If share options for which there are provisions with respect to the matters set forth in Article 236, paragraph (1), item (iii) are exercised, a stock company must petition the court, without delay after a delivery of property under the provisions of Article 281, paragraph (2), for the appointment of an inspector, in order to have the inspector investigate the value of the property provided for in that item (hereinafter in this Section referred to as "property contributed in kind").
株式会社は、第二百三十六条第一項第三号に掲げる事項についての定めがある新株予約権が行使された場合には、第二百八十一条第二項の規定による給付があった後、遅滞なく、同号の財産（以下この節において「現物出資財産」という。）の価額を調査させるため、裁判所に対し、検査役の選任の申立てをしなければならない。
If the petition referred to in the preceding paragraph has been filed, the court must appoint an inspector, except if it dismisses the petition as unlawful.
前項の申立てがあった場合には、裁判所は、これを不適法として却下する場合を除き、検査役を選任しなければならない。
If the court has appointed the inspector under the preceding paragraph, it may fix the amount of the remuneration that the stock company pays to relevant inspector.
裁判所は、前項の検査役を選任した場合には、株式会社が当該検査役に対して支払う報酬の額を定めることができる。
The inspector referred to in paragraph (2) must conduct the necessary investigation and submit a report to the court by providing it with a document detailing the results of the investigation or with an electronic or magnetic record (limited one prescribed by Ministry of Justice Order) in which these have been recorded.
If the court finds it necessary to clarify the contents of the report stated in the preceding paragraph or to confirm the grounds supporting that report, it may request that the inspector referred to in paragraph (2) submit a further report under the preceding paragraph.
If the inspector under paragraph (2) has submitted the report referred to in paragraph (4), the inspector must deliver a copy of the document referred to in that paragraph to the stock company or use a means prescribed by Ministry of Justice Order to provide it with the information recorded in the electronic or magnetic record referred to in that paragraph.
If the court receives a report under paragraph (4), if it finds the value provided for in Article 236, paragraph (1), item (iii) with respect to the property contributed in kind (excluding a value not subjected to the investigation by the inspector under paragraph (2)) to be improper, it must issue a ruling changing relevant value.
裁判所は、第四項の報告を受けた場合において、現物出資財産について定められた第二百三十六条第一項第三号の価額（第二項の検査役の調査を経ていないものを除く。）を不当と認めたときは、これを変更する決定をしなければならない。
If the value of the property contributed in kind has been changed, in whole or in part, because of a ruling under the preceding paragraph, the share option holders referred to in paragraph (1) may rescind their manifestation of intention relating to the exercise of their share options, limited to within one week from the finalization of relevant ruling.
The provisions of the preceding paragraphs do not apply in the cases in each of the following items with respect to the matters prescribed respectively in those items:
前各項の規定は、次の各号に掲げる場合には、当該各号に定める事項については、適用しない。
if the total number of the shares to be delivered to the holders of share options that have been exercised does not exceed one tenth of the total number of issued shares:the value of the property contributed in kind that are tendered by the holders of relevant share options;
if the total sum of the values provided for under Article 236, paragraph (1), item (iii) with respect to the property contributed in kind does not exceed 5,000,000 yen:the value of relevant property contributed in kind;
現物出資財産について定められた第二百三十六条第一項第三号の価額の総額が五百万円を超えない場合 当該現物出資財産の価額
if the value provided for under Article 236, paragraph (1), item (iii) with respect to the property contributed in kind does not exceed the value calculated by the method prescribed by Ministry of Justice Order as the market price of relevant securities:the value of the property contributed in kind with respect to relevant securities;
現物出資財産のうち、市場価格のある有価証券について定められた第二百三十六条第一項第三号の価額が当該有価証券の市場価格として法務省令で定める方法により算定されるものを超えない場合 当該有価証券についての現物出資財産の価額
if the verification of an attorney, a legal professional corporation, a lawyer and registered foreign lawyer joint corporation, a certified public accountant, an audit corporation, a certified public tax accountant or a tax accountancy corporation (or if the property contributed in kind consist of real estate, relevant verification and an appraisal by a real estate appraiser; hereinafter the same applies in this item) is obtained with respect to the reasonableness of the value provided for under Article 236, paragraph (1), item (iii) with respect to property contributed in kind:the value of the property contributed in kind for which verification has been obtained;
現物出資財産について定められた第二百三十六条第一項第三号の価額が相当であることについて弁護士、弁護士法人、弁護士・外国法事務弁護士共同法人、公認会計士、監査法人、税理士又は税理士法人の証明（現物出資財産が不動産である場合にあっては、当該証明及び不動産鑑定士の鑑定評価。以下この号において同じ。）を受けた場合 当該証明を受けた現物出資財産の価額
if the property contributed in kind consist of a money claim (limited to claims that have already fallen due), and the value provided for under Article 236, paragraph (1), item (iii) with respect to relevant money claim does not exceed the book value of the debt representing the money claim:the value of the property contributed in kind with respect to relevant monetary claim.
現物出資財産が株式会社に対する金銭債権（弁済期が到来しているものに限る。）であって、当該金銭債権について定められた第二百三十六条第一項第三号の価額が当該金銭債権に係る負債の帳簿価額を超えない場合 当該金銭債権についての現物出資財産の価額
None of the following persons can provide the verification provided in item (iv) of the preceding paragraph:
次に掲げる者は、前項第四号に規定する証明をすることができない。
a director, an accounting advisor, a company auditor or executive officer, or an employee including a manager;
取締役、会計参与、監査役若しくは執行役又は支配人その他の使用人
a share option holder;
新株予約権者
a person who has become subject to a suspension of operations for whom the period of that suspension has not elapsed yet; or
業務の停止の処分を受け、その停止の期間を経過しない者
Read this with the articles around it
(Features of Share Option)
if property other than monies will be the subject of the contribution when share options are exercised, a statement to that effect and the description and value of that property;
金銭以外の財産を当該新株予約権の行使に際してする出資の目的とするときは、その旨並びに当該財産の内容及び価額
Open this provision(Payment of Amount to Be Paid in on Exercise of Share Option)
If any property other than monies is the subject of the contribution to be made on the exercise of share options, the share option holders must deliver the property provided for in Article 236…
金銭以外の財産を新株予約権の行使に際してする出資の目的とするときは、新株予約権者は、前条第一項第二号の日に、その行使に係る新株予約権についての第二百三十六条第一項第三号の財産を給付しなければならない。
Open this provisionIf share options for which there are provisions with respect to the matters set forth in Article 236, paragraph (1), item (iii) are exercised, a stock company must petition the court…
株式会社は、第二百三十六条第一項第三号に掲げる事項についての定めがある新株予約権が行使された場合には、第二百八十一条第二項の規定による給付があった後、遅滞なく、同号の財産（以下この節において「現物出資財産」という。）の価額を調査させるため、裁判所に対し、検査役の選任の申立てをしなければならない。
Open this provisiona director, an accounting advisor, a company auditor or executive officer, or an employee including a manager;
取締役、会計参与、監査役若しくは執行役又は支配人その他の使用人
Open this provisionIf the petition referred to in the preceding paragraph has been filed, the court must appoint an inspector, except if it dismisses the petition as unlawful.
前項の申立てがあった場合には、裁判所は、これを不適法として却下する場合を除き、検査役を選任しなければならない。
Open this provisionIf the court has appointed the inspector under the preceding paragraph, it may fix the amount of the remuneration that the stock company pays to relevant inspector.
裁判所は、前項の検査役を選任した場合には、株式会社が当該検査役に対して支払う報酬の額を定めることができる。
Open this provisionThe inspector referred to in paragraph (2) must conduct the necessary investigation and submit a report to the court by providing it with a document detailing the results of the investigation or with…
第二項の検査役は、必要な調査を行い、当該調査の結果を記載し、又は記録した書面又は電磁的記録（法務省令で定めるものに限る。）を裁判所に提供して報告をしなければならない。
Open this provisionIf the court finds it necessary to clarify the contents of the report stated in the preceding paragraph or to confirm the grounds supporting that report…
裁判所は、前項の報告について、その内容を明瞭にし、又はその根拠を確認するため必要があると認めるときは、第二項の検査役に対し、更に前項の報告を求めることができる。
Open this provisionIf the inspector under paragraph (2) has submitted the report referred to in paragraph (4), the inspector must deliver a copy of the document referred to in that paragraph to the stock company or use…
第二項の検査役は、第四項の報告をしたときは、株式会社に対し、同項の書面の写しを交付し、又は同項の電磁的記録に記録された事項を法務省令で定める方法により提供しなければならない。
Open this provisionIf the court receives a report under paragraph (4), if it finds the value provided for in Article 236, paragraph (1), item (iii) with respect to the property contributed in kind…
裁判所は、第四項の報告を受けた場合において、現物出資財産について定められた第二百三十六条第一項第三号の価額（第二項の検査役の調査を経ていないものを除く。）を不当と認めたときは、これを変更する決定をしなければならない。
Open this provisionIf the value of the property contributed in kind has been changed, in whole or in part, because of a ruling under the preceding paragraph, the share option holders referred to in paragraph (1) may…
第一項の新株予約権の新株予約権者は、前項の決定により現物出資財産の価額の全部又は一部が変更された場合には、当該決定の確定後一週間以内に限り、その新株予約権の行使に係る意思表示を取り消すことができる。
Open this provisionif the verification of an attorney, a legal professional corporation, a lawyer and registered foreign lawyer joint corporation, a certified public accountant, an audit corporation…
現物出資財産について定められた第二百三十六条第一項第三号の価額が相当であることについて弁護士、弁護士法人、弁護士・外国法事務弁護士共同法人、公認会計士、監査法人、税理士又は税理士法人の証明（現物出資財産が不動産である場合にあっては、当該証明及び不動産鑑定士の鑑定評価。以下この号において同じ。）を受けた場合 当該証明を…
Open this provisionshare option
「新株予約権」
A right that entitles its holder, by exercising it against a stock company, to receive shares of that company.
Defined inArticle 2, paragraph (1), item (xxi)· applies throughout the law
issued shares
「発行済株式」
The shares a stock company has issued.
Defined inArticle 2, paragraph (1), item (xxxi)
electronic or magnetic record
「電磁的記録」
A record made in electronic, magnetic or any other form people cannot perceive directly, of a kind that Ministry of Justice Order (法務省令) specifies as used in computer processing.
Defined inArticle 26, paragraph (2)
securitiescorrected by this site
「有価証券」
Securities as defined in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, including rights deemed to be securities under paragraph (2) of that Article.
Defined inArticle 33, paragraph (10), item (ii)
property contributed in kind
「現物出資財産」
Property other than money contributed on exercising a share option whose terms allow it, whose value the company must generally have checked by an inspector (検査役) the court appoints.
Short name set inArticle 284, paragraph (1)· applies only in this section
company auditor
監査役
An officer of a stock company, elected by the shareholders meeting (Companies Act, Article 329, paragraph (1)), whose job is to audit how the directors carry out their duties and to write an audit report on it (Article 381, paragraph (1)). Not an outside accountant — that is the financial auditor (会計監査人) — and not a director: a company auditor may not also be a director or employee of the company or its subsidiaries (Article 335, paragraph (2)). The term normally runs to the annual shareholders meeting for the last business year ending within four years of election (Article 336, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Companies Act, Arts. 329, 335, 336, 381 as a reference.
director
取締役
An officer of a stock company, elected by the shareholders meeting (Companies Act, Article 329, paragraph (1)). Every stock company has at least one (Article 326, paragraph (1)). Where there is no board of directors, the directors run the company's business unless the articles of incorporation say otherwise (Article 348, paragraph (1)), and each of them represents it unless the company has chosen representative directors (代表取締役) or others to do that (Article 349, paragraphs (1) and (3)). Where there is a board (取締役会, board of directors), the directors are its members, and the board decides the business and normally chooses the representative directors from among them (Article 362). The term normally runs to the annual shareholders meeting for the last business year ending within two years of election (Article 332, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Companies Act, Arts. 326, 329, 332, 348, 349, 362 as a reference.
manifestation of intention
意思表示
A person's expression of an intention to which the law gives a legal effect, such as an offer to conclude a contract, which shows its terms and forms the contract once the other party accepts it (Civil Code, Article 522, paragraph (1)), the acceptance itself (Article 527), or the notice to the other party by which a party rescinds (取消し) an act or cancels (解除) a contract (Articles 123 and 540, paragraph (1)). One made to another person takes effect when notice of it reaches that person, or when it would normally have reached them if they blocked it without good reason (Article 97, paragraphs (1) and (2)), and does not lose its effect because the person who made it dies, loses mental capacity (意思能力) or comes under legal limits on what they can do alone after sending the notice (Article 97, paragraph (3)); where the person making it cannot find out who the other party is or where they are, it can be made by public notice (Article 98, paragraph (1)). It is not void just because the person making it knew it was not their true intention, unless the other party knew or could have known that (Article 93, paragraph (1)); a false one made in collusion with the other party is void (Article 94, paragraph (1)); and neither voidness can be asserted against a third party who did not know of it (善意) (Articles 93, paragraph (2), and 94, paragraph (2)). One based on a mistake that is material in light of the purpose of the juridical act (法律行為) and accepted views in dealings may be rescinded — one based on a mistaken view of the circumstances behind the act only if it had been shown that the act was based on them, and as a rule not where the mistake came from the gross negligence of the person who made it (Article 95, paragraphs (1) to (3)) — and so may one made under fraud or duress, though one induced by a third party's fraud only if the other party knew of the fraud or could have known of it (Article 96, paragraphs (1) and (2)); a rescission for mistake or fraud cannot be relied on against a third party who did not know and was not careless in not knowing (Article 95, paragraph (4), and Article 96, paragraph (3)). One that an agent makes within the agent's authority, showing that it is made for the principal, takes effect directly for the principal (Article 99, paragraph (1)). The Consumer Contract Act lets a consumer rescind an offer or acceptance of a consumer contract made because the business, when soliciting it, told them something untrue about an important matter and they believed it, among other grounds (Consumer Contract Act, Article 4, paragraph (1), item (i)), and the Act on Specified Commercial Transactions does the same where, in a door-to-door sale, the seller or service provider told them something untrue about such matters as the goods or the price (Article 6, paragraph (1), and Article 9-3, paragraph (1), item (i)).
Written by AI using Civil Code, Arts. 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 123, 522, 527, 540, Consumer Contract Act, Art. 4 and Act on Specified Commercial Transactions, Arts. 6, 9-3 as a reference.
rescission
取消し
Undoing a legal act, such as an offer or acceptance of a contract (意思表示, a manifestation of intention), that the law says may be rescinded: for example one made through an important mistake, though a mistake about the circumstances behind the act only if it had been made clear that they were its basis, and as a rule not where the person was grossly careless (Civil Code, Article 95), or one made under fraud or duress, though fraud by a third party only if the other party knew of it or could have known (Article 96), or one a minor made without the consent of their legal representative (Article 5, paragraph (2)). Once rescinded, the act is treated as void from the start (Article 121). Only the person who made it, their representative or successor, or someone whose consent it needed may rescind it (Article 120). The right is lost if not used within five years from when the act could be confirmed — once the mistake, fraud or other cause has ended and the person knows they can rescind (Article 124) — or twenty years from the act (Article 126). It is lost sooner if the person confirms the act, and once it could be confirmed, performing it or demanding performance without reserving objections counts as confirming it (Articles 122 and 125). The Consumer Contract Act adds grounds of its own, such as a business telling the consumer something untrue about an important matter when soliciting the contract, where the consumer believed it and made the contract because of it (Article 4, paragraph (1), item (i)), and gives most of them a shorter time: one year from when the act could be confirmed, and five years from the contract (Article 7, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Civil Code, Arts. 5, 95, 96, 120, 121, 122, 124, 125, 126 and Consumer Contract Act, Arts. 4, 7 as a reference.