The delivery or eviction of immovable property or a residence (meaning immovable property or a vessel or other space in which a person resides; the same applies in this Article and in the following Article) is enforced by the court enforcement officer's removing the immovable property or a residence from the obligor's possession and having the obligee acquire possession of it.
不動産等（不動産又は人の居住する船舶等をいう。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）の引渡し又は明渡しの強制執行は、執行官が債務者の不動産等に対する占有を解いて債権者にその占有を取得させる方法により行う。
If it is particularly necessary to identify the possessor of the immovable property or residence referred to in the preceding paragraph to carry out the enforcement referred to in the paragraph, the court enforcement officer may question a person who is present at that immovable property or residence or request that person to present documents, at the immovable property or residence or in a place adjacent to it.
The judicial enforcement referred to in paragraph (1) may be carried out only when the obligee or their agent appeared at the place of enforcement.
第一項の強制執行は、債権者又はその代理人が執行の場所に出頭したときに限り、することができる。
When carrying out the judicial enforcement referred to in paragraph (1), the court enforcement officer may enter the immovable property or residence possessed by the obligor, and, if necessary, may take necessary measures to open closed or locked doors.
In the judicial enforcement referred to in paragraph (1), a court enforcement officer must remove any movables that are not the subject matter of enforcement and deliver them to the obligor or their agent, a cohabiting relative, or an employee or other relevant worker who will exercise reasonable discretion. In this case, if it is not possible to deliver the movables to any of the persons, the court enforcement officer may sell those movables pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Supreme Court.
執行官は、第一項の強制執行においては、その目的物でない動産を取り除いて、債務者、その代理人又は同居の親族若しくは使用人その他の従業者で相当のわきまえのあるものに引き渡さなければならない。この場合において、その動産をこれらの者に引き渡すことができないときは、執行官は、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、これを売却することができる。
If any part of the movables referred to in the preceding paragraph has not been delivered or sold under the paragraph, a court enforcement officer must retain the part of the movables. In this case, the provisions of the second sentence of the preceding paragraph applies mutatis mutandis.
The expenses for retention under the preceding paragraph are enforcement costs.
When a court enforcement officer has sold movables pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (5) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of paragraph (6)), the officer must deduct the expenses required for the sale and retention from the proceeds of the sale and make a statutory deposit of the remainder.
The provisions of Article 57, paragraph (5) apply mutatis mutandis to the judicial enforcement referred to in paragraph (1).
Read this with the articles around it