Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 36Judicial Decision Staying Enforcement in Connection with an Action Opposing the Granting of an Attestation of Enforceability

第三十六条(執行文付与に対する異議の訴え等に係る執行停止の裁判)

If an action opposing the granting of an attestation of enforceability or an action to dispute a claim has been filed, and if the circumstances that the person alleges for raising the opposition or dispute appear to be legally well-grounded and a prima facie showing is made on factual matters, the court in charge of the case, upon petition, may order a stay of enforcement until a judicial decision as referred to in paragraph (1) of the following Article is made in the final judgment, while either requiring or not requiring security to be provided, or, in addition to the order, may issue an order for judicial enforcement to continue while requiring security to be provided, or may issue an order voiding an enforcement measure that has already been taken while requiring security to be provided. If there are pressing circumstances, the presiding judge may also order these measures.

執行文付与に対する異議の訴え又は請求異議の訴えの提起があつた場合において、異議のため主張した事情が法律上理由があるとみえ、かつ、事実上の点について疎明があつたときは、受訴裁判所は、申立てにより、終局判決において次条第一項の裁判をするまでの間、担保を立てさせ、若しくは立てさせないで強制執行の停止を命じ、又はこれとともに、担保を立てさせて強制執行の続行を命じ、若しくは担保を立てさせて既にした執行処分の取消しを命ずることができる。急迫の事情があるときは、裁判長も、これらの処分を命ずることができる。

The court may render a judicial decision on the petition referred to in the preceding paragraph without hearing oral arguments.

前項の申立てについての裁判は、口頭弁論を経ないですることができる。

If the grounds prescribed in paragraph (1) exist, if there are pressing circumstances, the enforcement court, upon petition, may order the measures prescribed in that paragraph, while specifying a period for submitting an authenticated copy or certificate of recorded information of a judicial decision under that paragraph. This judicial decision may also be made before the filing of an action opposing the granting of an attestation of enforceability or an action to dispute a claim.

第一項に規定する事由がある場合において、急迫の事情があるときは、執行裁判所は、申立てにより、同項の規定による裁判の正本又は記録事項証明書を提出すべき期間を定めて、同項に規定する処分を命ずることができる。この裁判は、執行文付与に対する異議の訴え又は請求異議の訴えの提起前においても、することができる。

When the period specified pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph has expired or when a judicial decision under paragraph (1) has been submitted to the enforcement court or court enforcement officer within the period, the judicial decision stated in the preceding paragraph ceases to be effective.

前項の規定により定められた期間を経過したとき、又はその期間内に第一項の規定による裁判が執行裁判所若しくは執行官に提出されたときは、前項の裁判は、その効力を失う。

No appeal may be entered against a judicial decision on the petition referred to in paragraph (1) or paragraph (3).

第一項又は第三項の申立てについての裁判に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy