Article 193Requirements for Enforcing a Security Interest in a Claim or any Other Property Right
第百九十三条（債権及びその他の財産権についての担保権の実行の要件等）
Enforcement of a security interest in the claim prescribed in Article 143 or the property right prescribed in Article 167, paragraph (1) (referred to as "any other property right" in this paragraph) is commenced only when a document or electronic or magnetic record proving the existence of the security interest (or, for a security interest in any other property right for which registration is required in the case of transfer of the right and which is not a general statutory lien, if the security interest has been registered, etc. (excluding provisional registration) when a petition for enforcement of a security interest has been filed or a document or electronic or magnetic record prescribed in Article 181, paragraph (1), item (ii), (a) or (b) or paragraph (2) or (3) has been submitted). The same applies to the exercise of a security interest by a person having a security interest, conducted pursuant to the provisions of the Civil Code or any other Act against money or any other property to be received by the obligor as a result of a sale, lease or loss of or damage to the subject matter, establishment of a real right on the subject matter, or expropriation under the Land Expropriation Act (Act No. 219 of 1951) or any other administrative disposition.
第百四十三条に規定する債権及び第百六十七条第一項に規定する財産権（以下この項において「その他の財産権」という。）を目的とする担保権の実行は、担保権の存在を証する文書又は電磁的記録が提出されたとき（権利の移転について登記等を要するその他の財産権を目的とする担保権で一般の先取特権以外のものについては、担保権の登記等（仮登記又は仮登録を除く。）がされている場合においてその担保権の実行の申立てがあつたとき又は第百八十一条第一項第二号イ若しくはロ、第二項若しくは第三項に規定する文書若しくは電磁的記録が提出されたとき）に限り、開始する。担保権を有する者が目的物の売却、賃貸、滅失若しくは損傷又は目的物に対する物権の設定若しくは土地収用法（昭和二十六年法律第二百十九号）による収用その他の行政処分により債務者が受けるべき金銭その他の物に対して民法その他の法律の規定によつてするその権利の行使についても、同様とする。
The provisions of Section 2, Subsection 4, Division 1 of the preceding Chapter (excluding Article 146, paragraph (2), Article 152 and Article 153) and Articles 182 through 184 apply mutatis mutandis to the enforcement or exercise of a security interest prescribed in the preceding paragraph, the provisions of Article 146, paragraph (2), Article 152 and Article 153 apply mutatis mutandis to the enforcement or exercise of a general statutory lien prescribed in the preceding paragraph, and the provisions of Article 167-17 apply mutatis mutandis to the case where an obligee who has submitted a document proving that the obligee has a general statutory lien (limited to one pertaining to Article 306, item (iii) of the Civil Code) for property of the obligor has filed a petition under Article 197, paragraph (2) or a petition under Article 206, paragraph (2), respectively.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 145, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph, in the case where an obligee claims a monetary claim pertaining to an obligation concerning the custody of a child under the provisions of Article 766-3 of the Civil Code (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Articles 749, 771 and 788 of that Code), the enforcement court may, if it finds it necessary when issuing an order of seizure for the enforcement of a general statutory lien (limited to one pertaining to Article 306, item (iii) of that Code), interrogate the obligor.
前項において準用する第百四十五条第二項の規定にかかわらず、債権者が民法第七百六十六条の三（同法第七百四十九条、第七百七十一条及び第七百八十八条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による子の監護に関する義務に係る金銭債権を請求する場合には、執行裁判所は、一般の先取特権（同法第三百六条第三号に係るものに限る。）の実行としての差押命令を発するに際し、必要があると認めるときは、債務者を審尋することができる。
Read this with the articles around it