Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 105Consultation with the Review Board

第百五条(審査会への諮問)

Except in the cases that fall under any of the following items, when an appeal for review is filed for any inaction related to a decision on disclosure, a decisions on correction, or a decision on ceasing to use personal information, or related to a request for disclosure, a request for correction, or a request for ceasing to use personal information, the administrative organ's head or administrative entity that is expected to make a determination on that appeal for review must consult the Information Disclosure and Personal Information Protection Review Board (or with a review board separately provided for by law, if the administrative organ's head or administrative entity that is expected to make a determination on the appeal is the President of the Board of Audit):

開示決定等、訂正決定等、利用停止決定等又は開示請求、訂正請求若しくは利用停止請求に係る不作為について審査請求があったときは、当該審査請求に対する裁決をすべき行政機関の長等は、次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合を除き、情報公開・個人情報保護審査会(審査請求に対する裁決をすべき行政機関の長等が会計検査院長である場合にあっては、別に法律で定める審査会)に諮問しなければならない。

if the appeal for review is unlawful and is to be dismissed;

審査請求が不適法であり、却下する場合

if the whole appeal for review is upheld, and it is determined that all of the personal information the administrative entity holds that is subject to the appeal is to be disclosed (excluding cases in which a written opposition opinion has been submitted for the disclosure of the personal information the administrative entity holds);

裁決で、審査請求の全部を認容し、当該審査請求に係る保有個人情報の全部を開示することとする場合(当該保有個人情報の開示について反対意見書が提出されている場合を除く。)

if it is determined that the whole appeal for review is upheld and corrections to the personal information the administrative entity holds that is subject to the appeal are made;

裁決で、審査請求の全部を認容し、当該審査請求に係る保有個人情報の訂正をすることとする場合

if it is determined that the whole appeal for review is accepted and the use of the personal information the administrative entity holds that is subject the appeal is to cease.

裁決で、審査請求の全部を認容し、当該審査請求に係る保有個人情報の利用停止をすることとする場合

An administrative organ's head or administrative entity that has made a consultation pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph must notify the following persons to that effect:

前項の規定により諮問をした行政機関の長等は、次に掲げる者に対し、諮問をした旨を通知しなければならない。

an appellant and an intervenor (meaning an intervenor as prescribed in ; hereinafter the same applies in this paragraph and Article 107, paragraph (1), item (ii));

審査請求人及び参加人(に規定する参加人をいう。以下この項及び第百七条第一項第二号において同じ。)

開示請求者、訂正請求者又は利用停止請求者(これらの者が審査請求人又は参加人である場合を除く。)

a third party that has submitted a written opposition opinion regarding a disclosure of personal information an administrative entity holds that is subject to the appeal for review (excluding cases in which that third party is an appellant or an intervenor).

当該審査請求に係る保有個人情報の開示について反対意見書を提出した第三者(当該第三者が審査請求人又は参加人である場合を除く。)

The provisions of the preceding two paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis to a local government organ or a local incorporated administrative agency. In this case, the phrase "Information Disclosure and Personal Information Protection Review Board (or with a review board separately provided for by law, if the administrative organ's head or administrative entity that is expected to make a determination on the appeal is the President of the Board of Audit" in paragraph (1) is replaced with "organ referred to in or ".

前二項の規定は、地方公共団体の機関又は地方独立行政法人について準用する。この場合において、第一項中「情報公開・個人情報保護審査会(審査請求に対する裁決をすべき行政機関の長等が会計検査院長である場合にあっては、別に法律で定める審査会)」とあるのは、「又はの機関」と読み替えるものとする。

Read this in its chapter

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.SourcesTermsPrivacy