Article 96Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Immediate Appeal and of the Code of Civil Procedure
第九十六条（即時抗告の規定及び民事訴訟法の準用）
Changes by (Act No. 53 of 2023)
The provisions of Article 86, paragraph (2), Articles 87 through 89, Article 91, paragraph (1), and Article 93 apply mutatis mutandis to a special appeal and proceedings in the instance of the appeal. In this case, the phrase "and paragraph (5)" in Article 87, paragraph (6) is deemed to be replaced with "through paragraph (6)".
The provisions of Article 314, paragraph (2), Article 315, Article 316 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)), Article 321, paragraph (1), Article 322, the first sentence of paragraph (1), paragraph (2), the second sentence of paragraph (3), and paragraph (4) of Article 325, Article 326, and Article 336, paragraph (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to a special appeal and proceedings in the instance of the appeal. In this case: in Article 314, paragraph (2) of the Code, the phrase "Article 288 and Article 289, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding Article" is deemed to be replaced with "Article 87, paragraph (6) of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms and phrases pursuant to Article 96, paragraph (1) of the Act"; in Article 316, paragraph (2) of the Code, the phrase "may be filed against" is deemed to be replaced with "may be filed, within an unextendable period of one week, against"; in Article 322 of the Code, the phrase "the preceding two Articles" is deemed to be replaced with "the provisions of Article 94, paragraph (2) of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act, and Article 321, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 96, paragraph (2) of the Act"; in the first sentence of paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of Article 325 of the Code, the phrase "Article 312, paragraph (1) or (2)" is deemed to be replaced with "Article 94, paragraph (1) of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act"; in the second sentence of paragraph (3) of Article 325 of the Code, the phrase "In such a case" is deemed to be replaced with "When a court that has accepted a case remanded or transferred thereto makes a judicial decision"; and in paragraph (4) of Article 325 of the Code, the term "as referred to in the preceding paragraph" is deemed to be replaced with "at a court that has accepted a case remanded or transferred thereto".
民事訴訟法第三百十四条第二項、第三百十五条、第三百十六条（第一項第一号を除く。）、第三百二十一条第一項、第三百二十二条、第三百二十五条第一項前段、第二項、第三項後段及び第四項、第三百二十六条並びに第三百三十六条第二項の規定は、特別抗告及びその抗告審に関する手続について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百十四条第二項中「前条において準用する第二百八十八条及び第二百八十九条第二項」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第九十六条第一項において読み替えて準用する同法第八十七条第六項」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「対しては」とあるのは「対しては、一週間の不変期間内に」と、同法第三百二十二条中「前二条」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第九十四条第二項の規定及び同法第九十六条第二項において準用する第三百二十一条第一項」と、同法第三百二十五条第一項前段及び第二項中「第三百十二条第一項又は第二項」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第九十四条第一項」と、同条第三項後段中「この場合」とあるのは「差戻し又は移送を受けた裁判所が裁判をする場合」と、同条第四項中「前項」とあるのは「差戻し又は移送を受けた裁判所」と読み替えるものとする。
Read this with the articles around it
special appeal
「特別抗告」
An appeal to the Supreme Court against a family court ruling (審判) that cannot otherwise be appealed, or against a high court's decision in an adjudication case, on the ground that it misinterprets or otherwise violates the Constitution.
Short name set inArticle 94, paragraph (2)