Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

3 articles

Article 47Enforcement Approval Order of Orders for Interim Measures

第四十七条(暫定保全措置命令の執行等認可決定)

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (1) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

With the person that received an order for interim measures (irrespective of whether or not the place of arbitration is in Japan; hereinafter the same applies in this Chapter) as the respondent, in accordance with the categories stated in each of the following items, a person that filed a petition for the order for interim measures may file a petition with the court to issue the orders specified in those items (hereinafter referred to as "enforcement approval orders"):

暫定保全措置命令(仲裁地が日本国内にあるかどうかを問わない。以下この章において同じ。)の申立てをした者は、当該暫定保全措置命令を受けた者を被申立人として、裁判所に対し、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、当該各号に定める決定(以下「執行等認可決定」という。)を求める申立てをすることができる。

Changes and moves to Article 49, paragraph (1), item (i) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

an order for interim measures that orders taking measures stated in Article 24, paragraph (1), item (iii):an order allowing the civil enforcement based on the order for interim measures; and

暫定保全措置命令のうち第二十四条第一項第三号に掲げる措置を講ずることを命ずるもの 当該暫定保全措置命令に基づく民事執行を許す旨の決定

Changes and moves to Article 49, paragraph (1), item (ii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

an order for interim measures that orders taking measures stated in Article 24, paragraph (1), items (i), (ii), (iv) or (v):an order allowing issuance of an order for payment of money stated in Article 49, paragraph (1), if the court finds that the respondent violates or is likely to violate the order for interim measures.

暫定保全措置命令のうち第二十四条第一項第一号、第二号、第四号又は第五号に掲げる措置を講ずることを命ずるもの 当該暫定保全措置命令に違反し、又は違反するおそれがあると認めるときに第四十九条第一項の規定による金銭の支払命令を発することを許す旨の決定

Changes and moves to Article 49, paragraph (2) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

When filing the petition referred to in the preceding paragraph, the party must submit a copy of the written order for interim measures, a document certifying that the content of the copy is the same as that in the written order for interim measures, and a Japanese translation of the written order for interim measures (excluding one prepared in Japanese; hereinafter the same applies in this paragraph); provided, however, that if the court finds it appropriate, after hearing the opinions of the respondent, the court may decide not to require the submission of the Japanese translation of the whole or part of the written order for interim measures.

前項の申立てをするときは、暫定保全措置命令の命令書の写し、当該写しの内容が暫定保全措置命令の命令書と同一であることを証明する文書及び暫定保全措置命令の命令書(日本語で作成されたものを除く。以下この項において同じ。)の日本語による翻訳文を提出しなければならない。ただし、裁判所は、相当と認めるときは、被申立人の意見を聴いて、暫定保全措置命令の命令書の全部又は一部について日本語による翻訳文を提出することを要しないものとすることができる。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (3) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

If the court with which the petition referred to in paragraph (1) is filed has come to acknowledge that a petition for revoking, amending or suspending the order for interim measures is filed with the arbitral tribunal or judicial body (limited to the case in which the judicial body of the country to which the place of arbitration belongs has authority, according to the laws and regulations of that country (or if the laws and regulations applied to the order for interim measures are laws and regulations of a country other than the country to which the place of arbitration belongs, according to the laws and regulations of that other country)) and finds it necessary to do so, the court may suspend the procedure for the petition referred to in that paragraph. In this case, the court may order the respondent to provide security, upon the petition of the person that filed the petition referred to in that paragraph.

第一項の申立てを受けた裁判所は、仲裁廷又は裁判機関(仲裁地が属する国の法令(当該暫定保全措置命令に適用された法令が仲裁地が属する国以外の国の法令である場合にあっては、当該法令)により当該国の裁判機関がその権限を有する場合に限る。)に対して暫定保全措置命令の取消し、変更又はその効力の停止を求める申立てがあったことを知った場合において、必要があると認めるときは、同項の申立てに係る手続を中止することができる。この場合において、裁判所は、同項の申立てをした者の申立てにより、被申立人に対し、担保を立てるべきことを命ずることができる。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (4) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5, paragraphs (1) and (2), the case subject to the petition referred to in paragraph (1) is under the exclusive jurisdiction of the following courts:

第一項の申立てに係る事件は、第五条第一項及び第二項の規定にかかわらず、次に掲げる裁判所の管轄に専属する。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (4), item (ii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the district court which has jurisdiction over the location of the subject matter of the claim or the seizable property of the respondent; and

請求の目的又は差し押さえることができる被申立人の財産の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (4), item (iii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the Tokyo District Court and the Osaka District Court (limited to the case in which the place of arbitration, the location of the general venue of the respondent, or the location of the subject matter of the claim or the seizable property of the respondent is in Japan).

東京地方裁判所及び大阪地方裁判所(仲裁地、被申立人の普通裁判籍の所在地又は請求の目的若しくは差し押さえることができる被申立人の財産の所在地が日本国内にある場合に限る。)

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (5) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

An immediate appeal may be filed against the decision under Article 5, paragraph (4) or (5) with regard to a case related to the petition referred to in paragraph (1).

第一項の申立てに係る事件についての第五条第四項又は第五項の規定による決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (6) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The court is required to make an enforcement approval order, except the case in which it dismisses the petition referred to in paragraph (1) without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of the following paragraph or paragraph (8).

裁判所は、次項又は第八項の規定により第一項の申立てを却下する場合を除き、執行等認可決定をしなければならない。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

If a petition referred to in paragraph (1) has been filed, the court may dismiss the petition without prejudice only when it finds that any of the grounds stated in the following items exist (for the grounds stated in items (i) through (viii), limited to the case in which the respondent has proved the existence of the grounds):

裁判所は、第一項の申立てがあった場合において、次の各号に掲げる事由のいずれかがあると認めるとき(第一号から第八号までに掲げる事由にあっては、被申立人が当該事由の存在を証明した場合に限る。)に限り、当該申立てを却下することができる。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (i) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the arbitration agreement is not valid due to the limitation on the legal capacity of a party;

仲裁合意が、当事者の行為能力の制限により、その効力を有しないこと。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (ii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the arbitration agreement is not valid on grounds other than the limitation on the legal capacity of a party pursuant to the laws and regulations designated by the agreement of the parties as those which should be applied to the arbitration agreement (or if the designation has not been made, pursuant to the laws and regulations of the country to which the place of arbitration belongs);

仲裁合意が、当事者が合意により仲裁合意に適用すべきものとして指定した法令(当該指定がないときは、仲裁地が属する国の法令)によれば、当事者の行為能力の制限以外の事由により、その効力を有しないこと。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (iii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the party did not receive the notice that is required pursuant to the laws and regulations of the country to which the place of arbitration belongs (or if the parties have reached an agreement on the matters concerning the provisions unrelated to public order in those laws and regulations, pursuant to the agreement) in the procedure of appointing arbitrators or in the arbitration procedure (limited to the part which concerns an order for interim measures; the same applies in the following item and item (vi));

当事者が、仲裁人の選任手続又は仲裁手続(暫定保全措置命令に関する部分に限る。次号及び第六号において同じ。)において、仲裁地が属する国の法令の規定(その法令の公の秩序に関しない規定に関する事項について当事者間に合意があるときは、当該合意)により必要とされる通知を受けなかったこと。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (iv) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the party was unable to conduct a defense in the arbitration procedure;

当事者が、仲裁手続において防御することが不可能であったこと。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (v) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the order for interim measures was issued concerning matters beyond the scope of the arbitration agreement or other agreement concerning an order for interim measures or concerning matters beyond the scope of a petition for an order for interim measures;

暫定保全措置命令が、仲裁合意若しくは暫定保全措置命令に関する別段の合意又は暫定保全措置命令の申立ての範囲を超える事項について発せられたものであること。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (vi) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitration procedure is in violation of the laws and regulations of the country to which the place of arbitration belongs (or if the parties have reached an agreement concerning the matters concerning the provisions unrelated to public order in those laws and regulations, in violation of the agreement);

仲裁廷の構成又は仲裁手続が、仲裁地が属する国の法令の規定(その法令の公の秩序に関しない規定に関する事項について当事者間に合意があるときは、当該合意)に違反するものであったこと。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (vii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

when the arbitral tribunal has ordered the party requesting an order for interim measures to provide appropriate security, and the party is in violation of the order and is not providing appropriate security;

仲裁廷が暫定保全措置命令の申立てをした者に対して相当な担保を提供すべきことを命じた場合において、その者が当該命令に違反し、相当な担保を提供していないこと。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (viii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the order for interim measures has been revoked, amended or suspended by the arbitral tribunal or the judicial body stated in paragraph (3);

暫定保全措置命令が、仲裁廷又は第三項に規定する裁判機関により、取り消され、変更され、又はその効力を停止されたこと。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (ix) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the petition filed in the arbitration procedure is concerned with a dispute which may not be subject to an arbitration agreement pursuant to the provisions of Japanese laws and regulations; or

仲裁手続における申立てが、日本の法令によれば、仲裁合意の対象とすることができない紛争に関するものであること。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (x) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the content of the order for interim measures is contrary to public policy in Japan.

暫定保全措置命令の内容が、日本における公の秩序又は善良の風俗に反すること。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (8) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

If the grounds stated in item (v) of the preceding paragraph exist, and the part concerning the matters provided for in that item can be separated from the other parts of the order for interim measures, the relevant part and the other parts of the order for interim measures are respectively deemed to be independent orders for interim measures, and the provisions of that paragraph apply.

前項第五号に掲げる事由がある場合において、当該暫定保全措置命令から同号に規定する事項に関する部分を区分することができるときは、当該部分及び当該暫定保全措置命令のその他の部分をそれぞれ独立した暫定保全措置命令とみなして、同項の規定を適用する。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (9) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

An enforcement approval order is not effective until it becomes final and binding.

執行等認可決定は、確定しなければその効力を生じない。

Changes and moves to Article 49, paragraph (10) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The provisions of Article 44, paragraphs (4) and (7) apply mutatis mutandis to the decision on the petition referred to in paragraph (1).

第四十四条第四項及び第七項の規定は、第一項の申立てについての決定について準用する。

Article 48Civil Enforcement Based on an Order for Interim Measures

第四十八条(暫定保全措置命令に基づく民事執行)

Changes and moves to Article 50, paragraph (1) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

Civil enforcement based on an order for interim measures (limited to the orders to take measures stated in Article 24, paragraph (1), item (iii)) may be processed only when there is an enforcement approval order stated in the preceding Article.

暫定保全措置命令(第二十四条第一項第三号に掲げる措置を講ずることを命ずるものに限る。)は、前条の規定による執行等認可決定がある場合に限り、当該暫定保全措置命令に基づく民事執行をすることができる。

Article 49Order for Payment of Penalty Regarding Order for Interim Measures

第四十九条(暫定保全措置命令に係る違反金支払命令)

Changes and moves to Article 51, paragraph (1) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

When there is a final and binding enforcement approval order regarding an order for interim measures (limited to the orders to take measures stated in Article 24, paragraph (1), item (i), (ii), (iv) and (v); hereinafter the same applies in this Article) and the court finds that the person that received the order for interim measures (hereinafter referred to as a "respondent" in this Article) violates or is likely to violate it, upon the petition of the person that filed the petition for the order for interim measures (referred to as a "petitioner" in paragraph (6)), the court may order the respondent to pay to the petitioner money of a certain amount that is found to be reasonable (subject to the violation of the order for interim measures, when it finds that the respondent is likely to violate it), taking into consideration the content and nature of the interest that would be harmed by the violation of the order for interim measures and also in what manner and to what extent that interest would be harmed.

裁判所は、暫定保全措置命令(第二十四条第一項第一号、第二号、第四号又は第五号に掲げる措置を講ずることを命ずるものに限る。以下この条において同じ。)について確定した執行等認可決定がある場合において、当該暫定保全措置命令を受けた者(以下この条において「被申立人」という。)がこれに違反し、又は違反するおそれがあると認めるときは、当該暫定保全措置命令の申立てをした者(第六項において「申立人」という。)の申立てにより、当該暫定保全措置命令の違反によって害されることとなる利益の内容及び性質並びにこれが害される態様及び程度を勘案して相当と認める一定の額の金銭の支払(被申立人が暫定保全措置命令に違反するおそれがあると認める場合にあっては、被申立人が当該暫定保全措置命令に違反したことを条件とする金銭の支払)を命ずることができる。

Moves to Article 51, paragraph (2) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the court may issue an order for payment of money under the paragraph (hereinafter referred to as an "order for payment of penalty" in this Article) at the same time it issues an enforcement approval order. In this case, the order for payment of penalty is not finalized until the enforcement approval order is finalized.

裁判所は、前項の規定にかかわらず、同項の規定による金銭の支払命令(以下この条において「違反金支払命令」という。)を、執行等認可決定と同時にすることができる。この場合においては、違反金支払命令は、執行等認可決定が確定するまでは、確定しないものとする。

Changes and moves to Article 51, paragraph (3) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5, paragraphs (1) and (2), the case subject to the petition referred to in paragraph (1) is under the exclusive jurisdiction of the court that issued the enforcement approval order or the court before which the case subject to the petition referred to in Article 47, paragraph (1) (limited to the case referred to in item (ii) of that paragraph; the same applies in the following paragraph) is pending.

第一項の申立てに係る事件は、第五条第一項及び第二項の規定にかかわらず、執行等認可決定をした裁判所及び第四十七条第一項の申立て(同項第二号に係るものに限る。次項において同じ。)に係る事件が係属する裁判所の管轄に専属する。

Changes and moves to Article 51, paragraph (4) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

If the court has issued an order for payment of penalty and an enforcement approval order simultaneously pursuant to the first sentence of paragraph (2), and a judicial decision that sets aside the enforcement approval order becomes final and binding or the petition referred to in Article 47, paragraph (1) is withdrawn, it must set aside the order for payment of penalty on its own initiative.

裁判所は、第二項前段の規定に基づき、違反金支払命令を執行等認可決定と同時にした場合において、執行等認可決定を取り消す裁判が確定したとき又は第四十七条第一項の申立てが取り下げられたときは、職権で、違反金支払命令を取り消さなければならない。

Moves to Article 51, paragraph (5) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

An order for payment of penalty is not effective until it becomes final and binding.

違反金支払命令は、確定しなければその効力を生じない。

Moves to Article 51, paragraph (6) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

If there has been payment of money that was ordered pursuant to the order for payment of penalty, and the amount of damages that resulted from violation of the order for interim measures exceeds the amount of payment, the petitioner is not precluded from claiming compensation for damages for the amount in excess.

違反金支払命令により命じられた金銭の支払があった場合において、暫定保全措置命令の違反により生じた損害の額が支払額を超えるときは、申立人は、その超える額について損害賠償の請求をすることを妨げられない。

Changes and moves to Article 51, paragraph (7) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

If the order for interim measures has been revoked, amended or suspended by the arbitral tribunal or the judicial body stated in Article 47, paragraph (3) after the order for payment of penalty was issued, upon the petition of the respondent, the court that issued the order for payment of penalty may set aside the order for payment of penalty.

違反金支払命令が発せられた後に、仲裁廷又は第四十七条第三項に規定する裁判機関により、暫定保全措置命令が取り消され、変更され、又はその効力を停止されたときは、違反金支払命令を発した裁判所は、被申立人の申立てにより、違反金支払命令を取り消すことができる。

Changes and moves to Article 51, paragraph (8) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The provisions of Article 47, paragraph (3) apply mutatis mutandis to the petition referred to in paragraph (1), and the provisions of Article 44, paragraphs (4) and (7) apply mutatis mutandis to the decision concerning the petition referred to in paragraph (1) and the preceding paragraph.

第四十七条第三項の規定は第一項の申立てについて、第四十四条第四項及び第七項の規定は第一項及び前項の申立てについての決定について、それぞれ準用する。

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy