Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 28-2Concealing Parties' Domiciles and Identifying Information

第二十八条の二(当事者に対する住所、氏名等の秘匿)

The provisions of Part I, Chapter VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure (excluding and and ) apply mutatis mutandis to petitions and other statements in labor tribunal proceedings. In this case, the term "party" in is deemed to be replaced with "party or intervenor (meaning a person who has participated in the labor tribunal proceedings pursuant to the provisions of Article 11 of the Civil Mediation Act (Act No. 222 of 1951) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 29, paragraph (2) of the Labor Tribunal Act; the same applies in , and )"; in , the term "case record, etc. (meaning a case record or the record of a case in which there has been a petition for a disposition as referred to in ; the same applies in this Chapter)" is deemed to be replaced with "labor tribunal case records", and the phrase "inspection, etc. of a case record, etc. (meaning inspection, etc. of a case record, inspection, etc. of a non-electronic or magnetic record of a disposition on the collection of evidence, or inspection, etc. of an electronic or magnetic record of a disposition on the collection of evidence; the same applies in this Chapter) with regard to" is deemed to be replaced with "inspection or copying of, or the issuance of a transcript or extract of"; the phrase "inspection, etc. of a case record, etc. relating to" in is deemed to be replaced with "inspection or copying of, or the issuance of a transcript or extract of"; the phrase "in a case record, etc." in is deemed to be replaced with "in the labor tribunal case records"; the phrase "inspection, etc. of a case record, etc. relating to" in and is deemed to be replaced with "inspection or copying of, the issuance of an authenticated copy, transcript or extract of, or the reproduction of"; in , the phrase "document or electronic or magnetic record in which ... is stated or recorded" is deemed to be replaced with "document in which ... is stated", the phrase "that document or electronic or magnetic record" is deemed to be replaced with "that document", and the phrase "or electronic or magnetic record, or any other similar document or electronic or magnetic record, inspection, etc. of a case record, etc. relating to" is deemed to be replaced with "or any other similar document, inspection or copying of, or the issuance of a transcript or extract of"; the phrase "person ... the case record, etc." in is deemed to be replaced with "party or intervenor, or a third party that makes a prima facie showing of interest, ... the labor tribunal case records"; in , the term "party" is deemed to be replaced with "party or intervenor", the phrase "where the case record, etc. is kept" is deemed to be replaced with "where the labor tribunal case records are kept", and the phrase "inspection, etc. of a case record, etc." is deemed to be replaced with "inspection or copying, the issuance of an authenticated copy, transcript or extract, or the reproduction"; and the term "party" in is deemed to be replaced with "party or intervenor".

労働審判手続における申立てその他の申述については、民事訴訟法第一編第八章(及び並びにを除く。)の規定を準用する。この場合において、中「当事者」とあるのは「当事者又は参加人(労働審判法第二十九条第二項において準用する民事調停法(昭和二十六年法律第二百二十二号)第十一条の規定により労働審判手続に参加した者をいう。、及びにおいて同じ。)」と、中「訴訟記録等(訴訟記録又はの処分の申立てに係る事件の記録をいう。以下この章において同じ。)」とあるのは「労働審判事件の記録」と、「について訴訟記録等の閲覧等(訴訟記録の閲覧等、非電磁的証拠収集処分記録の閲覧等又は電磁的証拠収集処分記録の閲覧等をいう。以下この章において同じ。)」とあるのは「の閲覧若しくは謄写又はその謄本若しくは抄本の交付」と、中「に係る訴訟記録等の閲覧等」とあるのは「の閲覧若しくは謄写又はその謄本若しくは抄本の交付」と、中「訴訟記録等中」とあるのは「労働審判事件の記録中」と、及び中「に係る訴訟記録等の閲覧等」とあるのは「の閲覧若しくは謄写、その正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又はその複製」と、中「記載され、又は記録された書面又は電磁的記録」とあるのは「記載された書面」と、「当該書面又は電磁的記録」とあるのは「当該書面」と、「又は電磁的記録その他これに類する書面又は電磁的記録に係る訴訟記録等の閲覧等」とあるのは「その他これに類する書面の閲覧若しくは謄写又はその謄本若しくは抄本の交付」と、中「者は、訴訟記録等」とあるのは「当事者若しくは参加人又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、労働審判事件の記録」と、中「当事者」とあるのは「当事者又は参加人」と、「訴訟記録等の存する」とあるのは「労働審判事件の記録の存する」と、「訴訟記録等の閲覧等」とあるのは「閲覧若しくは謄写、その正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又はその複製」と、中「当事者」とあるのは「当事者若しくは参加人」と読み替えるものとする。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.SourcesTermsPrivacy