Code of Criminal Procedure
Article 316-28, paragraph (2)
第三百十六条の二十八第二項
Each amendment that changed this provision, and each that will, oldest first. Each is shown against the wording just before it; where an amendment gives the provision another number, it is followed under the new one. Read it as it stands today
In force today
The provisions of the preceding Subsection (excluding the provisions of Article 316-2, paragraph (1) and Article 316-9, paragraph (3)) apply mutatis mutandis to the inter-trial arrangement proceeding. In this case, the evidence that the public prosecutor, the defendant or the defense counsel requested to be examined before the ruling prescribed in the preceding paragraph is deemed to be the evidence that was requested to be examined in the inter-trial arrangement proceeding and the words "the date of the pretrial arrangement proceeding" prescribed in Articles 316-6 to 316-10 and 316-12 are deemed to be "the date of the inter-trial arrangement proceeding" and the word "the records of the pretrial arrangement proceeding" prescribed in paragraph (2) of the same Article is deemed to be "the records of the inter-trial arrangement proceeding."
期日間整理手続については、前款（第三百十六条の二第一項及び第三百十六条の九第三項を除く。）の規定を準用する。この場合において、検察官、被告人又は弁護人が前項の決定前に取調べを請求している証拠については、期日間整理手続において取調べを請求した証拠とみなし、第三百十六条の六から第三百十六条の十まで及び第三百十六条の十二中「公判前整理手続期日」とあるのは「期日間整理手続期日」と、同条第二項中「公判前整理手続調書」とあるのは「期日間整理手続調書」と読み替えるものとする。
The provisions of the preceding Subsection (excluding the provisions of Article 316-2, paragraph (1) and Article 316-9, paragraph (3)) apply mutatis mutandis to the inter-trial arrangement proceeding. In this case, the evidence that the public prosecutor, the defendant or the defense counsel requested to be examined before the ruling prescribed in the preceding paragraph is deemed to be the evidence that was requested to be examined in the inter-trial arrangement proceeding and the words "the date of the pretrial arrangement proceeding" prescribed in Articles 316-6 to 316-10 and
316-12Article 316-12, paragraphs (1) and (2) are deemed to be "the date of the inter-trial arrangement proceeding" and thewordwords "the records of the pretrial arrangement proceeding" prescribed in paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the same Articleisare deemed to be "the records of the inter-trial arrangement proceeding."期日間整理手続については、前款（第三百十六条の二第一項及び第三百十六条の九第三項を除く。）の規定を準用する。この場合において、検察官、被告人又は弁護人が前項の決定前に取調べを請求している証拠については、期日間整理手続において取調べを請求した証拠とみなし、第三百十六条の六から第三百十六条の十まで
及び並びに第三百十六条の十二第一項及び第二項中「公判前整理手続期日」とあるのは「期日間整理手続期日」と、同条第二項項及び同条第三項中「公判前整理手続調書」とあるのは「期日間整理手続調書」と読み替えるものとする。