Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding Article, if an administrative organ's head or administrative entity finds that making a decision on ceasing to use personal information would require a particularly long period of time, it is sufficient for them to make a decision on ceasing to use the personal information within a reasonable period of time. In this case, the administrative organ's head or administrative entity must notify the person making a request for ceasing to use the personal information in writing of the following matters within the period of time prescribed in paragraph (1) of that Article:
the application of this Article and the grounds for its application;
この条の規定を適用する旨及びその理由
the due date for making a decision on ceasing to use the personal information.
利用停止決定等をする期限
Subsection 4 Appeals for Review
第四款 審査請求
Article 104Exclusion from Application of Provisions Concerning Review Proceedings by Review Officers
第百四条（審理員による審理手続に関する規定の適用除外等）
The provisions of Article 9, Article 17, Article 24, Chapter II, Sections 3 and 4, and Article 50, paragraph (2) of the Administrative Complaint Review Act (Act No. 68 of 2014) do not apply to an appeal for review to any inaction of an administrative organ's head or administrative entity (excluding a local government organ or a local incorporated administrative agency; the same applies in the following paragraph and the following Article) in relation to a decision on disclosure, a decision on correction, a decision on ceasing to use personal information, or in relation to a request for disclosure, a request for correction, or a request for ceasing to use personal information.
When applying the provisions in Chapter II of the Administrative Complaint Review Act to an appeal for review to any inaction of an administrative organ's head or administrative entity in relation to a decision on disclosure, a decisions on correction, a decision ceasing to use personal information, or in relation to a request for disclosure, a request for correction, or a request for ceasing to use personal information, the term "a person who has been designated pursuant to the provisions of Article 9, paragraph (1) (hereinafter referred to as a "review officer)" in Article 11, paragraph (2) of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "an administrative agency (including an administrative agency that takes over the appeal for review pursuant to the provisions in Article 14; hereinafter referred to as a "reviewing agency") to which an appeal for review has been filed pursuant to the provisions in Article 4 (including a Cabinet Order issued pursuant to Article 107, paragraph (2) of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (Act No. 57 of 2003)"); the term "review officer" in Article 13, paragraphs (1) and (2) of that Act is deemed to be replaced with the term "reviewing agency"; the phrase "has been filed or a written opinion to suggest the necessity to order a stay of execution as prescribed in Article 40 has been submitted by a review officer" in Article 25, paragraph (7) of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "has been filed"; the term "Administrative Complaint Review Board, etc." in Article 44 of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "Information Disclosure and Personal Information Protection Review Board (or a review board specified by another law if the President of the Board of Audit is the reviewing agency, the same applies in Article 50, paragraph (1), item (iv))"; in that Article, the phrase "has received a report to its consultation from the Administrative Complaint Review Board, etc. (or when a review officer's written opinion has been submitted in cases in which the consultation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is not necessary (excluding the cases falling under item (ii) or (iii) of that paragraph), or when deliberations prescribed in item (ii) or (iii) of that paragraph have been held in the cases falling under item (ii) or (iii) of that paragraph)" is deemed to be replaced with "has received a report to its consultation from the Administrative Complaint Review Board, etc."; and the term "the review officer's written opinion or the written report from the Administrative Complaint Review Board, etc. or the Council, etc." in Article 50, paragraph (1), item (iv) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "the Information Disclosure and Personal Information Protection Review Board".
行政機関の長等に対する開示決定等、訂正決定等、利用停止決定等又は開示請求、訂正請求若しくは利用停止請求に係る不作為に係る審査請求についての行政不服審査法第二章の規定の適用については、同法第十一条第二項中「第九条第一項の規定により指名された者（以下「審理員」という。）」とあるのは「第四条（個人情報の保護に関する法律（平成十五年法律第五十七号）第百七条第二項の規定に基づく政令を含む。）の規定により審査請求がされた行政庁（第十四条の規定により引継ぎを受けた行政庁を含む。以下「審査庁」という。）」と、同法第十三条第一項及び第二項中「審理員」とあるのは「審査庁」と、同法第二十五条第七項中「あったとき、又は審理員から第四十条に規定する執行停止をすべき旨の意見書が提出されたとき」とあるのは「あったとき」と、同法第四十四条中「行政不服審査会等」とあるのは「情報公開・個人情報保護審査会（審査庁が会計検査院長である場合にあっては、別に法律で定める審査会。第五十条第一項第四号において同じ。）」と、「受けたとき（前条第一項の規定による諮問を要しない場合（同項第二号又は第三号に該当する場合を除く。）にあっては審理員意見書が提出されたとき、同項第二号又は第三号に該当する場合にあっては同項第二号又は第三号に規定する議を経たとき）」とあるのは「受けたとき」と、同法第五十条第一項第四号中「審理員意見書又は行政不服審査会等若しくは審議会等」とあるのは「情報公開・個人情報保護審査会」とする。
Article 105Consultation with the Review Board
第百五条（審査会への諮問）
Except in the cases that fall under any of the following items, when an appeal for review is filed for any inaction related to a decision on disclosure, a decisions on correction, or a decision on ceasing to use personal information, or related to a request for disclosure, a request for correction, or a request for ceasing to use personal information, the administrative organ's head or administrative entity that is expected to make a determination on that appeal for review must consult the Information Disclosure and Personal Information Protection Review Board (or with a review board separately provided for by law, if the administrative organ's head or administrative entity that is expected to make a determination on the appeal is the President of the Board of Audit):
if the appeal for review is unlawful and is to be dismissed;
審査請求が不適法であり、却下する場合
if the whole appeal for review is upheld, and it is determined that all of the personal information the administrative entity holds that is subject to the appeal is to be disclosed (excluding cases in which a written opposition opinion has been submitted for the disclosure of the personal information the administrative entity holds);
if it is determined that the whole appeal for review is upheld and corrections to the personal information the administrative entity holds that is subject to the appeal are made;
裁決で、審査請求の全部を認容し、当該審査請求に係る保有個人情報の訂正をすることとする場合
if it is determined that the whole appeal for review is accepted and the use of the personal information the administrative entity holds that is subject the appeal is to cease.
An administrative organ's head or administrative entity that has made a consultation pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph must notify the following persons to that effect:
an appellant and an intervenor (meaning an intervenor as prescribed in Article 13, paragraph (4) of the Administrative Complaint Review Act; hereinafter the same applies in this paragraph and Article 107, paragraph (1), item (ii));
審査請求人及び参加人（行政不服審査法第十三条第四項に規定する参加人をいう。以下この項及び第百七条第一項第二号において同じ。）
a person requesting disclosure, a person requesting correction, or a person making a request for ceasing to use personal information (excluding cases in which that person is an appellant or an intervenor);
a third party that has submitted a written opposition opinion regarding a disclosure of personal information an administrative entity holds that is subject to the appeal for review (excluding cases in which that third party is an appellant or an intervenor).
The provisions of the preceding two paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis to a local government organ or a local incorporated administrative agency. In this case, the phrase "Information Disclosure and Personal Information Protection Review Board (or with a review board separately provided for by law, if the administrative organ's head or administrative entity that is expected to make a determination on the appeal is the President of the Board of Audit" in paragraph (1) is replaced with "organ referred to in Article 81, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of the Administrative Complaint Review Act".
第百六条（地方公共団体の機関等における審理員による審理手続に関する規定の適用除外等）
The provisions of Article 9, paragraphs (1) through (3), Article 17, Article 40, Article 42, Chapter II, Section 4, and Article 50, paragraph (2) of the Administrative Complaint Review Act do not apply to an appeal for review to any inaction of a local government organ or a local incorporated administrative agency in relation to a decision on disclosure, a decision on correction, a decision on ceasing to use personal information, or in relation to a request for disclosure, a request for correction, or a request for ceasing to use personal information.
With respect to the application of the provisions of the Administrative Complaint Review Act set forth in the left-hand column of the following table regarding an appeal for review to any inaction of a local government organ or a local incorporated administrative agency in relation to a decision on disclosure, a decision on correction, a decision on ceasing to use personal information, or in relation to a request for disclosure, a request for correction, or a request for ceasing to use personal information, the terms set forth in the middle column of that table that are used in these provisions are deemed to be replaced with the terms set forth in the right-hand column of that table; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms is specified by Cabinet Order.
| Article 9, paragraph (4) | In the case prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if it is found necessary, the reviewing agency | If it is found necessary, the administrative agency that has received a request for review pursuant to Article 4 or ordinance based on the provision of Article 107, paragraph (2) of Act on the Protection of Personal Information (Act No.57 of 2003) (including an administrative agency that takes over the appeal for review pursuant to the provisions in Article 14; hereinafter referred to as a "reviewing agency") |
| Article 31, paragraph (1) as applied pursuant to the preceding paragraph following the deemed replacement of the terms | Article 31, paragraph (1) as applied pursuant to Article 106, paragraph (2) of that Act following the deemed replacement of the terms | |
| Article 34 as applied pursuant to the preceding paragraph following the deemed replacement of the terms | Article 34 as applied pursuant to Article 106, paragraph (2) of that Act following the deemed replacement of the terms | |
| Article 36 as applied pursuant to the preceding paragraph following the deemed replacement of the terms | Article 36 as applied pursuant to Article 106, paragraph (2) of that Act following the deemed replacement of the terms | |
| Article 11, paragraph (2) | a person who has been designated pursuant to the provisions of Article 9, paragraph (1) (hereinafter referred to as a "review officer") | the reviewing agency |
| Article 13, paragraph (1) and (2), Article 28, Article 30, Article 31, Article 32, paragraph (3), Articles 33 through 37, Article 38, paragraphs (1) through (3) and (5), Article 39, and Article 41, paragraph (1) and (2) | review officer | reviewing agency |
| Article 25, paragraph (7) | When a petition for a stay of execution has been filed or a written opinion to suggest the necessity to order a stay of execution as prescribed in Article 40 has been submitted by a review officer | When a petition for a stay of execution has been filed |
| Article 29, paragraph (1) | When having been appointed by the reviewing agency, a review officer must immediately | When a request for review has been filed, except for the case of dismissing the request for review without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of Article 24, the reviewing agency must promptly |
| Article 29, paragraph (2) | A review officer | The reviewing agency that falls under any category other than the administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition |
| administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition to submit a written explanation | submission of a written explanation, and the reviewing agency that falls under the administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition is to prepare a written explanation within an appropriate period of time | |
| Article 29, paragraph (5) | a review officer | the reviewing agency |
| from the administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition | from the administrative agency , etc.reaching the disposition or the reviewing agency has prepared a written explanation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) | |
| Article 30, paragraph (3) | intervenors and the administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition | intervenors and the administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition (when the administrative agency reaching the disposition falls under the reviewing agency, intervenors) |
| relevant requestor for review and the administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition | relevant requestor for review and the administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition (when the administrative agency reaching the disposition falls under the reviewing agency, the relevant requestor for review) | |
| Article 31, paragraph (2) | all of the persons concerned with proceedings | all of the persons concerned with proceedings (when the administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition falls under the reviewing agency, the relevant requestor for review and intervenors; hereinafter, the same applies in this Section and Article 50, paragraph (1), item (iii)) |
| Article 41, paragraph (3) | a review officer | the reviewing agency |
| the review officer should promptly give a notice to the persons concerned with proceedings to inform them of the conclusion of the procedures for proceedings and the time when the written opinion of the review officer prescribed in paragraph (1) of the following Article and the case record (meaning the written request for review, written explanation, and other documents and articles pertaining to the case wherein the request for review has been filed, which are specified by Cabinet Order; the same applies in paragraph (2) of the following Article and Article 43, paragraph (2)) are scheduled to be submitted to the Reviewing Agency. The same applies when the scheduled time of submission is altered | the reviewing agency should promptly give a notice to the persons concerned with proceedings to inform them of the conclusion of the procedures for proceedings | |
| Article 44 | the Administrative Complaint Review Board, etc. | the organ set forth in Article 81, paragraph (1) or (2) |
| (or when a review officer's written opinion has been submitted in the case where the consultation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is not necessary (excluding the cases falling under item (ii) or (iii) of the relevant paragraph), or when deliberations prescribed in item (ii) or (iii) of the relevant paragraph have been held in the cases falling under item (ii) or (iii) of the relevant paragraph) | [Deleted] | |
| Article 50, paragraph (1), item(iv) | the review officer's written opinion or the written reply from the Administrative Complaint Review Board, etc. or the council, etc. | the written reply from the organ set forth in Article 81, paragraph (1) or (2) |
| Article 74 as applied mutatis mutandis in Article 81, paragraph (3) | the reviewing agency that has consulted with the board pursuant to the provisions of Article 43, paragraph (1) | the reviewing agency |
地方公共団体の機関又は地方独立行政法人に対する開示決定等、訂正決定等、利用停止決定等又は開示請求、訂正請求若しくは利用停止請求に係る不作為に係る審査請求についての次の表の上欄に掲げる行政不服審査法の規定の適用については、これらの規定中同表の中欄に掲げる字句は、それぞれ同表の下欄に掲げる字句とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。
| 第九条第四項 | 前項に規定する場合において、審査庁 | 第四条又は個人情報の保護に関する法律（平成十五年法律第五十七号）第百七条第二項の規定に基づく条例の規定により審査請求がされた行政庁（第十四条の規定により引継ぎを受けた行政庁を含む。以下「審査庁」という。） |
| 前項において読み替えて適用する第三十一条第一項 | 同法第百六条第二項において読み替えて適用する第三十一条第一項 | |
| 前項において読み替えて適用する第三十四条 | 同法第百六条第二項において読み替えて適用する第三十四条 | |
| 前項において読み替えて適用する第三十六条 | 同法第百六条第二項において読み替えて適用する第三十六条 | |
| 第十一条第二項 | 第九条第一項の規定により指名された者（以下「審理員」という。） | 審査庁 |
| 第十三条第一項及び第二項、第二十八条、第三十条、第三十一条、第三十二条第三項、第三十三条から第三十七条まで、第三十八条第一項から第三項まで及び第五項、第三十九条並びに第四十一条第一項及び第二項 | 審理員 | 審査庁 |
| 第二十五条第七項 | 執行停止の申立てがあったとき、又は審理員から第四十条に規定する執行停止をすべき旨の意見書が提出されたとき | 執行停止の申立てがあったとき |
| 第二十九条第一項 | 審理員は、審査庁から指名されたときは、直ちに | 審査庁は、審査請求がされたときは、第二十四条の規定により当該審査請求を却下する場合を除き、速やかに |
| 第二十九条第二項 | 審理員は | 審査庁は、審査庁が処分庁等以外である場合にあっては |
| 提出を求める | 提出を求め、審査庁が処分庁等である場合にあっては、相当の期間内に、弁明書を作成する | |
| 第二十九条第五項 | 審理員は | 審査庁は、第二項の規定により |
| 提出があったとき | 提出があったとき、又は弁明書を作成したとき | |
| 第三十条第三項 | 参加人及び処分庁等 | 参加人及び処分庁等（処分庁等が審査庁である場合にあっては、参加人） |
| 審査請求人及び処分庁等 | 審査請求人及び処分庁等（処分庁等が審査庁である場合にあっては、審査請求人） | |
| 第三十一条第二項 | 審理関係人 | 審理関係人（処分庁等が審査庁である場合にあっては、審査請求人及び参加人。以下この節及び第五十条第一項第三号において同じ。） |
| 第四十一条第三項 | 審理員が | 審査庁が |
| 終結した旨並びに次条第一項に規定する審理員意見書及び事件記録（審査請求書、弁明書その他審査請求に係る事件に関する書類その他の物件のうち政令で定めるものをいう。同条第二項及び第四十三条第二項において同じ。）を審査庁に提出する予定時期を通知するものとする。当該予定時期を変更したときも、同様とする | 終結した旨を通知するものとする | |
| 第四十四条 | 行政不服審査会等 | 第八十一条第一項又は第二項の機関 |
| 受けたとき（前条第一項の規定による諮問を要しない場合（同項第二号又は第三号に該当する場合を除く。）にあっては審理員意見書が提出されたとき、同項第二号又は第三号に該当する場合にあっては同項第二号又は第三号に規定する議を経たとき） | 受けたとき | |
| 第五十条第一項第四号 | 審理員意見書又は行政不服審査会等若しくは審議会等 | 第八十一条第一項又は第二項の機関 |
| 第八十一条第三項において準用する第七十四条 | 第四十三条第一項の規定により審査会に諮問をした審査庁 | 審査庁 |
Article 107Procedures in Cases in Which an Appeal for Review from a Third Party is Dismissed
第百七条（第三者からの審査請求を棄却する場合等における手続等）
The provisions of Article 86, paragraph (3) apply mutatis mutandis to the cases in which the determination falls under any of the following items:
第八十六条第三項の規定は、次の各号のいずれかに該当する裁決をする場合について準用する。
a determination to dismiss without prejudice or dismiss with prejudice on the merits an appeal for review from a third party against a decision to disclose;
a determination that alters a decision on disclosure subject to an appeal for review (excluding a determination to disclose all of the personal information the administrative entity holds that is subject to a request for disclosure), and discloses the personal information relating to that appeal (limited to the case in which a third party intervenor has manifested an intention to oppose the disclosure of the information on that third party).
With regard to an appeal for review to any inaction related to a decision on disclosure, a decision on correction, a decision on ceasing to use personal information, or related to a request for disclosure, a request for correction, or a request for ceasing to use personal information, the special provisions prescribed in Article 4 of the Administrative Complaint Review Act may be established as provided for by Cabinet Order (or as provided for by local ordinance, in cases of a local government organ or local incorporated administrative agency).
Subsection 5 Relationships with Local Ordinances
第五款 条例との関係
第百八条
The provisions in this Section do not preclude a local government from providing necessary provisions by local ordinance regarding matters concerning the procedure for disclosing, correcting, or ceasing to use personal information an administrative entity holds, or for a request for review, unless they violate the provisions in this Section.