The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.
Article 761第七百六十一条
Joint and Several Liability for Debts Incurred for Household Necessities(日常の家事に関する債務の連帯責任)
Article 761, paragraph (1)
When one party to a marriage performs a juridical act with a third party in respect of a household necessity, the other party to the marriage is jointly and severally liable for the debt arising from that act; provided, however, that this does not apply if advance notice is given to the third party indicating that the other party to the marriage will not bear such liability.
Vesting of Property in the Husband and Wife(夫婦間における財産の帰属)
Article 762, paragraph (1)
Property owned by one party before marriage and property obtained in the name of that party during the marriage is separate property (meaning property that one party to a marriage owns independently of the other party).
Article 764, paragraph (1)(婚姻の規定の準用)(Mutatis Mutandis Application of Marriage Provisions)Changed
The provisions of Articles 738,Article 739, and Article 747 apply mutatis mutandis to a divorce by agreement.
第七百三十八条、第七百三十九条及び第七百四十七条の規定は、協議上の離婚について準用する。
Article 765第七百六十五条
Acceptance of Application to Register a Divorce(離婚の届出の受理)
Article 765, paragraph (1)
It is not permissible to accept an application to register a divorce until the divorce has been found not to violate the provisions of Article 739, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding Article or the provisions of any other law or regulation, and, if there is a child between the husband and wife who has not attained the age of majority, to fall under any of the following items.
the person with parental authority has been determined;
親権者の定めがされていること。
Article 765, paragraph (1), item (ii)
a petition for a domestic relations ruling or domestic relations conciliation seeking the designation of the person with parental authority has been filed.
親権者の指定を求める家事審判又は家事調停の申立てがされていること。
Article 765, paragraph (2)
Even if an application to register a divorce is accepted in violation of the provisions of the preceding paragraph, this does not impair the validity of the divorce.
Determining Issues of Child Custody Following Divorce(離婚後の子の監護に関する事項の定め等)
Article 766, paragraph (1)
If parents divorce by agreement, the issues that need to be determined in connection with child custody, such as who will have custody over the child or the allocation of custody of the child, contact between the father or mother and the child, and the sharing of expenses that custody of the child requires, are determined in that agreement. The child's interests must be given the highest priority in the consideration of these issues, in such a case.
If the agreement referred to in the preceding paragraph is not reached or if discussions toward such an agreement cannot be held, the issues referred to in the preceding paragraph are determined by the family court.
前項の協議が調わないとき、又は協議をすることができないときは、家庭裁判所が、同項の事項を定める。
Article 766, paragraph (3)
The family court may change a determination under the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs and order any other proper disposition regarding child custody if it finds this to be necessary.
Parental rights and duties beyond the scope of custody are not altered by the provisions of the preceding three paragraphs.
前三項の規定によっては、監護の範囲外では、父母の権利義務に変更を生じない。
Article 766-2第七百六十六条の二
Determination of Contact between a Child and Relatives Other Than the Parents by Ruling(審判による父母以外の親族と子との交流の定め)
Article 766-2, paragraph (1)
In the cases referred to in paragraph (2) or paragraph (3) of the preceding Article, if the family court finds it particularly necessary for the interests of the child, it may determine that contact between the child and relatives other than the parents is to take place, as an issue that needs to be determined in connection with child custody prescribed in paragraph (1) of that Article.
A request for a ruling under paragraph (2) or paragraph (3) of the preceding Article regarding the determination referred to in the preceding paragraph may be made by the following persons (in the case of the person listed in item (ii), only where there is no other appropriate method for making a determination on contact between that person and the child):
relatives of the child other than the parents (in the case of persons other than the child's lineal ascendants and siblings, limited to those who have previously had custody of the child)
Special Provisions Where There Is No Determination on the Sharing of Expenses Required for Child Custody(子の監護に要する費用の分担の定めがない場合の特例)
Article 766-3, paragraph (1)
If the parents divorce by agreement without having made a determination on the sharing of expenses required for the custody of the child, the one of the parents who has continuously been primarily responsible for the custody of the child since the time of the divorce may, from the date of the divorce until the earliest of the following dates, demand of the other parent, at the end of each month, payment, as the sharing of expenses required for the custody of the child, of an amount calculated in accordance with a Ministry of Justice Order according to the number of children, taking into consideration the standard amount of expenses required to maintain the minimum standard of living of a child who is to be supported by the parents and other circumstances; provided, however, that the other parent may refuse to pay all or part of that amount upon proving that he or she is unable to pay it for lack of ability to pay or that his or her livelihood would be seriously impoverished by paying it.
the date on which the parents made, by agreement, a determination on the sharing of expenses required for the custody of the child;
父母がその協議により子の監護に要する費用の分担についての定めをした日
Article 766-3, paragraph (1), item (ii)
the date on which a ruling on the sharing of expenses required for the custody of the child becomes final and binding;
子の監護に要する費用の分担についての審判が確定した日
Article 766-3, paragraph (1), item (iii)
the date on which the child attains the age of majority.
子が成年に達した日
Article 766-3, paragraph (2)
The amount referred to in the preceding paragraph for the month containing the date of the divorce or the month containing the earliest of the dates set forth in the items of that paragraph is calculated on a daily basis, as provided by Ministry of Justice Order.
When the family court makes or changes a determination on the sharing of expenses required for the custody of the child pursuant to the provisions of Article 766, paragraph (2) or (3), it may, taking into consideration the ability to pay of the other parent who bears the obligation under the provisions of paragraph (1), order the exemption of all or part of that obligation, a deferment of payment, or any other proper disposition.
Reversion to Previous Surname upon Divorce(離婚による復氏等)
Article 767, paragraph (1)
The surname of the husband or wife who changed surnames upon marriage reverts to the surname used before marriage upon divorce by agreement.
婚姻によって氏を改めた夫又は妻は、協議上の離婚によって婚姻前の氏に復する。
Article 767, paragraph (2)
The husband or wife whose surname has reverted to the surname used before marriage pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph may take the surname used at the time of divorce by filing a registration pursuant to the Family Register Act within three months of the day of divorce.
One party to a divorce by agreement may ask the other party to effectuate a division of property.
協議上の離婚をした者の一方は、相手方に対して財産の分与を請求することができる。
Article 768, paragraph (2)
If no agreement between the parties is reached with respect to the division of property under the preceding paragraph or if discussions toward such an agreement cannot be held, either party may file a request with the family court for a disposition in lieu of such an agreement; provided, however, that this does not apply once five years have passed since the time of divorce.
In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the family court determines whether a division is to be made and the amount and method of the division, taking into consideration the amount of property acquired or maintained by both parties during the marriage and the degree of each party's contribution to its acquisition or maintenance, the duration of the marriage, the standard of living during the marriage, the state of cooperation and assistance during the marriage, the age, physical and mental condition, occupation and income of each party, and all other circumstances, in order to achieve equity in the property of the parties following the divorce. In this case, the degree of each party's contribution to the acquisition or maintenance of property during the marriage is to be equal if it is not clear that the degrees differ.
Succession of Rights after Reversion to Previous Surname upon Divorce(離婚による復氏の際の権利の承継)
Article 769, paragraph (1)
If the husband or wife who changed surnames upon marriage becomes party to a divorce by agreement after succeeding to rights as referred to in Article 897, paragraph (1), the matter of who succeeds to those rights must be determined through the agreement of the parties and any other interested persons.
If the agreement referred to in the preceding paragraph is not reached or if discussions toward such an agreement cannot be held, the family court determines who succeeds to the rights referred to in that paragraph.
One party to a marriage may independently initiate an action for divorce only in one of the following cases:
夫婦の一方は、次に掲げる場合に限り、離婚の訴えを提起することができる。
Article 770, paragraph (1), item (i)
if the other spouse commits adultery;
配偶者に不貞な行為があったとき。
Article 770, paragraph (1), item (ii)
if the party has been willfully abandoned by the other spouse;
配偶者から悪意で遺棄されたとき。
Article 770, paragraph (1), item (iii)
if it has been unclear whether the party's spouse is dead or alive for three or more years;
配偶者の生死が三年以上明らかでないとき。
Article 770, paragraph (1), item (iv)
if there are any other material grounds that make it difficult for the marriage to continue.
その他婚姻を継続し難い重大な事由があるとき。
Article 770, paragraph (2)
Even if any grounds as set forth in items (i) through (iii) of the preceding paragraph are present, the court may dismiss a divorce filing if, taking into consideration all circumstances, it finds it to be reasonable for the marriage to continue.