Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

6 articles

Section 1 Procedures for Agreement and Consultation

第一節 合意及び協議の手続

Article 350-2

第三百五十条の二

When a public prosecutor finds it necessary taking into account the importance of evidence obtained if a suspect or the defendant in a case involving the specific crime performs one or more than one of the acts set forth in item (i) with regard to another person's criminal case involving the specific crime (hereinafter simply referred to as "another person's criminal case"), the gravity and circumstances of the crime concerned, the extent of the relevance of that crime concerned and other circumstances, the public prosecutor may reach an agreement with the suspect or defendant to the effect that the suspect or defendant performs one or more than one of the acts set forth in the same item with regard to that another person's criminal case, and the public prosecutor performs one or more than one of the acts set forth in item (ii) with regard to the case of the suspect or defendant.

検察官は、特定犯罪に係る事件の被疑者又は被告人が特定犯罪に係る他人の刑事事件(以下単に「他人の刑事事件」という。)について一又は二以上の第一号に掲げる行為をすることにより得られる証拠の重要性、関係する犯罪の軽重及び情状、当該関係する犯罪の関連性の程度その他の事情を考慮して、必要と認めるときは、被疑者又は被告人との間で、被疑者又は被告人が当該他人の刑事事件について一又は二以上の同号に掲げる行為をし、かつ、検察官が被疑者又は被告人の当該事件について一又は二以上の第二号に掲げる行為をすることを内容とする合意をすることができる。

Acts set forth in the following:

次に掲げる行為

making a true statement in an interrogation conducted by the public prosecutor, the public prosecutor's assistant officer or a judicial police official pursuant to the provisions of Article 198, paragraph (1) or Article 223, paragraph (1);

第百九十八条第一項又は第二百二十三条第一項の規定による検察官、検察事務官又は司法警察職員の取調べに際して真実の供述をすること。

making a true statement when the suspect or defendant is examined as a witness; or

証人として尋問を受ける場合において真実の供述をすること。

in relation to the collection of evidence by the public prosecutor, the public prosecutor's assistant officer or a judicial police official, submitting evidence or providing other necessary cooperation (except those set forth in (a) and (b)).

検察官、検察事務官又は司法警察職員による証拠の収集に関し、証拠の提出その他の必要な協力をすること(イ及びロに掲げるものを除く。)。

Acts set forth in the following:

次に掲げる行為

not instituting prosecution;

公訴を提起しないこと。

withdrawing prosecution;

公訴を取り消すこと。

instituting or maintaining prosecution using the specific count and applicable penal statute;

特定の訴因及び罰条により公訴を提起し、又はこれを維持すること。

requesting the addition or withdrawal of the specific count or applicable penal statute, or the alteration of a count or an applicable penal statute to the specific count or applicable penal statute;

特定の訴因若しくは罰条の追加若しくは撤回又は特定の訴因若しくは罰条への変更を請求すること。

stating an opinion to the effect that the specific sentence should be rendered to the defendant, in the statement of opinions pursuant to the provisions of Article 293, paragraph (1);

第二百九十三条第一項の規定による意見の陳述において、被告人に特定の刑を科すべき旨の意見を陳述すること。

filing a petition for expedited trial proceedings; or

即決裁判手続の申立てをすること。

filing a request for a summary order.

略式命令の請求をすること。

The "specific crime" provided in the preceding paragraph means one of the following crimes (except those punishable by the death penalty or imprisonment for life):

前項に規定する「特定犯罪」とは、次に掲げる罪(死刑又は無期拘禁刑に当たるものを除く。)をいう。

crimes under pertaining to the crimes under , or , attempts of crimes under pertaining to the crimes under or , or crimes under or ;

、若しくはに掲げる罪に係るの罪、若しくはに掲げる罪に係るの罪の未遂罪又は若しくはの罪

in addition to those set forth in the preceding two items, crimes under laws related to taxes, the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 54 of 1947) or the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (Act No. 25 of 1948), or other crimes provided by Cabinet Order as finance and economy-related crimes;

前二号に掲げるもののほか、租税に関する法律、私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律(昭和二十二年法律第五十四号)又は金融商品取引法(昭和二十三年法律第二十五号)の罪その他の財政経済関係犯罪として政令で定めるもの

crimes under the following laws:

次に掲げる法律の罪

Criminal Regulations to Control Explosives (Cabinet Ordinance No. 32 of 1884);

爆発物取締罰則(明治十七年太政官布告)

;

;

;

;

;

; or

crimes under Article 103, 104 or 105-2 of the Penal Code, or crimes under (limited to those involving persons set forth in ) or (for any of these crimes, limited to those listed in the preceding items, which are regarded as the crimes of the principal offenders).

刑法第百三条、第百四条若しくは第百五条の二の罪又はの罪(に掲げる者に係るものに限る。)若しくはの罪(いずれも前各号に掲げる罪を本犯の罪とするものに限る。)

In an agreement under paragraph (1), matters incidental to the acts performed by the suspect or defendant as set forth in item (i) of the same paragraph, or the acts performed by the public prosecutor as set forth in item (ii) of the same paragraph, and other necessary matters to achieve the purpose of the agreement may be contained.

第一項の合意には、被疑者若しくは被告人がする同項第一号に掲げる行為又は検察官がする同項第二号に掲げる行為に付随する事項その他の合意の目的を達するため必要な事項をその内容として含めることができる。

Article 350-3

第三百五十条の三

An agreement under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article must be made with the consent of the defense counsel.

前条第一項の合意をするには、弁護人の同意がなければならない。

Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)

An agreement under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article must be made in writing jointly signed by a public prosecutor, and a suspect or the defendant and the defense counsel, clearly stating the content of the agreement.

前条第一項の合意は、検察官、被疑者又は被告人及び弁護人が連署した書面により、その内容を明らかにしてするものとする。

Article 350-4

第三百五十条の四

The necessary consultation to make an agreement under Article 350-2, paragraph (1) shall be held between a public prosecutor, and a suspect or the defendant and the defense counsel; provided, however, that when the suspect or defendant and the defense counsel do not raise an objection, the public prosecutor may consult only with the defense counsel in part.

第三百五十条の二第一項の合意をするため必要な協議は、検察官と被疑者又は被告人及び弁護人との間で行うものとする。ただし、被疑者又は被告人及び弁護人に異議がないときは、協議の一部を弁護人のみとの間で行うことができる。

Article 350-5

第三百五十条の五

In a consultation under the preceding Article, a public prosecutor may request that a suspect or the defendant should make a statement on another person's criminal case. In this case, the provisions of Article 198, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis.

前条の協議において、検察官は、被疑者又は被告人に対し、他人の刑事事件について供述を求めることができる。この場合においては、第百九十八条第二項の規定を準用する。

A statement made by a suspect or the defendant during a consultation under the preceding Article may not be used as evidence if the agreement under Article 350-2, paragraph (1) is not reached.

被疑者又は被告人が前条の協議においてした供述は、第三百五十条の二第一項の合意が成立しなかつたときは、これを証拠とすることができない。

The provisions of the preceding paragraph do not apply when any act performed by a suspect or the defendant during a consultation thereunder falls under a crime under Article 103, 104 or 172 of the Penal Code or a crime under pertaining to the persons set forth in provisions of or , and a statement made during the consultation is used in the cases involving these crimes.

前項の規定は、被疑者又は被告人が当該協議においてした行為が刑法第百三条、第百四条若しくは第百七十二条の罪又は若しくはに掲げる者に係るの罪に当たる場合において、これらの罪に係る事件において用いるときは、これを適用しない。

Article 350-6

第三百五十条の六

When a public prosecutor intends to start consultation under Article 350-4 with a suspect in a case referred or sent by a judicial police officer or a case the public prosecutor finds that a judicial police officer is actually investigating, the public prosecutor must consult with the judicial police officer in advance.

検察官は、司法警察員が送致し若しくは送付した事件又は司法警察員が現に捜査していると認める事件について、その被疑者との間で第三百五十条の四の協議を行おうとするときは、あらかじめ、司法警察員と協議しなければならない。

When a public prosecutor finds it necessary for the investigation of another person's criminal case pertaining to a consultation under Article 350-4 taking into account that a judicial police officer is actually investigating that another person's criminal case and other circumstances, the public prosecutor may have the judicial police officer request a statement pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article and perform other necessary acts for the consultation. In this case, the judicial police officer may present the content of the act set forth in item (ii) of Article 350-2, paragraph (1), which is proposed by the public prosecutor to be the content of the agreement under the same paragraph, to the extent that the public prosecutor individually delegates powers to the judicial police officer.

検察官は、第三百五十条の四の協議に係る他人の刑事事件について司法警察員が現に捜査していることその他の事情を考慮して、当該他人の刑事事件の捜査のため必要と認めるときは、前条第一項の規定により供述を求めることその他の当該協議における必要な行為を司法警察員にさせることができる。この場合において、司法警察員は、検察官の個別の授権の範囲内で、検察官が第三百五十条の二第一項の合意の内容とすることを提案する同項第二号に掲げる行為の内容の提示をすることができる。

Section 2 Special Provisions on Trial Procedure

第二節 公判手続の特例

Article 350-7

第三百五十条の七

Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)

When a public prosecutor reaches an agreement with a suspect under Article 350-2, paragraph (1), and institutes prosecution with regard to the suspect's case pertaining to the agreement, the public prosecutor must request the examination of the document referred to in Article 350-3, paragraph (2) (hereinafter referred to as the "statement of agreement") as evidence without delay after the completion of the procedure under Article 291 (or if it has been ruled that the case be subject to a pretrial arrangement proceeding, after that time). The same applies when a public prosecutor reaches an agreement with the defendant with regard to the defendant's case after institution of prosecution under Article 350-2, paragraph (1).

検察官は、被疑者との間でした第三百五十条の二第一項の合意がある場合において、当該合意に係る被疑者の事件について公訴を提起したときは、第二百九十一条の手続が終わつた後(事件が公判前整理手続に付された場合にあつては、その時後)遅滞なく、証拠として第三百五十条の三第二項の書面(以下「合意内容書面」という。)の取調べを請求しなければならない。被告事件について、公訴の提起後に被告人との間で第三百五十条の二第一項の合意をしたときも、同様とする。

Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)

When a public prosecutor requests the examination of the statement of agreement pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, and is notified by the party to the agreement that the party is to pull out of the agreement pursuant to the provisions of Article 350-10, paragraph (2), the public prosecutor must request the examination of the document referred to in the same paragraph together with that statement of agreement.

前項の規定により合意内容書面の取調べを請求する場合において、当該合意の当事者が第三百五十条の十第二項の規定により当該合意から離脱する旨の告知をしているときは、検察官は、あわせて、同項の書面の取調べを請求しなければならない。

Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)

After a public prosecutor has requested the examination of the statement of agreement pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), if the public prosecutor is notified by the party to the agreement that the party is to pull out of the agreement pursuant to the provisions of Article 350-10, paragraph (2), the public prosecutor must request the examination of the document referred to in the same paragraph without delay.

第一項の規定により合意内容書面の取調べを請求した後に、当該合意の当事者が第三百五十条の十第二項の規定により当該合意から離脱する旨の告知をしたときは、検察官は、遅滞なく、同項の書面の取調べを請求しなければならない。

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy