Article 761Joint and Several Liability for Debts Incurred for Household Necessities
第七百六十一条(日常の家事に関する債務の連帯責任)
When one party to a marriage performs a juridical act with a third party in respect of a household necessity, the other party to the marriage is jointly and severally liable for the debt arising from that act; provided, however, that this does not apply if advance notice is given to the third party indicating that the other party to the marriage will not bear such liability.
夫婦の一方が日常の家事に関して第三者と法律行為をしたときは、他の一方は、これによって生じた債務について、連帯してその責任を負う。ただし、第三者に対し責任を負わない旨を予告した場合は、この限りでない。
Article 762Vesting of Property in the Husband and Wife
第七百六十二条(夫婦間における財産の帰属)
Property owned by one party before marriage and property obtained in the name of that party during the marriage is separate property (meaning property that one party to a marriage owns independently of the other party).
夫婦の一方が婚姻前から有する財産及び婚姻中自己の名で得た財産は、その特有財産(夫婦の一方が単独で有する財産をいう。)とする。
Property that does not clearly belong to either husband or wife is presumed to be held in coownership.
夫婦のいずれに属するか明らかでない財産は、その共有に属するものと推定する。
Section 4 Divorce
第四節 離婚
Subsection 1 Divorce by Agreement
第一款 協議上の離婚
Article 763Divorce by Agreement
第七百六十三条(協議上の離婚)
A husband and wife may divorce by agreement.
夫婦は、その協議で、離婚をすることができる。
Article 764Mutatis Mutandis Application of Marriage Provisions
第七百六十四条(婚姻の規定の準用)
Article 765Acceptance of Application to Register a Divorce
第七百六十五条(離婚の届出の受理)
It is not permissible to accept an application to register a divorce until the divorce has been found not to violate the provisions of Article 739, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding Article or the provisions of any other law or regulation, and, if there is a child between the husband and wife who has not attained the age of majority, to fall under any of the following items.
離婚の届出は、その離婚が前条において準用する第七百三十九条第二項の規定その他の法令の規定に違反しないこと及び夫婦間に成年に達しない子がある場合には次の各号のいずれかに該当することを認めた後でなければ、受理することができない。
the person with parental authority has been determined;
親権者の定めがされていること。
a petition for a domestic relations ruling or domestic relations conciliation seeking the designation of the person with parental authority has been filed.
親権者の指定を求める家事審判又は家事調停の申立てがされていること。
Even if an application to register a divorce is accepted in violation of the provisions of the preceding paragraph, this does not impair the validity of the divorce.
離婚の届出が前項の規定に違反して受理されたときであっても、離婚は、そのためにその効力を妨げられない。
Article 766Determining Issues of Child Custody Following Divorce
第七百六十六条(離婚後の子の監護に関する事項の定め等)
If parents divorce by agreement, the issues that need to be determined in connection with child custody, such as who will have custody over the child or the allocation of custody of the child, contact between the father or mother and the child, and the sharing of expenses that custody of the child requires, are determined in that agreement. The child's interests must be given the highest priority in the consideration of these issues, in such a case.
父母が協議上の離婚をするときは、子の監護をすべき者又は子の監護の分掌、父又は母と子との交流、子の監護に要する費用の分担その他の子の監護について必要な事項は、その協議で定める。この場合においては、子の利益を最も優先して考慮しなければならない。
If the agreement referred to in the preceding paragraph is not reached or if discussions toward such an agreement cannot be held, the issues referred to in the preceding paragraph are determined by the family court.
The family court may change a determination under the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs and order any other proper disposition regarding child custody if it finds this to be necessary.
家庭裁判所は、必要があると認めるときは、前二項の規定による定めを変更し、その他子の監護について相当な処分を命ずることができる。
Parental rights and duties beyond the scope of custody are not altered by the provisions of the preceding three paragraphs.
前三項の規定によっては、監護の範囲外では、父母の権利義務に変更を生じない。
Article 766-2Determination of Contact between a Child and Relatives Other Than the Parents by Ruling
第七百六十六条の二(審判による父母以外の親族と子との交流の定め)
In the cases referred to in paragraph (2) or paragraph (3) of the preceding Article, if the family court finds it particularly necessary for the interests of the child, it may determine that contact between the child and relatives other than the parents is to take place, as an issue that needs to be determined in connection with child custody prescribed in paragraph (1) of that Article.
A request for a ruling under paragraph (2) or paragraph (3) of the preceding Article regarding the determination referred to in the preceding paragraph may be made by the following persons (in the case of the person listed in item (ii), only where there is no other appropriate method for making a determination on contact between that person and the child):
the parents;
父母
relatives of the child other than the parents (in the case of persons other than the child's lineal ascendants and siblings, limited to those who have previously had custody of the child)
父母以外の子の親族(子の直系尊属及び兄弟姉妹以外の者にあっては、過去に当該子を監護していた者に限る。)
第七百六十六条の三(子の監護に要する費用の分担の定めがない場合の特例)
If the parents divorce by agreement without having made a determination on the sharing of expenses required for the custody of the child, the one of the parents who has continuously been primarily responsible for the custody of the child since the time of the divorce may, from the date of the divorce until the earliest of the following dates, demand of the other parent, at the end of each month, payment, as the sharing of expenses required for the custody of the child, of an amount calculated in accordance with a Ministry of Justice Order according to the number of children, taking into consideration the standard amount of expenses required to maintain the minimum standard of living of a child who is to be supported by the parents and other circumstances; provided, however, that the other parent may refuse to pay all or part of that amount upon proving that he or she is unable to pay it for lack of ability to pay or that his or her livelihood would be seriously impoverished by paying it.
父母が子の監護に要する費用の分担についての定めをすることなく協議上の離婚をした場合には、父母の一方であって離婚の時から引き続きその子の監護を主として行うものは、他の一方に対し、離婚の日から、次に掲げる日のいずれか早い日までの間、毎月末に、その子の監護に要する費用の分担として、父母の扶養を受けるべき子の最低限度の生活の維持に要する標準的な費用の額その他の事情を勘案して子の数に応じて法務省令で定めるところにより算定した額の支払を請求することができる。ただし、当該他の一方は、支払能力を欠くためにその支払をすることができないこと又はその支払をすることによってその生活が著しく窮迫することを証明したときは、その全部又は一部の支払を拒むことができる。
the date on which the parents made, by agreement, a determination on the sharing of expenses required for the custody of the child;
父母がその協議により子の監護に要する費用の分担についての定めをした日
the date on which a ruling on the sharing of expenses required for the custody of the child becomes final and binding;
子の監護に要する費用の分担についての審判が確定した日
the date on which the child attains the age of majority.
子が成年に達した日
The amount referred to in the preceding paragraph for the month containing the date of the divorce or the month containing the earliest of the dates set forth in the items of that paragraph is calculated on a daily basis, as provided by Ministry of Justice Order.
When the family court makes or changes a determination on the sharing of expenses required for the custody of the child pursuant to the provisions of Article 766, paragraph (2) or (3), it may, taking into consideration the ability to pay of the other parent who bears the obligation under the provisions of paragraph (1), order the exemption of all or part of that obligation, a deferment of payment, or any other proper disposition.
家庭裁判所は、第七百六十六条第二項又は第三項の規定により子の監護に要する費用の分担についての定めをし又はその定めを変更する場合には、第一項の規定による債務を負う他の一方の支払能力を考慮して、当該債務の全部若しくは一部の免除又は支払の猶予その他相当な処分を命ずることができる。
Article 767Reversion to Previous Surname upon Divorce
第七百六十七条(離婚による復氏等)
The surname of the husband or wife who changed surnames upon marriage reverts to the surname used before marriage upon divorce by agreement.
婚姻によって氏を改めた夫又は妻は、協議上の離婚によって婚姻前の氏に復する。
The husband or wife whose surname has reverted to the surname used before marriage pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph may take the surname used at the time of divorce by filing a registration pursuant to the Family Register Act within three months of the day of divorce.
Article 768Division of Property
第七百六十八条(財産分与)
One party to a divorce by agreement may ask the other party to effectuate a division of property.
協議上の離婚をした者の一方は、相手方に対して財産の分与を請求することができる。
If no agreement between the parties is reached with respect to the division of property under the preceding paragraph or if discussions toward such an agreement cannot be held, either party may file a request with the family court for a disposition in lieu of such an agreement; provided, however, that this does not apply once five years have passed since the time of divorce.
前項の規定による財産の分与について、当事者間に協議が調わないとき、又は協議をすることができないときは、当事者は、家庭裁判所に対して協議に代わる処分を請求することができる。ただし、離婚の時から五年を経過したときは、この限りでない。
In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the family court determines whether a division is to be made and the amount and method of the division, taking into consideration the amount of property acquired or maintained by both parties during the marriage and the degree of each party's contribution to its acquisition or maintenance, the duration of the marriage, the standard of living during the marriage, the state of cooperation and assistance during the marriage, the age, physical and mental condition, occupation and income of each party, and all other circumstances, in order to achieve equity in the property of the parties following the divorce. In this case, the degree of each party's contribution to the acquisition or maintenance of property during the marriage is to be equal if it is not clear that the degrees differ.
前項の場合には、家庭裁判所は、離婚後の当事者間の財産上の衡平を図るため、当事者双方がその婚姻中に取得し、又は維持した財産の額及びその取得又は維持についての各当事者の寄与の程度、婚姻の期間、婚姻中の生活水準、婚姻中の協力及び扶助の状況、各当事者の年齢、心身の状況、職業及び収入その他一切の事情を考慮して、分与をさせるべきかどうか並びに分与の額及び方法を定める。この場合において、婚姻中の財産の取得又は維持についての各当事者の寄与の程度は、その程度が異なることが明らかでないときは、相等しいものとする。
Article 769Succession of Rights after Reversion to Previous Surname upon Divorce
第七百六十九条(離婚による復氏の際の権利の承継)
If the husband or wife who changed surnames upon marriage becomes party to a divorce by agreement after succeeding to rights as referred to in Article 897, paragraph (1), the matter of who succeeds to those rights must be determined through the agreement of the parties and any other interested persons.
婚姻によって氏を改めた夫又は妻が、第八百九十七条第一項の権利を承継した後、協議上の離婚をしたときは、当事者その他の関係人の協議で、その権利を承継すべき者を定めなければならない。
If the agreement referred to in the preceding paragraph is not reached or if discussions toward such an agreement cannot be held, the family court determines who succeeds to the rights referred to in that paragraph.
Subsection 2 Judicial Divorce
第二款 裁判上の離婚
第七百七十条(裁判上の離婚)
One party to a marriage may independently initiate an action for divorce only in one of the following cases:
夫婦の一方は、次に掲げる場合に限り、離婚の訴えを提起することができる。
if the other spouse commits adultery;
配偶者に不貞な行為があったとき。
if the party has been willfully abandoned by the other spouse;
配偶者から悪意で遺棄されたとき。
if it has been unclear whether the party's spouse is dead or alive for three or more years;
配偶者の生死が三年以上明らかでないとき。
if there are any other material grounds that make it difficult for the marriage to continue.
その他婚姻を継続し難い重大な事由があるとき。
Even if any grounds as set forth in items (i) through (iii) of the preceding paragraph are present, the court may dismiss a divorce filing if, taking into consideration all circumstances, it finds it to be reasonable for the marriage to continue.
裁判所は、前項第一号から第三号までに掲げる事由がある場合であっても、一切の事情を考慮して婚姻の継続を相当と認めるときは、離婚の請求を棄却することができる。
Article 771Mutatis Mutandis Application of Divorce by Agreement Provisions
第七百七十一条(協議上の離婚の規定の準用)
The provisions of Article 766 through Article 769 apply mutatis mutandis to a judicial divorce.
第七百六十六条から第七百六十九条までの規定は、裁判上の離婚について準用する。