When a public prosecutor is to give an opportunity to learn of the name and address of a witness, an expert witness, an interpreter or a translator pursuant to the provisions of Article 299, paragraph (1), and finds that the body or property of the person or the person's relative is likely to be harmed or either of these persons is likely to be threatened or confused, the public prosecutor may, after giving the defendant's defense counsel the opportunity to learn of the person's name and address, set a condition that the defense counsel must not notify the defendant of that name or address, or designate the time or method of notification to the defendant; provided, however, that this does not apply when the condition or designation makes it impossible to confirm whether or not the witness, expert witness, interpreter or translator has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of that person's statement, or otherwise is likely to substantially harm the defense of the defendant.
検察官は、第二百九十九条第一項の規定により証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人の氏名及び住居を知る機会を与えるべき場合において、その者若しくはその親族の身体若しくは財産に害を加え又はこれらの者を畏怖させ若しくは困惑させる行為がなされるおそれがあると認めるときは、弁護人に対し、当該氏名及び住居を知る機会を与えた上で、当該氏名又は住居を被告人に知らせてはならない旨の条件を付し、又は被告人に知らせる時期若しくは方法を指定することができる。ただし、その証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人の供述の証明力の判断に資するような被告人その他の関係者との利害関係の有無を確かめることができなくなるときその他の被告人の防御に実質的な不利益を生ずるおそれがあるときは、この限りでない。
Where the opportunity to learn of the name and address of a witness is to be given pursuant to Article 299, paragraph (1), the same applies as in the preceding paragraph also if the extract of the charging sheet, etc. has been submitted pursuant to Article 271-2, paragraph (2), or the extract of the written request for alteration of counts, etc. (meaning the extract of the written request for alteration of counts, etc. prescribed in Article 312-2, paragraph (2); hereinafter the same applies in this Article and Article 299-5, paragraph (2), item (i)) has been submitted pursuant to Article 312-2, paragraph (2) (excluding the case where a ruling dismissing the request under Article 312, paragraph (1) has been made; the same applies in paragraph (7)), and it is found that the name or address falls under the particulars identifying an individual stated in the charging sheet that are not stated in the extract of the charging sheet, etc., or the particulars identifying an individual stated in the written request for alteration of counts, etc. (meaning the written request for alteration of counts, etc. prescribed in Article 312, paragraph (4); hereinafter the same applies in this Article and Article 299-5, paragraph (2), item (i)) that are not stated in the extract of the written request for alteration of counts, etc. (in either case excluding those that are to be notified by a ruling under Article 271-5, paragraph (1) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis with the terms replaced pursuant to Article 312-2, paragraph (4)); the same applies in paragraph (7) and Article 299-5, paragraph (2), item (i)), and it is found to be those of a person set forth in Article 271-2, paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii). In this case, the phrase "the witness, expert witness, interpreter or translator" in the proviso of the preceding paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "the witness".
第二百九十九条第一項の規定により証人の氏名及び住居を知る機会を与えるべき場合において、第二百七十一条の二第二項の規定により起訴状抄本等を提出した場合又は第三百十二条の二第二項の規定により訴因変更等請求書面抄本等(同項に規定する訴因変更等請求書面抄本等をいう。以下この条及び次条第二項第一号において同じ。)を提出した場合(第三百十二条第一項の請求を却下する決定があつた場合を除く。第七項において同じ。)であつて、当該氏名又は住居が起訴状に記載された個人特定事項のうち起訴状抄本等に記載がないもの又は訴因変更等請求書面(第三百十二条第四項に規定する訴因変更等請求書面をいう。以下この条及び同号において同じ。)に記載された個人特定事項のうち訴因変更等請求書面抄本等に記載がないもの(いずれも第二百七十一条の五第一項(第三百十二条の二第四項において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。)の決定により通知することとされたものを除く。第七項及び同号において同じ。)に該当し、かつ、第二百七十一条の二第一項第一号又は第二号に掲げる者のものに該当すると認めるときも、前項と同様とする。この場合において、同項ただし書中「証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人」とあるのは、「証人」とする。
In the case of the main clause of paragraph (1), when a public prosecutor finds that it is likely impossible to prevent the acts provided in the main clause of the same paragraph by the measures taken pursuant to the provisions of the main clause of the same paragraph (including the case when there is no defense counsel for the defendant), the public prosecutor does not have to give the defendant and the defense counsel an opportunity to learn of the name or address of a witness, an expert witness, an interpreter or a translator, unless this makes it impossible to confirm whether or not the witness, expert witness, interpreter or translator has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of that person's statement, or otherwise is likely to substantially harm the defense of the defendant. In this case, the public prosecutor must give the defendant or the defense counsel an opportunity to learn of a pseudonym in lieu of the name, or a contact address in lieu of the address.
検察官は、第一項本文の場合において、同項本文の規定による措置によつては同項本文に規定する行為を防止できないおそれがあると認めるとき(被告人に弁護人がないときを含む。)は、その証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人の供述の証明力の判断に資するような被告人その他の関係者との利害関係の有無を確かめることができなくなる場合その他の被告人の防御に実質的な不利益を生ずるおそれがある場合を除き、被告人及び弁護人に対し、その証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人の氏名又は住居を知る機会を与えないことができる。この場合において、被告人又は弁護人に対し、氏名にあつてはこれに代わる呼称を、住居にあつてはこれに代わる連絡先を知る機会を与えなければならない。
Where the opportunity to learn of the name and address of a witness is to be given pursuant to Article 299, paragraph (1), the same applies as in the preceding paragraph also if the extract of the charging sheet, etc. or the extract of the written request for alteration of counts, etc. has been submitted pursuant to Article 271-3, paragraph (3) or Article 271-4, paragraph (4) (including the case where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 312-2, paragraph (4); the same applies in paragraph (9)) (excluding the case where a ruling dismissing the request under Article 312, paragraph (1) has been made; the same applies in paragraph (9)), and it is found that the name or address falls under the particulars identifying an individual stated in the charging sheet that are not stated in the extract of the charging sheet, etc., or the particulars identifying an individual stated in the written request for alteration of counts, etc. that are not stated in the extract of the written request for alteration of counts, etc. (in either case excluding those that are to be notified by a ruling under Article 271-5, paragraph (1) or (2) (including the case where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 312-2, paragraph (4)); the same applies in paragraph (9)), and it is found to be those of a person set forth in Article 271-2, paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii). In this case, the phrase "the witness, expert witness, interpreter or translator has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of that person's statement" in the preceding paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "the witness has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of the testimony of the witness", and the phrase "the name or address of a witness, an expert witness, an interpreter or a translator" in that paragraph with "that name or address".
第二百九十九条第一項の規定により証人の氏名及び住居を知る機会を与えるべき場合において、第二百七十一条の三第三項又は第二百七十一条の四第四項(これらの規定を第三百十二条の二第四項において準用する場合を含む。第九項において同じ。)の規定により起訴状抄本等又は訴因変更等請求書面抄本等を提出した場合(第三百十二条第一項の請求を却下する決定があつた場合を除く。第九項において同じ。)であつて、当該氏名又は住居が起訴状に記載された個人特定事項のうち起訴状抄本等に記載がないもの又は訴因変更等請求書面に記載された個人特定事項のうち訴因変更等請求書面抄本等に記載がないもの(いずれも第二百七十一条の五第一項又は第二項(これらの規定を第三百十二条の二第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の決定により通知することとされたものを除く。第九項において同じ。)に該当し、かつ、第二百七十一条の二第一項第一号又は第二号に掲げる者のものに該当すると認めるときも、前項と同様とする。この場合において、同項中「証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人の供述」とあるのは「証人の供述」と、「その証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人の氏名」とあるのは「当該氏名」とする。
In the case prescribed in the first sentence of paragraph (2), the same applies as in paragraph (3) also when the defendant has no defense counsel. In this case, the phrase "the witness, expert witness, interpreter or translator has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of that person's statement" in paragraph (3) is deemed to be replaced with "the witness has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of the testimony of the witness", and the phrase "the name or address of a witness, an expert witness, an interpreter or a translator" in that paragraph with "that name or address".
When a public prosecutor is to give an opportunity to inspect documentary evidence or articles of evidence pursuant to the provisions of Article 299, paragraph (1), and finds that the body or property of a person whose name or address is included or recorded in the documentary evidence or articles of evidence and whose examination as a witness, an expert witness, an interpreter or a translator is to be requested by the public prosecutor, or of a person who has made a statement in a recorded statement document (hereinafter referred to as the "witness, etc. requested by the public prosecutor" in this paragraph and paragraph (8)), or of a relative of the witness, etc. requested by the public prosecutor, is likely to be harmed, or either of these persons is likely to be threatened or confused, the public prosecutor may, after giving the defendant's defense counsel the opportunity to inspect the documentary evidence or articles of evidence, set a condition that the defense counsel must not notify the defendant of the name or address of that witness, etc. requested by the public prosecutor, or designate the time or method of notification to the defendant; provided, however, that this does not apply when the condition or designation makes it impossible to confirm whether or not that witness, etc. requested by the public prosecutor has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of that person's statement, or otherwise is likely to substantially harm the defense of the defendant.
検察官は、第二百九十九条第一項の規定により証拠書類又は証拠物を閲覧する機会を与えるべき場合において、証拠書類若しくは証拠物に氏名若しくは住居が記載され若しくは記録されている者であつて検察官が証人、鑑定人、通訳人若しくは翻訳人として尋問を請求するもの若しくは供述録取書等の供述者(以下この項及び第八項において「検察官請求証人等」という。)若しくは検察官請求証人等の親族の身体若しくは財産に害を加え又はこれらの者を畏怖させ若しくは困惑させる行為がなされるおそれがあると認めるときは、弁護人に対し、証拠書類又は証拠物を閲覧する機会を与えた上で、その検察官請求証人等の氏名又は住居を被告人に知らせてはならない旨の条件を付し、又は被告人に知らせる時期若しくは方法を指定することができる。ただし、その検察官請求証人等の供述の証明力の判断に資するような被告人その他の関係者との利害関係の有無を確かめることができなくなるときその他の被告人の防御に実質的な不利益を生ずるおそれがあるときは、この限りでない。
Where the opportunity to inspect documentary evidence or articles of evidence is to be given pursuant to Article 299, paragraph (1), the same applies as in the preceding paragraph also if the extract of the charging sheet, etc. has been submitted pursuant to Article 271-2, paragraph (2), or the extract of the written request for alteration of counts, etc. has been submitted pursuant to Article 312-2, paragraph (2), and it is found that the particulars identifying an individual stated in the charging sheet that are not stated in the extract of the charging sheet, etc., or the particulars identifying an individual stated in the written request for alteration of counts, etc. that are not stated in the extract of the written request for alteration of counts, etc. are those of a person set forth in Article 271-2, paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii). In this case, the phrase "the name or address of that witness, etc. requested by the public prosecutor" in the preceding paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "those particulars identifying an individual that are included or recorded in them", and the phrase "that witness, etc. requested by the public prosecutor" in the proviso of that paragraph with "the witness pertaining to those particulars identifying an individual".
第二百九十九条第一項の規定により証拠書類又は証拠物を閲覧する機会を与えるべき場合において、第二百七十一条の二第二項の規定により起訴状抄本等を提出した場合又は第三百十二条の二第二項の規定により訴因変更等請求書面抄本等を提出した場合であつて、起訴状に記載された個人特定事項のうち起訴状抄本等に記載がないもの又は訴因変更等請求書面に記載された個人特定事項のうち訴因変更等請求書面抄本等に記載がないものが第二百七十一条の二第一項第一号又は第二号に掲げる者のものに該当すると認めるときも、前項と同様とする。この場合において、同項中「その検察官請求証人等の氏名又は住居」とあるのは「これらに記載され又は記録されているこれらの個人特定事項」と、同項ただし書中「その検察官請求証人等」とあるのは「これらの個人特定事項に係る証人」とする。
In the case of the main clause of paragraph (6), when a public prosecutor finds that it is likely impossible to prevent the acts provided in the main clause of the same paragraph by the measures taken pursuant to the provisions of the main clause of the same paragraph (including the case when there is no defense counsel for the defendant), the public prosecutor does not have to give the defendant and the defense counsel an opportunity to inspect the part of the documentary evidence or articles of evidence, in which the name or address of that witness, etc. requested by the public prosecutor is included or recorded, unless this makes it impossible to confirm whether or not that witness, etc. requested by the public prosecutor has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of that person's statement, or otherwise is likely to substantially harm the defense of the defendant. In this case, the public prosecutor must give the defendant or the defense counsel an opportunity to learn of a pseudonym in lieu of the name, or a contact address in lieu of the address.
検察官は、第六項本文の場合において、同項本文の規定による措置によつては同項本文に規定する行為を防止できないおそれがあると認めるとき(被告人に弁護人がないときを含む。)は、その検察官請求証人等の供述の証明力の判断に資するような被告人その他の関係者との利害関係の有無を確かめることができなくなる場合その他の被告人の防御に実質的な不利益を生ずるおそれがある場合を除き、被告人及び弁護人に対し、証拠書類又は証拠物のうちその検察官請求証人等の氏名又は住居が記載され又は記録されている部分について閲覧する機会を与えないことができる。この場合において、被告人又は弁護人に対し、氏名にあつてはこれに代わる呼称を、住居にあつてはこれに代わる連絡先を知る機会を与えなければならない。
Where the opportunity to inspect documentary evidence or articles of evidence is to be given pursuant to Article 299, paragraph (1), the same applies as in the preceding paragraph also if the extract of the charging sheet, etc. or the extract of the written request for alteration of counts, etc. has been submitted pursuant to Article 271-3, paragraph (3) or Article 271-4, paragraph (4), and it is found that the particulars identifying an individual stated in the charging sheet that are not stated in the extract of the charging sheet, etc., or the particulars identifying an individual stated in the written request for alteration of counts, etc. that are not stated in the extract of the written request for alteration of counts, etc. are those of a person set forth in Article 271-2, paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii). In this case, the phrase "that witness, etc. requested by the public prosecutor has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of that person's statement" in the preceding paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "the witness pertaining to those particulars identifying an individual has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of the testimony of that witness", and the phrase "the name or address of that witness, etc. requested by the public prosecutor" in that paragraph with "those particulars identifying an individual".
第二百九十九条第一項の規定により証拠書類又は証拠物を閲覧する機会を与えるべき場合において、第二百七十一条の三第三項又は第二百七十一条の四第四項の規定により起訴状抄本等又は訴因変更等請求書面抄本等を提出した場合であつて、起訴状に記載された個人特定事項のうち起訴状抄本等に記載がないもの又は訴因変更等請求書面に記載された個人特定事項のうち訴因変更等請求書面抄本等に記載がないものが第二百七十一条の二第一項第一号又は第二号に掲げる者のものに該当すると認めるときも、前項と同様とする。この場合において、同項中「その検察官請求証人等の供述」とあるのは「これらの個人特定事項に係る証人の供述」と、「その検察官請求証人等の氏名又は住居」とあるのは「これらの個人特定事項」とする。
In the case prescribed in the first sentence of paragraph (7), the same applies as in paragraph (8) also when the defendant has no defense counsel. In this case, the phrase "that witness, etc. requested by the public prosecutor has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of that person's statement" in paragraph (8) is deemed to be replaced with "the witness pertaining to those particulars identifying an individual has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of the testimony of that witness", and the phrase "the name or address of that witness, etc. requested by the public prosecutor" in that paragraph with "those particulars identifying an individual".
A public prosecutor must, when having taken measures pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraphs, promptly notify the court to that effect.
検察官は、前各項の規定による措置をとつたときは、速やかに、裁判所にその旨を通知しなければならない。
定義第二百一条の二第一項
氏名及び住所その他の個人を特定させることとなる事項
わかりやすく言うと
氏名や住所など、その人が誰かを特定できることになる事柄のことです。
略称規定第二百七十一条の二第二項
前項の規定による求めは、公訴の提起において、裁判所に対し、起訴状とともに、被告人に送達するものとして、当該求めに係る個人特定事項の記載がない起訴状の抄本その他の起訴状の謄本に代わるもの(以下「起訴状抄本等」という。)を提出して行わなければ…
わかりやすく言うと
検察官が起訴の際、起訴状と一緒に裁判所に出す、被害者などの個人特定事項を記載していない起訴状の抄本など、被告人に送達する起訴状の謄本の代わりとなるもののことです。
定義第二百九十条の三第一項
供述書、供述を録取した書面で供述者の署名若しくは押印のあるもの又は映像若しくは音声を記録することができる記録媒体であつて供述を記録したもの
わかりやすく言うと
供述書、供述を聞き取って書いた書面で供述者の署名か押印があるもの、または映像や音声を記録できる媒体に供述を記録したもの、のいずれかのことです。
定義第二百九十九条の四第二項・この条及び第二百九十九条の五第二項第一号の中だけ
第三百十二条第四項に規定する訴因変更等請求書面
わかりやすく言うと
検察官が、起訴状に書かれた訴因や罰条の追加、撤回又は変更を裁判所に請求するときに提出する書面のことです(第三百十二条第三項)。
定義第二百九十九条の四第二項・この条及び第二百九十九条の五第二項第一号の中だけ
同項に規定する訴因変更等請求書面抄本等
わかりやすく言うと
訴因変更等請求書面に書かれた被害者などの個人特定事項が、その謄本の送達で被告人に知られないよう検察官が措置を求めるときに、被告人に送達するものとして裁判所に出す、その事項の記載がない抄本など謄本に代わるもののことです。
略称規定第二百九十九条の四第六項・この項及び第二百九十九条の四第八項の中だけ
…証拠書類若しくは証拠物に氏名若しくは住居が記載され若しくは記録されている者であつて検察官が証人、鑑定人、通訳人若しくは翻訳人として尋問を請求するもの若しくは供述録取書等の供述者(以下この項及び第八項において「検察官請求証人等」という。)…
わかりやすく言うと
閲覧させる証拠書類や証拠物に氏名か住居が記載又は記録されている人のうち、検察官が証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人として尋問を請求する人と、供述書や供述を録取した書面など(供述録取書等)の供述者のことです。
検察官
犯罪について、裁判所に訴えを起こす(公訴を行う)役目を負う者です(刑事訴訟法第二百四十七条)。犯人の性格、年齢や境遇、犯罪の重さや事情、犯罪の後の状況から、訴える必要がないと考えるときは、訴えを起こさないことができます(刑事訴訟法第二百四十八条)。刑事の事件では、裁判所に法を正しく当てはめるよう求め、裁判の執行を監督します。また、社会全体の利益を代表して、ほかの法令が検察官に任せた仕事も行い、それは刑事の事件に限りません(検察庁法第四条)。どのような犯罪についても捜査をすることができます(検察庁法第六条第一項)。検察官の仕事は検察庁がまとめており、検察庁には最高検察庁、高等検察庁、地方検察庁、区検察庁があります(検察庁法第一条)。
刑事訴訟法第247条・第248条、検察庁法第1条・第4条・第6条を参考にAIが作成。