If a written tribunal decision is to be served pursuant to the provisions of Article 20, paragraph (4) and any of the following grounds exists, the court must issue an order to nullify the labor tribunal decision:
a party's domicile, residence or any other place where the party is to be served is unknown;
当事者の住所、居所その他送達をすべき場所が知れないこと。
it is impossible to serve the relevant party pursuant to the provisions of Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20, paragraph (5);
第二十条第五項において準用する民事訴訟法第百七条第一項の規定により送達をすることができないこと。
with regard to service that is to take place in a foreign state, it is impossible to employ the means prescribed in Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20, paragraph (5), or it is found to be impossible to serve the relevant party by those means; or
外国においてすべき送達について、第二十条第五項において準用する民事訴訟法第百八条の規定によることができず、又はこれによっても送達をすることができないと認められること。
even after six months have elapsed since service was entrusted to the competent government agency of a foreign state pursuant to the provisions of Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20, paragraph (5), no document certifying that service has been sent.
第二十条第五項において準用する民事訴訟法第百八条の規定により外国の管轄官庁に嘱託を発した後六月を経過してもその送達を証する書面の送付がないこと。
The provisions of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a labor tribunal decision is revoked pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
Read this with the articles around it