Adjudication cases regarding the acceptance and renunciation of an inheritance (meaning adjudication cases regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, rows (90) through (95)) are subject to the jurisdiction of the family court which has jurisdiction over the place where the inheritance process has commenced.
相続の承認及び放棄に関する審判事件（別表第一の九十の項から九十五の項までの事項についての審判事件をいう。）は、相続が開始した地を管轄する家庭裁判所の管轄に属する。
Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, an adjudication case for the appointment of an appraiser upon the qualified acceptance (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (93)) is subject to the jurisdiction of a family court that has accepted a statement on the qualified acceptance (if the court in charge of appeal has accepted the statement, the family court that is the court of first instance).
前項の規定にかかわらず、限定承認の場合における鑑定人の選任の審判事件（別表第一の九十三の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。）は、限定承認の申述を受理した家庭裁判所（抗告裁判所が受理した場合にあっては、その第一審裁判所である家庭裁判所）の管轄に属する。
When a family court has accepted a statement on the qualified acceptance (if the court in charge of an appeal has accepted the statement, the court) when there are two or more heirs, it must, by its own authority, appoint a liquidator of the estate pursuant to the provisions of Article 936, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code.
家庭裁判所（抗告裁判所が限定承認の申述を受理した場合にあっては、その裁判所）は、相続人が数人ある場合において、限定承認の申述を受理したときは、職権で、民法第九百三十六条第一項の規定により相続財産の清算人を選任しなければならない。
The provisions of Article 118 apply mutatis mutandis to a person who may rescind the qualified acceptance or renunciation of an inheritance in an adjudication case for the acceptance of a statement on the rescission of the qualified acceptance or renunciation of an inheritance (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (91)).
第百十八条の規定は、限定承認又は相続の放棄の取消しの申述の受理の審判事件（別表第一の九十一の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。）における限定承認又は相続の放棄の取消しをすることができる者について準用する。
A statement on the qualified acceptance and the rescission thereof, and a statement on the renunciation of an inheritance and the rescission thereof must be filed with the family court, by submitting a written statement containing the following matters:
限定承認及びその取消し並びに相続の放棄及びその取消しの申述は、次に掲げる事項を記載した申述書を家庭裁判所に提出してしなければならない。
the party and the legal representative; and
当事者及び法定代理人
a statement on the qualified acceptance or the rescission thereof, or a statement on the renunciation of an inheritance or the rescission thereof.
限定承認若しくはその取消し又は相続の放棄若しくはその取消しをする旨
Changes by (Act No. 53 of 2023)
The provisions of Article 49, paragraphs (3) through (6) and Article 50 apply mutatis mutandis to the statement set forth in the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "paragraph (2)" in Article 49, paragraph (4) is deemed to be replaced with "Article 201, paragraph (5)".
Changes by (Act No. 53 of 2023)
When making a ruling of acceptance of the statement set forth in paragraph (5), a family court must include such fact in the written statement. In this case, the ruling becomes effective if the fact is included in the written statement.
家庭裁判所は、第五項の申述の受理の審判をするときは、申述書にその旨を記載しなければならない。この場合において、当該審判は、申述書にその旨を記載した時に、その効力を生ずる。
The provisions of Article 76 do not apply to the ruling set forth in the preceding paragraph.
An immediate appeal may be filed against the rulings set forth in the following items by the persons specified respectively in these items:
次の各号に掲げる審判に対しては、当該各号に定める者は、即時抗告をすることができる。
a ruling to dismiss a petition for an extension of the period for making an acceptance or renunciation of an inheritance:the petitioner;
相続の承認又は放棄をすべき期間の伸長の申立てを却下する審判 申立人
a ruling to dismiss a statement on the rescission of the qualified acceptance or renunciation of an inheritance:a person who may rescind the qualified acceptance or renunciation of an inheritance; and
限定承認又は相続の放棄の取消しの申述を却下する審判 限定承認又は相続の放棄の取消しをすることができる者
a ruling to dismiss a statement on the qualified acceptance or renunciation of an inheritance:the person who made a statement.
限定承認又は相続の放棄の申述を却下する審判 申述人
rescission
取消し
Undoing a legal act, such as an offer or acceptance of a contract (意思表示, a manifestation of intention), that the law says may be rescinded: for example one made through an important mistake, though a mistake about the circumstances behind the act only if it had been made clear that they were its basis, and as a rule not where the person was grossly careless (Civil Code, Article 95), or one made under fraud or duress, though fraud by a third party only if the other party knew of it or could have known (Article 96), or one a minor made without the consent of their legal representative (Article 5, paragraph (2)). Once rescinded, the act is treated as void from the start (Article 121). Only the person who made it, their representative or successor, or someone whose consent it needed may rescind it (Article 120). The right is lost if not used within five years from when the act could be confirmed — once the mistake, fraud or other cause has ended and the person knows they can rescind (Article 124) — or twenty years from the act (Article 126). It is lost sooner if the person confirms the act, and once it could be confirmed, performing it or demanding performance without reserving objections counts as confirming it (Articles 122 and 125). The Consumer Contract Act adds grounds of its own, such as a business telling the consumer something untrue about an important matter when soliciting the contract, where the consumer believed it and made the contract because of it (Article 4, paragraph (1), item (i)), and gives most of them a shorter time: one year from when the act could be confirmed, and five years from the contract (Article 7, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Civil Code, Arts. 5, 95, 96, 120, 121, 122, 124, 125, 126 and Consumer Contract Act, Arts. 4, 7 as a reference.