An obligor who disputes the existence or content of the claim under a title of obligation (excluding a title of obligation stated in Article 22, item (ii), or items (iii)-2 through (iv) which has yet to become final and binding; the same applies in this paragraph) may file an action to dispute the claim to call for the court to disallow judicial enforcement based on that title of obligation. The same applies for an obligor who disputes the establishment of a title of obligation not constituting a judicial decision.
債務名義（第二十二条第二号又は第三号の二から第四号までに掲げる債務名義で確定前のものを除く。以下この項において同じ。）に係る請求権の存在又は内容について異議のある債務者は、その債務名義による強制執行の不許を求めるために、請求異議の訴えを提起することができる。裁判以外の債務名義の成立について異議のある債務者も、同様とする。
Grounds to dispute a final and binding judgment are limited to those that arise after the conclusion of oral arguments.
確定判決についての異議の事由は、口頭弁論の終結後に生じたものに限る。
The provisions of Article 33, paragraph (2) and paragraph (2) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to the action stated in paragraph (1).
Read this with the articles around it