With the person that received an order for interim measures (irrespective of whether or not the place of arbitration is in Japan; hereinafter the same applies in this Chapter) as the respondent, in accordance with the categories stated in each of the following items, a person that filed a petition for the order for interim measures may file a petition with the court to issue the orders specified in those items (hereinafter referred to as "enforcement approval orders"):
暫定保全措置命令(仲裁地が日本国内にあるかどうかを問わない。以下この章において同じ。)の申立てをした者は、当該暫定保全措置命令を受けた者を被申立人として、裁判所に対し、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、当該各号に定める決定(以下「執行等認可決定」という。)を求める申立てをすることができる。
までに改正、第四十九条第一項第一号へ(令和五年法律第五十三号)
an order for interim measures that orders taking measures stated in Article 24, paragraph (1), item (iii):an order allowing the civil enforcement based on the order for interim measures; and
暫定保全措置命令のうち第二十四条第一項第三号に掲げる措置を講ずることを命ずるもの 当該暫定保全措置命令に基づく民事執行を許す旨の決定
までに改正、第四十九条第一項第二号へ(令和五年法律第五十三号)
an order for interim measures that orders taking measures stated in Article 24, paragraph (1), items (i), (ii), (iv) or (v):an order allowing issuance of an order for payment of money stated in Article 49, paragraph (1), if the court finds that the respondent violates or is likely to violate the order for interim measures.
When filing the petition referred to in the preceding paragraph, the party must submit a copy of the written order for interim measures, a document certifying that the content of the copy is the same as that in the written order for interim measures, and a Japanese translation of the written order for interim measures (excluding one prepared in Japanese; hereinafter the same applies in this paragraph); provided, however, that if the court finds it appropriate, after hearing the opinions of the respondent, the court may decide not to require the submission of the Japanese translation of the whole or part of the written order for interim measures.
If the court with which the petition referred to in paragraph (1) is filed has come to acknowledge that a petition for revoking, amending or suspending the order for interim measures is filed with the arbitral tribunal or judicial body (limited to the case in which the judicial body of the country to which the place of arbitration belongs has authority, according to the laws and regulations of that country (or if the laws and regulations applied to the order for interim measures are laws and regulations of a country other than the country to which the place of arbitration belongs, according to the laws and regulations of that other country)) and finds it necessary to do so, the court may suspend the procedure for the petition referred to in that paragraph. In this case, the court may order the respondent to provide security, upon the petition of the person that filed the petition referred to in that paragraph.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5, paragraphs (1) and (2), the case subject to the petition referred to in paragraph (1) is under the exclusive jurisdiction of the following courts:
までに第四十九条第四項第一号へ移動(令和五年法律第五十三号)
the courts stated in the items of Article 5, paragraph (1);
第五条第一項各号に掲げる裁判所
までに第四十九条第四項第二号へ移動(令和五年法律第五十三号)
the district court which has jurisdiction over the location of the subject matter of the claim or the seizable property of the respondent; and
請求の目的又は差し押さえることができる被申立人の財産の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所
までに第四十九条第四項第三号へ移動(令和五年法律第五十三号)
the Tokyo District Court and the Osaka District Court (limited to the case in which the place of arbitration, the location of the general venue of the respondent, or the location of the subject matter of the claim or the seizable property of the respondent is in Japan).
東京地方裁判所及び大阪地方裁判所(仲裁地、被申立人の普通裁判籍の所在地又は請求の目的若しくは差し押さえることができる被申立人の財産の所在地が日本国内にある場合に限る。)
An immediate appeal may be filed against the decision under Article 5, paragraph (4) or (5) with regard to a case related to the petition referred to in paragraph (1).
The court is required to make an enforcement approval order, except the case in which it dismisses the petition referred to in paragraph (1) without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of the following paragraph or paragraph (8).
If a petition referred to in paragraph (1) has been filed, the court may dismiss the petition without prejudice only when it finds that any of the grounds stated in the following items exist (for the grounds stated in items (i) through (viii), limited to the case in which the respondent has proved the existence of the grounds):
裁判所は、第一項の申立てがあった場合において、次の各号に掲げる事由のいずれかがあると認めるとき(第一号から第八号までに掲げる事由にあっては、被申立人が当該事由の存在を証明した場合に限る。)に限り、当該申立てを却下することができる。
までに第四十九条第七項第一号へ移動(令和五年法律第五十三号)
the arbitration agreement is not valid due to the limitation on the legal capacity of a party;
仲裁合意が、当事者の行為能力の制限により、その効力を有しないこと。
までに第四十九条第七項第二号へ移動(令和五年法律第五十三号)
the arbitration agreement is not valid on grounds other than the limitation on the legal capacity of a party pursuant to the laws and regulations designated by the agreement of the parties as those which should be applied to the arbitration agreement (or if the designation has not been made, pursuant to the laws and regulations of the country to which the place of arbitration belongs);
仲裁合意が、当事者が合意により仲裁合意に適用すべきものとして指定した法令(当該指定がないときは、仲裁地が属する国の法令)によれば、当事者の行為能力の制限以外の事由により、その効力を有しないこと。
までに第四十九条第七項第三号へ移動(令和五年法律第五十三号)
the party did not receive the notice that is required pursuant to the laws and regulations of the country to which the place of arbitration belongs (or if the parties have reached an agreement on the matters concerning the provisions unrelated to public order in those laws and regulations, pursuant to the agreement) in the procedure of appointing arbitrators or in the arbitration procedure (limited to the part which concerns an order for interim measures; the same applies in the following item and item (vi));
までに第四十九条第七項第四号へ移動(令和五年法律第五十三号)
the party was unable to conduct a defense in the arbitration procedure;
当事者が、仲裁手続において防御することが不可能であったこと。
までに第四十九条第七項第五号へ移動(令和五年法律第五十三号)
the order for interim measures was issued concerning matters beyond the scope of the arbitration agreement or other agreement concerning an order for interim measures or concerning matters beyond the scope of a petition for an order for interim measures;
までに第四十九条第七項第六号へ移動(令和五年法律第五十三号)
the composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitration procedure is in violation of the laws and regulations of the country to which the place of arbitration belongs (or if the parties have reached an agreement concerning the matters concerning the provisions unrelated to public order in those laws and regulations, in violation of the agreement);
仲裁廷の構成又は仲裁手続が、仲裁地が属する国の法令の規定(その法令の公の秩序に関しない規定に関する事項について当事者間に合意があるときは、当該合意)に違反するものであったこと。
までに第四十九条第七項第七号へ移動(令和五年法律第五十三号)
when the arbitral tribunal has ordered the party requesting an order for interim measures to provide appropriate security, and the party is in violation of the order and is not providing appropriate security;
までに第四十九条第七項第八号へ移動(令和五年法律第五十三号)
the order for interim measures has been revoked, amended or suspended by the arbitral tribunal or the judicial body stated in paragraph (3);
までに第四十九条第七項第九号へ移動(令和五年法律第五十三号)
the petition filed in the arbitration procedure is concerned with a dispute which may not be subject to an arbitration agreement pursuant to the provisions of Japanese laws and regulations; or
仲裁手続における申立てが、日本の法令によれば、仲裁合意の対象とすることができない紛争に関するものであること。
までに第四十九条第七項第十号へ移動(令和五年法律第五十三号)
the content of the order for interim measures is contrary to public policy in Japan.
暫定保全措置命令の内容が、日本における公の秩序又は善良の風俗に反すること。
If the grounds stated in item (v) of the preceding paragraph exist, and the part concerning the matters provided for in that item can be separated from the other parts of the order for interim measures, the relevant part and the other parts of the order for interim measures are respectively deemed to be independent orders for interim measures, and the provisions of that paragraph apply.
An enforcement approval order is not effective until it becomes final and binding.
執行等認可決定は、確定しなければその効力を生じない。
The provisions of Article 44, paragraphs (4) and (7) apply mutatis mutandis to the decision on the petition referred to in paragraph (1).
定義第二条第一項・法令全体に適用
既に生じた民事上の紛争又は将来において生ずる一定の法律関係(契約に基づくものであるかどうかを問わない。)に関する民事上の紛争の全部又は一部の解決を一人又は二人以上の仲裁人にゆだね、かつ、その判断(以下「仲裁判断」という。)に服する旨の合意
わかりやすく言うと
すでに起きた民事上の紛争や、将来ある法律関係(契約によるものかどうかを問いません)から起きる民事上の紛争の全部又は一部の解決を一人以上の仲裁人に任せ、その判断に従うという合意のことです。
定義第二条第二項・法令全体に適用
仲裁合意に基づき、その対象となる民事上の紛争について審理し、仲裁判断を行う一人の仲裁人又は二人以上の仲裁人の合議体
略称規定第二十四条第三項
仲裁廷は、第一項各号に掲げる措置を講ずることを命ずる命令(以下「暫定保全措置命令」という。)を発するに際し、必要があると認めるときは、相当な担保を提供すべきことを命ずることができる。
わかりやすく言うと
仲裁判断があるまでの間、仲裁廷が当事者の一方の申立てにより他方に対し、財産の処分の禁止、損害の防止や原状回復、審理の妨害や証拠の廃棄の禁止などの措置を命じる命令です。当事者間に別段の合意があれば出せません(第二十四条第一項)。
略称規定第四十七条第一項
暫定保全措置命令(仲裁地が日本国内にあるかどうかを問わない。以下この章において同じ。)の申立てをした者は、当該暫定保全措置命令を受けた者を被申立人として、裁判所に対し、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、当該各号に定める決定(以下「執行等認可決定…
わかりやすく言うと
仲裁廷の暫定保全措置命令について裁判所がする決定です。損害の防止や原状回復などを命じるものにはそれに基づく民事執行を許し、財産の処分や証拠の廃棄の禁止などを命じるものには、違反し又は違反のおそれがあるときに金銭の支払を命じることを許します(第四十九条)。
公の秩序又は善良の風俗
社会の公の秩序と善良な風俗のことで、法の適用に関する通則法第四十二条の見出しは「公序」と呼んでいます。これに反するものには法的な効力が認められません。公の秩序又は善良の風俗に反する契約などの法律行為は無効であり(民法第九十条)、慣習は、これに反しないもので、法令の規定により認められたもの又は法令に規定されていない事項に関するものに限り、法律と同一の効力を持ち(法の適用に関する通則法第三条)、同法により外国法によるべき場合でも、その規定を適用することがこれに反するときは、その規定は適用されません(同法第四十二条)。
民法第90条、法の適用に関する通則法第3条・第42条を参考にAIが作成。