Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

8 articles

Chapter VI Arbitral Award and End of Arbitration Procedure

第六章 仲裁判断及び仲裁手続の終了

Article 36Applicable Law to be Applied in Arbitral Award

第三十六条(仲裁判断において準拠すべき法)

Moves to Article 38, paragraph (1) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The laws which the arbitral tribunal should comply with in making an arbitral award are as provided by the agreement of the parties. In this case, if laws and regulations of a given State have been designated, that designation is deemed not to designate the laws and regulations of the State providing the application of conflicting domestic and foreign laws and regulations but rather the laws and regulations of the State which are to be directly applied to the case, unless a contrary intention has been clearly indicated.

仲裁廷が仲裁判断において準拠すべき法は、当事者が合意により定めるところによる。この場合において、一の国の法令が定められたときは、反対の意思が明示された場合を除き、当該定めは、抵触する内外の法令の適用関係を定めるその国の法令ではなく、事案に直接適用されるその国の法令を定めたものとみなす。

Moves to Article 38, paragraph (2) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

If an agreement referred to in the preceding paragraph has not been reached, the arbitral tribunal must apply the laws and regulations of a State which has the closest relationship to the civil dispute that has been referred to the arbitration procedure and which should be directly applied to the case.

前項の合意がないときは、仲裁廷は、仲裁手続に付された民事上の紛争に最も密接な関係がある国の法令であって事案に直接適用されるべきものを適用しなければならない。

Moves to Article 38, paragraph (3) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, if both parties have stated a clear request, the arbitral tribunal is to decide ex aequo et bono.

仲裁廷は、当事者双方の明示された求めがあるときは、前二項の規定にかかわらず、衡平と善により判断するものとする。

Moves to Article 38, paragraph (4) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

An arbitral tribunal must make decisions in accordance with the terms of the contract related to the civil dispute which has been referred to the arbitral procedure, if the contract exists, and take into account the practices applicable to the relevant civil dispute, if any practices exist.

仲裁廷は、仲裁手続に付された民事上の紛争に係る契約があるときはこれに定められたところに従って判断し、当該民事上の紛争に適用することができる慣習があるときはこれを考慮しなければならない。

Article 37Decision of the Arbitral Tribunal Which is a Panel

第三十七条(合議体である仲裁廷の議事)

Moves to Article 39, paragraph (1) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

An arbitral tribunal which is a panel must appoint a presiding arbitrator, who is to be elected from among the arbitral tribunal members.

合議体である仲裁廷は、仲裁人の互選により、仲裁廷の長である仲裁人を選任しなければならない。

Moves to Article 39, paragraph (2) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The decision of an arbitral tribunal which is a panel is made by the majority of the arbitrators constituting the arbitral tribunal.

合議体である仲裁廷の議事は、仲裁廷を構成する仲裁人の過半数で決する。

Changes and moves to Article 39, paragraph (3) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the procedural matters in an arbitration procedure may be decided by the arbitrator who is the presiding arbitrator, if agreed to by both of the parties or delegated by all the other arbitrators.

前項の規定にかかわらず、仲裁手続における手続上の事項は、当事者双方の合意又は他のすべての仲裁人の委任があるときは、仲裁廷の長である仲裁人が決することができる。

Moves to Article 39, paragraph (4) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The provisions of the preceding three paragraphs do not apply if otherwise agreed by the parties.

前三項の規定は、当事者間に別段の合意がある場合には、適用しない。

Article 38Settlement

第三十八条(和解)

Moves to Article 40, paragraph (1) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

During the course of the arbitration procedure, if a settlement is arranged between the parties with regard to a civil dispute which has been referred to an arbitration procedure and both the parties have so petitioned, the arbitral tribunal may make a decision based on the agreed matters in the settlement.

仲裁廷は、仲裁手続の進行中において、仲裁手続に付された民事上の紛争について当事者間に和解が成立し、かつ、当事者双方の申立てがあるときは、当該和解における合意を内容とする決定をすることができる。

Moves to Article 40, paragraph (2) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The decision referred to in the preceding paragraph has the effect of an arbitral award.

前項の決定は、仲裁判断としての効力を有する。

Moves to Article 40, paragraph (3) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

In making the decision referred to in paragraph (1), an arbitral tribunal must prepare a written decision in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (3) of the following Article and indicate that the written decision is an arbitral award.

第一項の決定をするには、次条第一項及び第三項の規定に従って決定書を作成し、かつ、これに仲裁判断であることの表示をしなければならない。

Moves to Article 40, paragraph (4) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

If the consent of both parties has been obtained, an arbitral tribunal or one or more arbitrators who have been appointed by the arbitral tribunal may attempt to arrange a settlement for the civil dispute which has been referred to an arbitral procedure.

当事者双方の承諾がある場合には、仲裁廷又はその選任した一人若しくは二人以上の仲裁人は、仲裁手続に付された民事上の紛争について、和解を試みることができる。

Moves to Article 40, paragraph (5) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The consent referred to in the preceding paragraph or the revocation of the consent must be made in writing, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.

前項の承諾又はその撤回は、当事者間に別段の合意がない限り、書面でしなければならない。

Article 39Written Arbitral Award

第三十九条(仲裁判断書)

Moves to Article 41, paragraph (1) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

For an arbitral award to be made, a written arbitral award must be prepared and signed by the arbitrators who have made the arbitral award; provided, however, that if the arbitral tribunal is a panel, it will be sufficient that the written arbitral award is signed by the majority of the arbitrators constituting the arbitral tribunal and states the reasons for the signatures of other arbitrators being omitted.

仲裁判断をするには、仲裁判断書を作成し、これに仲裁判断をした仲裁人が署名しなければならない。ただし、仲裁廷が合議体である場合には、仲裁廷を構成する仲裁人の過半数が署名し、かつ、他の仲裁人の署名がないことの理由を記載すれば足りる。

Moves to Article 41, paragraph (2) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

A written arbitral award must state its reasons; provided, however, that this does not apply if otherwise agreed by the parties.

仲裁判断書には、理由を記載しなければならない。ただし、当事者間に別段の合意がある場合は、この限りでない。

Moves to Article 41, paragraph (3) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

A written arbitral award must state the date of the preparation and the place of arbitration.

仲裁判断書には、作成の年月日及び仲裁地を記載しなければならない。

Moves to Article 41, paragraph (4) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

An arbitral award is deemed to have been made at the place of arbitration.

仲裁判断は、仲裁地においてされたものとみなす。

Moves to Article 41, paragraph (5) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

If an arbitral award has been made, the arbitral tribunal must notify each party of the arbitral award by sending a copy of the written arbitral award signed by the arbitrators.

仲裁廷は、仲裁判断がされたときは、仲裁人の署名のある仲裁判断書の写しを送付する方法により、仲裁判断を各当事者に通知しなければならない。

Moves to Article 41, paragraph (6) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The provisions of the proviso to paragraph (1) apply mutatis mutandis to the copy of the written arbitral award referred to in the preceding paragraph.

第一項ただし書の規定は、前項の仲裁判断書の写しについて準用する。

Article 40End of Arbitration Procedure

第四十条(仲裁手続の終了)

Moves to Article 42, paragraph (1) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

An arbitration procedure ends when an arbitral award or a decision to end the arbitration procedure has been made.

仲裁手続は、仲裁判断又は仲裁手続の終了決定があったときに、終了する。

Changes and moves to Article 42, paragraph (2) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

Beyond what is provided for in the provisions of Article 23, paragraph (4), item (ii) or Article 33, paragraph (1), if any of the following grounds exist, an arbitral tribunal must make a decision to end the arbitration procedure:

仲裁廷は、第二十三条第四項第二号又は第三十三条第一項の規定による場合のほか、次に掲げる事由のいずれかがあるときは、仲裁手続の終了決定をしなければならない。

Moves to Article 42, paragraph (2), item (i) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

if the arbitration petitioner has withdrawn their petition; provided, however, that this does not apply to cases in which the arbitration respondent has stated their objection against the withdrawal, and the arbitral tribunal recognizes a legitimate interest on the part of the arbitration respondent in resolving the civil dispute which has been referred to an arbitration procedure;

仲裁申立人がその申立てを取り下げたとき。ただし、仲裁被申立人が取下げに異議を述べ、かつ、仲裁手続に付された民事上の紛争の解決について仲裁被申立人が正当な利益を有すると仲裁廷が認めるときは、この限りでない。

Moves to Article 42, paragraph (2), item (ii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

if both the parties have reached an agreement to end the arbitral procedure;

当事者双方が仲裁手続を終了させる旨の合意をしたとき。

Changes and moves to Article 42, paragraph (2), item (iii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

if a settlement has been arranged between the parties in regard to the civil dispute which has been referred to an arbitration procedure (excluding the case in which the decision referred to in Article 38, paragraph (1) has been made); and

仲裁手続に付された民事上の紛争について、当事者間に和解が成立したとき(第三十八条第一項の決定があったときを除く。)。

Moves to Article 42, paragraph (2), item (iv) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

beyond the cases set forth in the preceding three items, if the arbitral tribunal has found that it is unnecessary or impossible to continue the arbitration procedure.

前三号に掲げる場合のほか、仲裁廷が、仲裁手続を続行する必要がなく、又は仲裁手続を続行することが不可能であると認めたとき。

Changes and moves to Article 42, paragraph (3) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

When the arbitration procedure has ended, the duties of the arbitral tribunal end; provided, however, that the acts under the following Article through Article 43 may be carried out.

仲裁手続が終了したときは、仲裁廷の任務は、終了する。ただし、次条から第四十三条までの規定による行為をすることができる。

Article 41Correction of Arbitral Award

第四十一条(仲裁判断の訂正)

Moves to Article 43, paragraph (1) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

An arbitral tribunal may correct any miscalculation, clerical error or any other error similar to them in the arbitral award, upon the petition of the parties or on its own initiative.

仲裁廷は、当事者の申立てにより又は職権で、仲裁判断における計算違い、誤記その他これらに類する誤りを訂正することができる。

Moves to Article 43, paragraph (2) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The petition referred to in the preceding paragraph must be filed within 30 days from the date of receipt of the notice of arbitral award, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.

前項の申立ては、当事者間に別段の合意がない限り、仲裁判断の通知を受けた日から三十日以内にしなければならない。

Moves to Article 43, paragraph (3) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

If the party makes a petition referred to in paragraph (1), they must issue a notice containing the contents of the petition to the other party, in advance of or at the same time as the petition.

当事者は、第一項の申立てをするときは、あらかじめ、又は同時に、他の当事者に対して、当該申立ての内容を記載した通知を発しなければならない。

Moves to Article 43, paragraph (4) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The arbitral tribunal must make a decision on the petition referred to in paragraph (1) within 30 days from the date of that petition.

仲裁廷は、第一項の申立ての日から三十日以内に、当該申立てについての決定をしなければならない。

Moves to Article 43, paragraph (5) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

If it finds it necessary, the arbitral tribunal may extend the period referred to in the preceding paragraph.

仲裁廷は、必要があると認めるときは、前項の期間を延長することができる。

Changes and moves to Article 43, paragraph (6) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The provisions of Article 39 apply mutatis mutandis to the decision to correct the arbitral award and the decision to dismiss the petition referred to in paragraph (1) without prejudice.

第三十九条の規定は、仲裁判断の訂正の決定及び第一項の申立てを却下する決定について準用する。

Article 42Interpretation of Arbitral Award by Arbitral Tribunal

第四十二条(仲裁廷による仲裁判断の解釈)

Moves to Article 44, paragraph (1) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The parties may petition the arbitral tribunal to give an interpretation of a specific part of the arbitral award.

当事者は、仲裁廷に対し、仲裁判断の特定の部分の解釈を求める申立てをすることができる。

Moves to Article 44, paragraph (2) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The petition referred to in the preceding paragraph may be filed only if an agreement has been reached between the parties that the petition may be filed.

前項の申立ては、当事者間にかかる申立てをすることができる旨の合意がある場合に限り、することができる。

Changes and moves to Article 44, paragraph (3) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The provisions of the preceding Article, paragraphs (2) and (3) apply mutatis mutandis to the petition referred to in paragraph (1), and the provisions of Article 39 and the preceding Article, paragraphs (4) and (5) apply mutatis mutandis to the decision on the petition referred to in paragraph (1).

前条第二項及び第三項の規定は第一項の申立てについて、第三十九条並びに前条第四項及び第五項の規定は第一項の申立てについての決定について、それぞれ準用する。

Article 43Additional Arbitral Award

第四十三条(追加仲裁判断)

Changes and moves to Article 45, paragraph (1) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

If the award regarding a petition in an arbitration procedure is not stated in the arbitral award, the parties may petition the arbitral tribunal to make an arbitral award regarding the petition, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. In this case, the provisions of Article 41, paragraphs (2) and (3) apply mutatis mutandis.

当事者は、仲裁手続における申立てのうちに仲裁判断において判断が示されなかったものがあるときは、当事者間に別段の合意がない限り、仲裁廷に対し、当該申立てについての仲裁判断を求める申立てをすることができる。この場合においては、第四十一条第二項及び第三項の規定を準用する。

Changes and moves to Article 45, paragraph (2) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The arbitral tribunal must make a decision on the petition referred to in the preceding paragraph within 60 days from the date of the petition. In this case, the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (5) apply mutatis mutandis.

仲裁廷は、前項の申立ての日から六十日以内に、当該申立てについての決定をしなければならない。この場合においては、第四十一条第五項の規定を準用する。

Changes and moves to Article 45, paragraph (3) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The provisions of Article 39 apply mutatis mutandis to the decision referred to in the preceding paragraph.

第三十九条の規定は、前項の決定について準用する。

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy