Labor Tribunal Act
労働審判法
The whole law on one page. Read it a page at a time
第一条(目的)
The purpose of this Act is to establish a system of proceedings for civil disputes between individual employees and employers about whether or not a labor contract exists or about any issue involving labor relations (referred to below as a "civil dispute on labor relations"), in which a labor tribunal composing of a judge and persons with expert knowledge and experience in labor relations hears the case in a court of law upon petition by the relevant party, and goes through mediation if the labor tribunal believes the issue could likely be resolved this way, or renders a labor tribunal decision (meaning a decision to resolve civil disputes on labor relations of individuals in accordance with the circumstances of the case while taking into account the rights and interests of the parties; the same applies below) (such proceedings are referred to below as "labor tribunal proceedings"), thereby achieving fair, effective, and expedient dispute resolution taking into account the circumstances surrounding the dispute.
この法律は、労働契約の存否その他の労働関係に関する事項について個々の労働者と事業主との間に生じた民事に関する紛争(以下「個別労働関係民事紛争」という。)に関し、裁判所において、裁判官及び労働関係に関する専門的な知識経験を有する者で組織する委員会が、当事者の申立てにより、事件を審理し、調停の成立による解決の見込みがある場合にはこれを試み、その解決に至らない場合には、労働審判(個別労働関係民事紛争について当事者間の権利関係を踏まえつつ事案の実情に即した解決をするために必要な審判をいう。以下同じ。)を行う手続(以下「労働審判手続」という。)を設けることにより、紛争の実情に即した迅速、適正かつ実効的な解決を図ることを目的とする。
第二条(管轄)
Cases involving labor tribunal proceedings (referred to below as "labor tribunal case") are to be under the jurisdiction of the district court with jurisdiction over the location of the domicile, residence, business office, or any other office of the respondent; the district court that has jurisdiction over the location of the employer's place of business at which the employee actually works or has worked most recently based on the labor relations between the employee and the employer from which the civil dispute on labor relations arose; or a district court determined by an agreement between the parties.
労働審判手続に係る事件(以下「労働審判事件」という。)は、相手方の住所、居所、営業所若しくは事務所の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所、個別労働関係民事紛争が生じた労働者と事業主との間の労働関係に基づいて当該労働者が現に就業し若しくは最後に就業した当該事業主の事業所の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所又は当事者が合意で定める地方裁判所の管轄とする。
Labor tribunal cases fall under the jurisdiction of the district court that has jurisdiction over the last place of domicile of the respondent (excluding juridical corporations or any other association or foundation) if the respondent has no domicile or residence in Japan, or the respondent's domicile or residence is unknown.
労働審判事件は、日本国内に相手方(法人その他の社団又は財団を除く。)の住所及び居所がないとき、又は住所及び居所が知れないときは、その最後の住所地を管轄する地方裁判所の管轄に属する。
Labor tribunal cases in which the respondent is a juridical corporation or any other association or foundation (excluding a foreign association or foundation) are subject to the jurisdiction of the district court with jurisdiction over the place of domicile of its representative or any other principal person in charge of its business if it has no business office or other office in Japan, or the location of its business office or other office is unknown.
労働審判事件は、相手方が法人その他の社団又は財団(外国の社団又は財団を除く。)である場合において、日本国内にその事務所若しくは営業所がないとき、又はその事務所若しくは営業所の所在地が知れないときは、代表者その他の主たる業務担当者の住所地を管轄する地方裁判所の管轄に属する。
Labor tribunal cases in which the respondent is a foreign association or foundation are subject to the jurisdiction of the district court with jurisdiction over the place of domicile of its representative or any other principal person in charge of its business assigned in Japan if it has no business office or other office in Japan.
労働審判事件は、相手方が外国の社団又は財団である場合において、日本国内にその事務所又は営業所がないときは、日本における代表者その他の主たる業務担当者の住所地を管轄する地方裁判所の管轄に属する。
第三条(移送)
If the court finds that all or part of labor tribunal cases are not under its jurisdiction, it will, upon petition or by its own authority, transfer the case to a court with jurisdiction.
裁判所は、労働審判事件の全部又は一部がその管轄に属しないと認めるときは、申立てにより又は職権で、これを管轄裁判所に移送する。
If labor tribunal cases brought before the court are under its jurisdiction and the court finds it appropriate in order to process the case, it may upon petition or by its own authority, transfer all or part of the labor tribunal cases to another court with jurisdiction.
裁判所は、労働審判事件がその管轄に属する場合においても、事件を処理するために適当と認めるときは、申立てにより又は職権で、当該労働審判事件の全部又は一部を他の管轄裁判所に移送することができる。
第四条(代理人)
No person other than an attorney may serve as an agent in labor tribunal proceedings, except for an agent who can perform judicial acts under laws and regulations; provided, however, that if the court finds it necessary and appropriate in order to protect the rights and interests of the parties and ensure smooth progress in labor tribunal proceedings, the court may permit a person who is not an attorney to serve as an agent.
労働審判手続については、法令により裁判上の行為をすることができる代理人のほか、弁護士でなければ代理人となることができない。ただし、裁判所は、当事者の権利利益の保護及び労働審判手続の円滑な進行のために必要かつ相当と認めるときは、弁護士でない者を代理人とすることを許可することができる。
The court may rescind the permission granted under the provisions of the proviso to the preceding paragraph.
裁判所は、前項ただし書の規定による許可を取り消すことができる。
Article 5Petitions for Labor Tribunal Proceedings
第五条(労働審判手続の申立て)
In order to achieve the resolution of a civil dispute on labor relations, a party may file a petition for labor tribunal proceedings with the court.
当事者は、個別労働関係民事紛争の解決を図るため、裁判所に対し、労働審判手続の申立てをすることができる。
The petition set forth in the preceding paragraph must be filed by submitting a written petition to a court.
前項の申立ては、申立書を裁判所に提出してしなければならない。
The written petition set forth in the preceding paragraph must state the following matters:
前項の申立書には、次に掲げる事項を記載しなければならない。
the parties and the statutory agents; and
当事者及び法定代理人
the object of and reasons for the petition.
申立ての趣旨及び理由
Article 6Dismissal of Defective Petitions
第六条(不適法な申立ての却下)
If the court finds that a petition for labor tribunal proceedings is defective, it must issue an order to dismiss the petition.
裁判所は、労働審判手続の申立てが不適法であると認めるときは、決定で、その申立てを却下しなければならない。
第七条(労働審判委員会)
The court conducts labor tribunal proceedings under a labor tribunal composed of one labor tribunal judge and two labor tribunal members.
裁判所は、労働審判官一人及び労働審判員二人で組織する労働審判委員会で労働審判手続を行う。
Article 8Designation of Labor Tribunal Judges
第八条(労働審判官の指定)
Labor tribunal judges are designated by the district court from among its judges.
労働審判官は、地方裁判所が当該地方裁判所の裁判官の中から指定する。
Article 9Labor Tribunal Members
第九条(労働審判員)
Labor tribunal members, as provided for by this Act, participate in labor tribunals and perform the duties necessary for processing the case from a fair and neutral manner.
Labor tribunal members are appointed from among persons who have expert knowledge and experience in labor relations.
労働審判員は、労働関係に関する専門的な知識経験を有する者のうちから任命する。
Labor tribunal members serve part-time, and in addition to what is provided for in the preceding paragraph, the necessary matters concerning their appointment and dismissal are prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme Court.
労働審判員は、非常勤とし、前項に規定するもののほか、その任免に関し必要な事項は、最高裁判所規則で定める。
Labor tribunal members are paid an allowance as separately provided by law as well as travel expenses, a daily allowance, and lodging expenses, at amounts specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.
労働審判員には、別に法律で定めるところにより手当を支給し、並びに最高裁判所規則で定める額の旅費、日当及び宿泊料を支給する。
Article 10Designation of Labor Tribunal Members
第十条(労働審判員の指定)
Labor tribunal members in labor tribunals are designated by the court for each labor tribunal case.
労働審判委員会を組織する労働審判員は、労働審判事件ごとに、裁判所が指定する。
When designating labor tribunal members pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the court must take into account the knowledge and experience of the members and any other relevant circumstances, and make careful consideration so as to ensure an appropriate composition of members.
裁判所は、前項の規定により労働審判員を指定するに当たっては、労働審判員の有する知識経験その他の事情を総合的に勘案し、労働審判委員会における労働審判員の構成について適正を確保するように配慮しなければならない。
Article 11Disqualification of Labor Tribunal Members
第十一条(労働審判員の除斥)
The provisions of Article 11, and Article 13, paragraphs (2), (4), (8), and (9) of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act (Act No. 51 of 2011) (excluding the parts concerning a challenge) apply mutatis mutandis to the disqualification of labor tribunal members.
労働審判員の除斥については、非訟事件手続法(平成二十三年法律第五十一号)第十一条並びに第十三条第二項、第四項、第八項及び第九項の規定(忌避に関する部分を除く。)を準用する。
A judicial decision on the disqualification of a labor tribunal member is made by the district court to which that labor tribunal member belongs.
労働審判員の除斥についての裁判は、労働審判員の所属する地方裁判所がする。
第十二条(決議等)
Resolutions by labor tribunals are made in accordance with the opinion of the majority.
労働審判委員会の決議は、過半数の意見による。
Labor tribunal deliberations are to be confidential.
労働審判委員会の評議は、秘密とする。
Article 13Leadership in Labor Tribunal Proceedings
第十三条(労働審判手続の指揮)
Labor tribunal proceedings are led by the labor tribunal judge.
労働審判手続は、労働審判官が指揮する。
Article 14Date for Labor Tribunal Proceedings
第十四条(労働審判手続の期日等)
Labor tribunal judges must specify the date for labor tribunal proceedings and summon the relevant persons to appear in court.
労働審判官は、労働審判手続の期日を定めて、事件の関係人を呼び出さなければならない。
A court clerk must clearly indicate on the record the outline of developments in the proceedings held on the date set forth in the preceding paragraph.
裁判所書記官は、前項の期日について、その経過の要領を記録上明らかにしなければならない。
If the labor tribunal judge so orders, a court clerk must prepare a record of the proceedings held on the date set forth in paragraph (1).
裁判所書記官は、労働審判官が命じた場合には、第一項の期日について、調書を作成しなければならない。
第十五条(迅速な手続)
Labor tribunals must hear statements by the relevant parties and promptly arrange issues and evidence.
労働審判委員会は、速やかに、当事者の陳述を聴いて争点及び証拠の整理をしなければならない。
Labor tribunal proceedings must be concluded by the end of the third date of proceedings. except for cases where special circumstances arise.
労働審判手続においては、特別の事情がある場合を除き、三回以内の期日において、審理を終結しなければならない。
第十六条(手続の非公開)
Labor tribunal proceedings are not open to the public; provided, however, that observation by certain individuals may be permitted if labor tribunals deem it appropriate.
労働審判手続は、公開しない。ただし、労働審判委員会は、相当と認める者の傍聴を許すことができる。
Article 17Examination of Evidence
第十七条(証拠調べ等)
Labor tribunals may examine facts by its own authority, and may examine evidence as necessary upon petition or by its own authority.
労働審判委員会は、職権で事実の調査をし、かつ、申立てにより又は職権で、必要と認める証拠調べをすることができる。
The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV (excluding Article 179, Article 182; the second sentence of Article 185, paragraph (1), and paragraphs (2) and (3); Article 188, Article 189, Articles 192 through 195 (including cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis under Article 201, paragraph (5); Article 210, and Article 216 of the Act)); Article 200, Article 202 (including cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 210 of the Act), Article 205, paragraph (2), Article 206 (including cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 210 of that Act), Article 207, paragraph (2), Article 208, Article 209, Article 215, paragraph (2), Article 215-2, paragraphs (2) through (4), Article 215-4, Article 224 (including cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 229, paragraph (2), Article 231-3, paragraph (1), and Article 232, paragraph (1) of the Act), Article 225, Article 227, paragraph (2), Article 229, paragraphs (4) through (6), Article 230, Article 232, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 232-2, and Article 239) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Act No. 109 of 1996) apply mutatis mutandis to the examination of evidence. In this case, the phrase "matters, or matters recorded in a file pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph or matters recorded in the recording medium referred to in that paragraph" in Article 205, paragraph (3) of that Act and the phrase "matters, or matters recorded in a file pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) or matters recorded in the recording medium referred to in that paragraph" in Article 215, paragraph (4) of that Act are deemed to be replaced with "matters"; the phrase "means, or the means of using an electronic data processing system specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court" in Article 231-2, paragraph (2) of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "means"; and the phrase "or sending it, or using an electronic data processing system specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court" in Article 231-3, paragraph (2) of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "or sending it".
証拠調べについては、民事訴訟法(平成八年法律第百九号)第二編第四章(第百七十九条、第百八十二条、第百八十五条第一項後段、第二項及び第三項、第百八十八条、第百八十九条、第百九十二条から第百九十五条まで(これらの規定を同法第二百一条第五項、第二百十条及び第二百十六条において準用する場合を含む。)、第二百条、第二百二条(同法第二百十条において準用する場合を含む。)、第二百五条第二項、第二百六条(同法第二百十条において準用する場合を含む。)、第二百七条第二項、第二百八条、第二百九条、第二百十五条第二項、第二百十五条の二第二項から第四項まで、第二百十五条の四、第二百二十四条(同法第二百二十九条第二項、第二百三十一条の三第一項及び第二百三十二条第一項において準用する場合を含む。)、第二百二十五条、第二百二十七条第二項、第二百二十九条第四項から第六項まで、第二百三十条、第二百三十二条第二項及び第三項、第二百三十二条の二並びに第二百三十九条を除く。)の規定を準用する。この場合において、同法第二百五条第三項中「事項又は前項の規定によりファイルに記録された事項若しくは同項の記録媒体に記録された事項」とあり、及び同法第二百十五条第四項中「事項又は第二項の規定によりファイルに記録された事項若しくは同項の記録媒体に記録された事項」とあるのは「事項」と、同法第二百三十一条の二第二項中「方法又は最高裁判所規則で定める電子情報処理組織を使用する方法」とあるのは「方法」と、同法第二百三十一条の三第二項中「若しくは送付し、又は最高裁判所規則で定める電子情報処理組織を使用する」とあるのは「又は送付する」と読み替えるものとする。
Article 18Burden of Costs for Successful Mediation
第十八条(調停が成立した場合の費用の負担)
If mediation is successful, each party is to bear the costs that they have incurred for which no provisions have been made in the terms of mediation.
各当事者は、調停が成立した場合において、その支出した費用のうち調停条項中に費用の負担についての定めがないものを自ら負担するものとする。
Article 19Conclusion of Proceedings
第十九条(審理の終結)
When concluding proceedings, labor tribunals must declare this fact on the relevant date of the proceedings.
労働審判委員会は、審理を終結するときは、労働審判手続の期日においてその旨を宣言しなければならない。
Article 20Labor Tribunal Decisions
第二十条(労働審判)
Labor tribunals render decisions based on the rights and interests of the parties found as a result of proceedings, and in light of the developments of the labor tribunal proceedings.
Labor tribunals may through decisions establish the relationship of the parties' rights to one another, order the payment of monies, delivery of objects, or any other payment of economic benefit, and may specify other matters that are considered to be appropriate for the resolution of the civil dispute on labor relations.
労働審判においては、当事者間の権利関係を確認し、金銭の支払、物の引渡しその他の財産上の給付を命じ、その他個別労働関係民事紛争の解決をするために相当と認める事項を定めることができる。
A labor tribunal decision must be rendered by preparing a written tribunal decision stating the main text of the decision and the gist of the grounds for that decision.
労働審判は、主文及び理由の要旨を記載した審判書を作成して行わなければならない。
The written tribunal decision referred to in the preceding paragraph must be served upon the relevant parties. The labor tribunal decision takes effect once it has been served upon the parties.
Part I, Chapter V, Section 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure (excluding Article 100, paragraph (2); Article 104; and subsections (3) and (4)) apply mutatis mutandis to the service of a written tribunal decision under the preceding paragraph.
前項の規定による審判書の送達については、民事訴訟法第一編第五章第四節(第百条第二項、第百四条、第三款及び第四款を除く。)の規定を準用する。
If a labor tribunal finds it appropriate, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (3), it may render a labor tribunal decision by making an oral announcement of the main text of the labor tribunal decision and the gist of the reasons for it on a date of labor tribunal proceedings on which all parties appear, in lieu of preparing a written tribunal decision. In this case, the labor tribunal decision takes effect when it has been announced.
If a labor tribunal decision is made pursuant to the provisions of the first sentence of the preceding paragraph, the court must have the court clerk make a record of the main text of the decision, and the gist of the grounds for that decision in the record.
Article 21Filing of Challenges
第二十一条(異議の申立て等)
A party may file an objection with the court against a labor tribunal decision within an inalterable period of two weeks from the day on which the party was served with the written tribunal decision under the provisions of paragraph (4) of the preceding Article, or the day on which the labor tribunal decision under the provisions of paragraph (6) of that Article was announced.
If the court finds that the filing of an objection is defective, it must issue an order to dismiss the challenge.
裁判所は、異議の申立てが不適法であると認めるときは、決定で、これを却下しなければならない。
If a lawful objection has been filed, the labor tribunal decision ceases to be valid.
適法な異議の申立てがあったときは、労働審判は、その効力を失う。
If no lawful objection is filed, the labor tribunal decision has the same effect as a judicial settlement.
適法な異議の申立てがないときは、労働審判は、裁判上の和解と同一の効力を有する。
In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, each party is to bear, among the costs that the party incurred, those for which there are no provisions on the burden of costs in the labor tribunal decision.
Article 22Constructive Filing of Actions
第二十二条(訴え提起の擬制)
If a lawful objection is filed against a labor tribunal decision, an action on the claim made in the petition for labor tribunal proceedings is deemed to have been filed at the time that the petition for labor tribunal proceedings was filed with the district court in which the labor tribunal case was pending when the labor tribunal decision was made. In this case, if Japanese courts do not have jurisdiction over that claim pursuant to the provisions of Part I, Chapter II, Section 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the action that is deemed to have been filed is to be dismissed.
A case for which an action is deemed to have been filed pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph (excluding cases where an action is to be dismissed pursuant to the provisions of the second sentence of that paragraph) is under the jurisdiction of the district court set forth in that paragraph.
If it is deemed that an action has been filed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), for the purpose of the application of the provisions of Articles 137 through 138, and Article 158 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the written petition set forth in Article 5, paragraph (2) is deemed to be a complaint.
Article 23Nullifying Labor Tribunal Decisions
第二十三条(労働審判の取消し)
If a written tribunal decision is to be served pursuant to the provisions of Article 20, paragraph (4) and any of the following grounds exists, the court must issue an order to nullify the labor tribunal decision:
a party's domicile, residence or any other place where the party is to be served is unknown;
当事者の住所、居所その他送達をすべき場所が知れないこと。
it is impossible to serve the relevant party pursuant to the provisions of Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20, paragraph (5);
第二十条第五項において準用する民事訴訟法第百七条第一項の規定により送達をすることができないこと。
with regard to service that is to take place in a foreign state, it is impossible to employ the means prescribed in Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20, paragraph (5), or it is found to be impossible to serve the relevant party by those means; or
外国においてすべき送達について、第二十条第五項において準用する民事訴訟法第百八条の規定によることができず、又はこれによっても送達をすることができないと認められること。
even after six months have elapsed since service was entrusted to the competent government agency of a foreign state pursuant to the provisions of Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20, paragraph (5), no document certifying that service has been sent.
第二十条第五項において準用する民事訴訟法第百八条の規定により外国の管轄官庁に嘱託を発した後六月を経過してもその送達を証する書面の送付がないこと。
The provisions of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a labor tribunal decision is revoked pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
Article 24Closing of Labor Tribunal Cases Without a Labor Tribunal Decision
第二十四条(労働審判をしない場合の労働審判事件の終了)
If a labor tribunal finds that conducting proceedings is unsuitable for the prompt and fair resolution of a dispute due to the nature of the case, it may terminate the labor tribunal case.
The provisions of Article 22 apply mutatis mutandis to cases where labor tribunal cases are closed pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph. In this case, the phrase "before which the labor tribunal case was pending when the labor tribunal decision was made" in paragraph (1) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "before which the labor tribunal case was pending when the labor tribunal case was terminated."
Article 24-2Withdrawal of Petitions for Labor Tribunal Proceedings
第二十四条の二(労働審判手続の申立ての取下げ)
Petitions for labor tribunal proceedings may be withdrawn in all or part before a labor tribunal decision becomes final and binding.
第二十五条(費用の負担)
If a labor tribunal case is terminated (excluding the cases prescribed in Article 18 and Article 21, paragraph (5)), and the court finds it necessary, it may, upon petition or by its own authority, issue an order to bear the costs for the case proceedings.
Article 26Access to Case Records
第二十六条(事件の記録の閲覧等)
The parties to a case and any third party that makes a prima facie showing of interest in the case may file a request with a court clerk to inspect or copy the labor tribunal case records, to issue an authenticated copy, transcript, or extract of those records, or to issue a certificate of information concerning the labor tribunal case.
当事者及び利害関係を疎明した第三者は、裁判所書記官に対し、労働審判事件の記録の閲覧若しくは謄写、その正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又は労働審判事件に関する事項の証明書の交付を請求することができる。
The provisions of Article 91, paragraphs (4) and (5) and Article 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure (excluding paragraphs (9) and (10)) apply mutatis mutandis to the records referred to in the preceding paragraph.
民事訴訟法第九十一条第四項及び第五項並びに第九十二条(第九項及び第十項を除く。)の規定は、前項の記録について準用する。
Article 27Suspension of Court Proceedings
第二十七条(訴訟手続の中止)
If an action is pending with regard to a case for which a petition for labor tribunal proceedings has been filed, the court in charge of the case may suspend court proceedings until the labor tribunal case has been terminated.
第二十八条(即時抗告)
An immediate appeal may be filed against an order made under the provisions of Article 25.
第二十五条の規定による決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
An immediate appeal against an order made under the provisions of Article 6, Article 21, paragraph (2), Article 23, paragraph (1), and Article 25 has the effect of a stay of execution.
Article 28-2Concealing Parties' Domiciles and Identifying Information
第二十八条の二(当事者に対する住所、氏名等の秘匿)
The provisions of Part I, Chapter VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure (excluding Article 133-2, paragraphs (5) and (6) and Article 133-3, paragraph (2)) apply mutatis mutandis to petitions and other statements in labor tribunal proceedings. In this case, the term "party" in Article 133, paragraph (1) of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "party or intervenor (meaning a person who has participated in the labor tribunal proceedings pursuant to the provisions of Article 11 of the Civil Mediation Act (Act No. 222 of 1951) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 29, paragraph (2) of the Labor Tribunal Act; the same applies in Article 133-4, paragraphs (1), (2) and (7))"; in paragraph (3) of that Article, the term "case record, etc. (meaning a case record or the record of a case in which there has been a petition for a disposition as referred to in Article 132-4, paragraph (1); the same applies in this Chapter)" is deemed to be replaced with "labor tribunal case records", and the phrase "inspection, etc. of a case record, etc. (meaning inspection, etc. of a case record, inspection, etc. of a non-electronic or magnetic record of a disposition on the collection of evidence, or inspection, etc. of an electronic or magnetic record of a disposition on the collection of evidence; the same applies in this Chapter) with regard to" is deemed to be replaced with "inspection or copying of, or the issuance of a transcript or extract of"; the phrase "inspection, etc. of a case record, etc. relating to" in Article 133-2, paragraph (1) of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "inspection or copying of, or the issuance of a transcript or extract of"; the phrase "in a case record, etc." in paragraph (2) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "in the labor tribunal case records"; the phrase "inspection, etc. of a case record, etc. relating to" in that paragraph and paragraph (3) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "inspection or copying of, the issuance of an authenticated copy, transcript or extract of, or the reproduction of"; in Article 133-3, paragraph (1) of that Act, the phrase "document or electronic or magnetic record in which ... is stated or recorded" is deemed to be replaced with "document in which ... is stated", the phrase "that document or electronic or magnetic record" is deemed to be replaced with "that document", and the phrase "or electronic or magnetic record, or any other similar document or electronic or magnetic record, inspection, etc. of a case record, etc. relating to" is deemed to be replaced with "or any other similar document, inspection or copying of, or the issuance of a transcript or extract of"; the phrase "person ... the case record, etc." in Article 133-4, paragraph (1) of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "party or intervenor, or a third party that makes a prima facie showing of interest, ... the labor tribunal case records"; in paragraph (2) of that Article, the term "party" is deemed to be replaced with "party or intervenor", the phrase "where the case record, etc. is kept" is deemed to be replaced with "where the labor tribunal case records are kept", and the phrase "inspection, etc. of a case record, etc." is deemed to be replaced with "inspection or copying, the issuance of an authenticated copy, transcript or extract, or the reproduction"; and the term "party" in paragraph (7) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "party or intervenor".
労働審判手続における申立てその他の申述については、民事訴訟法第一編第八章(第百三十三条の二第五項及び第六項並びに第百三十三条の三第二項を除く。)の規定を準用する。この場合において、同法第百三十三条第一項中「当事者」とあるのは「当事者又は参加人(労働審判法第二十九条第二項において準用する民事調停法(昭和二十六年法律第二百二十二号)第十一条の規定により労働審判手続に参加した者をいう。第百三十三条の四第一項、第二項及び第七項において同じ。)」と、同条第三項中「訴訟記録等(訴訟記録又は第百三十二条の四第一項の処分の申立てに係る事件の記録をいう。以下この章において同じ。)」とあるのは「労働審判事件の記録」と、「について訴訟記録等の閲覧等(訴訟記録の閲覧等、非電磁的証拠収集処分記録の閲覧等又は電磁的証拠収集処分記録の閲覧等をいう。以下この章において同じ。)」とあるのは「の閲覧若しくは謄写又はその謄本若しくは抄本の交付」と、同法第百三十三条の二第一項中「に係る訴訟記録等の閲覧等」とあるのは「の閲覧若しくは謄写又はその謄本若しくは抄本の交付」と、同条第二項中「訴訟記録等中」とあるのは「労働審判事件の記録中」と、同項及び同条第三項中「に係る訴訟記録等の閲覧等」とあるのは「の閲覧若しくは謄写、その正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又はその複製」と、同法第百三十三条の三第一項中「記載され、又は記録された書面又は電磁的記録」とあるのは「記載された書面」と、「当該書面又は電磁的記録」とあるのは「当該書面」と、「又は電磁的記録その他これに類する書面又は電磁的記録に係る訴訟記録等の閲覧等」とあるのは「その他これに類する書面の閲覧若しくは謄写又はその謄本若しくは抄本の交付」と、同法第百三十三条の四第一項中「者は、訴訟記録等」とあるのは「当事者若しくは参加人又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、労働審判事件の記録」と、同条第二項中「当事者」とあるのは「当事者又は参加人」と、「訴訟記録等の存する」とあるのは「労働審判事件の記録の存する」と、「訴訟記録等の閲覧等」とあるのは「閲覧若しくは謄写、その正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又はその複製」と、同条第七項中「当事者」とあるのは「当事者若しくは参加人」と読み替えるものとする。
第二十九条(非訟事件手続法及び民事調停法の準用)
Except as otherwise provided, with regard to labor tribunal cases, the provisions of Part II of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act (excluding Article 12 of that Act (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Articles 14 and 15 of that Act), and Articles 27, 40, 42-2, 52, 53, and 65 of that Act) apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the term "paragraph (2)" in Article 43, paragraph (4) of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "Article 5, paragraph (3) of the Labor Tribunal Act".
特別の定めがある場合を除いて、労働審判事件に関しては、非訟事件手続法第二編の規定(同法第十二条(同法第十四条及び第十五条において準用する場合を含む。)、第二十七条、第四十条、第四十二条の二、第五十二条、第五十三条及び第六十五条の規定を除く。)を準用する。この場合において、同法第四十三条第四項中「第二項」とあるのは、「労働審判法第五条第三項」と読み替えるものとする。
The provisions of Articles 11, 12, 16, and 36 of the Civil Mediation Act (Act No. 222 of 1951) apply mutatis mutandis to labor tribunal cases. In this case: in Article 11 of that Act, the terms "of mediation," "mediation committee," and "mediation proceedings" are deemed to be respectively replaced with "of labor tribunal proceedings," "labor tribunal," and "labor tribunal proceedings"; in Article 12, paragraph (1) of that Act, the terms "mediation committee," "for mediation," and "measure prior to mediation" are deemed to be respectively replaced with "labor tribunal," "for mediation or labor tribunal decision," and "measure prior to mediation or labor tribunal decision"; and in Article 36, paragraph (1) of that Act, the term "the preceding two Articles" is deemed to be replaced with "Articles 31 and 32 of the Labor Tribunal Act (Act No. 45 of 2004)."
民事調停法(昭和二十六年法律第二百二十二号)第十一条、第十二条、第十六条及び第三十六条の規定は、労働審判事件について準用する。この場合において、同法第十一条中「調停の」とあるのは「労働審判手続の」と、「調停委員会」とあるのは「労働審判委員会」と、「調停手続」とあるのは「労働審判手続」と、同法第十二条第一項中「調停委員会」とあるのは「労働審判委員会」と、「調停の」とあるのは「調停又は労働審判の」と、「調停前の措置」とあるのは「調停又は労働審判前の措置」と、同法第三十六条第一項中「前二条」とあるのは「労働審判法(平成十六年法律第四十五号)第三十一条及び第三十二条」と読み替えるものとする。
Article 30Rules of the Supreme Court
第三十条(最高裁判所規則)
In addition to what is provided for in this Act, necessary particulars concerning labor tribunal proceedings are prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme Court.
この法律に定めるもののほか、労働審判手続に関し必要な事項は、最高裁判所規則で定める。
Article 31Penalty for Nonappearance
第三十一条(不出頭に対する制裁)
If a person who has been summoned to appear by the labor tribunal judge in relation to a case does not appear without justifiable grounds, the court will fine that person with a civil fine of not more than 50,000 yen.
労働審判官の呼出しを受けた事件の関係人が正当な理由がなく出頭しないときは、裁判所は、五万円以下の過料に処する。
Article 32Penalty for Noncompliance with Measure
第三十二条(措置違反に対する制裁)
If a party to the case does not comply with the measure ordered under the provisions of Article 12 of the Civil Mediation Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 29, paragraph (2), without justifiable grounds, the court will fine that person with a civil fine of not more than 100,000 yen.
Article 33Criminal Disclosure of Confidential Deliberations
第三十三条(評議の秘密を漏らす罪)
If a labor tribunal member or a person who was a labor tribunal member divulges any information with respect to the proceedings of deliberations, the opinions of the labor tribunal judge and labor tribunal members, or the number minority or majority opinions without justifiable grounds, that member or person will be fined not more than 300,000 yen.
労働審判員又は労働審判員であった者が正当な理由がなく評議の経過又は労働審判官若しくは労働審判員の意見若しくはその多少の数を漏らしたときは、三十万円以下の罰金に処する。
If a labor tribunal member or a person who was a labor tribunal member divulges any individual's confidential information obtained in the course of their duties without justifiable grounds, that member or person will be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or fined not more than 500,000 yen.
労働審判員又は労働審判員であった者が正当な理由がなくその職務上取り扱ったことについて知り得た人の秘密を漏らしたときは、一年以下の拘禁刑又は五十万円以下の罰金に処する。