Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 106Exclusion from Application of Provisions Concerning Review Proceedings by Review Officers for Local Government Organs

第百六条(地方公共団体の機関等における審理員による審理手続に関する規定の適用除外等)

The provisions of , , , , Chapter II, Section 4, and do not apply to an appeal for review to any inaction of a local government organ or a local incorporated administrative agency in relation to a decision on disclosure, a decision on correction, a decision on ceasing to use personal information, or in relation to a request for disclosure, a request for correction, or a request for ceasing to use personal information.

地方公共団体の機関又は地方独立行政法人に対する開示決定等、訂正決定等、利用停止決定等又は開示請求、訂正請求若しくは利用停止請求に係る不作為に係る審査請求については、からまで、、、、第二章第四節及びの規定は、適用しない。

With respect to the application of the provisions of the Administrative Complaint Review Act set forth in the left-hand column of the following table regarding an appeal for review to any inaction of a local government organ or a local incorporated administrative agency in relation to a decision on disclosure, a decision on correction, a decision on ceasing to use personal information, or in relation to a request for disclosure, a request for correction, or a request for ceasing to use personal information, the terms set forth in the middle column of that table that are used in these provisions are deemed to be replaced with the terms set forth in the right-hand column of that table; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms is specified by Cabinet Order.

In the case prescribed in , if it is found necessary, the reviewing agencyIf it is found necessary, the administrative agency that has received a request for review pursuant to or ordinance based on the provision of Article 107, paragraph (2) of Act on the Protection of Personal Information (Act No.57 of 2003) (including an administrative agency that takes over the appeal for review pursuant to the provisions in ; hereinafter referred to as a "reviewing agency")
as applied pursuant to following the deemed replacement of the terms as applied pursuant to Article 106, paragraph (2) of that Act following the deemed replacement of the terms
as applied pursuant to following the deemed replacement of the terms as applied pursuant to Article 106, paragraph (2) of that Act following the deemed replacement of the terms
as applied pursuant to following the deemed replacement of the terms as applied pursuant to Article 106, paragraph (2) of that Act following the deemed replacement of the terms
a person who has been designated pursuant to the provisions of (hereinafter referred to as a "review officer")the reviewing agency
and , , , , , , and , , and and review officerreviewing agency
When a petition for a stay of execution has been filed or a written opinion to suggest the necessity to order a stay of execution as prescribed in has been submitted by a review officerWhen a petition for a stay of execution has been filed
When having been appointed by the reviewing agency, a review officer must immediatelyWhen a request for review has been filed, except for the case of dismissing the request for review without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of , the reviewing agency must promptly
A review officerThe reviewing agency that falls under any category other than the administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition
administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition to submit a written explanationsubmission of a written explanation, and the reviewing agency that falls under the administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition is to prepare a written explanation within an appropriate period of time
a review officerthe reviewing agency
from the administrative agency, etc. reaching the dispositionfrom the administrative agency , etc.reaching the disposition or the reviewing agency has prepared a written explanation pursuant to the provisions of
intervenors and the administrative agency, etc. reaching the dispositionintervenors and the administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition (when the administrative agency reaching the disposition falls under the reviewing agency, intervenors)
relevant requestor for review and the administrative agency, etc. reaching the dispositionrelevant requestor for review and the administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition (when the administrative agency reaching the disposition falls under the reviewing agency, the relevant requestor for review)
all of the persons concerned with proceedingsall of the persons concerned with proceedings (when the administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition falls under the reviewing agency, the relevant requestor for review and intervenors; hereinafter, the same applies in this Section and )
a review officerthe reviewing agency
the review officer should promptly give a notice to the persons concerned with proceedings to inform them of the conclusion of the procedures for proceedings and the time when the written opinion of the review officer prescribed in and the case record (meaning the written request for review, written explanation, and other documents and articles pertaining to the case wherein the request for review has been filed, which are specified by Cabinet Order; the same applies in and ) are scheduled to be submitted to the Reviewing Agency. The same applies when the scheduled time of submission is alteredthe reviewing agency should promptly give a notice to the persons concerned with proceedings to inform them of the conclusion of the procedures for proceedings
the Administrative Complaint Review Board, etc.the organ set forth in or
(or when a review officer's written opinion has been submitted in the case where the consultation pursuant to the provisions of is not necessary (excluding the cases falling under or of the relevant paragraph), or when deliberations prescribed in or of the relevant paragraph have been held in the cases falling under or of the relevant paragraph)[Deleted]
the review officer's written opinion or the written reply from the Administrative Complaint Review Board, etc. or the council, etc.the written reply from the organ set forth in or
as applied mutatis mutandis in the reviewing agency that has consulted with the board pursuant to the provisions of the reviewing agency

地方公共団体の機関又は地方独立行政法人に対する開示決定等、訂正決定等、利用停止決定等又は開示請求、訂正請求若しくは利用停止請求に係る不作為に係る審査請求についての次の表の上欄に掲げる行政不服審査法の規定の適用については、これらの規定中同表の中欄に掲げる字句は、それぞれ同表の下欄に掲げる字句とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。

に規定する場合において、審査庁又は個人情報の保護に関する法律(平成十五年法律第五十七号)第百七条第二項の規定に基づく条例の規定により審査請求がされた行政庁(の規定により引継ぎを受けた行政庁を含む。以下「審査庁」という。)
において読み替えて適用する同法第百六条第二項において読み替えて適用する
において読み替えて適用する同法第百六条第二項において読み替えて適用する
において読み替えて適用する同法第百六条第二項において読み替えて適用する
の規定により指名された者(以下「審理員」という。)審査庁
及び、、、、、、及び、並びに及び審理員審査庁
執行停止の申立てがあったとき、又は審理員からに規定する執行停止をすべき旨の意見書が提出されたとき執行停止の申立てがあったとき
審理員は、審査庁から指名されたときは、直ちに審査庁は、審査請求がされたときは、の規定により当該審査請求を却下する場合を除き、速やかに
審理員は審査庁は、審査庁が処分庁等以外である場合にあっては
提出を求める提出を求め、審査庁が処分庁等である場合にあっては、相当の期間内に、弁明書を作成する
審理員は審査庁は、の規定により
提出があったとき提出があったとき、又は弁明書を作成したとき
参加人及び処分庁等参加人及び処分庁等(処分庁等が審査庁である場合にあっては、参加人)
審査請求人及び処分庁等審査請求人及び処分庁等(処分庁等が審査庁である場合にあっては、審査請求人)
審理関係人審理関係人(処分庁等が審査庁である場合にあっては、審査請求人及び参加人。以下この節及びにおいて同じ。)
審理員が審査庁が
終結した旨並びにに規定する審理員意見書及び事件記録(審査請求書、弁明書その他審査請求に係る事件に関する書類その他の物件のうち政令で定めるものをいう。及びにおいて同じ。)を審査庁に提出する予定時期を通知するものとする。当該予定時期を変更したときも、同様とする終結した旨を通知するものとする
行政不服審査会等又はの機関
受けたとき(の規定による諮問を要しない場合(又はに該当する場合を除く。)にあっては審理員意見書が提出されたとき、又はに該当する場合にあっては又はに規定する議を経たとき)受けたとき
審理員意見書又は行政不服審査会等若しくは審議会等又はの機関
において準用するの規定により審査会に諮問をした審査庁審査庁

Read this in its chapter

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.SourcesTermsPrivacy