Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

This text is not in force yetIt by 23 December 2028, on a day set by — at the latest in 2 years

Read the text in force →

Civil Code

民法(みんぽう)

Chapter II Persons (Articles 11 to 32-2)

The law as Act Partially Amending the Civil Code, etc. (Act No. 45 of 2026) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.

The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.

Article 11第十一条Caption changed

Decisions for Commencement of CuratorshipDecisions to Grant Authority to Represent to an Assistant保佐開始の審判補助人に代理権を付与する旨の審判
4 changes in this article
Article 11, paragraph (1)(補助人に代理権を付与する旨の審判)Decisions to Grant Authority to Represent to an AssistantChanged

The family court may decide to commence a curatorship in respectIn any of a person whose capacity to appreciate their own situation is extremely inadequate due to a mental disorder or disability, atthe following cases, if the request of the person in question, the person's spouse, the person's relative within the fourth degree of kinship, the guardian, the guardian's supervisor,family court finds it to be necessary, it may issue a decision to grant the assistant, the assistant's supervisor, or authority to represent, for a public prosecutor; provided, however, that this does not applyperson subject to a person in respectdecision for commencement of whom a cause stated in Article 7 exists.assistance, in respect of specified juridical acts:

精神上の障害により事理を弁識する能力が著しく不十分である者については、家庭裁判所は、本人、配偶者、四親等内の親族、後見人、後見監督人次に掲げる場合において、必要があると認めるときは、補助人、補助監督人又は検察官の請求により、保佐開始開始の審判を受けた者のために特定の法律行為について補助人に代理権を付与する旨の審判をすることができる。ただし、第七条に規定する原因がある者については、この限りでない。

Article 11, paragraph (1), item (i)(補助人に代理権を付与する旨の審判)Decisions to Grant Authority to Represent to an AssistantAdded

if a request is made by a person prescribed in Article 7, paragraph (1) when a decision for commencement of assistance is made;

補助開始の審判をする場合において、第七条第一項に規定する者から請求があったとき。

Article 11, paragraph (1), item (ii)(補助人に代理権を付与する旨の審判)Decisions to Grant Authority to Represent to an AssistantAdded

if, after a decision for commencement of assistance has been made, a request is made by a person prescribed in Article 7, paragraph (1) or by the assistant or the assistant's supervisor.

補助開始の審判があった後、第七条第一項に規定する者又は補助人若しくは補助監督人から請求があったとき。

Article 11, paragraph (2)(補助人に代理権を付与する旨の審判)Decisions to Grant Authority to Represent to an AssistantAdded

The issuance of a decision under the provisions of the preceding paragraph at the request of a person other than the person in question requires the consent of the person in question; provided, however, that this does not apply if the person in question is unable to manifest the person's intention.

本人以外の者の請求により前項の規定による審判をするには、本人の同意がなければならない。ただし、本人がその意思を表示することができない場合は、この限りでない。

Article 12第十二条Caption changed

Persons Under Curatorship; CuratorsSetting Aside of Decisions for Commencement of Assistance, etc.被保佐人及び保佐人補助開始の審判等の取消し
6 changes in this article
Article 12, paragraph (1)(補助開始の審判等の取消し)Setting Aside of Decisions for Commencement of Assistance, etc.Changed

A person subject If the grounds prescribed in Article 7, paragraph (1) cease to a exist, the family court must set aside the decision for commencement of curatorship becomes assistance at the request of a person under curatorship, and a curator is appointed for that personprescribed in that paragraph, the assistant, or the assistant's supervisor.

保佐第七条第一項に規定する原因が消滅したときは、家庭裁判所は、同項に規定する者又は補助人若しくは補助監督人の請求により、補助開始の審判を受けた者は、被保佐人とし、これに保佐人を付する取り消さなければならない。

Article 13第十三条Caption removed

Acts Requiring Consent of Curator

保佐人の同意を要する行為等

Article 13, paragraph (1)(保佐人の同意を要する行為等)(Acts Requiring Consent of Curator)Removed

A person under curatorship must obtain the consent of the curator in order to perform any of the following acts; provided, however, that this does not apply to an act provided for in the proviso of Article 9:

被保佐人が次に掲げる行為をするには、その保佐人の同意を得なければならない。ただし、第九条ただし書に規定する行為については、この限りでない。

Article 13, paragraph (1), item (i)(保佐人の同意を要する行為等)(Acts Requiring Consent of Curator)Removed

receiving or using principal;

元本を領収し、又は利用すること。

Article 13, paragraph (1), item (ii)(保佐人の同意を要する行為等)(Acts Requiring Consent of Curator)Removed

borrowing money or guaranteeing an obligation;

借財又は保証をすること。

Article 13, paragraph (1), item (iii)(保佐人の同意を要する行為等)(Acts Requiring Consent of Curator)Removed

performing an act with the purpose of acquiring or losing any right regarding immovables or other significant property;

不動産その他重要な財産に関する権利の得喪を目的とする行為をすること。

Article 13, paragraph (1), item (iv)(保佐人の同意を要する行為等)(Acts Requiring Consent of Curator)Removed

performing a procedural act;

訴訟行為をすること。

Article 13, paragraph (1), item (v)(保佐人の同意を要する行為等)(Acts Requiring Consent of Curator)Removed

giving a gift, reaching a settlement, or entering into an arbitration agreement (meaning an arbitration agreement as provided in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Arbitration Act (Act No. 138 of 2003));

贈与、和解又は仲裁合意(仲裁法(平成十五年法律第百三十八号)第二条第一項に規定する仲裁合意をいう。)をすること。

Article 13, paragraph (1), item (vi)(保佐人の同意を要する行為等)(Acts Requiring Consent of Curator)Removed

accepting or renouncing a succession or dividing an estate;

相続の承認若しくは放棄又は遺産の分割をすること。

Article 13, paragraph (1), item (vii)(保佐人の同意を要する行為等)(Acts Requiring Consent of Curator)Removed

refusing an offer of a gift, renouncing a legacy, accepting an offer of gift with burden, or accepting a legacy with burden;

贈与の申込みを拒絶し、遺贈を放棄し、負担付贈与の申込みを承諾し、又は負担付遺贈を承認すること。

Article 13, paragraph (1), item (viii)(保佐人の同意を要する行為等)(Acts Requiring Consent of Curator)Removed

constructing a new building, renovating, expanding, or undertaking major repairs;

新築、改築、増築又は大修繕をすること。

Article 13, paragraph (1), item (ix)(保佐人の同意を要する行為等)(Acts Requiring Consent of Curator)Removed

granting a lease for a term that exceeds the period stated in Article 602; or

第六百二条に定める期間を超える賃貸借をすること。

Article 13, paragraph (1), item (x)(保佐人の同意を要する行為等)(Acts Requiring Consent of Curator)Removed

performing any of the acts stated in the preceding items as a legal representative of a person with qualified legal capacity (meaning a minor, adult ward, or person under curatorship or a person under assistantship who is subject to a decision referred to in Article 17, paragraph (1); the same applies below).

前各号に掲げる行為を制限行為能力者(未成年者、成年被後見人、被保佐人及び第十七条第一項の審判を受けた被補助人をいう。以下同じ。)の法定代理人としてすること。

Article 13, paragraph (2)(保佐人の同意を要する行為等)(Acts Requiring Consent of Curator)Removed

At the request of a person referred to in the main clause of Article 11 or the curator or curator's supervisor, the family court may decide that the person under curatorship must also obtain the consent of the curator before performing an act other than those stated in each of the items of the preceding paragraph; provided, however, that this does not apply to an act provided for in the proviso to Article 9.

家庭裁判所は、第十一条本文に規定する者又は保佐人若しくは保佐監督人の請求により、被保佐人が前項各号に掲げる行為以外の行為をする場合であってもその保佐人の同意を得なければならない旨の審判をすることができる。ただし、第九条ただし書に規定する行為については、この限りでない。

Article 13, paragraph (3)(保佐人の同意を要する行為等)(Acts Requiring Consent of Curator)Removed

If the curator does not consent to an act for which the person under curatorship must obtain the curator's consent even though it is unlikely to prejudice the interests of the person under curatorship, the family court may grant permission that operates in lieu of the curator's consent at the request of the person under curatorship.

保佐人の同意を得なければならない行為について、保佐人が被保佐人の利益を害するおそれがないにもかかわらず同意をしないときは、家庭裁判所は、被保佐人の請求により、保佐人の同意に代わる許可を与えることができる。

Article 13, paragraph (4)(保佐人の同意を要する行為等)(Acts Requiring Consent of Curator)Removed

An act for which the person under curatorship must obtain the curator's consent may be revoked if the person performs it without obtaining the curator's consent or a permission that operates in lieu of it.

保佐人の同意を得なければならない行為であって、その同意又はこれに代わる許可を得ないでしたものは、取り消すことができる。

Article 14第十四条Caption removed

Setting Aside of Decisions for Commencement of Curatorship

保佐開始の審判等の取消し

Article 14, paragraph (1)(保佐開始の審判等の取消し)(Setting Aside of Decisions for Commencement of Curatorship)Removed

If the grounds prescribed in the main clause of Article 11 cease to exist, the family court must set aside the decision for the commencement of curatorship at the request of the person in question, that person's spouse, that person's relative within the fourth degree of kinship, the guardian of a minor, the supervisor of a minor's guardian, the curator, the curator's supervisor, or a public prosecutor.

第十一条本文に規定する原因が消滅したときは、家庭裁判所は、本人、配偶者、四親等内の親族、未成年後見人、未成年後見監督人、保佐人、保佐監督人又は検察官の請求により、保佐開始の審判を取り消さなければならない。

Article 14, paragraph (2)(保佐開始の審判等の取消し)(Setting Aside of Decisions for Commencement of Curatorship)Removed

At the request of a person provided for in the preceding paragraph, the family court may set aside all or part of the decision referred to in paragraph (2) of the preceding Article.

家庭裁判所は、前項に規定する者の請求により、前条第二項の審判の全部又は一部を取り消すことができる。

Article 15第十五条Caption removed

Decisions for Commencement of Assistance

補助開始の審判

Article 15, paragraph (1)(補助開始の審判)(Decisions for Commencement of Assistance)Removed

The family court may decide to commence an assistance in respect of a person whose capacity to appreciate their own situation is inadequate due to a mental disorder or disability, at the request of the person in question, that person's spouse, that person's relative within the fourth degree of kinship, the guardian, the guardian's supervisor, the curator, the curator's supervisor, or a public prosecutor; provided, however, that this does not apply to a person with respect to whom there are grounds as prescribed in Article 7 or the main clause of Article 11.

精神上の障害により事理を弁識する能力が不十分である者については、家庭裁判所は、本人、配偶者、四親等内の親族、後見人、後見監督人、保佐人、保佐監督人又は検察官の請求により、補助開始の審判をすることができる。ただし、第七条又は第十一条本文に規定する原因がある者については、この限りでない。

Article 15, paragraph (2)(補助開始の審判)(Decisions for Commencement of Assistance)Removed

The issuance of a decision for commencement of assistance at the request of a person other than the person in question requires the consent of the person in question.

本人以外の者の請求により補助開始の審判をするには、本人の同意がなければならない。

Article 15, paragraph (3)(補助開始の審判)(Decisions for Commencement of Assistance)Removed

A decision for commencement of assistance must be made concurrent with a decision referred to in Article 17, paragraph (1) or a decision referred to in Article 876-9, paragraph (1).

補助開始の審判は、第十七条第一項の審判又は第八百七十六条の九第一項の審判とともにしなければならない。

Article 16第十六条Caption removed

Persons under Assistantship; Assistants

被補助人及び補助人

Article 16, paragraph (1)(被補助人及び補助人)(Persons under Assistantship; Assistants)Removed

A person subject to a decision for commencement of assistance becomes a person under assistantship, and an assistant is appointed for that person.

補助開始の審判を受けた者は、被補助人とし、これに補助人を付する。

Article 17第十七条Caption removed

Decisions Requiring Person to Obtain Consent of Assistant

補助人の同意を要する旨の審判等

Article 17, paragraph (1)(補助人の同意を要する旨の審判等)(Decisions Requiring Person to Obtain Consent of Assistant)Removed

At the request of the person referred to in the main clause of Article 15, paragraph (1) or the assistant or assistant's supervisor, the family court may decide that the person under assistantship must obtain the consent of the person's assistant in order to perform a specific juridical act; provided, however, that the acts that such a decision may establish as those for which the person must obtain the consent of the assistant are restricted to a part of the acts provided for in Article 13, paragraph (1).

家庭裁判所は、第十五条第一項本文に規定する者又は補助人若しくは補助監督人の請求により、被補助人が特定の法律行為をするにはその補助人の同意を得なければならない旨の審判をすることができる。ただし、その審判によりその同意を得なければならないものとすることができる行為は、第十三条第一項に規定する行為の一部に限る。

Article 17, paragraph (2)(補助人の同意を要する旨の審判等)(Decisions Requiring Person to Obtain Consent of Assistant)Removed

The issuance of a decision referred to in the preceding paragraph at the request of a person other than the person in question requires the consent of the person in question.

本人以外の者の請求により前項の審判をするには、本人の同意がなければならない。

Article 17, paragraph (3)(補助人の同意を要する旨の審判等)(Decisions Requiring Person to Obtain Consent of Assistant)Removed

If the assistant does not consent to an act for which the person under assistantship must obtain the assistant's consent even though it is unlikely to prejudice the interests of the person under assistantship, the family court may grant permission that operates in lieu of the assistant's consent, at the request of the person under assistantship.

補助人の同意を得なければならない行為について、補助人が被補助人の利益を害するおそれがないにもかかわらず同意をしないときは、家庭裁判所は、被補助人の請求により、補助人の同意に代わる許可を与えることができる。

Article 17, paragraph (4)(補助人の同意を要する旨の審判等)(Decisions Requiring Person to Obtain Consent of Assistant)Removed

An act for which the person under assistantship must obtain the assistant's consent may be revoked if the person performs it without obtaining the assistance's consent or a permission that operates in lieu of it.

補助人の同意を得なければならない行為であって、その同意又はこれに代わる許可を得ないでしたものは、取り消すことができる。

Article 18第十八条Caption removed

Setting Aside of Decisions for Commencement of Assistance

補助開始の審判等の取消し

Article 18, paragraph (1)(補助開始の審判等の取消し)(Setting Aside of Decisions for Commencement of Assistance)Removed

If the grounds prescribed in the main clause of Article 15, paragraph (1) cease to exist, the family court must set aside the decision for commencement of assistance at the request of the person in question, that person's spouse, that person's relative within the fourth degree of kinship, the guardian of a minor, the supervisor of a minor's guardian, the assistant, the assistant's supervisor, or a public prosecutor.

第十五条第一項本文に規定する原因が消滅したときは、家庭裁判所は、本人、配偶者、四親等内の親族、未成年後見人、未成年後見監督人、補助人、補助監督人又は検察官の請求により、補助開始の審判を取り消さなければならない。

Article 18, paragraph (2)(補助開始の審判等の取消し)(Setting Aside of Decisions for Commencement of Assistance)Removed

At the request of a person as prescribed in the preceding paragraph, the family court may set aside all or part of the decision referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article.

家庭裁判所は、前項に規定する者の請求により、前条第一項の審判の全部又は一部を取り消すことができる。

Article 18, paragraph (3)(補助開始の審判等の取消し)(Setting Aside of Decisions for Commencement of Assistance)Removed

If setting aside the decision referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article and the decision referred to in Article 876-9, paragraph (1) in their entirety, the family court must set aside the decision for commencement of assistance.

前条第一項の審判及び第八百七十六条の九第一項の審判をすべて取り消す場合には、家庭裁判所は、補助開始の審判を取り消さなければならない。

Article 19第十九条Caption removed

Relationship between Decisions

審判相互の関係

Article 19, paragraph (1)(審判相互の関係)(Relationship between Decisions)Removed

If the family court decides to commence a guardianship and the person in question is a person under curatorship or a person under assistantship, it must set aside the decision for commencement of the curatorship or commencement of assistance respecting that person.

後見開始の審判をする場合において、本人が被保佐人又は被補助人であるときは、家庭裁判所は、その本人に係る保佐開始又は補助開始の審判を取り消さなければならない。

Article 19, paragraph (2)(審判相互の関係)(Relationship between Decisions)Removed

The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis if the court decides to commence a curatorship and the person in question is an adult ward or a person under assistantship or if the court decides to commence an assistance and the person in question is an adult ward or a person under curatorship.

前項の規定は、保佐開始の審判をする場合において本人が成年被後見人若しくは被補助人であるとき、又は補助開始の審判をする場合において本人が成年被後見人若しくは被保佐人であるときについて準用する。

Article 12, paragraph (2)(補助開始の審判等の取消し)Setting Aside of Decisions for Commencement of Assistance, etc.Added

If the family court finds that it is no longer necessary, it may set aside all or part of the decision under the provisions of Article 9, paragraph (1) at the request of a person prescribed in Article 7, paragraph (1), the assistant, or the assistant's supervisor.

家庭裁判所は、必要がなくなったと認めるときは、第七条第一項に規定する者又は補助人若しくは補助監督人の請求により、第九条第一項の規定による審判の全部又は一部を取り消すことができる。

Article 12, paragraph (3)(補助開始の審判等の取消し)Setting Aside of Decisions for Commencement of Assistance, etc.Added

If the grounds prescribed in Article 10, paragraph (1) cease to exist, the family court must set aside the decision under the provisions of Article 10, paragraph (1) at the request of a person prescribed in Article 7, paragraph (1), the specified assistant, or the assistant's supervisor.

第十条第一項に規定する原因が消滅したときは、家庭裁判所は、第七条第一項に規定する者又は特定補助人若しくは補助監督人の請求により、第十条第一項の規定による審判を取り消さなければならない。

Article 12, paragraph (4)(補助開始の審判等の取消し)Setting Aside of Decisions for Commencement of Assistance, etc.Added

If the family court finds that it is no longer necessary, it may set aside all or part of the decision under the provisions of Article 10, paragraph (1) or the decision under the provisions of paragraph (3) of that Article at the request of a person prescribed in Article 7, paragraph (1), the specified assistant, or the assistant's supervisor.

家庭裁判所は、必要がなくなったと認めるときは、第七条第一項に規定する者又は特定補助人若しくは補助監督人の請求により、第十条第一項の規定による審判又は同条第三項の規定による審判の全部若しくは一部を取り消すことができる。

Article 12, paragraph (5)(補助開始の審判等の取消し)Setting Aside of Decisions for Commencement of Assistance, etc.Added

If the family court finds that it is no longer necessary, it may set aside all or part of the decision under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article at the request of a person prescribed in Article 7, paragraph (1), the assistant, or the assistant's supervisor.

家庭裁判所は、必要がなくなったと認めるときは、第七条第一項に規定する者又は補助人若しくは補助監督人の請求により、前条第一項の規定による審判の全部又は一部を取り消すことができる。

Article 12, paragraph (6)(補助開始の審判等の取消し)Setting Aside of Decisions for Commencement of Assistance, etc.Added

If all of the decisions under the provisions of Article 9, paragraph (1), Article 10, paragraph (1) and paragraph (1) of the preceding Article are set aside, the family court must set aside the decision for commencement of assistance.

第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び前条第一項の規定による審判を全て取り消す場合には、家庭裁判所は、補助開始の審判を取り消さなければならない。

Articles 13 to 19第十三条から第十九条まで

1 change in this article
Articles 13 to 19, paragraph (1)Added

Deleted

削除

Article 20第二十条

Right to Demand of the Other Party to Dealings Involving a Person with Qualified Legal Capacity(制限行為能力者の相手方の催告権)
2 changes in this article
Article 20, paragraph (1)(制限行為能力者の相手方の催告権)

After a person with qualified legal capacity who is involved in dealings with another party becomes a person with the legal capacity to act (meaning a person whose legal capacity to act is not subject to restrictions; the same applies below), the other party to those dealings may fix a period of one month or longer and demand that the person give a definite answer within that period of time as to whether the person will ratify an act that the person may revoke. In such a case, if the person fails to send a definite answer within that period of time, the person is deemed to have ratified that act.

制限行為能力者の相手方は、その制限行為能力者が行為能力者(行為能力の制限を受けない者をいう。以下同じ。)となった後、その者に対し、一箇月以上の期間を定めて、その期間内にその取り消すことができる行為を追認するかどうかを確答すべき旨の催告をすることができる。この場合において、その者がその期間内に確答を発しないときは、その行為を追認したものとみなす。

Article 20, paragraph (2)(制限行為能力者の相手方の催告権)(Right to Demand of the Other Party to Dealings Involving a Person with Qualified Legal Capacity)Changed

The second sentence of the preceding paragraph also applies if, before the person with qualified legal capacity becomes a person with the legal capacity to act, the other party to dealings involving the person with qualified legal capacity lodges the demand prescribed in the preceding paragraph with the legal representative, curator, or assistant of that person with respect to an act within the scope of their authority, and they fail to send a definite answer within the fixed period of time referred to in that paragraph.

制限行為能力者の相手方が、制限行為能力者が行為能力者とならない間に、その法定代理人、保佐人又は補助人に対し、その権限内の行為について前項に規定する催告をした場合において、これらの者が同項の期間内に確答を発しないときも、同項後段と同様とする。

Article 20, paragraph (3)(制限行為能力者の相手方の催告権)

If a person does not send notice within the period of time stated in the preceding two paragraphs indicating that the person has completed any special formalities that an act requires, the person is deemed to have revoked that act.

特別の方式を要する行為については、前二項の期間内にその方式を具備した旨の通知を発しないときは、その行為を取り消したものとみなす。

Article 20, paragraph (4)(制限行為能力者の相手方の催告権)(Right to Demand of the Other Party to Dealings Involving a Person with Qualified Legal Capacity)Changed

The other party to dealings involving a person with qualified legal capacity may lodge a demand with a person under curatorship or with a person under assistantship who is subject to a decision referred to in under the provisions of Article 179, paragraph (1) to demand that the person get the curator or assistant to ratify an act within the fixed period referred to in paragraph (1). In such a case, if the person under curatorship or personsubject to a decision under assistantship the provisions of paragraph (1) of that Article does not send notice within that period indicating that the person has gotten the curator or assistant to ratify the act in question, the person is deemed to have revoked that act.

制限行為能力者の相手方は、被保佐人又は第十七第九条第一項の規定による審判を受けた被補助人者に対しては、第一項の期間内にその保佐人又は補助人の追認を得るべき旨の催告をすることができる。この場合において、その被保佐人又は被補助人同条第一項の規定による審判を受けた者がその期間内にその追認を得た旨の通知を発しないときは、その行為を取り消したものとみなす。

Article 21第二十一条

Use of Fraudulent Means by Persons with Qualified Legal Capacity(制限行為能力者の詐術)
Article 21, paragraph (1)

If a person with qualified legal capacity uses fraudulent means to induce another person to believe that the person is a person with legal capacity to act, the person may not revoke the act in question.

制限行為能力者が行為能力者であることを信じさせるため詐術を用いたときは、その行為を取り消すことができない。

Section 4 Domicile第四節 住所

Article 22第二十二条

Domicile(住所)
Article 22, paragraph (1)

A person's principal place of daily activity is that person's domicile.

各人の生活の本拠をその者の住所とする。

Article 23第二十三条

Residence(居所)
Article 23, paragraph (1)

If a person's domicile is unknown, the person's residence is deemed to be the person's domicile.

住所が知れない場合には、居所を住所とみなす。

Article 23, paragraph (2)

If a person does not have a domicile in Japan, the person's residence is deemed to be the person's domicile, regardless of whether the person is a Japanese national or a foreign national; provided, however, that this does not apply if the law of domicile is to be applied in accordance with the provisions of the laws that establish the governing law.

日本に住所を有しない者は、その者が日本人又は外国人のいずれであるかを問わず、日本における居所をその者の住所とみなす。ただし、準拠法を定める法律に従いその者の住所地法によるべき場合は、この限りでない。

Article 24第二十四条

Temporary Addresses(仮住所)
Article 24, paragraph (1)

If a temporary address is selected for an act, that temporary address is deemed to be the domicile as far as that act is concerned.

ある行為について仮住所を選定したときは、その行為に関しては、その仮住所を住所とみなす。

Section 5 Administration of Absentee Property; Declarations of Presumed Death第五節 不在者の財産の管理及び失踪の宣告

Article 25第二十五条

Administration of Absentee Property(不在者の財産の管理)
Article 25, paragraph (1)

If a person who has taken leave of the domicile or residence up until then (referred to as an "absentee" below) has not appointed an administrator for the person's property (in this Section referred to simply as an "administrator" below), the family court, at the request of an interested person or a public prosecutor, may order the necessary dispositions with regard to the administration of that property. The same applies if the administrator's authority is extinguished during the absence of the absentee.

従来の住所又は居所を去った者(以下「不在者」という。)がその財産の管理人(以下この節において単に「管理人」という。)を置かなかったときは、家庭裁判所は、利害関係人又は検察官の請求により、その財産の管理について必要な処分を命ずることができる。本人の不在中に管理人の権限が消滅したときも、同様とする。

Article 25, paragraph (2)

If an absentee appoints an administrator after an order under the provisions of the preceding paragraph has been issued, the family court must set aside that order at the request of the person's administrator, an interested person, or a public prosecutor.

前項の規定による命令後、本人が管理人を置いたときは、家庭裁判所は、その管理人、利害関係人又は検察官の請求により、その命令を取り消さなければならない。

Article 26第二十六条

Replacing Administrators(管理人の改任)
Article 26, paragraph (1)

If an absentee has appointed an administrator but it is unclear whether the absentee is dead or alive, the family court may replace that administrator with another at the request of an interested person or a public prosecutor.

不在者が管理人を置いた場合において、その不在者の生死が明らかでないときは、家庭裁判所は、利害関係人又は検察官の請求により、管理人を改任することができる。

Article 27第二十七条

Duties of Administrators(管理人の職務)
Article 27, paragraph (1)

An administrator appointed by the family court pursuant to the provisions of the preceding two Articles must prepare a list of the property that the administrator is to administer. In such a case, the expenses incurred are paid from the property of the absentee.

前二条の規定により家庭裁判所が選任した管理人は、その管理すべき財産の目録を作成しなければならない。この場合において、その費用は、不在者の財産の中から支弁する。

Article 27, paragraph (2)

If it is unclear whether an absentee is dead or alive and an interested person or a public prosecutor so requests, the family court may also order the administrator appointed by the absentee to prepare the list referred to in the preceding paragraph.

不在者の生死が明らかでない場合において、利害関係人又は検察官の請求があるときは、家庭裁判所は、不在者が置いた管理人にも、前項の目録の作成を命ずることができる。

Article 27, paragraph (3)

Beyond what is provided for in the preceding two paragraphs, the family court may order the administrator to make the dispositions that the court finds to be necessary to preserve the property of the absentee.

前二項に定めるもののほか、家庭裁判所は、管理人に対し、不在者の財産の保存に必要と認める処分を命ずることができる。

Article 28第二十八条

Administrators' Authority(管理人の権限)
Article 28, paragraph (1)

If an administrator needs to perform an act exceeding the authority provided for in Article 103, the administrator may perform that act after obtaining the permission of the family court. The same applies if it is unclear whether the absentee is dead or alive and the administrator needs to perform an act exceeding the authority established by the absentee.

管理人は、第百三条に規定する権限を超える行為を必要とするときは、家庭裁判所の許可を得て、その行為をすることができる。不在者の生死が明らかでない場合において、その管理人が不在者が定めた権限を超える行為を必要とするときも、同様とする。

Article 29第二十九条

Provision of Security by and Remuneration of Administrators(管理人の担保提供及び報酬)
Article 29, paragraph (1)

The family court may require an administrator to provide reasonable security with respect to the administration and return of the property.

家庭裁判所は、管理人に財産の管理及び返還について相当の担保を立てさせることができる。

Article 29, paragraph (2)

The family court may grant reasonable remuneration to the administrator from the property of the absentee based on the relationship between the administrator and absentee and other circumstances.

家庭裁判所は、管理人と不在者との関係その他の事情により、不在者の財産の中から、相当な報酬を管理人に与えることができる。

Article 30第三十条

Declarations of Presumed Death(失踪の宣告)
Article 30, paragraph (1)

If it has been unclear for seven years whether an absentee is dead or alive, the family court may enter a declaration of presumed death at the request of an interested person.

不在者の生死が七年間明らかでないときは、家庭裁判所は、利害関係人の請求により、失踪の宣告をすることができる。

Article 30, paragraph (2)

The provisions of the preceding paragraph also apply if it has been unclear whether a person who has entered a war zone, was aboard a vessel that has sunk, or was otherwise exposed to a danger likely to result in a person's death is dead or alive, for one year after the war has ended, the vessel sank, or other danger has passed.

戦地に臨んだ者、沈没した船舶の中に在った者その他死亡の原因となるべき危難に遭遇した者の生死が、それぞれ、戦争が止んだ後、船舶が沈没した後又はその他の危難が去った後一年間明らかでないときも、前項と同様とする。

Article 31第三十一条

Effect of Declarations of Presumed Death(失踪の宣告の効力)
Article 31, paragraph (1)

A person subject to a declaration of presumed death pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is deemed to have died when the period of time referred to in that paragraph ended, and a person subject to a declaration of presumed death pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of that Article is deemed to have died when that danger had passed.

前条第一項の規定により失踪の宣告を受けた者は同項の期間が満了した時に、同条第二項の規定により失踪の宣告を受けた者はその危難が去った時に、死亡したものとみなす。

Article 32第三十二条

Revocation of Declarations of Presumed Death(失踪の宣告の取消し)
Article 32, paragraph (1)

Having received proof that a person presumed dead is alive or they died at a time that is different from the time provided for in the preceding Article, the family court must revoke the declaration of presumed death, at the request of the person themselves or an interested party. In this case, the revocation does not affect the validity of any act performed in good faith after the declaration of presumed death but before its revocation.

失踪者が生存すること又は前条に規定する時と異なる時に死亡したことの証明があったときは、家庭裁判所は、本人又は利害関係人の請求により、失踪の宣告を取り消さなければならない。この場合において、その取消しは、失踪の宣告後その取消し前に善意でした行為の効力に影響を及ぼさない。

Article 32, paragraph (2)

A person who has acquired property due to a declaration of presumed death loses the rights in question due to its revocation; provided, however, that the person has the obligation to return that property only to the extent that the person has actually been enriched.

失踪の宣告によって財産を得た者は、その取消しによって権利を失う。ただし、現に利益を受けている限度においてのみ、その財産を返還する義務を負う。

Section 6 Presumption of Simultaneous Death第六節 同時死亡の推定

Article 32-2第三十二条の二

Article 32-2, paragraph (1)

If more than one person dies and it is unclear whether one of them was still alive after the death of another, it is presumed that they all died at the same time.

数人の者が死亡した場合において、そのうちの一人が他の者の死亡後になお生存していたことが明らかでないときは、これらの者は、同時に死亡したものと推定する。

Change 1 of 44
© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy