A court clerk must, in a disposition of seizure, prohibit the obligor from collecting or otherwise disposing the monetary claim and prohibit the third party obligor from providing performance to the obligor.
The provisions of Article 145, paragraphs (2), (3), (5), (7) and (8) apply mutatis mutandis to a disposition of seizure, and the provisions of paragraph (4) of that Article apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a disposition of seizure is served, respectively. In this case, the phrase "Article 153, paragraph (1) or (2)" in that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "Article 167-8, paragraph (1) or (2)", and the phrase "enforcement court" in paragraphs (7) and (8) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "court clerk".
A person must file an objection to a court clerk's disposition on a petition for a disposition of seizure within an inalterable period of one week from the day on which the person is notified of the disposition.
差押処分の申立てについての裁判所書記官の処分に対する執行異議の申立ては、その告知を受けた日から一週間の不変期間内にしなければならない。
An appeal may be filed against a judicial decision on the objection to an enforcement measure referred to in the preceding paragraph.
前項の執行異議の申立てについての裁判に対しては、執行抗告をすることができる。
The provisions of Article 74, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to a disposition made by a court clerk on a petition for a disposition on seizure. In this case, the preceding two paragraphs and paragraph (3) of that Article apply mutatis mutandis.
民事訴訟法第七十四条第一項の規定は、差押処分の申立てについての裁判所書記官の処分について準用する。この場合においては、前二項及び同条第三項の規定を準用する。
A person must file an objection to a court clerk's enforcement measure under Article 145, paragraph (8) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) within an inalterable period of one week from the date on which the person is notified of the measure.
An appeal may be filed against a judicial decision to deny the objection to an enforcement measure referred to in the preceding paragraph.
前項の執行異議の申立てを却下する裁判に対しては、執行抗告をすることができる。
A disposition made by a court clerk under Article 145, paragraph (8) which are replaced and applied mutatis mutandis in paragraph (2) is not effective until it becomes final and binding.
Read this with the articles around it