護人に対し、検察官が保管する証拠の一覧表の交付をしなければならない。
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
The list referred to in the preceding paragraph must include matters provided in the following items by evidence according to each category set forth in each item:
前項の一覧表には、次の各号に掲げる証拠の区分に応じ、証拠ごとに、当該各号に定める事項を記載しなければならない。
in the case of an article of evidence, the name and quantity;
証拠物 品名及び数量
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
in the case of a statement recorded and taken down in writing with the signature or seal of the person making the statement, the title of the document, the date of preparation, and the name of the person making the statement; or
供述を録取した書面で供述者の署名又は押印のあるもの 当該書面の標目、作成の年月日及び供述者の氏名
in the case of documentary evidence (excluding that set forth in the preceding item), the title of the documentary evidence, the date of preparation, and the name of the person preparing the documentary evidence.
証拠書類(前号に掲げるものを除く。) 当該証拠書類の標目、作成の年月日及び作成者の氏名
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a public prosecutor may not be required to include any matter otherwise to be included in the list referred to in paragraph (2) pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, which is found to be likely to cause any of the following risks if it is included in the list:
risk that the body or property of any person may be harmed or the person may be threatened or confused;
人の身体若しくは財産に害を加え又は人を畏怖させ若しくは困惑させる行為がなされるおそれ
risk that the reputation or peaceful social life of any person may be seriously harmed; or
人の名誉又は社会生活の平穏が著しく害されるおそれ
risk that the proof or investigation of the crime may be interfered with.
犯罪の証明又は犯罪の捜査に支障を生ずるおそれ
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
When a public prosecutor comes to hold new evidence after the delivery of the list pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2), the public prosecutor must promptly deliver to the defendant or the defense counsel a list of the new evidence the public prosecutor comes to hold. In this case, the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis.
recorded statement documentmachine translation
「供述録取書等」
A written statement by the person who makes it, a written record of a statement bearing the signature or seal of the person who made it, or a recording medium able to record images or sound on which a statement has been recorded.
Defined inArticle 290-3, paragraph (1)
facts planned to be provenmachine translation
「証明予定事実」
The facts a party plans to prove by evidence on the trial dates (公判期日); in pretrial arrangement proceedings (公判前整理手続) the public prosecutor must first set them out in a document submitted to the court.
Defined inArticle 316-13, paragraph (1)
evidence for examination requested by the public prosecutor
「検察官請求証拠」
Evidence a public prosecutor has asked the court to examine under Article 316-13 in a case put into pretrial arrangement proceedings (公判前整理手続), which the prosecutor must then promptly disclose to the defendant or defense counsel.
Short name set inArticle 316-14, paragraph (1)
public prosecutor
検察官
The official who brings a prosecution (公訴) for a crime before a court (Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 247), and who may decide not to prosecute where, in view of the offender's character, age and circumstances, the gravity and circumstances of the offence and what happened after it, prosecution is not needed (Article 248). In criminal cases a public prosecutor asks the court to apply the law correctly and oversees the carrying out of its judgments; and, as the representative of the public interest, a public prosecutor also does the work other laws and regulations assign to a public prosecutor, which is not limited to criminal cases (Public Prosecutors Office Act, Article 4). A public prosecutor may investigate any crime (Article 6, paragraph (1)). Public prosecutors work through the public prosecutors offices (検察庁): the Supreme, High, District and Local Public Prosecutors Offices (Article 1).
Written by AI using Code of Criminal Procedure, Arts. 247, 248 and Public Prosecutors Office Act, Arts. 1, 4, 6 as a reference.